Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Softening house market?

19091939596145

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭Fantana2


    I’m a potential second time buyer, this will not actually mean I will be able to borrow more. I was over the 20% with the potential equity on my current house already but the 3.5 was my limiting factor and this has not changed.

    6.96kwp South facing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,398 ✭✭✭almostover


    SF will become FF of the 90s and 00s if they get into government. That much is certain. They'll resort to populism much in the same way FF did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It has nothing to do with Captain Paschal or the government. The CB is independent of government. It has been reviewing the borrowing rates for the last 8-10 months. They would have had submission's from interested parties, but whether the department of finance or government made a submission is not clear at present. However I suspect there will be an FOI request to the CB to see who did make submissions. We will have to wait and see when these are published.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 226 ✭✭byrne249


    I just don't believe most people care, one way or the other, 90% of those 70% aren't moving any time soon and the prices are simply a curiosity. The idea of 'wealth' in a house should be hung out to dry after the revolution in any case :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,339 ✭✭✭Ubbquittious


    If there was any reason to keep such a submission quiet it would have been done discreetly on a golf course or tennis club



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,713 ✭✭✭Bluefoam




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Just to point out that if house prices jump, you may be able to refinance your existing mortgage at more competitive rates (all else equal) due to a better LTV ratio. So the price can matter in that scenario



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,273 ✭✭✭The Spider


    Oh they care, prices go up people feel richer whether they sell or not, they spend more and feel happier there’s enough research on this if you Google it.

    Applying this just to Ireland is silly, every economy relies on house prices rising it creates wealth, look at the gentrification of areas that were rundown to bits, the renewal of Smithfield wouldn’t have happened without rising house prices.

    Wouldn’t have attracted all the trendy restauraunts, cafes, pubs etc.

    you only have to look at Netflix to see the property porn programmes to know that this is global.

    As to people saying oh everyone will be priced out there’s one thing they’re leaving out - inflation in the 70s a house was 5 grand tops, I have personal experience of seeing redbricks in ranelagh in the early 90s at sub 100k a pop,

    I was renting a 2 bed in drumcondra for 350 a month in 1995 but my salary which was codnsidered pretty good at the time was 11grand a year I came away with 760 a month, so it’s not like house prices will rise but everybody’s wages stays the same.

    Post edited by The Spider on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    A simplistic thing for people to remember is that if they have borrowed 4X their wages, then their debt will accrue at four times their interest rate in terms of their salary.

    i.e. take on a 4X debt and if rates go to 5%, then an amount equal to 20% of your gross salary will be accruing on your debt. If you are on 100k, borrow 400k, then at a 5% rate, the interest will be accruing at a rate of 20k per year. That would be coming out of your net salary (assuming you want to keep "ahead" of the capital)

    I was checking out US rates there earlier today. The standard mortgage over there is a 30-year fixed. That's running at over 7%. It's not that long ago that you could get one almost as low as 2.5% or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,839 ✭✭✭mcsean2163


    House market erection?

    FWIW, not convinced there's another leg up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭newmember2


    Yes, new title...


    Irish Central Bank Inflating The House Market?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    You will get a five year fixed for 5.6 %. Remember as well in the USA there is the jingle mail option. Mortgage loans in the USA are non recourse.

    Obviously the lenders cannot access longterm deposits/funding at low rates. Historically there has been a large variation in there 30 years rate. That 2.5% rate was a tad above that and it was a historical low. Over a 50 year period the median would be 5% but the average a tad above that

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=NUh

    Again DT you are waffling

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Stop with the BS projecting Bass. We have all come to learn that when you accuse someone else of "waffling" it simply means you just don't understand something.


    You cannot point out a single thing in my post that is incorrect. Not one single thing. You may attempt to come up with some strawman, but it only yourself who waffles on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 76 ✭✭Cllr_Dermod_Fahy


    Christopher O'Sullivan, FF TD, on the Tonight Show letting the cat out of the bag of what FF/FG want. He says loosening the lending rules will mean there is more demand. Reading between the lines, he is called out that what he means is more demand means higher prices which means higher profits for builders.

    It's utterly depressing.

    Not only do we need more houses, we need them to come down in price! More houses at higher prices, what a bleak thought.

    The thing is that the more house prices go up, the more unequal society is. Someone who bought in 2017 has a much smaller mortgage than someone buying now yet everyone is in the same job market. And that's before you get into the situation of someone who bought 10 years ago.

    A shameful situation that the housing market has become. Politicians and bankers should be ashamed of themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 996 ✭✭✭Ozark707




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    While technically yes there is less likely hood even in recourse states for deficiency judgements to be sought. As well in the US you have much easier bankruptcy laws. Finally you have a flexibility option of upping and leaving everything behind and moving elsewhere and starting afresh. While technically you have the same option in the EU language is a significant barrier

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭Sono


    I want to trade up if possible, have equity in current house, wages have increased considerably for both of us in the past 6 years.

    Today’s new rules doesn’t change anything for us, if anything the houses we are in the market for might go up slightly and prices us out of the market.

    We have 2 young children and saving for a move but the amount we are saving doesn’t meet the rate the house prices are increasing.

    My own tuppence worth I don’t see the market softening at all unfortunately on the back of this news.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,566 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I think part of the point of today was not to change anything for people like you. By buying 6 years ago you’ve essentially already had a small lotto win.

    The changes were today were intended to try give FTBers some sort of a leg up to compete with those with large unearned equity gains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,676 ✭✭✭Sono


    That’s fair enough and I get we weren’t really the ones targeted.

    We will simply have to sit this out for a while and see what happens in the next couple of years.

    On a side note I thought winning the lotto would feel better!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Donald In pointed out the inconsistencies in what you posted. Aside from that the US is a single economy and significant variation in interest rates have happened over the years. On the US there tends not to be significant money on deposit it's all invested.

    In tbe EU you have more variable economies. On one hand you have the older wealthy economies with a large cohort of citizens with significant savings.

    Then you have the eastern newer members with lower wealth but with greater flexibility. Ireland is probably a mix of both with the savings but also with the flexibility of the newer economies. Ali with that it has the English language, an English common law system admittedly with all it's flaws but something American investment understand. How the Brits never managed to utilize this within the EU I do not know.

    However I have digressed. The EU as a whole cannot live with rates of 3+ percentage points. Not only that as rates rise deposits will flow into longterm deposit rates instead of investment. This will put a ceiling on mortgage rates.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,327 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    There is no inconsistency. I posted two things:

    First, that if a person took out a loan that was 4X their salary, then if interest rates went to 5%, interest would accrue at a rate equal to 20% of their gross take home (at least initially). That is simple mathematics.

    Second. I posted that it is not that long you could get a 30Y fixed rate mortgage in the US for almost as low as 2.5%. Today it is 7%. You yourself included a link which confirms that.

    I didn't post anything about Cairns or about the stock price of Meta or the price of Bitcoin. I didn't try to say that people in Ireland can only get mortgages in the US or anything else you are imagining. I posted the two facts above. If you want to run off and pretend that I said something else just so you can have a rant with some waffle that is irrelevant to my post, then there isn't a whole lot I can do about that. There is no need for the attitude



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,549 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Artificially inflating the housing market? Can't believe a coalition of FF and FG would even consider something like that.

    Joking aside, offering mortgages of 4 times income might make people feel good momentarily until they realise that everyone else has the same thing going for them as well.

    The bigger issue is the increased monthly repayments not to mention the interest rate hikes on top of the cost of living crisis.

    Maybe the idea is to make home ownership every bit as expensive as renting and drive people away from bothering with a mortgage which would be ok if we didn't have the worst rental sector in the developed world.

    The housing crisis deepens, but at least our landlord class rulers will keep on making money off of our misery, that is their primary purpose after all.

    Glazers Out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,197 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Donald you are getting uptight. Take a chill pill.

    You are joining the Chicken Licken brigade. You have a tendancy to now quote one piece of data and only want that piece of data dealt with. That is binary thinking. It's lacks overview.

    There is posters on here making comparisons with what is happening in the US and UK now. In the UK we have a party in government who could be described as Sinn Fein( ourselves alone) but from a different political ideology.

    https://www.instagram.com/reel/CjFT4ByJl9o/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=


    Truss has managed in a few weeks ( even though distracted by the death of the Queen and her funeral) to collapse the UK . Because of this the UK bond and pension market is in turmoil

    You posted about the US mortgage Interest rate. Will this happen right accross the EU. Will it happen Ireland. Will what is happening in the UK ( which is mostly the Brexit dividend they did not expect to becoming home to roost).

    Quite simply there is no indication that what you are indicating will happen. As I said in the USA most money is held in investments not on deposits and definitely not on short term deposits. The FED interest rate hike is exposing this.

    While the EU languished in negative interest rates the US has never gone there. For the last eleven years the EU has been dropping interest rates we have spend longer in negative interest rates than it takes the Tory party to elect four prime ministers. Pre COVID the US rate was rising and was at 2.5% and then dropped to a quarter of a percent. It has literally jumped from there to it's pre COVID figure and has continued climbing.

    Remember the US is not suffering as much from fuel inflation as the EU. They have ingenious supply. Therefore the US is trying to suppress general inflation. The EU is trying to suppress energy induced inflation.

    You do not want to take context into account. Everything is 1+1=2 at present with you. Binary Donald binary, waffle in other words.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,372 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    If your target property increases in price, it is likely that yours will too - although you might have a bigger gap to jump.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,045 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals



    In another post "FF is the party of homeownership" - Housing for all is a shambles so they're clinging to the CBI rules as a win.






  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Yes I was, as I stated in my comment the only time you should be worried about negative equity is if you don't plan on staying in house you buy long-term. Unfortunately the house we might buy in the next 12 months will not be our forever home as we wont be able to afford our forever home at that stage. Hence why we wouldn't want negative equity when we might want to sell 5 or 10 years down the line. As I said, if people see themselves in the homes they are buying now for the long-term, then they should buy, if not I don't see why anyone would buy a house with the plan on moving again in a few years. House prices are peaking or will do in the very near future.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You are literally the only person on here that thinks the CB made this decision entirely on their own....... and doing your best to rile people up, give it a rest will you....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 192 ✭✭IWW2900


    Anyone who rushes to buy on the back of this "news" is going to get so badly burned. Government should be ashamed.

    Rates are going up, this is all that matters. Property prices are going down.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement