Landlord moving back into property. Length of notice required for tenant

There is a lease in place. This lease effectively sells some of your sibling's rights for a thing called money. The people who have paid that money now have things called rights of their own which they have paid for.

Winter eviction ban those rented 3 bed semi are easy pickings for the guburment to part solve housing crisis

Glad I grabbed a place back early in the year better vacant, those unwanted LLs are stuck now.

And nobody tells you you have to continue renting to other people either.

If the wall is painted, you can't go and strip the paint off it. If you're a subcontractor and you haven't been paid for that freezer in that kitchen you fitted, then you can't go in a reef it back out no matter how much you want to. If you've given possession of your property to a tenant who stops paying, you can at least get it back eventually. But you made the decision to hand it over. That was your bad judgment.

Complete nonsense from you as usual.

Tenants can't really be evicted in less than 2 years, despite all legal procedures being follwed, and you know this.

Just more of your trolling.

I doubt there are many trades people who were partway through a big job and were forced to continue their service for a couple of years after the customer stopped paying. The trades person would pick up their tools and leave the customer to find some other fool.

Normal to decide the rules before the game not in the middle of it.

Becase the legislation changes every few months. Can you imagine dealing with an organisation who gets backt to you 2-3 weeks after you send them an email. Can you imagine an organisation that did some sort of a software upgrade last Autumn and after it you could not log into your account, Can you imagine an organisation where you changed your email address and it virtually impossible to register you accounts.

By the way the same tenants are cribbing and crying about the profession investment companies.

No they did not. However if they did not there would have been one less house rented for the last few years, one more homeless family. Nobody should consider renting any property that they may need back in the short term. However there are people who rented 1-2+ years ago that were going abroad short term who now arefinding it very hard to get there property back.

Problem for a homeowner is if the paperwork is any way incorrect the tenant can wait for the end of the notice period and object and the clock starts ticking again. Even if the paperwork is correct they can appeal on spurious grounds and the house owner has to go througt the appeals process. If a determination order is issued to a tenant the RTB will enforce it, if it to a LL they can f@@k off anf try to enforce it themselves.

People made decisions maybe before COVID and got trapped abroad and government has changed legislation so much that tit is not a legal minefield they finf themselves in.

Yet we wonder why we have a rental crisis. there is 60-70K vacant houses around the country. If half were rented it would definately impact on the rental problems. However most of these are houses that people may want back in the short term. Recently advised a friend not to rent his mother house. She had moved in with them and was wanted to rent it to help them pay for the granny flat they build. My advise was sell it but do not rent it. I gave the similar advice to a young couple who were going travelling for a year and thinking of renting out there apartment three months ago.

I this it's more like a couple of hundred thousand empty houses. I don't think this includes currently unused and underused religious buildings such as monasteries, convents, churches and the like. A great many towns around the country have properties of this sort in farily good nick that could be used as accommodation with a small financial input. It's not as if the various religious orders don't owe the state vast sums in unpaid compensation for abuse etc.

And it was a 4yr tenancy now 6yrs. Without a time machine is not possible to respond to goal posts that change that fast.

Again Nonsense

Smaller Landlords charge market price like everyone else.

Have a go and accidental landlording should be banned in this country.

Accidentally landlording should be banned?

So if someone buys a property that then loses value (ie goes into negative equity) and they cannot get the bank's permission to sell it, and they need to move somewhere else ( far away to get work,or bigger cos they've had kids) - then what should happen? It stays empty? How would that help anyone?

Do that and you will lose the vast majority of cheaper rentals and hap etc.

Institutional Landlords mostly at the top end of the market where the profits are greater.

It's a contributory factor in why supply at the bottom end is disappearing.

Length of notice was given at the start.