Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Donald Trump discussion Thread IX (threadbanned users listed in OP)

18182848687164

Comments

  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,018 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    The crime was him having them in the 1st place , the expediency of their actions may have been driven by a desire to prevent further crimes being committed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 588 ✭✭✭joe35


    It could all be a clever plan by Trump to grift money.

    He took a few documents, nothing of any note, maybe a few letters to the first lady or something.

    Mouths out of him that he took 'important' docs. FBI ask for them back, he says no.


    Search warrant issued. If nothing of note is found in his possession it's a great play for Donald to come out with.


    " Poor me, everybody is against me, I only took a few personal letters"



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,018 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    He's not that smart.

    Everything Trump has ever done has been exactly what it looks like..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    Please don't misread what I'm trying to say - I think your point of view and mine are actually quite similar.

    I'm not trying to minimise the crime of effectively stealing documents from the White House - if anything, I'd hope that anyone committing a crime like this would be prosecuted equally.

    But there is also the reality that a search warrant would inevitably become highly politicised. So the justice department would make sure that there is a water tight case, that they have strong, fact based reasons for a search warrant - as opposed to the more cautious way that they used to address the mishandling of documents for the last half year, by negotiating with his lawyers.

    There is a reason they stopped negotiating, and there is a reason they made a choice to use a search warrant as a tool to proceed, as opposed to issuing a subpoena.


    We can either speculate that the justice department effectively lost patience and started to get more serious about the publicly known, obvious crime of violating the presidential records act - which seems to be your point of view, if I understand correctly. Or my point of view, which is speculating about something possibly more nefarious that triggered the change in strategy of the justice department. We don't have enough information as of now to know which it is, or what else may be going on behind the scenes.

    I, for one, have put popcorn on my shopping list, for when more details come out...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,029 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    There is a reason they stopped negotiating, and there is a reason they made a choice to use a search warrant as a tool to proceed, as opposed to issuing a subpoena.

    trump never negotiates in good faith so how long should the DOJ have waited?

     So the justice department would make sure that there is a water tight case, that they have strong, fact based reasons for a search warrant

    strong reasons that convinced a judge that there was probable cause that a crime was committed and that a search of the location of the warrant would reveal evidence of that crime.

    Do you think they didn't have that probable cause? what is your issue with the warrant?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    ??

    I have no issue with the warrant, I assume that they had very strong probable cause.


    I've read some emerging news, that the defendant's lawyers who have a list of the items seized by the FBI don't even show this list to other close associates, much less publicise it - which might be the prudent strategy, if it would in any way exonerate him.

    So maybe the content of some of the documents was the trigger to go from negotiating to issuing a search warrant.


    When his lawyers returned 15 boxes of documents to the national archives earlier this year, there was a 150 page inventory list of unclassified items, and a much shorter, several page long unclassified list of classified items. Some items not listed on the public classify list, because even listing them is classified, because or the extreme sensitivity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,317 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The DOJ will have to get details of evidential matter the FBI found out to the media and the Archive people may have to publish details of whatever it was Trump DID NOT hand over to it on request to prove he is consistently refusing to co-operate with it by keeping possession of national and historical material he is NOT entitled to possess. Ref the warrant, it seems that some of Trump supporters are now interested in the judge who signed it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    Not sure about that - the DOJ has zero legal obligation to reveal anything to the press, especially in an ongoing investigation.

    We may have to wait till the investigation is over, and maybe till there is an actual indictment, before we get any real information.


    There is, of course, a lot of political pressure on the DOJ to explain their actions, but that's entirely disconnected from the legal process.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    ...and, regarding the judge who signed it: there are a lot of angry outbursts, up to calls for a civil war, among social media posts and public statements of the supporters.


    I believe there is probably next to zero actual appetite for civil war among the supporters. But there is a real danger, that this kind of messaging can have an effect on the most radicalised supporters, resulting in an increased threat to the lives of some high profile politicians, and people like the judge who signed the warrant. Like the abduction/assassination plot regarding Gretchen Whitmer in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,685 ✭✭✭Glencarraig


    ##Mod SNIP##

    Not up to standard for the Politics Forum

    Post edited by Quin_Dub on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,317 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    That's accepted. I'm thinking of some details which are not important to any charges but with value to burst the bubble the Trump supporters and general s***-stirrers are getting airborne. As exampled by the references online from nutjobs related to Trump's fanbase. to the judges welfare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,332 ✭✭✭amandstu


    They might find a use for that in Kiev if it could be lobbed over the lines...



  • Posts: 6,583 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well that is just it, but you have to have people ill, stupid and /or wrong enough to hand over the money.

    Quite often the same reasons for those who post pro Russian stuff in relation to the war in the Ukraine. Funnily enough they also have a habit of cheer posting for trump, LePen, Orban etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,543 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It's about what they can get away with, it seems a bit strange that he would be keeping the documents anyway unless they had some sort of value for him. Whatever the value is, even if illegal, the supporters of trump will be less happy that they have been removed from his possession (even if that value is proof of something illegal or silly he did while president).

    The need to never be wrong about something is what seems to be fueling a lot of this, hence the wish for another presidential run (which looks disastrous for the GOP unless they can bend the laws this way and that), similar to those hoping Boris gets a cabinet position under truss (or just supporting truss at all as the closest to boris).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,317 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    CNN news is running a report [from the WSJ] that an informant told the FBI that there were still classified documents from the Trump White House years at Mar-A-Lago following on from the time Trump & Co handed over some classified documents to the National Archives and that is why they went there with a search warrant. I checked the online WSJ and can't find that report. However it has a report about the FBI visit to Trump's home in June [the officials advisory visit] and advised the person concerned that a stronger lock be fitted to a storage-room door behind which there were government records, after which the relationship between the FBI and the former Presidents associates went downhill [to quote the WSJ words]. It's unclear whether the FBI visitors back in June saw the records in the storage room. Records is a peculiar word to use to describe classified documents but it might mean the records are not all written records.

    In terms of ongoing friendship between Mr Murdoch and Trump, there do seem to be more stories about Trump in the WSJ now which he might not like.

    The use of the word informant in relation to the tip the FBI got seems to infer some-one within Mar-A-Lago is feeding them current information. That notion is probably something likely to increase any worries Trump has about his confidences.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    Maybe CNN got it wrong, and they are not referring to a story from the WSJ, but this new report from Newsweek, which reports just what you describe.


    I'd still be cautious about the quality of the information, given that it comes most likely from associates of the person under investigation, who are, at this time, trying to control the narrative.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Not true. Never suggested injecting bleach. Watch the video, never even said the word bleach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    He said injecting disinfectant. Sodium hypochlorite is a disinfectant. It's also commonly known as bleach.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Will be interesting to see the warrant and the evidence given for a judge to issue the warrant. If they don’t find something big this will blow up in their face not to mention potentially weaponising the DOJ to pursue a political opponent.


    So far the stated reasons don’t stand up to scrutiny. If documents were taken then the national archive would recover those through legal channels as has happened with previous government officials and never with the use of 30 or so FBI agents. If they used the “unrecovered documents” as pretext to obtain a search warrant to obtain info in relation to Jan 6 then that is v concerning for anyone who values due process and rule of law.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Here’s the full video, continue to perpetuate misinformation if you wish.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    From 24 seconds to 36 seconds in that very video he suggests that disinfectant by injection might be worth trying. Don't accuse me of what you're attempting to do yourself.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hydrogen peroxide is also a disinfectant, salt and boiling water are disinfectant, there are several natural remedies that are disinfectants.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    A disinfectant could be many things but most people choose to wrench it out of context and say he suggested injecting bleach even though he explicitly said it would need to be done by doctors and they are looking at many things but the die is cast and the lie is spread so what’s one more person.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    Right, are you willing to inject any of them into yourself as a cure for covid? Also, hydrogen peroxide is also commonly known as bleach.



  • Posts: 821 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    That depends. Under medical supervision maybe. Cancer patients undergo chemo but for covid no because the ifr is so low that risk of dying is very very low.

    Btw, hydrogen peroxide is essentially just water with an extra oxygen molecule.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,703 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    this is so exciting!! what has he been charged with?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭sameoldname


    And if you strip the oxygen off water you get rocket fuel. I don't know what that has to do with anything though?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭Unicorn Milk Latte


    People have told me - for real - that you really have to dilute the bleach before ingesting it.

    Guess it was actually Really Good Advice, widely misunderstood, like so many things he said. Poor guy, so many witch hunts. Many, many witch hunts. More, bigger witch hunts than anybody else. Tremendous witch hunts.






  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,850 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    In case anyone needs a reminder of what he said. I'm not sure how anyone can spin this in a way that makes him look intelligent. It's all in the past though. Dan Quayle has nothing on Trump for just spewing moronic comments.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,703 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22




Advertisement