Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Game News 2.0

19798100102103174

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    The golden age of music, movies and gaming were all roughly when you were 15.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    To be fair, only the music industry comes close to matching the volume and sense of a saturated market. Look at Steam: you say look harder but ye gods, trying ot find pearls among the mudslide of content is a job in of itself. And unless you're someone who enthuses about the industry you mightn't see Indie Game X.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    There's certainly a lot of noise, but I think even the slightest effort will dramatically help with sorting through the noise. Find a few podcasts / YouTubers you like, regularly visit a few sites that still specialise in extensive and varied reviews, and even just follow a handful of interesting developers and critics on social media... you'll be flying with recommendations in no time. End of year 'best of' lists are also invaluable in tracking down the gems that might have escaped your attention - I'd have missed one of my favourites of last year, Strange Horticulture, had it not popped up on a few lists. I also think relying on storefronts to offer recommendations is a bad idea, as they're unfiltered and commercial entities, even if they can occasionally allow interesting games to organically rise up.

    It's a relatively safe assumption that anyone on a gaming forum is naturally enthusiastic enough to look just a little deeper - and it certainly should be an expectation that an academic in digital humanities should take the modest effort to look beyond the AAA chaff before publishing an article decrying the lack of creativity in gaming :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,364 ✭✭✭SuperBowserWorld


    I think that guy needs to play

    Captain Toad Treasure Tracker

    Not sure if it's AA, AAA, or AAAA

    But it's GreAAAt.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    Still bummed out that EA cancelled that new Respawn shooter? Maybe these guys will make it all better some day. They're basically a new studio made up of Titanfall and Apex Legends veterans. They include Mohammad Alavi, former Titanfall 2 senior game designer and supposedly the lead of the cancelled Titanfall Legends. One to keep an eye on, although don't expect anything soon.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 12 the_covey



    Seems you're never too young to go full "old man shouts at cloud". This really is an article written by someone with only a surface-level understanding of gaming and even the games he references. He cites Fallout 3 as a landmark game (it's shite) instead of New Vegas, calls Zero dawn a triumph of storytelling (that's a red flag if I've ever read one) and spouts such nonsense that it's entirely believable he hasn't played any of the games he's listed and just watched a few angry reviews of them on YouTube. His criticism of Elden Ring's combat mechanics highlighted this (I'm not a fan of Elden Ring) when he states "its mechanics feel like something from 2004: hit one button to dodge, the other to attack. It’s a common complaint: you’re either dodging or parrying then countering" - didn't fancy using any of spells, pal? Or the stealth?

    I'd like to think the guy is just a hot-take merchant, taking the piss for the clicks but it's written with a level of conviction achieved only by the truly deluded. The fact he's just glossed over the entire Indie sphere is journalistic malpractice and shows him up as the clueless fool he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    "His criticism of Elden Ring's combat mechanics highlighted this (I'm not a fan of Elden Ring) when he states "its mechanics feel like something from 2004: hit one button to dodge, the other to attack. It’s a common complaint: you’re either dodging or parrying then countering" - didn't fancy using any of spells, pal? Or the stealth?"

    Not even just that, but the variety in ER's combat comes from build types, the number of different enemies and boss types, the spells, and an insane amount of different weapons and weapon arts, which makes it one of the most varied combat systems in games in years, and that's ignoring the various consumables and stuff you can use against enemies.

    I mean, Christ on a bike, if he complained that Elden Ring isn't as well presented in terms of story, characters, motion capture kind of stuff, or that a lot of the games systems aren't well explained or something, fair enough. I'd disagree with some of that but could see why someone would say that or why it'd put them off if they value those kind of things (which given their praise of the likes of Horizon Zero Dawn, probably are things they value highly in games), but f*ck sake the one thing you can't really knock Elden Ring down on is the variety of the combat system.

    A lot of games like Horizon, God of War etc make you such a tank and your enemies hit so softly that you only really die if you're just being a bit ignorant and trying to belt through everything with little care/focus. But that doesn't carry over to Elden Ring or other Souls games, where the entire combat system is built around risk v reward. Take the risk to time a parry right or to dodge an attack to try get a backstab, and you'll be rewarded for pulling it off. Trying to just stand in front of the enemy and tanking hits like you would in the big AAA games the author seems to like, and you're going to have a bad time.

    I don't think he's just glossing over indies as I think the way he mentions them at the end of the article is his way of saying that the quality of indies as a whole hasn't really changed, but that the focus of the article is more about the decline of AAA games.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Civ VI slowly grew on me, but never sank its tendrils in the same way V did (especially when its expansion packs really revamped the experience). Stil always super exited to hear there's another one on the horizon; the question will be if they'll innovate further or go back to formula. I know VI's mechanics, art-style and overall approach wasn't universally popular...




  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Took me a while for Civ 6 to really bite, and only after watching a load of youtuber playthroughs did I start to understand what I was doing, but it really is brilliant. Having the districts outside the city really changed the feel of it, made me have to think about where I was placing each city.

    I assume that they'll go in a new direction for it, they have on every previous one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,474 ✭✭✭Niska


    Felt the same - never grew to love VI compared to V (and Steam's stats show that - 380+ hours on Civ V compared to only 48 for VI).

    But would certainly a new Civ - especially as VI plays well on the Switch (performance chugging aside) and PS5.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    I never got into Civ V but really enjoyed VI a lot. I think Civ IV remains my all time favourite though. TBH it probably has less to do with the merits of each game and more to do with what was going on in my life and how much time I had to devote to learning and mastering them.

    I generally trust Firaxis in whatever direction they choose to go, they've never made a bad mainline Civ game. Would have been more excited by an Alpha Centauri 2 announcement though.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Currently on 328 on Steam, 50 on Switch, 168 on Xbox.

    Hmm. Just figured out where all the time has gone.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I'm not sure I have the mental fortitude for Civ. I played Civ 2 and I had to stop because my videogame/life balance was thrown out of whack. I mean last night I was plying Deus Ex Invisible War, got past the first major hub and it was the perfect time to stop playing at midnight. But no. I had to have a little look around before bed and it was after 1am that I stopped.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I have 11 hours of Civ 5 recorded on Steam.

    I'm pretty sure I only ever played it twice, on two consecutive evenings.

    Divide 11 by two, and that is the reason I haven't gone back 😅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,917 ✭✭✭nix


    haha i had a non gaming friend recently ask me for a game he could play while he was now working from home. I knew the type of games he liked and used to play. So i recommended Civ 5 (i have never played Civ but know about it), i told him to be careful with it though as it can suck up time pretty quickly i heard. The NEXT DAY he messages me going "jesus i see what you mean, i threw it on after dinner last night and before i knew it the sun was rising" 🤣

    It didnt scare him away though, he just had to be careful going forward :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,461 ✭✭✭RedXIV


    This is why I think I'm so timid when it comes to starting new games. I get heavily sucked in and would play till all hours until I'm satisfied (leaving me very UNsatisfied with my decisions the next day). On a number of JRPGs now where I know I'm coming up to the home stretch, I'd fallen for "ah I'm nearly there, hang in a little longer"......aaaaaaand it's 4am.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Man, the news out of that MS ABK presser is insane. Nintendo sign the ten year COD on Nintendo consoles contract, then they announce that Nvidia also get the deal, but with all Xbox pc games.

    Then they clarify that the Nintendo deal will involve current Xbox games too.

    EDIT: Going to have to correct myself here, Eurogamer got it wrong, the Nintendo deal is just for COD after all.

    Post edited by CatInABox on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    It's clever by Microsoft. Makes Sony look like they are being purposefully stubborn.

    Calling their bluff in a way.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I dunno, a lot of today was cleverly orchestrated by Microsoft to dominate the headlines on a day when they faced a tough regulatory hearing. It’s hard to tell whether it’ll be enough to tip the scales.

    The interesting thing of course is that the CMA’s concerns are a lot, lot deeper than just CoD exclusivity. Feels like they’re the ones who’ll be hardest to win over.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    Horror film producers Blumhouse are launching their own game development and publishing arm. From Game Informer;

    Dubbed Blumhouse Games, it will primarily partner with indie designers to create horror-themed projects. A press release states that the company will target titles with budgets under $10 million to "enable innovation and pushing creative boundaries." The games will target console, PC, and mobile platforms. 




  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yeah, the CMA really focused on the cloud aspect, which is why getting Nvidia on board was a big win. I think that they also mentioned bringing it to other cloud operators if they wanted to, which would surely alleviate some of the issues that the CMA had with it.

    As you say though, not sure if it'll be enough.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    Yeah all these theatrics are just a distraction that will have little influence on the regulators. The regulators are there to protect and represent consumers, not Sony or Nintendo or Nvidia. Microsoft having the power to offer sweetheart deals to some other companies in order to garner their support might actually be seen as a negative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    I know credit largely goes to John Johanas and his team on the creative side, but credit also to Mikami for helping usher Hi-Fi Rush into the world. Feels like it was the game where Tango finally made the great game they always had in their sights. Even if Mikami is gone, very curious to see what happens next with them.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Honestly I don't think Mikami has had much input into the creative aspect in a long time. Any game he has his name against is usually there for marketing and there's always another Director/Planner that is the true creative lead, even as far back as Capcom. He is often credited as director in games but that's more a producer role in japanese credits whereas the creative lead is credited as designer or planner. I think there's some good talent at Tango to keep churning out interesting games.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    From what I can gather from interviews Mikami had little role in Hi-Fi Rush beyond supporting the project as a studio lead and being there to speak with the creative team and share ideas. John Johanas was very much the project lead. But still, it was very much Mikami's studio and it's good to see someone build a studio to a successful and hopefully sustainable place. He leaves them in a far better spot than he would've had he left, say, pre Tokyo Ghostwire, at least from a public perspective.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Rumours going around about a metal gear solid collection at the state of play tonight.

    Hopefully it is and, even though I think the game is complete garbage, hopefully it will include mgs4 as it's stuck on PS3.

    Also if it is announced I really hope it's not a Sony exclusive. I'd buy it for Mgs3 on pc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,920 ✭✭✭Grumpypants


    Sony releasing a Sony Exclusive after spending months talking about bad it is for MS to make COD Xbox exclusive is the most Sony thing they could do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Mr Crispy


    "Project Dragon", the long-mooted fantasy game from Hitman creators IO Interactive, has been confirmed (although they're currently calling it Project Fantasy). As a kid, I was a big fan of the Fighting Fantasy book series (Ian Livingston, Steve Jackson) that IOI cite as inspiration for the new venture, but this sounds a bit GaaS-esque from the brief blurb/hiring pitch. Still, apart from the unnecessarily convoluted purchase methods, Hitman was great so good luck to 'em (but I'm still more interested in their take on Bond).




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,100 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,352 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm



    New details released by CMA about most recent responses from Sony and Microsoft.

    I especially like this one -

    "Microsoft also offered to put Call of Duty on PS+ subscription service, but Sony says in the documentation that it would hurt their $70 retail game business, thus making Call of Duty an Xbox Game Pass exclusive — which would also hurt their $70 retail game business. There is of course no mention of how consumers would benefit from getting Call of Duty in PS+ or Xbox Game Pass, though."



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    The whole nonsense today about Microsoft deliberately launching a buggy version of Call of Duty today is some real next level nonsense from the sony Lawyer brigade. The whole thing is near schoolyard console wars level.

    Anyway even if there was a dirty game breaking bug in it it wouldn't stop sony selling it. They were happy to release cyberpunk on PS4 and lets not forget that every Bethesda game on PS3 was fundamentally broken with performance deteriorating as the save file got bigger until the game became unplayable. Still sold them.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    Windowscentral.com doesn't seem like it's going to be most unbiased of sources.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Nope but it's being reported in more neutral sites like Eurogamer as well.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,352 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    You can see all the details on the CMA website.

    I believe this is an Activision Executive saying that Sony don't want any deal, they just want to block the merger.


    Post edited by TitianGerm on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,213 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Surely Sony would be better at this stage accepting the deal that COD gets to be on PS+ and earn the revenue from microtransactions rather than the retail of the game, especially considering how much better the F2P Warzone seems to be doing lately compared to the full price releases.

    I get that they don't want to risk ever losing COD even 10 years down the line, but if I was a predominantly COD PS5 gamer I'd be starting to look at moving to Xbox regardless, as the deal will likely go through in some shape or form.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,352 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    COD is the biggest selling game in Playstation so that's why they don't want it on PS+. They'd lose out on to much money.

    For the gamers my a**e.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 29,717 CMod ✭✭✭✭johnny_ultimate


    There are many legitimate antitrust and competition concerns with the deal, so it's frustrating that so much of the argument around it is a bunch of mega-corps pulling a strop over it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    Your issue here is you are treating this like a normal rational person. The only thing that is driving this is that if this merger gets approved Sony's share prices are going to take a big hit and Sony will move the earth to protect their shareholders (spoiler; they aren't 'for the player'). There is no scenario where this merger goes through and Sony's share prices don't take a hit so Sony is going to do everything it can to stop it.

    Nintendo on the other hand despite being in the same business are protected from this because they are seen as not competing with Sony and Microsoft (makes no sense I know but this merger won't hit their share prices). They're also a japanese company so react a little more rationally than their hyper capitalist american counterparts. You might think Sony is japanese but they're now headquartered and are effectively an american company now.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Company with a monopoly complains that their monopoly could drop from 80% dominance to 79%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    The actual document can be found here

    It's not a corporation throwing a strop, it's lawyers doing their job properly.

    The quote in question is taken out of context from section 21 of that document. The previous section very specifically mentions Microsoft could be acting in good faith, rather than implying sabotage like all the sensationalist headlines, but due to the nature of game development and the inevitability of developers focusing on the Xbox as the primary platform, more bugs or performance issues could slip through to the Playstation version. This happens on the secondary platform of different games all the time, mostly with terrible Switch or PC ports.

    A platform holder making a legal commitment to put its games on the direct competition which it otherwise wouldn't as a means of getting an acquisition past regulators is kind of unprecedented, but you could easily see the other platform getting the sort of second class treatment the PC often does in that case. The document also doesn't say Microsoft wouldn't make the effort to fix any issues, but that these things simply take time to detect and fix by their nature, and with the majority of sales happening in the very early days of a game being released that could be damaging.

    It's always worth looking into what's really being said, rather than the lazy clickbait headlines that come out of it. I would say section 27 and 28 are the most interesting parts of the document, showing precisely why regulators are concerned about the acquisition, but it doesn't make for juicy gossip or get fanboys riled up so it doesn't get reported.

    Also that Lulu Cheng Meservey character is regularly embarassing herself on twitter over the last few months with her total desperation for the big payday that will come if the sale goes through, so I wouldn't listen to a word she says. Which I guess is par for the course for an Activision exec.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Zero-Cool


    Lulu "Sony is the First of Us when it comes to games".



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 51,831 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    I thought you were making a really really **** joke but she actual said that.

    Start the Rapture please.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    Seen that being quoted hat looks like very selective statistics on display by Microsoft to make them out to be the underdog. Gamepass doesn't solely operate on the xbox Isn't the grand plan for Xbox and Gamepass to move beyond consoles?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,109 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    That's a great post. Good to be able to read the actual document.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I was exaggerating. I don't know what the percentages are but there's no doubt about it Sony control the overwhelming majority of the console market. Xbox are actually 3rd behind Nintendo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,505 ✭✭✭marcbrophy


    And would remain 3rd with the Activision deal!

    It's amazing that the regulators don't see that Sony ARE the monopoly that they are trying to stop Microsoft from becoming!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,661 ✭✭✭quokula


    The relative number of consoles sold isn't that relevant, the regulators aren't there to help one console catch up on another, that's not their job. They aren't there to represent Sony or Nintendo or Microsoft. They're there to represent consumers. And the biggest third party publisher in existence, which has published games on all platforms for decades, suddenly being gobbled up and made to operate for the good of one console manufacturer only is indisputably a bad thing for consumers. The fact that that console is owned by a minority only serves to exacerbate the fact that this would be a bad thing for the majority of consumers.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    This is the narrative being controlled by Sony. The fact that xbox manufacture consoles has nothing to do with it. Sony are applying their own antiquated business model to the deal. Xbox has not been a console manufaturer in years. They happen to manufacture consoles, but that is not the same. They report subscription numbers to their share holders, not console sales numbers.

    This acquisition is actually about mobile gaming. But of course you.can jist say they are lying and really what they want is more console sales. I mean where do you even start refuting arguments like that. "We're not lying". "Prove it"

    Proving a negative means: proving the non - existence of that for which no evidence of any kind exists



  • Advertisement
Advertisement