Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ireland the land of taxes and endless "fees"

1910111315

Comments

  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Give it 4 or 5 weeks and it'll be raised to €40,000



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    I wasn't replying to you. I don't know why people aren't reading what I'm actually saying or who I'm saying it to, it's quite strange.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,447 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Yes, that is welcome.

    But a close to 50% MTR should only start at, say, double median earnings.

    I suggest 100k.



  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Add yourself to the ballot for the next general election. You'll be very popular with this on your manifesto.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,447 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I have considered joining a party, but I wouldn't have the charm / plamas to be a Cllr or TD.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    You might think 125k is megamoney but it is a very standard kind of pay for a global professional. Taking 40% or more from a hard working person who has tried to better themselves is wrong in my opinion (and fact the rate kicks up to 40% at 40k is an absolute travesty ).


    In principle I think there should be a tax ceiling on how much tax a government can charge an individual no matter their earnings.


    The reason for this is obvious if you live in Ireland as Irish people are getting nickle and dimed with stealth taxes on top of their income taxes.


    So you pay income tax ,PRSI, and USC, but then they get you with very high rates on VAT, then property tax, capital gains tax your pension and funds (up to 40% for ETF), bin tax (company fee), electricity standing fees, TV tax (tv license), fuel tax@49%, VRT, road tax (tolls), car tax, business rates for business owners, insurance levy, sugar levy, takeaway cup levy , bank levy , credit card levy, savings account levy, even a concrete block levy ffs, . They are continually adding new taxes and levies while not removing the old ones!!!

    Basically these are mandatory taxes you have to pay if you live here and they easily add up to 50% plus tax on your earnings.

    There should be a calculation where when a new tax is introduced or raised above a threshold they need to reduce another tax to alleviate the overall tax burden.

    It's the overall tax burden that is helping to drive up costs here .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    The UK uses universal benefit to push folks into work. Working must pay better than social welfare , that's a core principle that also needs to be adhered to.


    This would have added benefit of reducing demand on the taxpayer (which in a perfect world would mean reducing income taxes).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,045 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    No, simply incorrect.

    if it was funded or could be proportionally to the number of people who need to use it. No problem… so please desist with your disinformation with your trillion and it wouldn’t be good enough. Nobody is asking for immediate. They are asking for a good and efficient healthcare service.. proportioned and suitable to the healthcare requirements of each patient… as works in other countries. . Unfortunately the extra demand from outside on our taxes is a major issue. People die because of it.

    and…

    if the population and therefore demand on it wasn’t increasing at such an obscene rate.

    current population… 5.02 million

    Population in 2002… 3.89 million

    a country, of our size with a population growth of… 1.13 million people in 20 years… on this small island that’s dispiriting, foolhardy, tear away and despicable ‘fûck it’ thinking.…

    If more people arrive… more services need to be provided…. If alll these people get free accommodation and benefits, free education, free travel… free this and that…. Essential services get worse…… less money to pay for current demand never mind increased.

    so these taxes and fees are required just to get a poor return for our money… great. Endless, enveloping poor value…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    They aren't ignoring it.

    It's just that that is baked in from the start. So yes low incomes get a decent deal from our tax system as long as they stay away from smokes and drink and driving a car. The tax take increases incredibly sharply as soon as you hit 40k and that is the crux of the matter. Middle class and up get absolutely walloped.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    So you want tax breaks for the top 5% and you want reduced public spending to fund it. You'd never get it to the Dail never mind get it passed. I know you won't name the country you were talking about before for whatever reason but how about you name a country that has a similar taxation system to what you're proposing here. Then we can actually discuss what your proposals actually might look like in practice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Also, just because you mentioned it, you don't pay capital gains on your pension, it's exempt. In fact, paying into a pension is an excellent way of avoiding income tax.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,123 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Yes, and that's something we really need badly here.

    Agreed. In fact in a lot of large companies it's possible to get contribution matches into your pension. So we have a 7% match. Meaning I pay 7% of my pretax income into my pension, and the company pays another 7%. The 7% costs me 3.5% in reality as it's a pretax contribution. One of the easiest and most straight forward ways to avoid income tax



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,123 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Just don't go full SF on it. Provide a costed solution. Universal Credit would be a good one. Become the party of the workers, you'd have my vote for sure. I'm aware I earn a good wage for sure but 80-100k these days isnt what it was 5 years ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    Pretty much the only way to reduce income tax substantially isn't it.

    I think that is good, but limits personal choice in terms of investing substantially e.g. compared to 410k or Australian system. Pensions in Ireland get hit with high fees.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I was more referring to the pension levy.

    However it seems this is a rare example whereby the levy has been abolished, in this case abolished in 2016. More of this please!


    https://www.pensionsauthority.ie/en/lifecycle/tax/tax_on_pension_assets/


    Of course there is PAYE payable on occupational pensions, just not on social welfare pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 803 ✭✭✭jcon1913


    Yes interesting graphs.

    However - take GNI* - our income in Ireland adjusted for multinational earnings in 2021 - €323 Billion

    Source - Central Statistics Office

    Total Expenditure €104 Billion

    Source - Where Your Money Goes - government funded website

    Net Tax Rate - 32%



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Any chance you could respond to the main question I asked?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,635 ✭✭✭maninasia


    I don't want anybody to pay more than 50% tax whoever they are. Why should the government take more than half of your earnings. It's nonsensical.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,123 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I agree, and the government taking 32% approx of my earnings last year is also nonsensical. I think effective tax rate should be capped at 20%. Big government is a crippling crutch that Europe seems to want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    As I pointed out before, in this country you need to be earning ~€700,000 a year to pay over 50% of your wages to the government. And that's as a single person with no deductions. Honestly, who gives a shite what somebody earning that amount of money wants? And I don't care about marginal tax rates either, I care what you actually pay at the end of the month, not what you feel you pay.

    Also, you said you didn't want anyone paying over 40% earlier, now it's 50%. It'd be a lot easier if you could just name a country you'd like to emulate like I asked earlier.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    You'd have riots on the streets within a decade once people realise how much money is going to the top and how little is going to the rest. Also, even the markets would balk at reducing taxes to such levels. Look what happened in the UK just recently when they said they were going to reduce taxes on the wealthy. We're long past thinking that Reganomics is a desirable model. Trickle-down economics doesn't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,123 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I think you'd be surprised. Middle Ireland is pissed off at how much money is given out to lifetime dole wasters. (As always, this group is only the perennial unemployed, not including carers pensioners etc).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,447 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    You may not care about MTR, but thousands of people making decisions about how much to work do consider the marginal tax rate on any extra income.

    Overtime is an obvious example, where people do consider the extra tax paid on extra income.

    Dismissing marginal tax rates is like dismissing one of the main issues of the debate.


    When I suggest that people on median earnings should not face close to 50% MTR on extra income, I am not calling for lower effective tax rates.

    I want a person on median earnings 40k-42k to face a much lower MTR, say maybe 30%, not 48.5%, but I do not want them to face a lower effective tax rate.


    I don't want tax revenues to fall, I want the tax system to better reward work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    I don't know of a single developed country on Earth that would have such a low effective tax rate on earners. Even the US has no such cap. You could execute every single one of the perennially unemployed and the entire prison population along with it and the economy would still go straight into recession once you reduced government spending in the economy that would be required by such a tax cut. And that's just for starters, inequality would explode and middle Ireland would soon find out how much of their wealth actually comes from the redistribution of other peoples taxes.


    Just as a matter of interest, do you have any figures of what we pay out to the terminally unemployed each year for reference?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    So who is actually going to be paying the extra taxes needed to make up for the shortfall if you raise the bands? If you want total state tax take to remain constant somebody's going to have to pay more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Or there could be a root and branch review in the 2 depts of largest spend public sector and welfare and savings made there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Or, you could read what I was responding to and realise that's not what he suggested. But we both know you won't/can't.

    Have you bought yourself a decent bag for life yet so you can avoid the plastic bag levy?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,615 ✭✭✭fliball123


    You were asking where the shortfall would come from and if we made savings then there would be no shortfall if taxes were lowered. Can you move the conversation on for phuck sake.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 901 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Oh for Christ's sake, he stated he doesn't want tax revenues to fall. He's not looking for savings. It's literally in the last sentence of the post I was responding to.

    Once again, you're responding to posts you don't read on a subject you don't understand. You're just a complete waste of energy.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You can't reduce the marginal tax rate and not have tax revenues fall, unless you increase taxes elsewhere. If you do this for income tax you either have to start taxing the low paid who pay no income tax, or else go after high income earners again, whi already pay the overwhelming majority of income tax in Ireland.

    Unless you have some magical tax ideas to replace the lost tax revenues?



Advertisement