Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

1371372374376377419

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36,496 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Where is the specific proposal for multi-generational households? There isn't one. So yes, they are silent on how multi-generational households would cope in this regime. They are supposed to be the experts, yet their expertise is basically... well the professionals who currently advocate restrictions could come up with a different set of measures... we just don't know what they are, or how effective they would be, or what their drawbacks would be but .... lockdowns bad.

    That is not science.

    No estimate is provided for how long it would take to achieve herd immunity... how long infection immunity would last.

    No estimate is provided for the additional deaths, severe cases, long covid in the 'less vulnerable' groups - both in terms of additional burden on hospital care and in life changing events.

    Here is another humdinger from this piece of nonsense: "By way of example, nursing homes should use staff with acquired immunity and perform frequent testing of other staff and all visitors"

    How are the staff meant to get this immunity? How is the nursing home to be staffed during this process? What about essential staff that don't have immunity? How many of the staff can we expect to get serious covid or long covid during this process?

    This was written in October 2020, well before we had rapid testing... so how many PCRs and how fast would they be needed. How many cases will be missed in the gap between test and result.

    There is a world of difference between schools open in a society under restrictions, and schools open in a society where covid is running rampant.

    So the schools are open. What about multi-generational households where there is a vulnerable person living? What about the children of healthcare workers?

    Schools were shut during periods of the worst outbreaks.

    Where was it said children didn't transmit the disease? It was said they were less likely. And you are muddying the waters on 'children', are you talking about 6 year olds or 16 year olds? The Declaration also calls for the re-opening of Universities, which are not populated by children.

    It is not science to just say, re-open the schools. The schools were re-opened based on an assessment of their risk of spread versus the risks to education. That is science.

    "Focused Protection", in comparison to the actual measures deployed, is a meaningless slogan, backed up by nothing.

    So yes, it is just fantasy\aspirational nonsense. It is a political statement. It is not science.

    That is not just my opinion:

    The American Public Health Association and 13 other public-health groups in the United States warned in a joint open letter that the "Great Barrington Declaration is not grounded in science and is dangerous."

    “If followed, the recommendations in the Great Barrington Declaration would haphazardly and unnecessarily sacrifices lives... The declaration is not a strategy, it is a political statement. It ignores sound public health expertise. It preys on a frustrated populace. Instead of selling false hope that will predictably backfire, we must focus on how to manage this pandemic in a safe, responsible, and equitable way."

    Dozens of public health groups, experts blast ‘herd immunity’ strategy backed by White House | The Hill

    As an association of more than 12,000 frontline infectious diseases scientists, physicians, public health experts, and other health professionals, the Infectious Diseases Society of America and its HIV Medicine Association strongly denounce the “declaration,” released without data or evidence, that states this crisis can be controlled in the absence of critical public health measures.

    “Herd Immunity” is Not an Answer to a Pandemic (idsociety.org)

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭snowcat


    Yes but if its more virulent why are the unvaxxed countries not seeing a spike in hospitalisations and funerals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭snowcat


    We should really be the poster boys of what vaccination can do. Not going into the depths of another wave while the unvaxxed countries seem to be coping ok.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭hometruths



    From the text:

    As immunity builds in the population, the risk of infection to all – including the vulnerable – falls. We know that all populations will eventually reach herd immunity – i.e. the point at which the rate of new infections is stable – and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine. Our goal should therefore be to minimize mortality and social harm until we reach herd immunity. 

    As you say it was written in October 2020, when still nobody knew how long the vaccine development would take, and certainly it was not expected by the end of that year.

    The whole point of their proposal was instead of locking down and shielding absolutely everybody from the virus, it was better to start building up as much immunity as possible in the population whilst we waited for a vaccine - and that this can be assisted by (but is not dependent upon) a vaccine

    The acceptable science at the time was we wait for the vaccine to get herd immunity, and reduce transmission as much as possible while we wait.

    Oddly enough, shortly after the vaccine was rolled out, all ambitions and talk of herd immunity were shelved.

    Now two years on we are living and coping with covid back to something like normal - and the acceptable science now says that this is thanks to a high level population wide immunity, from a combination of previous infection and vaccines.

    Or to put it another way we've built up immunity in the population assisted by but not dependent on a vaccine.



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]



    The fact they are engaging in an anti-science tactic like this.

    Why are they using an open letter format where they cannot actually verify if the people signing are actually experts? Or aren't cartoon characters?

    (Gonna predict the usual dodge of "you'd have to ask them" etc. Or just outright ignoring the question.)


    The folks behind AE9/11's petition are also experts in their fields who are likewise qualified and have impressive sounding resumes. This doesn't prevent them from being anti-science.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Also we have to keep in mind that conspiracy theorists have been constantly telling us that there hasn't been enough time to fully evaluate the safety of the vaccine.

    Yet, this doesn't seem to apply to the virus. For some reason it's perfectly ok for them to dismiss the possibility that there might be unknown effects of the virus yet to be identified and to assume that there's no danger in being infected since only a "pittance" of 6 million people died.

    This goes doubly so since this declaration was made with even less time to study the virus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    A lot of hamster-wheel style nitpicking going on here.

    Been awhile since we've had any hint of a conspiracy, anything at all credible linked to the vaccines?



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    None. There's only vague hints at them such as the notion that research that puts the vaccines into a bad light is being suppressed while positive research that is fraudulent is allowed to be published.


    None of out resident antivaxxers want to directly state these conspiracy beliefs because they understand that it will rob them of any credibility with readers not already familiar with them.

    They also understand that the more extreme they admit their belief is the harder it will be for them to support each other.


    So in the name of spread vaccine misinformation any discussion of conspiracy theories is best avoided.



  • Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I remember having these very same conversations this time last year..

    Could be a bad winter again..

    Better roll out another variant to explain the injections not working again..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    The virus mutates and evolves, there have been multiple strains already, I have no doubt you are aware of them.

    Genuine question, why do you think we have annual boosters for one virus, while for others generally just one jab suffices?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We remember having this conversation 10 years ago when conspiracy theorists were telling us all this same stuff about the swine flu.


    At least then people were willing to be direct about the stuff they believed.



  • Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Because there's never been a vaccine that works for a coronavirus..



  • Posts: 7,714 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And they only paid out damages for swine flu vaccine injuries last year..



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    But the conspiracies weren't "there would be a handful of injuries" were they.


    Is that the extent of the conspiracy theory now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 881 ✭✭✭moonage


    There seems to be a lot of regret among those who succumbed to the needlecraft and none among the purebloods.

    Most of the posters on this thread are fanatical pro-covid-vaxxers but I suspect, deep down, lots of them feel rather foolish and feel they've been duped. You have to be bonkers if you think it was a good idea trying to get every man, woman and child needlecrafted during a pseudopandemic with an undertested and potentially dangerous "treatment".

    It must be galling for the fanatical pro-vaxxers and everyone else to know that public health agencies, governments and the media conspired to hide the fact that the needlecraft didn't stop transmission.

    From an Australian poll:

    "More than half of respondents either said they regret getting vaccinated, or were unvaccinated and happy with their decision.

    Only 35 per cent out of more than 45,000 people said they were vaccinated and would make the same decision again.

    Not a single person said they were unvaccinated and regret the decision."

    Covid poll Australia: Masks, vaccines, lockdowns, cases, deaths and more | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site



  • Subscribers Posts: 43,427 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    ^

    Hahaha

    I can see why the resident loony conspiracy theorists here want this place to be a haven for fictional writing.

    You've the making of a tweeny sci Fi novel there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,507 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    Still talking about your stitching classes? I can see you haven’t improved. Usually practice improves people’s techniques, but there are those that just can be helped no matter how much they love stitching. They just will never understand anything about it.


    However, as a plant to make conspiracy theorists look ridiculous you are doing a great job. Your monthly salary should be in your account by COB on Friday.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    There's one vaccine that works for Yellow Fever

    However with the flu vaccine we need annual booster shots

    This isn't a trick question, do you know why that is?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,087 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    If you are vaccinated you are less likely to die from Covid. The older you get the more risk there is. If you are quite young, I wouldn't worry about it too much, but if you are middle aged and older, then you are gambling.

    People with underlying conditions and the elderly are most at risk. Straightforward question, would you convince elderly relatives of yours not to get jabbed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,022 ✭✭✭✭The Nal


    "Not a single person said they were unvaccinated and regret the decision."


    Did they interview the dead people?

    Speaking of, I thought all the vaccinated were supposed to be dead by now? 4 billion people dead or something was the goal



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 15,864 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭Big Bag of Chips


    @moonage you have been warned before about your use of childish language.

    Do not post in this thread again



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Apparently vaccine effectiveness (against hospitalisation) is improved by physical exercise.

    This is the stunning revelation in a study recently published in British Journal of Sports Medicine.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,218 ✭✭✭snowcat


    I thought it was the unvaxxed were meant to be dead by now. Seems no one was right. Except the purveyors.



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Again.

    Over 6 million people died from the virus.

    It has been shown that millions more would have died if the vaccines didn't exist.


    You guys have claimed that the vaccines were killing thousands of people a week. You claimed the death toll for the vaccine could be in the millions.

    You have provided nothing to support this claim and seem to have abandoned it and want to pretend it never happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,784 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    In other news, water is wet.

    That's parody level stuff.



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    OK. And?

    This seems like you're just dumping a link to make implications but don't want to directly state what your point is.


    I suspect that you're trying to imply that this study somehow casts doubt on vaccines or the effectiveness but realise that if you say that direct people will agai point out that you are misrepresenting things and claiming a study says something it doesn't.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭hometruths


    My point is highlighting yet another amazing characteristic of these vaccines - namely that people can boost the effectiveness themselves if they choose to do so. Quite an extraordinary achievement from the manufacturers.

    I wonder is it the mRna technology that has managed this or some other secret sauce. I guess that's not for lay folk like you and I to fathom, and we should just be grateful for Science 2.0 and its expert consensus. It truly is groundbreaking stuff.



  • Posts: 25,874 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yup. Cool. The study doesn't say that though. You're misrepresenting things because you've been told so by someone on Twitter.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,146 Mod ✭✭✭✭robinph


    Pretty much all medical interventions will be improved by the patient being fitter and healthier and exercising.

    As already stated, it's a study declaring that water is wet essentially.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,703 ✭✭✭hometruths


    This is your stock reply. Any chance you'd care to tell me what I am misrepresenting?



Advertisement