Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M20 - Cork to Limerick [preferred route chosen; in design - phase 3]

1154155157159160170

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 317 ✭✭steeler j


    Irha want to build 2 bypasses and finish the rest off on a later date , that's just kicking the can down the road . This is the last major road infrastructure and it should be done as soon as possible . The Irha are completely wrong here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Distance via Cahir would be 120-130km compared to less than 100km via an M20 option. Most traffic on this route originates on this route. Absolute rubbish out of an organisation that should know better.

    Good quality single or lane and a half carrigeway will suffice most of the Limerick to Cahir route and onto Waterford.

    Post edited by Bass Reeves on

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭cjpm


    Wouldn’t you think the editor of the Examiner would have more cop on than letting that jibberish go to print.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I have no problem with them printing it. The problem arises in that they have done little in the way of a counter view.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭pigtown




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It's what they tried to do at Mallow. There is an adequate section at Cahir. Basically your road switches from one to two lanes every 3+km. But you do it to the same width as lanes in motorway it dual carriageway

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    They are very dangerous and save very little money. As soon as the second lane opens, the racers try to outdo each other before the next changeover.

    Why penny pinch for such a project?



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    TII have already said that no 2+1 roads will be built in the future. 2+2 is the standard to be used between single carriageway and dual carriageway/motorway.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I drove that 2+1 in Cork a lot a few years back. I never saw such dangerous driving.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The I e in Cork is anomaly. It was imposed on an existing road without any upgrade. The one below Cahir is a different setup it's new road. Neither are the real deal where you have maybe 40-60km of continual switching every 3km.

    There is no 2+1 roads build at present. There is just the dangerous thing they did in Mallow and the bit outside Cahir.

    Down the line some of the better single carrigways may be upgradable with minor land acquisition if needed. Newcastlewest to Castleisland would be such a road. There is some up around the west and Midlands. The Knock bypass word be another example

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    The were a number of 2+1 pilot schemes built. The M20 outside Mallow, N2 Clontibret to Castleblayney and the Piltown Bypass. After these were built the NRA decided against building any more and replaced the 2+1 with 2+2 as they were too dangerous.

    The N4 Dromod to Rooskey was to be 2+1 but was upgraded to 2+2 during planning.

    As for Newcastle West, it and Abbeyfeale are due to get full green field bypasses. If the rest of the road is to be upgraded it will be to 2+2 standard (which I think is now called type 2 DC).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Such dangerous overtaking is the reason that the NRA decided not to build any more of them back in 2007.

    However, the NRA found that there was a tendency for drivers to accelerate to try and pass traffic just before the double-lane section switched and that this was a hazard.




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    You may not have seen it, but there are plenty of head cases on the road who appear to have one goal in life and that is to overtake the vehicle in front - even if it is stupidly dangerous. I have seen reckless overtaking across solid white lines to gain nothing too often. Young male drivers are the most common at it - but there are plenty others.

    Now, to build a 2+1 DC is just setting up a situation for such nutters to see a need to get past that car in front before the dual carriageway returns to single lane. It is a hazard we can do without.

    It is a study in penny pinching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭cjpm


    It’s more than that. It’s a study of stupidity



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    The 2+1 new-builds (Cahir is one) are much better than the 2+1 retrofits (Piltown, N20 south of Mallow), but the 2+2 road type is only slightly more expensive and has much higher capacity and much higher safety levels. A 2+2 gives both directions two lanes all the time,and with every junction as a grade-separated one, or a large roundabout: there are no crossing movements.

    2+1, or “Type 3 Dual Carriageway” to give it its proper name, is no longer in the standard design manual at TII, so it cannot be used for any new road projects on the national network.

    N24 Cahir to Limerick is planned to be a 2+2, and the Waterford to Cahir section will probably be too. Nobody is proposing a “motorway” (type 1 DC) here.



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Limerick74




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,918 ✭✭✭gifted


    That the same national road that has speed ramps on it? Only in ireland......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Limerick Foynes road after getting approval. Bypass Adare,onto Rathkeale ( this is motorway) dual carriageway then to Foynes.

    it will be interesting if the usual suspects will try to delay it further

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Was there much local opposition to the M21 road?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I am not really sure. According to the papers it was by some landowners effected only.

    However now if there is no objections the LA has to start serving notices to treat ( purchase and take over of land of land within 12 months).

    This means if no objections the minister must allow the project to proceed to land purchase/ take over or the complete project will have to start again

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,862 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The M21 and M20 could really transform the south west and mid west in terms of access. Hope they get it done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭cjpm




  • Registered Users Posts: 910 ✭✭✭brianc89


    By usual suspects, do you mean Eamon Ryan? I imagine he is in favour of the M21 given the link it provides to Foynes. This will be a launch port for huge investment in offshore wind power. Can't see anything but support from the Greens.

    On the M20, clearly from the Limerick Leader article, this won't advance for at least another decade. What a joke. If the Greens are so sure on their plan (active travel, town bypasses, regional trains) then let's see them put their (our) money where their mouth is.....



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,318 ✭✭✭pigtown


    Does anybody think that the new m20 and m21 when open will cause problems at the existing m7-m20 sliproad? It's just a single lane and it merges very close to J2 on the m20. I can see conflict with trucks especially and people coming from the city and trying not to miss the J2 exit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    It will obviously have to be redesigned. There should have been two slipways first day. However penny pinching decided on that solution. The present solution would not work for the M20 anyway

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    God what a sad country we live in at times. It’s heading into winter, we’re facing the prospect of insane energy prices, if not shortages, and the Minister responsible for these areas is in Matt Cooper’s kitchen preaching about how he’s going to defy his own agencies and obstruct Government policy for no apparent gain. TII have always said this needs to be a T1DC/motorway the whole length, it’s also widely seen as common sense that it has to be done as so. If it’s not done as such, it’ll have to be revisited again at additional cost. At the minute, we’re building a second bypass of Castlebar replacing a 90s build, upgrading a junction in Cork at a cost of €100m+ that was built in the 90s, and we have 2nd bypasses/upgrades in planning for Killarney, Clonmel, Rathkeale, Mallow, Monaghan, Galway City and more because they weren’t done right the first time.

    Such a desperate shame. This is completely at odds with the local TDs as well who, apart from the Green Party TD from Limerick whose policies would in general align with someone who was sent in to advocate policies to handicap the growth of the city, are fully in favour of the M20. It’ll be interesting to see how it goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    In fairness, most of the places you mentioned were always going to need both an inner distributor road and an outer bypass. The issue is not building two roads with distinct purposes, its the length of time between them being built. In the case of Killarney, I can't see another bypass being built, an upgrade with some junctions being closed would be more likely.

    A bigger travesty around the towns you mentioned would have been a Tullamore bypass situation where one road was specifically built for two non-compatible purposes and we will be stuck with that for a very long time.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    That’s a fair point about needing both but they were built with the intention of them being long term bypasses. There’s a whole other debate about development at junctions that could be had there. I take your point on Tullamore too but haven’t used it enough to understand it

    Killarney certainly needs a bypass. The 1990 relief road now starts and ends in the town, it has several horrific junctions along it and the northern and eastern approaches, and the two original terminal roundabouts have been destroyed with development and have no room for expansion. It also needs a link to the N71.

    My main point is, when there’s a colossal sum spent on this road, it should be spent for once and for all. No one is talking about upgrading the inter urbans built in the 2000s, or the Limerick/Waterford bypasses, or the new parts of the M11 etc, which we would be doing if these were half assed builds in the first place



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    IMO it's the last bit of motorway that needs to be built. It's a disaster of a road and an embarrassment in its current form. Eamon Ryan really is the most unlikeable politician in recent memory..



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Certainly I wouldn't be one for cheerleading new roads, but this one seems to be an absolute no-brainer.

    For anyone saying that the rail line should be upgraded as a competitor to the M20, I say "yes please, do that too". But the M20 is needed. It shouldn't be either/or.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    No point in wasting money on a rail line that will not be used

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    I'm not sure which rail upgrades are proposed, but I think they may have ruled out direct-line to Limerick from Charleville. I think it's upgrades of the existing rail line that's proposed now. So twin-tracking the Limerick-Limerick Jn, through-running at Limerick Jn etc. That'll be used alright.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    IMO money spent on the Cork-Limerick interurban isn’t going to attract many new patrons. The most offputting elements of going from Cork to Limerick by rail are getting to/from Kent and Colbert station at either end. Improving that side of things would have major benefits.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Even if you sorted those issues you have the problem with frequency of schedule. Neither has the demand between them to allow the frequency of service to attract enough commuters

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    As far as I can tell, the improvements to the rail line are a double-tracking from Limerick Junction to Colbert Station and, as part of that, some advance works that will make the eventual electrification of this stretch cheaper to achieve later. This will allow more trains per day, and a faster journey times between the two endpoints. The biggest problem with Cork-Limerick by rail is that it is so slow: you have to change at Limerick Junction and then the last section is much, much slower.

    Colbert station is pretty centrally located in Limerick - it’s less than 10 minutes by foot from the station to the commercial centre of the city. Cork Kent access has improved greatly now that an entrance has been opened on Horgan’s Quay, but it’s still a long way from the commercial centre (about 20 minutes’s walk). At least now with the extra space to the south there’s a chance of having a couple of onward city-service buses waiting for each train arrival.

    The current rail link between Cork and Limerick is a deterrent to travelling by rail, even with the N20 being such a poor option - these works will make it attractive for city-to-city travel. But I think that improving the railway isn’t really about Cork-Limerick journeys (any more than improving N20 is about journeys starting in one city and ending in the other). The real gain from this rail work will be to allow for more sustainable housing development to the south east of Limerick city (which in turn will reduce commuter load on the forthcoming N24). This will be one of five planned commuter-rail corridors in Limerick (the other four are the Ennis line including a new branch to Shannon Airport; services as far as Castleconnel on the current Birdhill line; and new-build lines to Mungret and Adare).



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,966 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is only one issue f@@king very few works in Limerick city center. You have a few pound & charity shops as well as the present boom.in coffee shops After that it's the solicitors , auctioneers and accountancy firms etc most of them work from home 3 days a week on average.

    If you miss you train from Castleconnell you be in Limerick walking before the net one and Sixmilebridge would be similar. Adare dose not have the population to sustain a train service and neither dse Mungeret

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    We're slightly off-topic here, but good conversation.

    I think regardless what happens with the M20 Limerick-Limerick Jn needs to be upgraded, as does through-running at Limerick Jn. M20 is needed too, but for slightly different reasons.

    Kent isn't every endpoint in Cork. I'd use the Cork Commuter line to get to Limerick, for instance. And you could have future Luas users getting the train to Limerick. But Limerick Jn is definitely a bottleneck.

    But Limerick's endpoints are a bit of a problem alright though. I have walked to Dooradoyle because it was easier than public transport!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    I don’t recall saying that the existing services were adequate. To be clear now: They’re not. That’s why we need improvements.

    I believe the M20 should be built because N20 is inadequate for the needs of the people who would use it. I also think rail investment is needed around our cities because the current half-arsed services are inadequate for the needs of the people who would use them.

    I don’t understand the thinking that says “we need better roads” (which is usually true) and then adds “we don’t need better rail”. Every time we put proper money into rail in this country, it has paid off. The problem is the same kind of penny-pinching we see in roads: doing half a job to save a quarter of the cost. To fix our housing problems, we need to fix our transport problems too, because our poor transport infrastructure is a major barrier to people being able to afford to live somewhere where they can get to and from a paying job. That means investing in roads, but also in cycling, bus and rail.

    A lot of our problems with transport have been down to pitching rail agains road, or public-transport against private cars. That’s a stupid position, and even if you only want to drive everywhere in your own car, you should support investment in the alternatives, because that will mean less traffic when you get in your car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    There is no guarantee that double tracking to LJ will be part of the rail option proposal. I can't see how it would be justified for the service frequency.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    It doesn't need to be as Iarnrod Eireann have already said that it's to be done as part of their own upgrade plans.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    Yep exactly. Maybe that's gone over people's head a little bit because of the way we had framed it in the context of the M20. The rail upgrades WILL happen, I believe. The challenge is to swat away talk of "M20 isn't needed because of rail".

    So that conversation goes both ways: rail upgrades are needed regardless of the M20, M20 is needed regardless of rail upgrades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭cjpm


    Remember the big deal our transport minister was making about the proposed cost of the M20. And he kept referring to it as a 3 billion euro project.


    I’m sure he’ll have no issues stumping up the €200,000,000.00 that the DAA will be looking for shortly for a fcuking tunnel under the runway at Dublin Airport.

    But hey, cow farts are causing global warming, he’s no problem with all the flights in and out of Dublin.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The DAA receives no funding whatsoever from the state



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,494 ✭✭✭cjpm


    I stand corrected!!

    Insane to think that a tunnel scheme at the airport, will cost between a 1/4 and a 1/5 of the entire M20 scheme including the land acquisition….



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    They're planning on building a 700m tunnel under the cross wind runway to facilitate access to new remote stands which are to be built on the West side of that runway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,754 ✭✭✭KrisW1001


    ... and it will cost so much because they’re going to build it as quickly as possible while keeping the runway above in operation.

    But as already noted, DAA is a private business and this isn’t tax money.


    So... what about that M20, eh?



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Can we keep this thread for Limerick to Cork M20. Dublin Airport is a long way away from the proposed route.

    You are welcome to open a new thread to discuss the DAA and its proposed spending of tax payers money because it is a state owned company and all its funds are ultimately our.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,241 ✭✭✭hans aus dtschl


    This month is getting on now, any signs of the preferred route announcement date?



  • Registered Users Posts: 468 ✭✭Limerick74


    The preferred option was announced in March 2022.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement