Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1183618371839184118423690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,757 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Not completely my fault, I tried to include some subtle clues. eg the T-13s and the 'Islanders' (apologies to People from Iceland, part of Belfast and Samoa/Tonga/Fiji)



  • Posts: 6,559 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,132 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    Private Russian Telegram, reports of heavy fighting in Lyman. Lots of 200's on their side. Russian reinforcements arriving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,431 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Putin was f@@ked when the fishermen from Castletownbere ran off his Navy. The game was up then he just did not have enough sense to realise it,,🤣🤣🤣

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,757 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Lyman will be interesting. Ukraine have a strong foothold on the left bank of the Siversky Donets around there. But if the Russians were to reinforce Lyman, there's a slight risk they could be pushed back. A bit like Davydiv Brid down south for the past few months. So I would imagine that Ukraine would want to drive the Russians out of Lyman and give themselves their first major town on that side of the river. But if Lyman falls, where do the Russians retrench to?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,051 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Sure he did, which just goes to prove that it was just an excuse for him, and his plan to restore imperial Russia with him as the new Tzar.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11



    Ukrainian aviation conducted 12 airstrikes at Russian troops, air defense shot down Su-25, Su-24M planes, one Mi-8 helicopter and a drone, - General Staff of Armed Forces of Ukraine says in the morning report

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,203 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The only way Ukraine can ever be free from threat from the Orcs, is if they had a handfull of nuclear weapons. Giving them some would be the cheapest option for the west and is the only known working vaccine for the Orc problem. Nothing else can offer a permanent solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,221 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The Baltic states remain uninvaded by Russia, despite having no nukes of their own. They do, however, have NATO membership, which seems effective at making Russia think twice. I think, on balance, NATO would be more of a likelihood for Ukraine than getting a clutch of nukes.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Apparently yesterday Kiev received written security guarantees from most of its nato neighbors...

    It would only be right after 20+ years from discussions to join Nato they be brought into the fold once the orcs have. Been removed from inside their borders



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,736 ✭✭✭Rawr


    If Lyman goes they'll probably have to pull back to Kremmina to defent the road / railway there. There's not much in the way of settlements between the two. Going back to Kremmina would probably bring the front back to Lysychansk which they I'm guessing they'll really want to avoid.

    If a Kremmina line were to fall, then I think they've got only one more defensive line available before they are back at the Russian border. (Apart from the older 2014 trenches.)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,135 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    While chief orc is currently hiding in a bunker somewhere.

    A real leader of Men is meeting his troops at the front lines..

    Zelensky wears a military patch Ukraine or Death (skull looks familiar)

    Screenshot_20220914-124009_Chrome.jpg Screenshot_20220914-124014_Chrome.jpg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout



    Thanks for this. Really interesting stuff. Makes me wonder about a lot of things...not just in this conflict.

    For example, I always dismissed the idea of a future outright conflict between the USA and China purely because they're both nuclear powers. This makes it seem like they actually could have a full on war where they both lob nuclear bombs at each other's cities without causing tens/hundreds of millions of deaths instantly.

    Also: Wow Russia really are goosed. I mean the nuclear threat was their ace in the hole. If that's not really the massive trump card that their supporters would have you believe then they haven't got much left that they can do in this conflict.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭hometruths_real


    Just for info....Chief Orc is meant to visit Uzbekistan sometime in the coming days... it will be interesting to see if it goes ahead... his pre-arrival party have already set up shop there



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,424 ✭✭✭✭markodaly




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 93 ✭✭hometruths_real


    great read, and something I was wondering too... considering how crap everything else has turned out to be...

    Although very secretive, if you read between the lines on some of the comments in articles from the AWE (UK) and DOE (US) you get the gist that even though they have X amount of warheads, only Y are ever available for various reasons, and would need some time to be made available.

    the American's regularly cycle their nukes in Europe, going by flight data, this was possibly done earlier in the year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,762 ✭✭✭Pa ElGrande



    The Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland) did not get themselves into that position, then again you can argue there was not much in the way of resources to steal. Much of Ukrainian culture is not dissimilar from that of Russia and they do have a shared heritage, its not the Baltic states being invaded today. One thing you will notice about thugs & muggers here in Ireland, is they pick on people they perceive as weak or vulnerable. If you are drunkenly staggering down the street, you are more vulnerable to being robbed, same if you are an old person, same if you are a woman on her own late at night, they always prey on people weaker than themselves who can't hit back.

    This is from around 2018 it is average gross monthly salaries. Ukraine is near the bottom, why is this so? It is a resource rich country with a geographically favourable position. The Russians perceived the country as weak and invaded for the resources. In a parallel universe what could the Ukranians have done differently since independence in 1991 and prevented the Russian invasion? Obviously there is not a straightforward answer to that since it involves a combination of politics, diplomacy and economics. I'll bet if they were doing better economically than Russia, that there would be little scope for exploitation by the Kremlin of malcontent with the various corrupt Kiev governments.

    image.png


    Net Zero means we are paying for the destruction of our economy and society in pursuit of an unachievable and pointless policy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,221 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Hang on a second, nuclear bombs, especially bigger and newer ones, release massive amounts of radiation. It's not just about the initial blast (which I don't think I'd want to be too near, indoors or not). Depending on where and when the bomb is designed to explode (in the air or on the ground) it can produce varying intensities of nuclear fallout to a local area, which is the most damaging thing after the initial flash of high-frequency radiation and shockwave. That's the thing that settles on the ground, poisoning the water and the soil and starts to kill the local people who weren't killed by the initial blast, except it's a much slower and more agonising death. The city of Dresden was not made of wood and paper, but it still suffered badly enough from a concentrated bombing campaign, so I'm not entirely optimistic about what a large nuclear weapon could do to a modern city.

    Maybe a nuclear exchange wouldn't end the world immediately, but concentrated strikes in a limited geographical area would introduce an infrastructural and humanitarian crisis that no country would surely want to deal with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,636 ✭✭✭rogber


    Because it was part of the Soviet Union. Totally different circumstances



  • Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's lucky russia is so big, they can locate the BOMB at one end of the country, and the RED BUTTON at the other end.... just in case.....




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,629 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The things are so dangerous and destructive that most nuclear powers privately know that they can never be fired in anger. They are not a realistic or credible option for any type of military conflict. The only reason two of them were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is that the US was the only country in the world to possess them - if Japan had their own atomic bombs and the capacity to hit US cities in response, we can be pretty certain Hiroshima would never have happened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Darth Putin


    You keep trying to paint Ukraine as corrupt and “same culture” as Russia

    Yet the last six months have shown beyond doubt which of the countries is so corrupt as to be rotten to the core.

    As for same “culture”, you don’t think that’s a bit insulting? Ukraine has clearly illustrated it does not have the culture of genocide, rape, murder, looting and prisoner abuse which the seems to be part of Russian culture (calling these Russian barbarians cultured is a bit strange no?)



  • Posts: 4,503 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Technically I would think Ukraine could have a bomb relatively quickly. Politically I don't think they'd develop one.

    OTOH, if I were them, I would. Forgiveness is easier acquired than permission.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,936 ✭✭✭threeball


    I didn't put forward that argument. The guy who I quoted had 30yrs experience in nuclear armaments. He very much seemed to know his stuff and presented a clear and structured argument which he backed up in later posts when questioned. He's certainly right on one thing, theres no way in hell that Russia has maintained even a fraction of the nuclear weapons they claim to have. I'd wager we're more at risk of an accidental detonation of one sitting in storage than one that actually makes it off the ground. You can be sure as **** the ones the Yanks, Brits and French have work though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I know you're getting a lot of smart remarks in response to this post but that's because people have been staying stuff like this since the beginning of this conflict and piece by piece all of these arguments have been debunked or proven to be wishful Russian thinking.

    • "...Russia is a massive, absolutely country with a hugely powerful economy..." - The first half of this is correct. The second half is not.
    • "Europeans will prostrate themselves to Putin" - No. No they won't. In fact they are doing the opposite by introducing measures for a price cap for Russian Oil
    • "Biden will do a deal" - Why in god's name would Biden do a deal? Opposing Putin is great politics for him and unlike Europe the USA had miniscule Russian hydrocarbon imports
    • "Zelensky will be hung out to dry" - No
    • "This is the way the world works and it's only a matter of time" - Since the beginning of this conflict the cynics spouting such cliches have been proven wrong again and again. The EU united. NATO actually increasing its land border with Russia. Germany altering 75 years of defence policy. European countries throwing open their borders to Ukrainian refugees.
    • "Putin will mobilise and a million more troops will pour across the border" - Maybe. Maybe not. Even if he did what kind of training would they have had? What sort of motivation would they have? What equipment would they be given? This isn't WW2 where they can just throw bodies at the Wehrmacht.

    I'm not going to bother with the rest except to point out that you're using "We" in reference to the Russians. It sounds like you've watched too much of your countries propaganda.


    Russia are losing and will lose and it's going to come as a massive shock to a lot of Russians and their supporters going by the amount of them that are still coming out with this tired nonsense. Perhaps this is the kind of shock therapy that Russia needs. Perhaps it will humble their people enough for them to take stock and demand a different path. I live in hope.


    Edit: Damn you got me. Good stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,368 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Its definitely sarcasm, I don't believe even the most ardent kremlinite would think this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 644 ✭✭✭Darth Putin


    Ukraine does have homegrown Grom2 missiles that can reach Moscow

    Putin would want to think long and hard before pushing the BUTTON on the BOMB as retaliation could arrive in form of highly radioactive dirty missiles.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement