Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

DART+ (DART Expansion)

1169170172174175217

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Two weeks ago IÉ issued a tender for Multi-Disciplinary Consultant Services for the DART+ BEMU Infrastructure Project, this relates to from tender stage onwards. It doesn't mentione particular sections of the DART+ project so presumably it will be one appointment to oversee all sections.

    At the same time, they issued the tender for Drogheda Depot Modifications for DART + BEMU Fleet. I dont believe this has gone to consultation, perhaps these works dont need a RO but if not, I would have thought they'd need planning permission for the modular building at least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    Yes



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,919 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    I agree 100%.

    Mountjoy Prison is about 10 hectares, so you could comfortably house 4000 people, although that depends if buildings are listed or not.

    It would be very desirable location along the canal and with Metro stations and other transport links. Can walk to town also.

    Might be easier to control drug problem if it was located in countryside also.

    Broadstone depot is similar size so should be redeveloped also.

    Move both outside the city.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    The first significant news in a while, and it hasn't really made the news.

    Cabinet has approved the purchase of the next 90 BEMUs for the new DART fleet. This is in addition to the 95 ordered last year.

    Exciting times.




  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    Something I saw today reminded me to reply to this post, which I had been meaning to do. Sorry for the late reply.

    As the crow flies, it's 450 metres, at most, not 900m, between the Cabra LUAS stop and the proposed metro station at Glasnevin. Inevitable cannibalisation of the Green LUAS's catchment by the metro will ensue.

    As i see it there are currently two North-South rail corridors delivering Dublin residents into and out of the city on the Northside, namely, the northside DART and the LUAS Green Line. (The Maynooth, Dunboyne and PPT lines broadly serve people who live outside of Dublin or live in the outer Western suburbs - not LUAS or potential metrolink areas - and these lines all travel right across the city before hitting anything approximating to 'the centre').

    The metrolink represents a potential third north-south corridor within the city. Why build it so close to one of the others?

    From what I have seen from developed European cities (in public transport terms), they seem to broadly be aiming at about a 2 km gap between rail-based transport for suburbs which are about 10 km from the centre. Obviously this gap gets narrower as the lines converge on their city centres.

    The gap between the LUAS Green Line corridor and the DART corridor was ripe to be filled very efficiently on that broad '2km' basis, at Drumcondra. Moving the 'metro' corridor westward to Glasnevin, under the current plan, will leave a large catchment hole between Glasnevin and Connolly, while also almost certainly cutting severely ino the ridership of the Green Line, on which must has been invested.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Glasnevin is nowhere near 10km from the city centre though, more like 2km crowsfly distance. 10km from the city cente is outside the M50 and there'll be a lot more than 2km between the rail lines at that distance under current plans. The luas green line extension will not exceed 10km from the city centre anyway



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It's 850m walking, at best, and about 600m as the crow flies.

    I definitely see your argument for Drumcondra - a better spread of lines.

    However, Glasnevin will be significantly cheaper to construct versus Drumcondra and easier to get planning approval.

    It also benefits form the proximity of the two proposed Dart lines. It will become a super station for connections with Dart+ West, Dart+SW and Metro in the same station.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    There is a future need for a tallaght to coolock metro line serving Harold's Cross and Beaumont through the city centre. But that's a future project.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    It's 450 metres between the LUAS and the proposed metro, as the crow flies. That is what will matter for people deciding which to choose in that catchment area.

    We all know it will be much easier to build it at Glasnevin: it's an off-street, out-of-the-way location. of course there will be no disruption, and no obvious problems during construction.

    As I have said before, people can make only one choice in an interchange station, no matter how many options may appear to be available: once they make it, they are gone from that station.

    I say that the 'DART' choices between the PPT line and the Maynooth/Dunboyne lines would be made at Glasnevin.

    Passenger choices between either and both of those and the metro could then be made at Drumcondra, if an appropriate station were built, or were planned to be built.Such a station would provide equal connectivity, would not involve cannibalisation of the Green Line catchment, and would directly serve more people.

    This can't unfortunately be even looked at, because of the primal fear of disruption.

    My paltry hope is that ABP will ask for a proper reason why this Glasnevin arrangement is better than what they approved the last time - the metronorth route via Drumcondra. Admittedly, the last time, ABP would have given the green light to pretty well anything, because they knew it wouldn't be built anyway during the financial crisis. Given the state of ABP now the views of whatever new lot come in are very much a mystery, but I would hope that they would ask what advantages accrue by a change from ABP's previously approved Railway Order, which was for a metro via Drumcondra.

    We shall have to see.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    It's c. 2100 feet according to Google Maps which is 650m AS THE CROW FLIES. That's 40% higher than you are incorrectly stating.


    The people of Drumcondra are already served by numerous bus routes and a train station which will be updated to regular Dart. One stop will take you to Glasnevin super station.


    "people can make only one choice in an interchange station, no matter how many options may appear to be available: once they make it, they are gone from that station."

    What are you even talking about? People can only ever make one choice. Giving people several choices at one super station (Glasnevin) gives people options.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,242 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Interesting that they mention the BEMUs could be used in cork too. Makes sense as the only major infrastructure work required would be adding the charging facilities at Kent and potentially the various terminus stations on that network.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Sorry to stay off topic, but would such a line ever be built given it would need to cross the Port Tunnel?



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yeah, I think the long term ambition is electrify the Cork region, creating an actual Dart equivalent. BEMUs are a good bridge solution though, but I hope that the ambition is to electrify everything sooner rather than later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    do these BEMUs recharge while travelling under the wired sections of the network, or do they need to go back to the depot to recharge? Either way I can't see how they would work in Cork with no electrified sections, they only have an 80km range.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    They'd charge under wired sections. Ultimately they'll need to electrify the whole line to get the most out of these trains, but putting up the wires at all the stations along the line would be enough to keep them going all day



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    really? - they'd be under the wires at the stations for what, 2 minutes at a time?

    plus to put wires at the stations presumably means putting in substations at every single one which would be really inefficient and probably as much work as just electrifying the whole line anyway.

    if they were going with partial electrification, just doing the central section and maybe the terminus stations would seem more practical.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    Brian, I am certainly not suggesting that you are wrong, but my google maps is giving me 460 metres or so, as the crow flies, between the proposed Glasnevin Statio, and the nearest LUAS station in Cabra.

    There are also many buses travelling along those corridords to Glasnevin and Phibsboro, and Finglas, and into the city. Hopefully we we can get to the stage in Dublin where buses are mostly delivering people between the tram/meto/DART lines, to makee it as efficient as possible.

    I recently had an experience, in Poland, where I had just two steps and a hop from my bus from an outlying area onto a tram into my city. Less than 10 seconds. That was extraordinary, and I don''t expect that even in the current place I live. But Dublin, I think ,should do better than the current plan



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    You must be placing one of them wrong @strassenwo!f

    On the grounds that Cabra Luas Stop already exists, I'll assume you have that correct on the map. For Glasnevin Station which doesn't exist obviously, I've used the Brian Boru pub and it's around 630 metres as the crow flies using the google 'measure distance' utility. If you use Des Kelly Interiors it brings it to 590ish. I see no way of bringing it lower without breaking the laws of physics (or maybe I've the location of the station wrong?)



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 5,144 Mod ✭✭✭✭spacetweek


    Strassenwolf - we do not discuss in this thread alternative routings for Metrolink. The plans are thankfully set in stone and will be built as designed now.

    This is a DART+ thread for DART stuff.

    Other people - Please do not respond to off topic posts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    Thank you, Spacetweek.

    I am still not clear, like perhaps others, as to what the eventual DART service patterns will be, for the PPT, Maynooth and the Dunboyne lines. Which ones will likely run along the overground line across Drumcondra, which ones will go along the Midland line, etc. There's also fast trains to/from Sligo to be added into the mix.

    It seems clear to me that a station at Ballybough should be given serious consideration, and then be built, with a view to providing access to that relatively deprived area of Dublin to rail services, and to providing access from that area of Dublin to services going into the city and also going to many points to the west.

    Similarly, with the welcome proposed throughput from the west (Maynooth, PPT or Dunboyne), largely or eventually all DART services, I don't see how passengers could be passing through, on the midland line, a major population and work location (Drumcondra), without a station there.

    If the current rail plans go ahead, and they should, it may certainly be an option that such a station should be developed, along the canal, at Drumcondra, to serve the increased Midland Line throughput in that area.

    Would the current boat traffic on the canal be much impeded, if the canal were perhaps a metre narrower? And would the residents near the canal be seriously discommoded if a station along the canal were to be built?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    A station along the Royal Canal (Midland) Line between North Strand Rd and Ballybough Rd would be a fantastic, and necessary, addition to the future network. It would provide another access point to Croke Park on big match days and take pressure off Drumcondra.

    If you check Google Earth there is ample space between these 2 roads for station platforms. However, the same cannot be said about Drumcondra along this line. Whitworth road is right up against the line on one side and the canal on the other.

    It would simply cause too much disruption and could not be justified given you can go one stop on a Dart to Glasnevin and switch to this line if needed.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    The canal at Drumcondra:

    The residents (myself included) would never allow the canal (northern sunny bank) to be closed and dug up to build a Dart Station. I don't believe the demand would exist to justify the disruption.

    On the other side of the line (Whitworth Rd), any CPO of driveways should focus on providing an additional public transport lane for the F-Spine buses.

    I would love to see a station here but we have to be realistic regarding planning etc.




  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Regarding the future timetables, this is certainly unclear and will be interesting to see ABP view.

    This was discussed one page earlier in this thread. I believe most, not all, Dart+ West and South West services will terminate in New Spencer Dock, while capacity into Connolly will be reserved for Sligo, Longford and Newbridge PPT services.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    Brianc89, I think I am looking at a photo of Whitworth Road.

    I had more imagined Whitworth Place as a location for a station.

    Closed for a time during construction, a station built, then the residents looking out from their front windows at a row of lovely trees, albeit with those fine trees being at a lower level than they currently are, at the back of a DART platform. They would be 10 metres from a station. It could be very fine.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I just walked past there 5 minutes ago and was thinking about that!!

    The rail line is surprisingly high versus the southern bank of the canal which has apartments and a wall along its entire length. You would end up with an unsightly wall on each side of the canal. That section of canal is already very visually displeasing.

    It's definitely possible there, I believe, but I don't see a cost benefit analysis supporting it tbh? It would cannabilise Drumcondra main. A station between Ballybough and North Strand would be a better fight in my opinion.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,512 ✭✭✭strassenwo!f


    There's no reason why it would cannibalise the current station in Drumcondra, post the proposed DART Revolution.

    That suggested station would be on a different line. If such a station on the Midland Line were to be developed, the considerabe number of people who live in Drumcondra would have a choice as to which station would be better for them, as phone apps can readily tell them. Bus passengers would obviously have better choices, and - whatever the rail timetables turn out to be - it is an area that could be served by both lines. Services on the midland line could indeed be timetabled to provide a service to that part of the city when an intercity line to/from sligo is coming through on the other line, just 140 metres down the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj


    From the railway order

    Reading it , 12 trains max will serve the drumcondra line,

    - 3 Hazelhatch GCD

    - 4 Hazelhatch Spencer Dock

    - 3 Maynooth Bray

    - 2 towards Longford Sligo

    There will be 7 trains max serving the Midland line

    - 3 Maynooth Spencer Dock

    - 4 M3 Parkway Spencer Dock

    Post edited by thomasj on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,479 ✭✭✭jlang


    So is that only 3 trains an hour from western suburban stations direct to Connolly (and/or connecting with DART) with a bunch more to the relatively less useful Spencer Dock? Can someone remind me again how the extra capacity will aid someone commuting in from Clonsilla/Coolmine/etc to "not the Docklands".

    (answering my own question - ) Is it that where currently there is little point taking the Docklands-bound trains unless that is actually your preferred destination, after DART+ you will be able to take the next "any train" (10tph?) with the option to swap at Glasnevin to the similarly frequent Metro or Loop Line bound services?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,712 ✭✭✭GerardKeating


    What's the point of the two trains per hour terminating at laytown, why not just continue them to Drogheda ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    New Spencer Dock is right next to the Luas stop and only a short walk to the quays. They also plan a new bridge across the Liffey east of Samuel Beckett bridge. The new dart station here will be far more accessible than the current Docklands station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There will also be the option to change to the Green Line at Broombridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Well there will be six trains serving the Loop Line from Broombridge station so anyone on a Spencer Dock bound Dart service coming from the west could just alight here and change for one of these six services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭thomasj


    You mean Glasnevin? PPT trains don't serve Broombridge.

    Youve got to remember that when it happens , metro trains will have you over in Tara Street from Glasnevin in less than 10 minutes so you could continue on the DART from there if you don't want to wait for a DART on the Maynooth line. And you'll also have O'Connell Street and Stephens green as options.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Progress seems stalled on the coastal and SW projects. SW railway order application was due to be submitted in early December. Costs on the DART+ project may have spiralled to the point that parts of DART+ could be axed.

    Personally this doesn't bother me, there was never any real justification for high frequency trains to Hazelhatch, the project only really made sense with additional stations in populated areas like Ballyfermot and Cabra. Without them resources are better spent elsewhere. 4 tracking the line is a worthwhile project on its own though.

    On coastal, extending electrification to Drogheda makes sense but not a priority. 3 or 4 tracking the Northern line and double tracking to Greystones isn't part of the DART+ scope anyway so not much benefit to be got. Closing the D4 level crossings can be done cheap, there's no need to package it with a mega project.

    Maynooth DART maybe all that comes out of the current programme.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,653 ✭✭✭yer man!


    I don't know about it not being worthwhile to do SW because it's not currently going through large populated areas. The area around Adamstown and Clondalkin is absolutely exploding with homes with many many more to come. The current level of infrastructure will definitely not be enough. The fact that this area is a major relief valve for the city as there is a lot of space is a reason in itself to do it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Quad-tracking the line as far as Heuston is a worthwhile project on its own but to not create two commuter and two separate intercity tracks and electrify at the same time would be beyond stupid.

    If anything is cut from the scope, it'll be electrifying beyond the current DART system on the coastal line as originally envisaged. BEMUs will have to do for the foreseeable.



  • Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭VeryOwl


    These projects seem to be running in slow motion. And that's before they sink into the rubble of our planning system.

    Both the projects are half-hearted anyway. DART Costal arguably makes the service even worse and as you suggest DART SW+ is focused on running a high capacity line through urban areas but not actually servicing them. I cannot get my head around why you would not want to maximise the existing infrastructure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    AFAIK cost is the reason for not opening new stations in populated areas on the SW line. To me the whole point of a public transport project is to provide a service to the travelling public. Irish Rail seem to disagree. Perhaps they think its about employing drivers?

    4 track its self is useful to existing intercity and commuter services so should be done. I'm not sure what the point is in the rest of the DART+ SW line without opening stations on it. Seems bizarre in a country with Europe's worst public transport we'll be running trains every 10 minutes completely empty to semi rural areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,919 ✭✭✭✭LXFlyer


    It’s about putting in the transport infrastructure ahead of the development which is exactly how it should be done.

    The service level doesn’t necessarily need to be every 10 minutes initially - that’s the planned capacity.

    The new BusConnects routes that serve Hazelhatch, Adamstown, Kishogue, Fonthill and Parkwest stations will all facilitate increased usage of the railway, something you seem to keep ignoring.

    There has already been and there is ongoing large developments in Celbridge, Newcastle, Adamstown and Lucan South that will feed into the rail service.



  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    I just saw this in the FAQ section of the Dart+ West page. Disappointing that they can't even consider a future station along the canal between North Strand and Ballybough (on the SW line to Spencer Dock)


    Why can’t there be a DART station at Croke Park?

    It is not proposed to provide a station at Croke Park under the DART+ West project.

    A number of physical and operational constraints exist on the existing railway lines in the Ballybough area reduce the potential for an additional station, and these are presented below:

    Physical Constraints

    On the line to the north of Croke Park the railway is in a restricted area heading east of Ballybough Road towards Connolly and is elevated on a series of bridges and arches and not suited for location of a station. West of Ballybough Road the current gradient and tight curvature of the existing track geometry is not in accordance with standards for the provision of a station. Siting stations and platforms on tight curves introduces large stepping gaps and creates accessibility issues. Furthermore, the elevated nature of the existing railway, which is on a 4-metre-high embankment in this area, would raise issues regarding overlooking and visual impact on adjacent residential properties.

    On the line to the south of Croke Park (adjacent to the Royal Canal), the railway east of Ballybough Road is in a tight cutting parallel to the Royal Canal alongside Clonmore Terrace where there is limited space to the railway boundary and is not a suitable place to locate a station. West of Ballybough Road and towards Coke Park there is again a steep gradient issue identified. Impact on surrounding properties would also be an issue with limited space available.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    Are you basing this on anything concrete? ABP are swamped and dealing with recent management issues.

    Any delay to RO is more likely linked to this rather than any fundamental issue with the project?...

    On Dart+ SW, I can definitely see this being delayed a few years while other projects are prioritised. I reckon by the time it starts construction Cabra and Ballyfermot will also be included. Mary Lou lives in Cabra...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Yes the NTA have stopped Irish Rail from submitting RO for the time being in light of the headline cost of Maynooth DART. Theyve also stopped coastal moving to public consultation. However there could be movement on South West by the end of the month.



  • Registered Users Posts: 266 ✭✭Ronald Binge Redux


    Someone give the NTA a dose of Ducolax, for God's sake. It is the place where rail projects go to die, it seems from the evidence so far.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Saw this in the recently released transport plan:

    Are these new stations on the Dart+ SW line new, or are they included in the current plan? I thought that Heuston West was the only confirmed new station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    DART SW currently has no plans for a cabra or ballyfermot station. That could change of course but would delay the submission of an RO application.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,396 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Yeah, that's what I thought, so these are another project, pre 2042.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    'Project' is a serious word. I'd say 'aspiration' with no real intention on delivery. As it stands the NTA, CIE, ABP and TII do not have the resources to deliver the projects planned up to 2032. So at present the post 2032 proposals are an impossible ask.

    If the strategy were actually implemented in full (lol) it would be the most rapid transformation in infrastructure in the developed world in modern times (excluding back when they built metros with thousands of worker deaths). 20 years for everything in that strategy would be something that could be delivered in China because labour is free and there's no democracy in the planning process. It is simply not achievable in Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,107 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    I don't think the strategy is that ambitious - most of the big projects in it are already underway and due to be finished by the early 2030s, i.e. Metrolink, Dart+, BusConnects and Fingluas. The other items due to be done by 2042 are Bray and Lucan Luas and Navan Rail plus a few new stations - they have 10 years to plan those and another 10 to build them, not wildly unrealistic. The extra Luas lines and Metro extensions are only projected to be planned by 2042. (don't get me started on their aim of increasing cycling share to a whole 12% by 2042).

    Obviously I don't expect half of what's in there to actually happen but the scope is not unrealistic by international standards IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,760 ✭✭✭AngryLips


    Irish Rail earmarked Pelletstown Station as an 'immediate priority' in 2002 ...the station was opened in 2021. That says it all really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,754 ✭✭✭cgcsb


    Individual projects are not ambitious sure. I can't thing of any city that delivered anything close to what is proposed there in the space of 20 years. Can u think of any?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement