Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

World Cup 2022 - Team and Match Discussion

1126127129131132167

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    As someone not from Germany, seeing them knocked out just as they were getting going is a hard pill to swallow. Can't help feeling had they got through would of walked this tournament.

    Brazil as I pointed out were spoofers. Glad everyone got to see it. A team full of arrogant individuals believing their own unfounded hype. Primma donnas, all show and no real heart or fight.

    Hard to not see France win on paper but think Argentina will do it. As I said before, Argentina flaky and disjointed too, with a soft underbelly, but to their credit, they are all fighting for one another. I think it might see them through, they believe in themselves and there's a real unity in the camp, all pulling in the one direction. You just feel there's something in the air there.

    For the players and squads they always have, generally one of the best, if not the best in the world, they can never seem to just click as they used to. They fight and get stuck in, but it always feels disjointed for over a decade at this stage.

    Would be great to see the Argies just click and play that fluid attacking football they are renowned for. Where Brazil produced the samba footballers, Argentina specialise in the small mercurial technical player's. Would be nice to see them winning this tournament, and doing it by turning on the style we all know they are capable off!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Same people who backed England again just never learn



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    I don't get this train of thought. I don't see the hypocrisy of following an English team and shouting against England. The national team represents the nation and establishment, the clubs don't and originally derive from local communities, many with different ethos, many even with anti-British sentiment themselves.

    And to follow from that, many in Ireland take point with the British establishment, not the English people themselves, who most would be quite fond off, and where the clubs came from. So I fail to see the hypocrisy in supporting an English team and shouting against their national team. It's really shouting against a team who represent an establishment we don't like.

    I support Shels myself and would rather Irish people didn't follow the English league at the expense of our own, can follow both at least. In that sense your point is valid, but not in talking down people where there actually isn't any real hypocrisy. Just means people will double down not supporting the Irish league anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,785 ✭✭✭The Golden Miller


    Watching this world cup also drove home the point that Messi will always fall short of Maradona. He's been the best player but lacks something as a leader that Maradona had, which can't really be measured.

    Messi is this teams leader, but I get the impression the team are trying their hardest to get him this world cup, as a favour nearly, as they came through looking up to him and as friends. Whereas Maradona's presence commanded respect in and of itself.

    When Argentina went 2-0, that should of been it, but were a penalty shootout from going out. They led thanks to Messi, but from that position they nearly lost. As a leader, I don't think Messi had that force of will and presence to drive the game home.

    This can't be measured of course, but had Maradona been there, that lead doesn't slip. In all action gung ho fashion, Maradona drives the game home from the centre of the field, no question. He had that natural leadership and ability to force his will on the match.

    People can talk about talent, statistics, goals, achievements all day, but not everything can be measured. I'd love to see Messi lift the world cup, but this tournament confirmed to me that Maradona has no peers. On top of his ability, he possessed a leadership and will that separates him from the rest, Cruyff coming close possibly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,276 ✭✭✭AidoEirE


    Depends on your age to be honest, many including myself never seen Maradona kick a ball (bar the obvious videos)

    I'm 34 and would of loved to see Maradona play...

    But!

    You would have to agree the game has evolved to when Maradona played so would he do so well in this cup?

    Could also flip the coin and say would Messi have done so well in Maradona's time when tackles,referring, the game plan etc was way more straight forward.

    Dont disagree with anything you said as I cant compare it.

    Would love Messi to lift the Cup. I'm a silly fan though, when I've always thought Messi was 'meh sure he does it in a easy league' or some other excuse. He's definitely world class and his reading of the game and passes is not natural.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 847 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I have been warned so best not to get in to it really, but all valid points and taken on board!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    There was a foul on Saka before France went up field and got their first goal. The French were kicking lumps out of him and the ref was letting a lot go.


    England should of had a peno earlier on in game. These instances were as clear as day, not even in question. Griezman was very lucky not to be booked much sooner.

    Where were the comparable French benefits from the ref?

    Its funny that some people are saying “ but they got two penos”. Yes they got two penalties that were penos (one that the ref didn’t initially give) and did not get a third penalty that was a penalty.

    The ref was a joke and he gave French more favourable decisions, were it any of our teams we would be fuming.

    Post edited by Drumpot on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Watch clips of maradonna on 1982 v 1986 World Cup. Laws were changed to protect players like maradonna between the two WCs and look at the difference.

    Now consider the laws that have changed since where it’s becoming a near non constant sport. Maradonna (and many other great technical players of eras Gone by) would probably thrive even more so now.

    Transporting messi and Ronaldo back then would be fun. I’m 92.56% certain they wouldn’t of had a fraction of the achievements and goals they got. I’m absolutely certain they’d be injured alit more and their bodies would be broken by the time they hit 30.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,065 ✭✭✭✭Osmosis Jones


    I actually can't believe it's almost 2023 and we're still trying to compare players who played 40 years apart



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,408 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Ya but that's 3 tournaments now where they have gone out to teams they had on the ropes.

    He ended the small team mentality in qualifying but he is still too cautious in the big games. They need to learn to put 2 into teams and stop doing the Ireland.

    Southgate was the right man to bring in these kids and build the feel-good factor they never had before but they need someone else to finish the job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,464 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    It's so difficult comparing players of different generations, the game has changed alot since maradonna. All I know is, messi is undoubtedly the best player I've seen in my 30 years of watching football. He was kicked up and down la Liga if you think he couldn't handle the physical aspect of the past. Would he have had the longevity of the past, maybe not but Messi is not a player I'd consider unsuitable for a battle.

    Many of the great midfielders we remember couldn't play today's game, technical skill trumps the physical aspects of bygone eras.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,150 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    I thought the red was good. He let the game flow, there were some frees he didn’t give either team.


    It’s absolutely bollocks to say he favoured France. But I see it’s the narrative today.


    The problem with England is the midfield. You can’t play Rice and Henderson, Or Rice and Phillips in the Euros, and expect to beat real quality sides well. There is no creativity there. Southgate seems absolutely wedded to 2 big units in midfield

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 23,150 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    someone told me Messi has Asperger’s, doesn’t lend itself to being a charismatic leader.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Ah stop, the physicality of la is no patch on the EPL. The physicality of the EPL today isn’t a patch on what it was 20 years ago.

    Players today have absolutely every single advantage to be the best versions of themselves. They have the most money so can focus entirely on their profession. They have specialists helping them in every facet of their lives to be at the peak level they can achieve.

    That doesn’t even factor in the laws in the game that’s basically ending the proper hard man roles in midfield and defence. Some of the best defenders are probably as good at passing/dribbling as they are at tackling, tho tells you all you need to know about how the game has evolved

    In many ways Its good that it’s evolved this way, particularly for technical players , but the physicality of the sport today from decade ago is like comparing boxing with tag rugby.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,697 ✭✭✭elefant


    I'm pretty surprised Messi's leadership is being called into question for this world cup. Not only do the squad and the supporters seem to be totally rallying around him and taking inspiration from his presence in the squad, but he has been the player stepping up at all of the big moments for Argentina and pulling them through every game. Everything about the Argentinian drive to win the world cup is based around him.

    He's been incredible, under enormous pressure. What more could you expect from a leader?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,408 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its just another one of Millers train of thought posts that has no basis in reality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    England should of had a peno earlier on in game. These instances were as clear as day,

    This one? I wouldn't say it was clear as day, likely just outside the box

    Where were the comparable French benefits from the ref?

    Shaw nudged Giroud in the box and he went over. By the letter of the law...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    England bossed the midfield last night - and as a neutral would say that France got favourable decisions , he wasnt going to give second pen . and I wasnt up for England, with the never-ending media blitz that would follow.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Maadonna at '86 was the GOAT



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,315 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    True, and Giroud had as much of a chance of taking the ball under his control for that as Mount did for the penalty he was awarded!

    England went down very easily in and around the box in the hope of winning the game through a set piece. On the whole, they had no teeth against a relatively poor French defence and got what they deserved.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭Deub


    I don’t agree they didn’t create enough chances. They had more shots and more shots on target than France and yet they scored none when France had 2. That’s the only reason they are out. It is not because of the referee or something else.

    i have a feeling that the English medias are part of the reason as well. They are arrogant and like to look down on their opponents before a game. Placarding posters of Harry Kane around Paris… saying Lloris was the weakest link. Look at the match he had and I m pretty sure he had extra motivation going into this match.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    I know they made the finals of the Euro but he was contracted up until this tournament and could have saved themselves a few quid by not given him that two year contract extension.

    Not like a club team was gonna rush in to steal him once his contract was up. Don't think they'll fire him but Southgate could walk away from the job. Though I can see him remaining for the Euros and then leaving once his contract was up unless they win the tournament.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,315 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    I see what you did there, but goats bleat rather than Maa.

    Save boards.ie by subscribing: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Posts: 14,734 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The ref didn't give england anything they weren't due and gave a lot less the first half then they should have gotten.

    The foul on saka before the goal was obvious and of course it stings more when France score a goal from it, and then get turned down for the penalty or freekick which the ref of linesman should have given,.they weren't hard decision.

    Those 2 things even if evened out later (they weren't) changed the whole game and how it would play out. There is no one here who wouldn't be a bit salty about it if it happened to a team they support in a big game.

    The ref was bad last night not as bad as in the argie game and 3 of the 4 refs in the quarters had well below par games and also wildly different interpretations of the game it seems.

    Im surprised this is the cream of the crop of world refereeing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The real Ronaldo is the real World Cup GOAT.


    Three World Cup two wins and one lose where he was poisoned and 15 goals in 19 games.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,139 ✭✭✭✭thebaz


    Ronaldo was in much better teams than Maradonna had at '86



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,387 ✭✭✭✭McDermotX


    Loved the real Ronaldo, but doesn't he only have the one WC win ?

    Like only ONE ????? '02



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 61,272 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    He was an unused 17 year old squad player in 94 win.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,550 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89




Advertisement
Advertisement