Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

1394395397399400419

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Can you point me to where in the linked article it shows that FOI datasets were used in the process by the UK authorities \ NHS to decide on vaccine rollout?

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,135 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    The data wasnt incorrect, the extrapolation of the data was incorrect.


    At least now we can all see there was no significant increase in myocarditis or pericarditis caused by the vaccine



  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can you point me to where I claimed that the data was available to make the decisions, I made the point that flawed data could have been used.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    I thought your initial claim, and the whole point of the thread from the start, was that vaccines were killing people. You then provided the NHS data as proof of the vaccine killing people and that the NHS was hiding the data by making it public (never quite got my head around the conspiracy theorists who claim something is being hidden by posting data released by the bodies they claim to be hiding stuff). Turns out that the data you linked wasn't what you claimed, and didn't show what you wanted... So now you are claiming that the conspiracy isn't about the vaccine killing people but that the NHS were trying to trick you into thinking that it was killing people?


    At least that's my best guess of where you are currently at, could change again by tomorrow and you'll be claiming something completely opposite again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    You are using the FOI data error as the starting point for you claim of errors in data re vaccine rollout.

    You clearly alluded to this in earlier post.

    I am pointing out you have provided zero evidence of data to that standard being used in decision making. Only in FOI requests.

    So you have exactly zero evidence of data errors in the vaccine decisions.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    BREAKING BBC News: Cardiologist says likely contributory factor to excess cardiovascular deaths is covid mRNA vaccine and roll out should be suspended pending an inquiry.

    So we have a cardiologist who has managed to air his concerns about the Vaccines on BBC news, also claiming that was a contributory factor in his own father's death.

    He was being interviewed about the use of statins and the increases in heart disease due to poor health, but was able to slip in his concerns about the vaccines.

    Do people still believe that a cardiologist would be into conspiracy theories!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    In the twitter feed it mentions that he hold his father to stop taking statins before he died. That he is known for minority opinions on the role of cholesterol in heart disease... snippet from Wiki:

    "His views on diet and health have been criticized by the British Heart Foundation as "misleading and wrong", and his public questioning of the need ever to use statins has been condemned as a danger to public health."

    And has previously blamed the death on lack of paramedics.

    No conspiracy theory, no new evidence... just someone acting from emotional trauma trying to assign blame. So plausible nothing to do with vaccines but his own dangerous advice on statins and saturated fat.

    Untitled Image


    Post edited by odyssey06 on

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 930 ✭✭✭buzzerxx


    Do you believe the Vaccines are safe and effective?

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Thread banned poster. 1 month forum ban for ignoring moderator instruction

    Post edited by Big Bag of Chips on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 152 ✭✭PhantomHat


    Reuters are now reporting that FDA and CDC see early signals of Pfizer bivalent Covid shots links to stroke.

    Should be interesting to see how this pans out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    So the authorities are paying attention to the safety signals and following the process to establish if there is a link or if this is just data noise.

    This is excerpted for reference:

    The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said on Friday that a CDC vaccine database had uncovered a possible safety issue in which people 65 and older were more likely to have an ischemic stroke 21 days after receiving the Pfizer/BioNTech bivalent shot, compared with days 22-44...

    The FDA and CDC said that other large studies, the CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, other countries' databases and Pfizer-BioNTech's databases had not flagged this safety issue, adding that it requires more investigation."

    Although the totality of the data currently suggests that it is very unlikely that the signal in VSD (Vaccine Safety Datalink) represents a true clinical risk, we believe it is important to share this information with the public," the health authorities said.

    https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-says-pfizers-bivalent-covid-shot-may-be-linked-stroke-older-adults-2023-01-13/

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Spiderman0081


    But cleverly only accounting for those 65 and older.

    Why loose a knight if you can offer a pawn.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's the age group that's possibly impacted.

    It's unlikely to be anything, but they still have to a) check it and b) report it. Unfortunately whenever they report stuff like this, anti-vaccine groups seize on it and use it to promote fear or doubt about vaccines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,326 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    They promised "Safe and Effective", we got "Sudden and Unexpected".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The Covid vaccines are safe and effective. They were very effective against the strains they were developed for, and still relatively effective against later mutations.

    I don't know what you expect from medical science? This isn't Yellow fever or Smallpox that can be defeated with one shot. It's a different virus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,759 ✭✭✭mikeybhoy


    A lot of defibrillators have been installed near me lately particularly concerning is one in children's playground. I wonder why?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Because they are installed where people hang out, and people hang out at children's playgrounds who might not be children themselves.



  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    While it is good to see people finally admit that the vaccines were not as good as promised, blaming shortcomings in medical science is not the way to go, it is really the responsibility of the politicians who "short circuited" the testing regime that would have stopped the release of these vaccines as the issues became apparent. They have proven to be no where near as safe and effective as other medications that have been approved in recent years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Where are you getting that they were not as good as promised? It was hoped they would be nearly as good as the annual flu jabs, they significantly outperformed that.

    It wasn't politicians who figured that running trial stages in parallel was needed to speed things up, politicians just released the funds to make it happen based on what the likes of health regulator bodies, WHO and others said was needed to get fast results. And what issues are you claiming have become apparent?

    What other medications are you claiming that the covid vaccines are not as safe and effective as?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    We had a pandemic, the world managed to create vaccines (within a relatively short period of time), which was part of the aim, these vaccines were safe and effective.

    as promised

    There were no "promises" of anything. We tackle these things as best we can with the technology we have at the time. The virus could mutate into a much more dangerous strain tomorrow, we don't know. We aren't in control of everything. There's no "they", there's no conspiracy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    It's always the same theme to these posts. A notion that "we were told" or "we were promised" something by an unspecified higher power. It seems to represent a belief by certain people that we are always in control, and when something doesn't turn out the way they think, that must be some conspiracy or "failing" by authority figures.

    Rather than the fact that we aren't always in control of everything. We're just doing our best with whatever tools we have at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    There were no issues that in any way merited stopping the release of the vaccines.

    You have entirely failed to provide any evidence supporting your statement either specific to covid vaccines or eg wrt other medications and vaccines such as flu vaccine or aspirin.

    Your claims of political interference are likewise without merit or foundation.

    Just scurrilous inneundo without evidence which seems to be your standard operating practice... exercises in misinformation.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Heath professionals appear to have also lost faith in the vaccines, I wonder why???




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Maybe because they were infected recently due to the rise in cases. It would be the more logical conclusion rather than thinking there is some big conspiracy that can’t be defined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Because they've completed their primary vaccination course, so the booster is a marginal gain on that.

    Some may have gotten it in other settings and it doesn't show up in the stats.

    Some may be ineligible due to recent covid infection.

    Pre covid, there were perennial news articles about low uptake of flu vaccines by health care workers.

    https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40955567.html

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you both seem to agree that natural immunity is better than a booster?

    But you don't address their apparent lack of faith in them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,511 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    So you seem to agree that there is no conspiracy because you didn’t pick up on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,222 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    To address the real issue here. It's very unlikely you are wondering why. It's increasingly obvious from your posts here that you have developed a belief that these vaccines are "bad" or "ineffective" or "unsafe". As a result of this belief you are filtering information, i.e. cherry-picking only stories that you perceive throw any negative light on these vaccines in order to project that belief. Objectivity is out the window, it becomes a terminal exercise in lapping up and repeating anything "bad" about vaccines.

    It's the equivalent of someone disliking a football team, only posting negative stories about them, then turning around and validating it to themselves by claiming to be "just concerned" about the team.

    Anyway back to the point, we have seasonal flu boosters the same way we have Covid boosters. It's a relatively small gain in protection for most. Some people take them, some don't. I haven't bothered with mine as I've had Covid within the last few months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,410 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Where did anyone agree that natural immunity is 'better' than a booster? What does 'better' here even mean specifically?

    It may well be the case that natural immunity is better than vaccination, but only if you ignore that the risk of illness \ side effects is greater from infection than vaccination.

    And I reject the premise of your post as showing a lack of faith in the vaccines, whatever that vague statement even means is questionable.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 31,828 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you're not getting boosted because you had covid in the past few months, so how may times have you had covid?

    I assume you had all the earlier jabs as you're so supportive of them.

    Me, only had covid once and no jabs.



Advertisement