Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Ukrainian refugees in Ireland - Megathread

1332333335337338452

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 604 ✭✭✭fran38


    I'm not sorry for students one little bit. They've protested for every liberal globohomo cause that is deemed fashionable by media and liberal society ie; BLM, pro choice. But they remain silent on this and won't get the **** off their arses to protest against what is seen as a 'right on' narrative.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86 ✭✭Barbosa92


    He said he will get cash in hand hospitality work and also work as a freelance translator. He thinks he will be able to able to a very good wage as an English/Ukrainian translator since so many Ukrainian people will be settling in Ireland now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,371 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    Supposedly around 50,000 Ukrainians here now…

    About 1% of our population….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Well you can represent stats all you like.

    Using your criteria, I'd imagine that over half of the people in Ireland have an active welfare claim. Do you know that there are about 1.25m active welfare claims by Irish citizens under the age of 18? Your "Ukrainian" figures include all claims for child benefit. So in order to compare like with like we need to start with the fact that that 25% of the Irish population have an active claim. That will obviously increase when we include all college students etc. who are still getting child benefit. Only then can we continue to look at adults getting any sort of payment. At the other end of the scale, you are including pensions too. So that is basically everyone over 65



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Your the one who made claims of working now shift the goalpost. Considering the article is after the date of the data I provided I don't believe a word of it. What Irish people are claiming is Irrelevant. What next how many are on the Dole in France. Someone has been caught out fudging figures Or is the CSO not accurate. Bear in mind only till may. We have no idea how many more are on SW now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Show me this claim I made?

    I posted a link to one newspaper article with figures about Ukrainians working. I then posted another one from June as the original one upset some people.


    You are deliberately mispresenting a figure as if it is the number of people claiming dole. The figure you are presenting includes every claim for child benefit. Every person getting a pension payment. And so on and so on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    The june one is completely incorrect so why should anyone believe figures the papers report. Again is the CSO wrong ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    Not sure whether your logic is deliberately invalid in order to mislead or whether you actually think it is valid.

    CSO figures you quote are for people with an active claim back in May. Those figures neither confirm nor refute any figures to do with employment.

    Do you understand the difference between, say, getting child benefit, and having a job? That one person is getting child benefit does not prove that a different person is not employed. Those are completely different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    No the paper said x were employed then said how many PPS were handed out. As we can see that PPSN out by what 10k. So I don't believe a word of it.


    The minister also revealed that 34,330 PPS numbers had been allocated to displaced Ukrainians and 17,600 were getting financial assistance from the State, as well as 11,000 children who were eligible for child benefit.

    is 34,330 bigger June or smaller than 45,326 in may


    Someone has been fudging figures Is it the CSO ?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump


    What is your issue?

    Your CSO link has 32,400 PPS numbers allocated to Ukrainians in May. Not 45,326. The June 2 article says 34,330. Is that what you are giving out about?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Lol I do believe the CSO site has changed the data. down to 35,725 now..... Well there it is people. Anyone able to pull the cache ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Seems after the long absence the site has been changed. odd that. The data I provided was directly from the site at the time. Departments must be working late. And the 32,400 is incorrect on the updated data on the site.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,482 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    ..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,482 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    How many thousand and whats the break down of part time and full time?

    Part time would still be getting social welfare so that number would be important to your response.

    Throw up a link with the information, seen as how pedantic you are and hate people posting misinformation, so I am sure you have a link to your claim.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,482 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Do you think it's fair for all those thousands of Ukrainans who have to get up early for work to be sharing with students who will be coming in late drunk keeping them awake.

    Do you think it's fair on all those Ukrainian women who will be sharing a room with an unvetted man who will be coming back drunk putting them under threat of sexual assault.

    I thought you were looking to help and protect these people but I have my doubts now.

    Post edited by Boards.ie: Paul on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21


    Are you sure you understand what you posted there about students and calling them rapists?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    With respect, I find that difficult to believe. I have been involved with helping people from Ukraine settle temporarily in Kerry from the start and hear nothing like that. Most of them are half afraid to talk and those that do say little. They do greatly appreciate the help they receive that much I do know.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86 ✭✭Barbosa92



    What exactly do you find hard to believe? That he left Germany and came to Ireland when he found out about free hotel accommodation/food and social welfare allowance? That he is now planning on working cash in hand jobs while collecting the benefits? That he is ungrateful to have escaped his war ravaged country and be placed in Bunratty when he wants to live in Dublin? My post is 100% the truth and said directly to my face by the guy. As I mentioned already his brazenness left a bad taste in my mouth. Maybe your friends in Kerry are clever enough to keep their mouths shut when they know they have stuck it lucky on the generosity of the Irish taxpayers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86 ✭✭Barbosa92


    Was annoyed with myself for not asking why he was in Ireland and not in Ukraine defending his country like millions of other men.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Did your "Ukrainian" speak with a pure Clare accent?


    Are you sure it wasn't a local taking the pi$s out of you?



  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Sorry. I can’t stop laughing. I hope you’re joking. Otherwise the stupidity of your post is embarrassing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,346 ✭✭✭TaurenDruid


    The UK jumped ship because they'd been sold a pack of lies on a daily basis by the Telegraph, Mail, Sun and the rest of the Tory press pretty much since the first day they joined. Remember all the shite about "Brussels is insisting on straight bananas" and loads of other bullshit stories over the years? And the brexiteer champions quietly prepared and have made millions out of it, even as their economy goes down the toilet.

    The UK's concrete jungles are nothing to do with the EU, they're much more to do with 80+ countries in the world having an Independence Day holiday that celebrates getting independence from Britain.

    ===
    boards.ie default cookie settings now include "legitimate interest" for >200 companies, unless you specifically opted out!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    What goalposts were moved? You posted a link to May, then June that showed a declining number per head of emplyed Ukrainians. I only asked how many of them were on lower benefits, under 16, between 16-18, and were part-time. Nothing moved there, just asking for clarification on the types of employment and people being employed. I would find that very relevant, but also within the 'goalposts' without having to move them.

    So of the 9% - 10% 'employed' in May, the whole lot may have had zero effect on the benefits that were being handed out.

    The war is going around 6 months at this stage, are there any plans to reduce their benefits and add tighter restrictions on those coming in? Surely any that were in desperate need to get out of there after 'seeing their homes get flattened, and their villages destroyed' have been taken in at this stage, or are there still another couple of hundred thousand under the rubble?

    Or are we just going to leave things as they are, keep letting them unvetted into the country, as though it is still a major emergency, and keep throwing huge amounts of money at them.... 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Other poster said there were "thousands" working. Cue calls for "links".

    I provided link to article from May which said 2000 were working. Cue claims that 2000 was not "thousands"

    I provided link to article from start of June which said that 3500 were working. Cue calls for breakdown on how many Ukrainians were on reduced benefits and how many are aged between 16-18 and working part time.

    If I gave you that, you'd be asking for a breakdown of their star signs. The original request was for a reference that thousands were working. That has been provided. Nothing was in the original post (by another poster) regarding any breaking down between specific ages. When provided with what was asked for - you pretend you requested something different i.e. shifted the goalposts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    You provided a link from May which said there were 'nearly' 2000 working. That figure could be 1750 for all we know. No matter how loosely it is phrased, 'nearly' 2000 is not 'thousands'.

    The call for the breakdown on how many Ukrainians were on reduced benefits, under 16, between 16-18 etc. was before you posted the June figures showing the numbers working per head declining. I repeated it as you either ignored it or didn't see it. It is still relevant.

    The nonsense about star signs etc. is just that. Post filler nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,819 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    As of a month ago 5,526 Ukrainian Refugees had taken up employment.

    Table 4 shows that for the 5,526 persons with earnings from employment

    https://www.cso.ie/en/releasesandpublications/fp/p-aui/arrivalsfromukraineinirelandseries4/

    Amazing. Hopefully inspirational.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,337 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Suckit, what is the point of all this?

    You didn't believe there are "thousands" of them working. That is what the other poster said. When presented with a reference, and being told that 2000 of them had already gotten work back in May, you want to argue over the definition of "thousands".

    When given a more recent link, albeit only a couple of weeks later in early June, which says that there were 3,500 you go on about the percentage having decreased.

    Now you still want to go back to argue about the definition of "thousands" in an article from May - "That figure could be 1750 for all we know". It's irrelevant.


    There are indeed thousands of them working. QED



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,954 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Dire figures given the availability of employment in the economy. And as for “taking up employment “ it means absolutely zilch- you can still be dependent on real taxpayers for accommodation, food, travel, health, education etc and be “in employment”.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    No, The word 'thousands' was purposely used to give the impression that much more were working than actually were. You keep insisting that nearly 2000 is 'thousands' - it isn't. No matter how you say it, no matter how many ways you try, it isn't thousands. I am not arguing over the definition of the word, simply pointing out how to use it correctly.

    The questions I am asking are relevant, how that employment breaks down. It stops disingenuous posters from fluffing the figures up and trying to make it look and sound like many more are employed than actually are, and trying to imply that they are all full time workers who left their benefits behind and jumped into work at the first chance they had.

    We all know that isn't the case, and as long as they are receiving a months wage in a week with no way to spend it, things will remain that way. They are reading our papers, can see the issues with housing and rent being astronomical. They are reading about married couples having to live with their parents etc. They are not stupid. They can see there is little or no point (other than to 'thank' us) to working here, especially if it means losing their benefits and free accommodation and bills.

    They will sit on their hands, take the €208 handout and go back to Ukraine in a year after spending as little as possible of their free money. But you and others can keep posting stories with pumped up numbers to sell your story that they are all going out of their way to find work and pay taxes as quickly as possible while they are here.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement