Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Green Bay Packers Thread

1828385878893

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Second not much better



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Afraid it panned out more or less as expected.

    There was only one team in it.

    in general the Packers body language was terrible, seemed to drag themselves around while the Vikes were bouncing around, making the difficult catches, the hard runs , even watched Z Smith on the sidelines ‘geeing up’ everybody while the Packers sat glumly in their seats.

    Next week at home will tell a lot but a huge change needed.

    I think we are in for a roller coaster season.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    Terrible start but the combination of missing Lazard, Bak and Jenkins and with Tonyan looking like he was on a snap count meant it was always going to be tough especially for Rodgers. Any team missing their LT and RT are going to struggle no matter who is QB. They probably should have gone more to Jones and Dillon as they were getting a bit of joy but even as poorly as they played they still left scoreable chances out there and it could have been closer. After the first two plays I thought the rookies actually did pretty well.

    What to say about the defence though. I know its hard for one person to follow a player on every play but surely Jaire should have been opposite Jefferson more than we saw yesterday. It's like they didn't know he was a top 3 receiver.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    The way the Vikes knifed thru the Packers defense in the first drive of the game was indeed worrying.

    Way way too easy, had to say ,I think it was that first drive I watched for the first third down play from the Vikes with interest.

    I felt this would tell a lot, would the Packers be gouged down the middle as they usually are or would they get an important stop.

    Down the middle between the hashes, easy conversion by Jefferson in memory serves me.

    Nothing changed much I said and settled in for a long night.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    I'm still pretty confident that the defence will turn out to be good barring too many injuries (Barnes looks like he will miss a good while so that's one down already). Its harder to know about the offence. Rodgers was definitely poor by his standards but how much of that was down to the O Line we will see when (hopefully) the two tackles return.

    I do wonder how would things have differed if Watson had caught that first pass for a walk in touchdown.

    One positive from yesterday was there were no massive special teams issues so long may that continue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    12 is taking a bit of heat over the performance last Sunday. Justified it would appear.

    Its only the second week next Sunday and it’s perilously close to a ‘must win’ game given its a divisional opponent at home.

    Im confident of a win, they can’t be as bad as last week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Good win against the Bears….servicable but I wouldn’t be getting too excited.

    We can’t expect #33 and #28 to carry that load all season. Opposition teams will cop onto that and scheme to prevent it.

    Would need to get a lot more through the air. I realise there are new receivers but the NFC North won’t be a walk in the Park this year.

    9-8 is about the best I can predict at this stage.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    I hear what you are saying but I would be pretty sure the Bears knew #33 and #28 were going to get a lot more work compared to week one and they couldn't stop it. MLF and Rodgers both said it all week too. Obviously Jones isn't going to have those numbers every game but he is well capable of it as we saw a few seasons ago.

    The much maligned run defence is still a big issue but the secondary was much better. It will obviously be a different kettle of fish this week against Tampa but Mike Evans being out helps. Is Fields much better than Jordan Love? Probably not at this stage.

    I think 9-8 is a bit pessimistic but it all depends how the new receivers work out. They can probably make the playoffs relying on Watkins, Lazard, Cobb etc but if they want to go further they will need big impacts from Watson and Doubs.

    Also saw the highlights of the Vikings Eagles last night and its amazing what you can achieve by not leaving a top 3 receiver in the league wide open.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Indeed, but the Bears are not a good team and have a young inexperienced QB.

    As you say Tampa away will tell us a lot, Can we get to Brady? Can we stop the run? Can the O stay on the field?

    The way Montgomery knifed thru the Packers D in the second half vs the Bears is concerning.

    The Bears were within a blade of grass making it very uncomfortable in the 4th Q .

    Heres hoping the receivers can produce a more balanced offence in sunny Florida.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    The young WR corps is going to have to step up pretty rapidly as the season goes on. Its a lot to ask, but as things stand I'd agree with Brendan because of that - it'll be a scraping in to the playoffs and an early exit season otherwise.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yes, hope I am wrong, but it’s a tough schedule and needs a balanced offense.

    Given the set up of the NFL most teams will have the odd ‘down year’ maybe more!! and this could be the Packers turn.

    Was pleased to see #18 step up last Sunday and made some clutch catches.

    Also pleased to see a bit of variety in the O even though one motion play was messed up.

    I think it’s the early start of a new era, so I am resigned to a couple of less than stellar seasons while construction work is ongoing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    I'd be more thinking around Lazard stepping up as a proper WR1 as the season goes on rather than expecting a mad breakout from one of the rookies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Doing a run through of the fixtures I'd be hoping for a 12-5 season. Worst case scenario a 10-7.


    Probably going to be games we'll be surprised they win and a few surprise losses.


    Vikings losing already is good. I was worried they might go on a good early run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    I’d like to see that but I think the lad is too injury prone to make that jump.

    He is a very good player and has all the attributes for a top class receiver, but is he durable enough is the question.

    I’d like to see two breakouts from the rookies, Doubs and Watson.

    They can’t afford any of the experienced players to go down.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    Another thing to consider is that two of their best 5 receivers are probably Jones and Dillon but obviously you aren't going to get any big chunk plays with them.

    You'd wonder would things have been much different for Watson in terms of targets if he had caught that first pass against the Vikings. He does look like a serious athlete but as you have all said him and Doubs will have to step up big time probably by the second half of the year which wouldn't usually be the Packers way of doing things.

    I would say 10 wins is just the Packers winning all the games they should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    A great start to the game from the Offense that completely petered out with 0 points scored in the second half. Maybe it's just my own negativity bias impacting my memory, but it feels like this has been altogether too common. Luckily the D really stepped it up and the Buccs O struggled even more than our own.

    Doubs showing some good potential at WR probably my biggest positive takeaway (beyond the win that is).



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    To be fair that Bucs defence is I think ranked #1 overall and Rodgers' top receiver was a 4th round rookie in his 3rd NFL game. I agree about a common theme of the MLF era seems that the offense can't recover from a big momentum shift like a turnover. 8 or 9 series of 3 and out or whatever it was is pretty terrible.

    I think a big positive is that the defence looks good and a nice bonus is that the special teams isn't terrible. The punting and coverage was excellent.

    The biggest positive for me is Bahktiari being back. I don't think its unreasonable to say if he had never got injured they could have won a superbowl in 2020 and even 2021. 2020 vs the Bucs really stands out though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Very strange game indeed and well done to the Pack for holding out.

    A few questions need to be answered though and I understand the Bucks probably have the leagues best D.

    1. How did the Pack slice through them for two TDs and almost another one and then draw a blank in the second

    half?

    OK I know the Bucks would have taken steps to rectify and are very strong but a full half without a score….not good.

    What I was more concerned about was on the last Bucks drive starting at their 10 I think with, little time on the clock, they were up to the Packers 10 yard line so fast and easy.

    Was it soft coverage? . Was it luck, what was it .

    We almost lost the game because of it .


    Anyone…..?



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    The bucs played more zone in the first half and allot more man coverage in second. Also they had 6 dline in first compared to 5 in second. The packers played prevent defence and stood off the recievers which is a bad idea with tb12



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    Re: the Bucs last drive it looked to me like the Packers made the conscious decision to give up yards to eat the clock, to play a soft defense focused on the sidelines and defending deep. Which just seems an incredibly risky call against a QB with Brady's experience, as the TD showed. Especially considering how well the defense was working before this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    Agree about the last play. I know Jaire was missing but with the top 3 WRs also missing for the Bucs you would have to trust the much heralded secondary not to give up the big play and just play defence as you had been all game.

    It reminded me a bit of Trappatoni's/Martin O'Neills/Mick McCarthys...... Ireland! Get a goal and then stop doing everything good that led to the goal and just sit back inviting pressure hoping to hold out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Thanks lads, that’s basically how I saw it too.

    It was a gamble,that the clock will run out before you get into our Redzone .

    It was extremely risky …smacks of that famous or infamous 4th and 26 against Philly way back when.

    Packers betted everything on Philly not making that play or any big play downfield and set up the defence accordingly.

    They made it on the limit, and went on to win.

    Oooooh……painful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Packers need to come out swinging and sock it to that sour tosser Bellichick.

    I don’t need another nail biter.

    Back up QBs have a history of career games vs the Packers, D needs to lay down the law early on.

    Would not expect any serious threat in this game…..hopefully😁



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Should be a routine W......should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Rarely a routine win for the Packers, unfortunately.

    They usually find a way to fork it up!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Hence the should, Bren!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,636 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Well the Offense has been absolutely insipid so far, hopefully just to make the second half even more glorious....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Poor enough performance again but at least it's another win. Good to see Watson getting more touches and Doubs very unlucky to just lose the ball right at the last second.



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    A win is a win but I could have done with going to bed before 1am and really should have been. There a definitely glimpses of what the offence could be and Doubs and Watson have a chance to be stars if the big time drops are ironed out. Rodgers was terrible in the first half I thought but came good in the end. The pass to Doubs for what should have sealed it was glorious.

    Its like they are lowered to the level of the team they are playing and just do enough but I don't think that is sustainable. They'll have another 3rd string QB next week so can expect lots of runs again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 870 ✭✭✭pedatron


    London next week now for the Giants. Heading over on Saturday. Did anyone else manage to nab a ticket?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    That looked a really poor performance. Offence stuck in the mud, Rogers eventually hit a few passes but his body language and demeanour aren't helping.

    Gary had a fvckin monster game though



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    Yea I think Gary is in the TJ Watt, Myles Garrett etc bracket now. An absolute beast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Ok…. A win is a win and Rogers admitted in the post game interview that wins like that are not sustainable.

    Also admitted he did not play well first half but did better in the second.

    Bellichick will make it difficult on any opponent no matter who he has playing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Just for info, the game in London is live on Vmtv…..wonder who will they get to ‘analyze’?

    Or will they just take the feed from the American broadcasters or Sky?

    Hope they are less annoying than the gloamers they dig up for the Soccer.

    On the game itself, run defense will be tested so we need improvement there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,050 ✭✭✭boccy23


    New York Giants v Green Bay PackersNew York Giants v Green Bay Packers (Kick-off 2.30pm). Laura Woods presents coverage of the week five fixture between the NFC East and NFC North sides at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium. Aaron Rodgers and the Packers are the only side in the NFL who have never previously played in London, whereas the Giants took part in the very first game in the UK back in 2007, beating the Miami Dolphins 13-10, and returned in 2016 to defeat the Los Angeles Rams 17-10. Two-time Super Bowl winner and former New York Giants star Osi Umenyiora joins former NFL defensive back Jason Bell to provide analysis in the studio



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    Ya the feed will be taken directly from ITV. So Laura Woods, Jason Bell and Osi Omineyura (took a punt).

    Anyone else from here heading over?


    Seems to be Pep rallies at Belushi's Bar London Bridge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Getting a bit concerned about this game, based on the seemingly negative approach to it by Packers Management.

    It appears that LaFleur hasn’t ‘bought into’ it totally and that would not be a good mindset.

    Now all this may be pure speculation but anything less than full commitment to the game would be a loss for the Packers, in my opinion.

    Hopefully these vibes are not true and we get a performance worthy of the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    What the fork are the Packers doing on third downs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Packers beat themselves……simple as that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    Wow that second half was bad from everyone



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yep, and it’s not a new phenomenon.

    Every Packers game has been the same this season, turgid, slow, penalties, big third downs conceded.

    Being out coached by injury ravaged teams .

    Serious structural work needed.

    Tis auld fcukkery of “we need to do better” is worn out.

    Time to start sacking a few people .



  • Registered Users Posts: 191 ✭✭boccers


    All of a sudden Special Teams is the most reliable unit. How does this happen.

    Brendan called it about the attitude all week. Like they were annoyed that they had to travel over to the UK and hoped to just go through the motions.

    Aaron Jones comment afterwards about putting his money on himself of Dillon getting the 2 yards at the end is a view most fans would probably share.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yes, what I feared happened. They didn’t come out ready to play and the Giants despite their banged up list did.

    The litany of things that went wrong is sizeable, the holding penalty after the QB sack , the fumble by Amari Rogers, the failed attempt to recover the muffed punt return spilling the ball over the sideline, the inability to defend third and longs, and the general lack of ‘spirit’ in the team.

    Dan Jones had his best numbers this year…..with back up receivers and no name TE!

    That tells you something’s wrong.

    Rogers needs to take the ‘face’ off himself and encourage the younger players.

    His own play was quite poor as I saw it.

    This is at best a nine and eight outfit unless something happens to correct the issues on both sides of the ball.

    They let down the thousands of fans who went to see them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭Blut2


    One of the best RB rooms in the NFL, and one of the worst of WRs, and they throw it on a crucial 4th and 2 🤡

    The NFC North is still weak enough that theres hope for the season turning around yet at least I guess, thats my post positive Monday take on things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,729 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Yes, nice to see that, however, it won’t happen with the same listless displays.

    There will HAVE to be a change in attitude, spirit,coaching, play calling, on both sides of the ball.

    LaFluer now needs to earn his corn as the next three games will be vital to regain momentum.

    Needs to start here and now…. No more lame excuses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    So many plays felt forced yesterday. Opportunities to pick up 10 yards and keep moving up the field but Rodgers going for the big chunk plays.


    Was there yesterday, great experience but very disappointing finish. Just knew the halftime lead wasn't near enough based on the last few games.


    It almost feels like Rodgers isn't happy about his WRs so is purposely forcing plays to them to show they aren't up for it.


    They do need someone like OBJ though.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,127 ✭✭✭cosatron


    just run the damn ball and play man coverage on defence it's not rocket science. Every year we go through this with leFluer and every year we get the exact same result and now he will go back to taking what the defence give us and rely heavily on the run game and will eat out Joe Barry and low behold we will spank the jets on sunday. One thing i will say the refs missed allot of holding on the giants oline, the holding call against rasul douglas on the there last drive should've being offset for holding on there oline, it was a clear as day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,096 ✭✭✭Jofspring


    As mentioned before how many games did we lose last year because of the special teams. That gets rectified this year and everything else seems to have gone backwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,626 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    This game is the fvckin pits.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Well it got a whole lot worse, before a slight improvement! 10-17 now...



  • Advertisement
Advertisement