Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

16970727475237

Comments

  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You can't eat honour, especially if you don't have any to start with.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Good for you. Thanks for sharing. Best of luck. Enjoy your hard earned success in your field.

    Edit: those in the public sector you should reject the deal. Look how much the private sector are getting.

    @DubInMeath Does your employer also pay into your pension pot?



  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think they should be paid commensurate to the private sector salaries for the roles especially in I. T. for example and get more people to join, rather than paying a contractor company like Avenade 500+ euro a day for people over periods up to 20 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Tonesjones


    Sure. I dont know anything about that .It's above my pay grade.



  • Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    500? Not even close for someone of any worth (the + doesn't even cover it)



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well that is something you can fix.

    Also just seen your edit to the earlier post. Yes they pay into my pension.



  • Posts: 5,917 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Some of the older systems would only have lower value daily rates surely?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    You'd be surprised. If skills are hard to find the rates go up not down.

    Anyway, been thinking more about this "deal".

    The cost of living increases have left my family worse off. The deal doesn't adequately address this. Not nearly.

    Prices of petrol, gas, electricity may fall (But may not) but it's not just the price of these commodities leaping ahead, it's everything, and these general price increases are just not going to be reversed ever. Best we can possibly hope for is a period of stability - but when? Not any time soon and in the next year or two there could be plenty more pain to come.

    The idea that future deals would somehow make up for this erosion of living standards (i.e. be above the then-current inflation rate) is laughably naive. Not going to happen.

    So this is a permanent cut in living standards. But it gets worse.

    With pensions linked to pay, this cuts my pension too.

    I'll be poorer until the day I die because of this deal.

    And this comes after being locked into ridiculous 1% and 1.5% pa increases leading up to this.

    It's a sick joke.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭LegallyAbroad


    My private sector rate was over €300 p/h. The public sector cannot pay me that and nor should it.

    There has to be some element of public service involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 357 ✭✭LegallyAbroad


    That essentially the same for everyone.

    The odd person will receive a pay rise completey covering the rise (very odd). The odd person will get no rise.

    We're in the middle because we bargain as a public service. Some of us are excellent. Some of us are shite. Therefore we're getting a somewhere in the middle package.

    If we could bargain individually some of us would get the full pay rise but some of us would get nothing.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Per day was what was mentioned. Not p/h.


    We all accept a pay cut to work in PS, yeah I want my work to help general people and not wealthy shareholders.


    But that still does not excuse having IT staff thrown in with public service clerical banding. There's just too much a pay difference to tempt enough. Yeah we shouldn't match but too many people are missed for a few thousand, particularly as you have to come in on the lowest tier of your grade.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Lets be clear the majority of the private sector are not getting pay rises. In fact a very high % will not be in jobs come this time next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Pay cut public sector pay is on average 20 - 27% more than the private sector, where is the phucking pay cut.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭Pogue eile


    Will you stop making up sh*t and presenting opinions as fact with absolutely no evidence to back up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The average in both sectors can been in the CSO data. I put the link up before. The fact that private sector employees are not all getting pay rises in fact the majority are not I have put up links before as well. You can bring a horse to water but you cant make him drink. I hope you lot reject the deal and it runs into strikes. One thing is clear this winter is going to be horrible and the money there for your pay rises will simply not exist in 12 months time.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    Has everyone heard from their union? Not a peep from my one (Siptu)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,878 ✭✭✭Pogue eile


    I am a bigger fool for even replying to you.

    Never argue with an idiot they will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

    I'm done with this thread, I actually fell kind of sorry for you, you really need to get a grip, its extremely unhealthy to have such an obsession.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,518 ✭✭✭bren2001


    I have not received anything from SIPTU via email myself but they only issued their press release on it yesterday. They are recommending it is accepted with balloting starting next Monday.

    All the Unions seems to be recommending it is accepted so I will vote to accept the deal.

    https://www.siptu.ie/media/pressreleases2022/mainnews/fullstory_23121_en.html



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The only thing coherent and true in all your posts is you admitting that your a fool. Good man.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    This doesn't really address anything I posted.

    When the economy is doing less well, we get pay freezes or cuts, more work due to hiring freezes, etc.

    When the economy is doing well (and it's actually doing very well at the moment, despite inflation) the ground lost in less good times is never made up.

    Effect over my nearly 30 years is a gradual but definite erosion of living standards and ever-increasing difficulty in recruiting and retaining talented staff.

    Unions promise jam tomorrow (i.e. this deal is crap but it's the best we can do, hope for better next time) which never arrives.

    The civil service is being hollowed out and it appears that successive governments are perfectly fine with this - for all the shyte talk about "investing in people" and other PMDS-style nonsense.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Assuming, for a second, that this is true.........and, given your previous attempts at maths in this thread, I'm not exactly full of hope that it IS TRUE, Why do you think this is an issue?

    Do you think the average pay in both sectors should be the exact same, regardless of the work involved or the qualifications needed?

    Do you realise how utterly fcuking stupid that makes you look?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I am pointing out the hypocrisy on here . People are moaning saying the public sector never catch up blah blah blah. When they are already 20 to 27% ahead of the private sector. I don't know should they be the same, some on here want to be compared when looking at Tesco getting 10% payrises but don't factor in their employer not being in 240Billion of debt and then some dont want to be compared when the fact is that over 1.2 million private sector employees are getting zero payrises this year. Its the selective nature of the comparison that I have issue with.



  • Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If you don't know whether or not they should be the same then why in the name of Christ are you bemoaning the fact that they aren't?

    Why bring it up at all as some sort of stick to beat others with? For all you know, that figure should be 50% to make it fair.......you haven't a clue what the fair percentage is and are just bashing PS workers because of it, even though you've no idea.

    You look like a raving lunatic with this approach. You might as well be saying "well the staff in McDonald's only get €12 an hour while those in Patrick Guilbaud double Michelin star restaurant are on €40 an hour, it's not fair".

    You can't compare the two, and EVEN IF YOU COULD, you can't use averages as a basis for anything. It's ridiculous, and you've just admitted that you're doing it for no real reason.......why bring it up, then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Will you look at this thread it is awash with public sector people comparing selectively when it suits their pay rise narrative and then ignoring comparisons when it doesn't.



  • Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You've just admitted those comparisons are complete bullshit though? You've no idea whether the comparison shows that public pay is too low or too high when compared to the private sector.

    Why shouldn't they be dismissed?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    I am simply pointing out when people compare that it is very disingenuous to be very selective either we are comparing and then everything needs to be taken in or don't compare, so when for example your brethren come on here saying "well tesco got a 10 % pay rise so I want the same too". I am simply point out that this comparison does not take the whole of the private sector into account, nor the fact that Tesco workers get zero pensions from their employer and their employer is not 240 Billion in debt.

    The comparison from the CSO shows average wage in both sectors and the public sector is 20 - 27% ahead. If you have issue with these states I suggest you take it up with the CSO.



  • Posts: 8,385 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    And I could walk out, tomorrow and easily double my take home, but I prefer the ability to actually have my work mean something and not just add another bonus to some suit



  • Posts: 5,869 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hold your horses, chief. You are not addressing the points being put to you and instead are just grinding your axe every chance you get.You won't get very far in the PAS reading comprehension exams with that sort of skillset.

    People are pointing to companies in the private sector getting X% of a rise as that is a valid, real-world example of companies trying to retain staff and reward them for their work over the past few years by offsetting inflation. That is not selective, that's an actual capitalist behemoth who has acknowledged the state of the economy and raised their wages accordingly. They, and others like them, are doing this because of the current rate of inflation. PS workers are also affected by inflation and using them as an example of how profit-making entities are responding to the situation is a completely fair and valid comparison to make.

    The reason other companies aren't following suit is down to one thing: greed. They don't want to have to share the profits with their staff. If you want the country to be run like that, an entity whose sole goal is nothing but earning money, then lord help us all.

    Your reason for refusing the PS a similar percentage increase is because they already earn Y% more than the private sector. Turns out, you have no idea if that Y% is a real measure of the difference between the jobs and cannot say whether it should be even more of a gap. This makes your reason for refusing the X% increase as meaningless because, by your own admission, they could well be worth double that difference. You simply don't know and therefore have no logical basis for your stance on the matter.

    You are railing against the PS getting a raise simply because they are getting a raise. Logic and reason don't come into it, you just don't want them to get more money. Pure bitterness and spite, no more and no less.

    It is as clear as day that you do not want the PS to get any raise at all and you cannot explain why in any coherent manner. You look like a raving madman.

    The comparison from the CSO shows average wage in both sectors and the public sector is 20 - 27% ahead. If you have issue with these states I suggest you take it up with the CSO.

    As suspected, I think your maths is off. Either that, or you're misinterpreting the data.

    Lets say, for argument's sake, that the average wage in the public sector is €75,000 and the average in the private is €50,000. The difference between those two, divided by the base figure will give you the % increase/decrease when comparing. In this example, it's 25k over 50k which equals 50%. I've made those up to aid with the explanation, before anyone jumps down my throat. Who knows what the real figure is, but it will be a definite, real figure for both.

    It cannot be a range of percentages, like you're saying. It's impossible for the difference between the two averages to be between 20 and 27 percent. It's simply not possible. The average life expectancy age in Europe is 80 years of age. The average life expectancy in Africa is 64 years of age. Europeans live 16 years more than Africans, which is 40%. Note that it is not "between 35% and 40%". it is a definite, real number, not a range.

    Edit: and that's before we even get into how ridiculous it is to use averages when comparing two sets of workers that aren't easily comparable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 172 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,611 ✭✭✭fliball123


    So you think with an upcoming recession and a tsunami of price increases on energy, food and interest rates and you think companies are being greedy because they are not paying pay rises? REALLY? As I say your lot have your head stuck in the sand. Some companies are getting pay rises (they generally tend to be companies not overblown with debt and turning a profit, what are we 3rd most indebted country per capita in thweworld with a debt of 240 Billion, yet your employers think its a good call go give pay rises under those circumstances?) but the majority in the private sector are not as there is a sh1tstorm coming and a lot of companies cannot afford and will not be able to afford the increases in energy, food and interest rates and give more to employees in pay riese and then expect to make a profit. It just does not work like that in the private sector, they dont have an ECB money printing press out the back to turn on. The CSO do a weekly wage comparison on both sectors so your hypothetical sh1te and bringing up average ages in Africa vs Europe is just that absolute sh1te. Its there in black and white weekly wage for private and public (In Ireland not Europe or Africa) no amount of spinning that your trying with that post can be done to misrepresent those numbers. The figure from the CSOs weekly wage has it at about 20%, ISME have it at 22% https://www.isme.ie/public-sector-pay-demands-represent-self-interest-not-national-interest/ and how much will you lot be getting is it 4/5% this year which is why the variation I have put up is between 20% and 27% . I hope this clarifies it for you.

    I am railing as there is an avalanche of indicators showing where we as a country will be in 12 months time and I have explained why they should not be getting a pay rise very coherently. The fact that they are already paid a premium with job security and a guaranteed pension is already a significant buffer over the majority of the private sector. We also have to find the money to pay the pay rises meaning I will be paying more or seeing a cut in some other service or the bill will be passed onto my kids or grand kids. I hope that clarifies coherently my position. So when the recession comes it will once again be the private sector decimated and you lot cushioned like before.



Advertisement