Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1228022812283228522863690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    lol Ukraine would last 2 day. New russian territory taken within weeks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭mikewest


    Eeehh,,,, NO! Only in Putin's corrupt mind. Time for someone to put down the vodka bottle and go to bed. Actually there are a few here tonight that seem to be vodka posting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭mikewest


    If you want to be brief point one covers it all (but needs capitalization and an exclamation mark)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 853 ✭✭✭mikewest




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Hats off that made me laugh. Probably hazzar or what ever it was called back in the day.

    Edit googled huzzar  lol I remember that drain cleaner.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,027 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Hard to bate the auld Russian Standard wodka......for a headache to remember !!!😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,776 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Just stop posting this nonsense.

    Fighting an insurgency for 8 years? An "insurgency" only made viable by Russia. Without Russia intervention the "insurgency" would have collapsed within weeks. The irony is that Russian intervention achieved very little, hence this current war, BECAUSE Ukraine was united against it.

    Russia pounding civilian targets, cities, will not win them the war. That's been proven time and time again in history. Countless countries have been hit far, FAR, harder and failed to break in historical conflicts, what Ukraine is suffering is horrendous, but nowhere near breaking point. Russia is doing this because it's floundered on the actual battlefield and continues to do so, and is resorting to Nazi Germany terror tactics.

    It didn't work then, it won't ultimately work now.

    Who would have thought it. A modern Ukrainian army trained by the west, trouncing the antiquated Russian army with a fraction of the annual budget. How embarrassing.

    The point about strikebacks on Russia soil is irrelevant. It doesn't matter. Russia is the aggressor, Russia is the one that needs to feed a war machine that's not officially at war, fighting against an entire nation, and frankly, proven to not be capable of waging a real war after losing their opening gamble.

    I don't know what your obsession is with these mythical Russian defenses. Smacks of Hitler ranting about the impenetrable Atlantic Wall. We had posters here claiming that Ukraine could never take Kherson because of the topography. Sorry to rain on your parade but the Russian army is a rotten, corrupt disaster and it's being exposed by an army minuscule in size with very limited western support.

    And now Ukraine needs nuclear weapons to break the deadlock in your imaginary campaign? Ukraine should surrender because of the danger of civil war, despite the fact there's absolutely zero fracture within Ukraine, because the entire country is united against Russia? Seems impartial.

    Finally, Belarus. Ukraine should surrender because your vague, erotic, far-flung fantasy of civil war in Ukraine, might affect the dictatorship in Belarus, thus causing a refugee crisis.

    Seriously, put down the crack pipe.



  • Posts: 6,192 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Personal insults and jibes asides,(quite what yous hope to achieve accusing others of smoking crack is beyond me🤷)you have failed to address any actual points?


    Just posted some dogma about Russia being an out of date army & corrupt,which they may well be 🤷,but one that rains bombs down on Ukraine infrastructure and is crippling it's economy.....and have dismissed quite clear issues about a likely build up of russian defences on ground as irrelevant??


    When it would seem to me,the obvious issue that will happen,while society there collapsed and attacks each other and fractures develop.....the notion that peace talks are unnecessary & this war isn't going to cost 100s of thousands of lives next year is pure head in the sand stuff,


    25% of Ukraine's population either dead or fled,while another 25% internally displaced....and lads cheering on an even worse blood bath next year,and dismissing out of hand the potential for this to be multiples worse seemingly based entirely on dogma and rethoric...unless Ukraine has the ability to strike back at Russia internally,or gets a massive deployment international troops to turn the tide,this war could drag on for years on end....while seemingly anyone suggesting peace talks is to be accused/insinuated of smoking class A drugs🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 287 ✭✭dennis72


    A positive show of strength 5 NATO carrier groups and escorts patrolling the waters around Europe.

    The Gerald R Ford is the newest US carrier.

    Unity against 1 brutal and thankfully weakened enemy.

    I live in an area where many Russians have arrived for holidays they are cold creatures its in their eyes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Strand1970


    Ukrainian man power without the weapons means nothing. They will have to compromise for now. The west just wants the war over and doesn't t really care if Russia holds on to the east of Ukraine. Its amazing how important air defence has become, it almost neutralise a large air force



  • Posts: 596 [Deleted User]


    The full banned list is in. I'm shocked that Wallace and Daly are not on it. 🤣


    Fianna Fáil (33)

    Taoiseach Micheál Martin

    Minister for European Affairs Thomas Byrne

    Jackie Cahill TD

    Barry Cowen TD

    Cathal Crowe TD

    Cormac Devlin TD

    Joe Flaherty TD

    Seán Haughey TD

    John Lahart TD

    James Lawless TD

    Paul McAuliffe TD

    John McGuinness TD

    Michael Moynihan TD

    Jennifer Murnane O’Connor TD

    Jim O’Callaghan TD

    Willie O’Dea TD

    Christopher O’Sullivan TD

    Pádraig O’Sullivan TD

    Niamh Smyth TD

    Billy Kelleher MEP

    Senator Niall Blaney

    Senator Lisa Chambers

    Senator Lorraine Clifford-Lee

    Senator Ollie Crowe

    Senator Paul Daly

    Senator Timmy Dooley

    Senator Robbie Gallagher

    Senator Gerry Horkan

    Senator Erin McGreehan

    Senator Denis O’Donovan

    Senator Fiona O’Loughlin

    Senator Ned O’Sullivan

    Senator Diarmuid Wilson


    Fine Gael (16)

    Tánaiste Leo Varadkar

    Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney

    Minister for Justice Helen McEntee

    Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe

    Richard Bruton TD

    Ciarán Cannon TD

    Joe Carey TD

    Jennifer Carroll MacNeill TD

    Alan Dillon TD

    Alan Farrell TD

    Charlie Flanagan TD

    Brendan Griffin TD

    Joe McHugh TD

    John Paul Phelan TD

    Neale Richmond TD

    Michael Ring TD


    Labour leader Ivana Bacik TD

    Independent Senator Gerard Craughwell

    Sean Ó Fearghaíl Ceann Comhairle



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,758 ✭✭✭weisses


    Not as much as the Kremlin but close ... 122th vs 136 in the corruption index

    To corrupt to join the EU in the past



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,401 ✭✭✭h2005


    Repeating the same nonsense does not make it true. Why would Ukraine compromise? The tide has turned against Russia and the West continues to back Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Strand1970


    How many of these politicians were intending go to to Russia in the near future, none I would suggest. Funny daly and Wallace not on the list alright



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,574 ✭✭✭rogber


    I don't normally say this,but bloody hell, the Putin bots are out in force here the last couple of pages...claims so ridiculous they don't even bear engaging with...



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    “I don't support russia but…”

    Lads, ye are posting on an Irish forum, that’s low level stuff for flunkies… ye’ll surely be first on the list for repatriation when Russia’s embassy gets downsized… Hope ye didn’t get too acclimatised to a ‘decadent pig dog’ Western lifestyle.

    As for Russophile’s in Ukrainian Oblasts that welcomed Russian advances - I’d say they are sorely ruing that support now they’ve had a taste of ‘Russian Love’ - often forcibly.

    Anyone thinking Ukraine should look for peace with the animals from Russia are clueless. Will tens of thousands more Ukrainians die to preserve Ukraine from Russian tyranny… yes, that’s the price Ukraine knows it has to pay… simply because the alternative is clearly worse. Under Russia’s “protection” much worse would befall them. Anyone like to counter that argument, thinking Russia would be benevolent masters… anyone?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Funny how you speak for the west, when were you appointed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,486 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Yes Ireland is now in ruins because of Russia invading Ukraine.

    ...

    What are you on about you absolute space cadet?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Thanks for the brief version 🤗😀

    The Ukrainians are very capable people, and were some of the best scientists etc. during the USSR… I can see Ukraine thriving more and more as it embraces the West… which of course is what Putin detests, as it shows up his corrupt/mafia state.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Yep but current and newly found jingoism trumps the recent past and facts. Doesn't do much for objective reasoning to boot.

    Ukraine was one of the poorest and most corrupt nations in Europe and was widely seen and reported as such before the Russian invasion. However unlike Russia it was also reported and seen that Ukraine was trying to improve and was doing so.

    It was also seen and reported to be a hotbed of Far Right wing "nazis" particularly in the east and the civil war there. However as that's the current boogyman of some in Western "liberal" thought that was exaggerated(QV outlets like the BBC). Now it's pretty much ignored because it suits(QV the very same BBC). Never mind that there are more and more organised and fully government backed "nazis" in Russia and mainstream Russian politics and culture to a large degree would have the average right on pride flags in their bio suburban westerner crying into their ethically sourced vegan burgers.

    Most of all, and regardless of which flag one wants to wave, or which reality one wants to believe; the actual reality is millions wouldn't be displaced, many tens of thousands wouldn't be dead or crippled, Ukrainains and Russians and a host of other negatives, if Russia hadn't invaded. There are many reasons for this conflict, but the conflict itself and the misery of it are all on Russia.

    A compromise is a near certainty. How much of one and when are the questions. Way back in this thread, after Russia was chased back from Kyiv my take was that when the dust settled and papers were signed Crimea would stay Russian, Donbas too and that the part still up in the air is the land bridge between them. Not a lot has changed to make me think so differently. Crimea has been "Russified" for nearly a decade and would be their hard line in the sand. Donbas is and was a clusterfúck and now since this invasion many if not most of those who would be loyal to Ukraine have either fled or been killed. IMHO leave the Russians to it. Set it up as a demilitarised buffer zone. It'll bleed Russian resources.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,592 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Well that's the answer why they have so many people at the embassy - it's a training camp for trolls and unfortunately boards.ie is their training and testing grounds. If there is a positive response here they will spread it to the wider audience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,776 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Right putting aside the fact that I did address those points let's go through them and hold your hand.

    1. Civil War in Ukraine. This is nothing but a fantasy in your head which you are attempting to post as some sort of fact. It's so far fetched and based on nothing that not even Russia itself has really talked about this. Your buzz words like "societal collapse", "fracture" and attack each other" are based on nothing but a romance novel of the mind. You have made comparison to Iraq, but it has been pointed out to you, in detail, why that is a pointless comparison. The reason Ukraine has survived and weathered this invasion so well is literally national unity.
    2. Russia defences on the ground. No-one said they are irrelevant. You invented that word. What people have said, is that Russia defences are poor, and have proven to be poor, repeatedly, even when people made claims like "They will never breach Kherson's defences", etc. Unlike your claim that Ukraine is somehow on the brink of civil war, for which there's no evidence, there's any amount of evidence that the Russian army is an absolute joke given it's budget and size, and is massively under-performing, to put it mildly.
    3. No-one said peace talks are unnecessary. Another word you invented. What people are saying is that Ukraine has no need to enter peace talks on Russia's terms. Why would they? They're beating the brakes off Russia at the moment, figuratively and literally given their small size relative to Russia paper strength. Ukraine can decide when Ukraine wants to enter talks, and they hold that power precisely because they are giving Russia such a bloody nose.
    4. Ukraine doesn't need to strike back at Russia internally. As of this second, Russia has been humiliated, it's economy is in tatters, it has literally zero chance of winning in Ukraine. It is the invader, the launcher of an illegal war, the perpetrator of war crimes, the one holding the world to ransom over one pathetic man's imperial vision. Ukraine is the one fighting for survival. From the start this was Russia's war to lose, and they are losing it extremely badly.
    5. Your ridiculous claims that Ukraine can only make gains by deploying nuclear weapons. Putting aside the generally brain-dead sentiment of this claim, which flies in the fact of the fact that the UKR army is pumelling Russia, and the fact that Ukraine don't even have nuclear weapons. Why are you saying Ukraine would have to deploy nuclear weapons? As opposed to Russia, which is actually floundering, and actively threatening not just Ukraine but the entire west with nuclear weapons every other day.

    Your argument, again, is for reasons unknown speculating the absolutely best and most ridiculously unlikely possible outcome for Russia, while simultaneously predicting the equally most far-fetched pessimistic outcome for Ukraine. It basically amounts to the classic "Ukraine should surrender because they can't win", despite the fact that the entire world is watching Russia lose.....and it is absolutely their war to lose.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 322 ✭✭Strand1970


    Ukraine has alot of resources with great potential if corruption was reduced. I can see it eventually joining the EU to transition towards a more western european ecomony. This is what Russia fears, a strong democrate Ukraine that they can't control. Russia will end up with bits of Eastern Ukraine but that will just bleed away their resources over the years while the rest of the Ukraine can rebuild and move on. The Russians utterly failed in Ukraine but getting them out of all together is a different matter. Calling people Russia bots because they dont have the same option as yourself is pointless. Everyone has a different viewpoint, no one here is defending the Russians they are callous scumbags, but there will come a point in the any conflict when talks must happen. I wouldn't trust the Russia one bit, the UN or some neutral force will need to patrol any future boarder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,324 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    boards.ie is their training and testing grounds

    🤣 Apparently some were at the vodka last night, well after reading that the funny smelling tobacco is in play. Any spare? Because that's some good stuff.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,466 ✭✭✭zv2


    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,444 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    So your big boy pants solution for peace talks right now is that Russia will just walk away? What of Crimea? I thought you were delusional on the SF thread but this takes the biscuit.

    But ok, peace talks where russia fully withdraws, how does one instigate that? You know, besides thoughts and prayers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,091 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    He's out of the loop, and in no position to count bodies, that's why he 'estimates' Ukrainians are in a position to physically count bodies, and according to this, they publish full lists of their losses and don't hide them from relatives or their populace. According to that, the losses are 1:5. If the general was counting civillian deaths as well, then that's a very different matter.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Is it wrong to execute collaborators and informers?


    It was done here, one would want to be certain though.


    I would consider it an important thing to do.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement