Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Fighter jets for the Air Corps?

1131132134136137193

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The $3billion as I understand it is the entire life cycle cost for planes, weapons, training and support.

    New build Rafale are in the $120 million ballpark but let's say $1.5bln for the airframes and $1.65bln for training, equipment, weapons and support.

    I agree it's the same price as F35 but? The US won't sell F35s into South America for a long time yet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Pretty much this, not too mention for the AC personnel a hell of a drop in cost of living/commuting being out in Limerick/Shannon compared to Dublin. It might have to be done over a period but certainly outside of "we do it this way as this is the way we've always done it" I don't get why basing on the West Coast is a no go?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I guess not. But at the same time, I'm surprised the US let the sale go to Europe.

    Lets face it, for Colombia's needs, the F-16 Block 70/72 would have been more than adequate, unless they're planning to go to war with Brazil or something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    The Brazil as "enemy" hypothesis is honestly likely the prime reason the Gripen E has been excluded from their consideration. AFAICR the SAAB deal with Brazil included the marketing and manufacturing rights for S.A once Brazil made a minimum purchase.

    Columbia may take the view that buying Gripen E is strengthening a regional rival economy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Could also be time related? Some of the Eastern European orders have been delayed for the F16 already, maybe that factored into things? Also I wonder perhaps would the US be less willing to give the financial package that France might offer, or alternatively might South America politics make such a deal less attractive? Meanwhile of course Argentina continues to get nowhere with any purchase from anyone.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Qatar bought I don’t think they are leasing there is nothing available that I can see to check.

    Egypt bought them and are making additions to their current purchase there’s something about the arrange that has Dassault and the Egyptians under investigation.

    India bought all except for 4 Rafales M(carrrier based) which they are leasing.

    The Serbian airforce are buying them nothing online stating otherwise.

    Emirates are buying them outright



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    I suspect any EU/NATO sales to Serbia will be cancelled within the week.

    Another bunch of bargain-basement slavic fascists giving it the Billy-big-balls, that need their toes stamping on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Germany remilitarising, Italy going all RW, Turkey and Greece sabre-rattling,the Balkans being all Balkany with Serbia dicking around and Russia eyeing expansion and making a balls of it...

    All whilst global economy circles a drain fuelled by easy credit.

    One might almost be forgiven for thinking it was the 1920s rather than the 2020s

    Serbia are acting the bollox and the only way it gains them anything other than cheap fuel? Is a Russian hegemony arising again in Central Europe IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    No, because its got feet of clay. Russia and their acolytes are in a situation of great desperation.

    Germany militarising is only a positive for those of us that live under the umbrella of the western alliance, as themselves and Poland are the bulwark of NATO in the east.

    There is a lot of old guff being talked by Lavrov and Medvedev and Vučić and Lukashenko, but really they are all fart and no poo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,360 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    If the Air Corps moved to Shannon as a sweater the personal should be offered the government home loans as part of the deal for them to re settle

    Even widen it out to the whole defence forces if you agree to serve for 10 years



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,360 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Maybe not but to offset low wages they need to offer good benfits.

    There are various versions of the home loans being run by councils.

    One such version is if you cant get a mortage from a bank the government via the councils will organise a mortage for you @ around 2% fixed for 25 years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    State backed mortgages from County Councils or other approved agencies. They've been around for a hundred years.

    Not a bad idea to give DF personnel special access to them, failing the widespread re-introduction of base housing. They could help to both attract and tie talent to the DF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭Gary kk


    Poland gives DF personal interest free loans/mortgages. Well according to the Polish men I worked with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 826 ✭✭✭newcavanman


    You will note, I never said it was a success. It was a good idea but very badly handled. I believe that part of the quid pro quo, of having a public sector job, where it is practically impossible to be sacked or made redundant, is that the government can redeploy you to wherever is required,, within reason. I have many friends in the RAF and it part of their basic terms and conditions. For example, many personnel opted to stay on the E3 awacs, even tho it had regular foreign deployments as they were settled with family etc at Waddington. They assumed the E7 Wedge tails would also be based there. Now the E7s are going to Lossie. Much cheaper housing etc, but 500 miles north. They were given a choice, move or give up your job. That's how most militaries around the world operate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,894 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    Not fighter jet related but today the gardai will get a new helicopter which will also support the defence forces and also a brand new fixed wing aircraft, not sure what sort of plane they are thinking of though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    India has reportedly decided on the Rafale-M for their new Carrier and to replace Mig-29k in current service. Boeing had offered huge offseting as part of their pitch but it seems India are looking for both performance and intraoperability/logistics rationalisation

    It will give a high degree of commonality with the existing Indian AF Rafales and is also probably a leg up for Dassault in the Medium fighter tender.


    That seems to have been cut again from 112 airframes down to 57. Interesting offset possibility here tho. Is that Safran are offering full transfer of technology of the M88 engine and also working with Indian industry on next gen engines.

    Dassault are sitting pretty for a while with their order book even if the Columbians have nixed their tender process.

    More and more countries are buying new airframes and fully overhauling old ones. Less and less production capacity available for whatever the Dept here eventually decide to buy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Apropos of nothing other than many folk here and in the broader defence and aviation communities being fairly certain that if/when Ireland makes the transition to fast jets that the Gripen should be where we lay our money down.

    This is a very interesting article and makes clear the abilities of the Gripen versus peer adversaries. Highly capable airframe with capabilities that are tailored to austere operation and the data-link seems to really be a game changer.

    Imagine those capabilities in the hands of Ukrainian Air force!?! The Gripen was originally built to be a Sukhoi Slayer.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,751 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    I saw somewhere that they were pitted againist the latest Chinese fighter and won. The Saab had a distinct advantage at long range (probably most situations today) less so close in, dogfight.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    I'd be curious to know which of the latest crop of Chinese fighters? I'd fancy the Gripen E and Meteor combo against any of the Chinese Gen 4.5 fighters, the Sukhoi based J11, J15 & J16 and the J10 too.

    With regards the Chinese Gen 5 stuff? The J20 hasn't partaken in exercises with anyone aside from Russia and the FC31 is being developed into their Gen 5 carrier borne fighter. So I don't think that the Gripen E has been pitted against China's Gen 5 gear outside of Simulations.

    Would love to see the Boyd's theory breakdown for the gen 4.5 & 5 kit and lay that against RCS, Pk and general support requirements for the new gear.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,758 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Is anyone really surprised, that like Russian gear, Chinese military equipment is in fact all fart and no poo?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Thanks for that link. Interesting to see just how much the Gripen C/D outclasses the Chinese Sukhoi once the fight moves to medium range and beyond. The high energy and off alpha capability of the J11 make it a dangerous opponent up close despite its being a huge airframe.

    That article does a nice job of skirting just why thrust is so important in A2A. The lack of Chinese experience in Air combat and esp in defensive maneuvering to defeat missiles is quite stark.

    Given those results were against the "Old" Gripen and AMRAAM Vs the new "E" model and meteor? It's safe to assume that networked Gripen E and their additional situational awareness and missile range would decimate the Russian derived gear IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Canada are buying 88 F-35s and are doing away with the CF/18s, I thought recently upgraded these with the FA18s Australian got rid off. Or at least they were suppose too. Looking at the CFs ugrades it cost 862million to upgrade them as part of the The Phase 2 extension is designed to help bridge the capability gap until new jets come online. That’s serious cash to just tie them over. Would the CFs be going to scrap or resale?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Given how worn both the Canadian and Australian frames were I would be surprised if it's anything but scrapping them. If you were a nation looking for US F series fighters surely going to the Boneyard would be the better option?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Sgt. Bilko 09


    Yeah they’ve been thrown about alright, I would imagine they would go to a scrap yard, its nuts that’s literally only nearly a billion on upgrades



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,459 ✭✭✭sparky42


    The whole Canadian effort for a replacement fighter has been nuts from start to finish really, particularly as it would have needed divine intervention to pick anything other than the F35. Instead they just delayed the decision and had to waste to money trying to keep their Hornets going.

    Just goes to show we aren't the only ones with screwed up procurement issues.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,055 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Absolutely true. From being a tier 1 F35 partner with an agreed workshare, to ditching the F35 to reopen the tender. A tender that Dassault feel was dodgy and lop sided, to deciding to buy the fighter they'd plumped for 1st time around anyway.

    Canadian procurement decisions have always been a bit mad IMO. The Avro CF105 is a case in point. Especially when you consider that after ditching that, they went with the F101 voodoo, a plane that those in the know rated as even more dangerous to the pilot than a Starfighter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,360 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    An i read big delays have seaped in to the casa programme as well somehow



Advertisement