Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Mod Note Post #1 - The 2022 All Ireland Senior Football Championship.

1178179181183184186

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    Anybody who thinks Clifford is the best they have ever seen is talking through their arse, and thats the polite version.

    Claiming that Canavan didn't get special attention is just the cherry on top.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    The mark pre wants teams from defending too deep. Take it away and team set there defencive zones 10 Meyers close to goals. All three Kerry marks were superb last Sunday. All were above the head. Two were off the ground high fielding which was exactly the reason the mark was bought in. Previously the man winning the ball in such a situation was swamped when he landed on the ground. The third mark was a ball collected from overhead under pressure holding off a defender. If it's so easy why are other teams not found it. The rules are the same for both teams

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,776 ✭✭✭celt262


    He would want to be careful with that Snapchat doing the rounds off him he won't have a great reputation if that makes the media.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Yeah, if I want to watch a game with the mark in it I'll stick some AFL on. Football is supposed to be a fluid game. If a forward claims a high ball they should bloody we'll be able to do something with it. Lest we forget tackling is still part of the game. What really happened is that lads were claiming high ball and immediately being fouled by the opposition. Unfortunately we seem to have referees that are one step away from the school of the blind and never gave them. So, in typical GAA fashion, rather than police the existing rules they created another one.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭WJL


    Back in 1993 when Kelly won man of the match for Galway, although they lost to Kilkenny the SG used go to the losing and winning hotels.

    They haven't had interviews in the losers' hotel for a while. It facilitated them with giving a MOM to either team.

    Another losing man of the match was John Taylor Laois, getting it after they lost to Kilkenny in the first round of the 1984 championship. He was picked by Donal O'Grady of Cork. A class hurler who lost out controversially on an All Star at wing back to Dermot McCurtain of Cork that year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,237 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    I'd get rid of the attacking mark.

    I'd also add a shot clock to the taking of a free kick. Goalkeepers walking up, lining it up just taking to much time. 90 seconds easily gone before the kick is taken. Just too much. Really poor reflection too that an attacker can't kick a ball over the bar from a 45

    And for all the talk of the mark incentivising kicking the ball in, something that would force attackers to be able shoot well is the person fouled has to take the free kick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Well it if you want to watch packed defences just outside the 21 then that is grand. I take see the two marks by Clifford last Sunday. Just like the two block downs by Stephen O'Brien were brilliant as well

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    Do away with giving the award back at the hotel. Have it announced at the end of the match like any other game. Removes the politics from it and just give it to the best player on the day.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm



    One with Gooch always sticks out to me not the obvious of the 2013 SF v Dublin. But it was another match. I can't even remember the opponent against Kerry. But I happened to be near the front in CP. Two big lumps of fellas were in front of him - Gooch on the ball. Right I said, let's see what he does here.

    The Gooch feigned to go left, then right. Within a few seconds he had ran between to the two players with the ball.They were looking at each other as if to say, what happened?

    I just started laughing. The only other player that has made me laugh like that (with a mixture of pure cheek and skill) was Diarmuid Connolly.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    If he's as good as everyone says he is then Clifford should be able to field a high ball, turn, and stick it over the bar.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭threeball


    Clifford is very very good but he's not the best ever nor do I think he'll go on to be. He was a big strong minor who defences struggled against and he does kick some very good scores but skill wise he isn't the same level as Maurice Fitz and he's not as skillful as Walsh either. He's only just started getting realatively consistent on his weaker foot.

    Walsh is faster, can switch from left to right without blemish and still maintain the same speed regardless of foot. The quality of scores he can kick off either foot Clifford can't do yet. Clifford has other attributes like his fielding but there has been plenty of players that can field and run up big scores. I'm not seeing anything from Clifford I haven't seen before. Walsh on the other hand put together the best 70mins I've ever seen on Sunday. It wasn't just volume, it was the quality. Even the frees were top drawer and off either foot. Yes he has been inconsistent in the past so he won't get the recognition but on skill alone he's as good as I've seen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,805 ✭✭✭StupidLikeAFox


    I think k your missing the point - if the mark wasn't there then those balls wouldn't have gone in in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah Clifford is not a jinky type of player. Like the likes of Canavan, Walsh, Connolly, Gooch, Donnellan. A fella who can go past a player with ease - close ball control. Those are the players the fans love and the neutrals want to see.

    Clifford's game is more power based, fielding, and long range shots. I am not saying he is not a good player. But aesthetically he looks awkward. Now I know awkward looking players can be very effective like Michael Darragh McCauley. Or Johnny Doyle.

    But I feel there is no stylishness to Clifford. His size pace and power, are his most utilised attributes. I think he won't go down as one of the greats mainly because of his injury record. I can't see him staying fit for a sustained period to be mentioned in the same breath as the greats of football.

    Plus Clifford started so young and teams were so dependant on him. All those extra years on the legs will tell. It is not like he has that 'minding himself' slow side to side style Ciaran Kilkenny developed. Which has contributed to Kilkenny's longevity.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,258 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I hear this mentioned but balls were being played in before the mark was ever in the GAA lexicon. It takes good fielding and skill to score from one, well that and refs actually enforcing the rules of the game.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,853 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Please dont tell me you are comparing Clifford with MDMA.

    "No stylishness to Clifford" - Christ almighty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,510 ✭✭✭ArnoldJRimmer


    People tend to have short memories when it comes to the attacking mark. Before its introduction, the best forwards were triple marked out of the game, with little incentive for an attacking team to launch a high ball in, and little incentive for ultra defensive teams to come out past their own 45 when not in possession. Teams should be rewarded for attacking play, particularly against a packed defence, and I thought Kerry used the mark to great effect on Sunday. We're talking about 3 scores out of 36, its not as if we're seeing a stop start game for 70 minutes as a result of the rule



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 601 ✭✭✭WJL


    Clifford reminds me a bit of Jonah Lomu. Power, pace, no obvious weakness. You looked on in awe as he overpowered opponents. When Clifford got 4-4 v Derry minors and made them look like 12 year olds I had the same feeling.

    But the silky, jinky, stepping players in rugby, as in gaelic football, did more for me. Christian Cullen, Serge Blanco, Campese just oozed class when they ran with ball in hand. Same thing with Matt Connor, Maurice Fitz, Connolly, Gooch, Canavan, Ja Fallon, Donnellan, Geraghty etc.

    To compare Clifford to Lomu is a very good thing! But it's the power and pace thing other posters mentioned that are his big attributes.

    A lot of posters are saying Clifford will get injured. I don't think you can predict that. Many players who have played a lot of underage have lengthy senior careers. Joe Canning played minor county hurling since 15 (when the age was 18) and retired at 32. Brian Corcoran played minor hurling for Cork at 15 and football at 16. He was a dual player for years. Took a 2 year break but played hurling until 33. Clifford hasn't had anything too serious bar ankle ligaments. Since he arrived in senior he has been very consistent. This consistency is something that is separating him from the likes of Shane Walsh at the moment. Maybe having that extra power gives you a better chance of making your mark, literally and metaphorically, every day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 889 ✭✭✭MattressRick


    Consistency for years is what leads to someone being considered an all time great. And that consistency needs to occur in all the biggest games as well as the early rounds. Canavan was so consistent and very very skilful plus he did it on the biggest days. The all Ireland medal helps as it bolsters the argument that they dragged their county to the win. In hurling Shefflin was really consistent. Even before the ten all Irelands he was being considered an all time great because of his consistency over all games including finals. The ten medals then led to him being considered the best ever. But Shefflin wasn't as eye catching as other players in the sense that he could score from anywhere for sure, but Canning would be more skilful in my eyes. But it's consistency that is the main currency for greatness.

    Brolly is not doing Clifford any favours declaring him the best ever, it's nauseating because brolly will never stop saying it until he's proven right. But Clifford needs to keep this up for a long long time and if he misses big matches like finals through injury, in time we'll see him as a great, but possibly not the best ever.

    Though I have to say he's unmarkable nearly every day he goes out which is unreal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Matt O Connor was finished playing at 24 after a car accident. He had not reached his peak even. However he is rated as the greatest forward until Clifford came along.

    This was not a sympathy vote. He was similar to Clifford. Big string powerful player that was very skillful. He has only one Celtic cross. He is especially remembered for his display in the 1980 AI semifinal which is rated as the greatest personal display in a football game

    https://youtu.be/snlHd8e7uKs

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,045 ✭✭✭threeball


    I'd agree. Clifford isn't doing anything we didn't see from a young Michael Murphy. And I do think that injury will be a big factor in his career. Those big levers are more prone to damage than a more compact player.

    There seems to be a bit of a crossover on the thread about greatness vs the most skilfull and to my mind they're two different things. Very few people on a world stage never mind a group as small as the GAA can consistently play at a genius level but there are others who are excellent players who can repeat that over and over. Shefflin was a good example. Top class player but his highlight reel would be sparse enough next to someone like Canning.

    You can be the most skilfull player without being a legend just by not being consistent over a long period but it's the moments of magic those players produce that live in the memory. Ciaran Mcdonald is the perfect example. Didn't always blow hot but when he did its what everyone came to see and why he'll always get a mention as one of the best.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,237 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    I disagree.

    Look, there's not THAT many points scored by attacking marks but any time you get a mark just because you caught a ball and get a free chance to score a point is just wrong. Catching a ball should not give you the same benefit as someone fouling you. It's just wrong to be in football.

    I don't think the mark incentivises kicking in high balls at all. I don't think Kerry were aiming to get marks with all the high ball they sent in on Sunday. O'Shea didn't take the mark when he got the ball for the goal v Dublin. Teams often kick the ball in to the forwards, but it bounces before hand.



  • Posts: 676 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We could be here all day long debating if Clifford will become one of the greatest footballers ever but at the moment we should be enjoying watching him play. He is a rare talent. At 23 he is an unbelievable footballer and will probably get better. As a Kildare man I watched him destroy our minors in the All Ireland semi final in 2016,kick 8 points that day. We won the All Ireland under 20s in 2018 beating Kerry in the semi final. Clifford and Sean O'Shea were eligible to play with Kerry that year but play with the seniors instead. If Kerry had both of them we would have never won an all ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    It's amazing to see so many people wanting to get rid of the attacking mark they must be sadists who get a weird thrill out of slow backwards and sideways passing and 15 men behind the ball tripe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 350 ✭✭The Guru 123


    In my 20 years or so of watching football I'd have no issue saying Clifford is the best I've seen. He's an absolute class act, has everything to his game and he consistently produces both a very high quality and quantity of scores. His skill level and physicality makes him virtually unstoppable.

    Don't think there was anything really between his and Walsh's performance the last day so even as a Galway man I'd have no issue with him getting man of the match, especially given that it is easier to give it to someone on the winning side. Two of the greatest ever All Ireland final performances and was a pleasure to witness them.

    I would have big issue with anyone saying Shefflin was the greatest ever hurler. Very good and very consistent player in a brilliant team over many years but there's no way he was above the likes of Canning and TJ Reid and Tony Kelly. Shefflin personified those great teams and is synonymous with them and I think for that reason people tend to overstate his individual performances a little.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,519 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    Ya it's very easy to catch a ball. Before the mark the minute you caught a high ball by the time you came to ground you were swarmed by defenders and conceeded a free.

    The mark stopped defenders from only having to defend 10-15 meters inside the 45. The mark forces them to defend the total area inside the 45 because they will conceed otherwise.

    A year ago I would have changed the mark to having to catch the ball over your head. However again it would allow packing of defences to a certain extent. Remember the ball cannot touch the ground before it's caught and has to travel a minimum of 15 meters. Not as easy as it looks.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,296 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    Um sure you mean Matt Connor, and yes he was a great player.

    Re:the attacking mark, the reward is not for 'catching the ball' primarily, it's for kicking it, and was brought in to encourage kick passing. It's a bit unwieldy, too much left to the discretion of the ref eg how far the ball was kicked but these can be improved over time. (personally I'd have said a kick outside the 45 and caught inside the 20 was a simpler idea)

    It's not perfect, but anything that encourages good kicking is to be stuck with IMHO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,435 ✭✭✭Scoundrel


    Yes indeed tweaks could be made to improve but the game is called football for a reason this backwards and sideways passing is total skilless sh!te.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,853 ✭✭✭robbiezero


    Agreed. The best minor I have ever seen by a mile. Looked like a 16 year old playing u12 at times at that level.

    Also best player I have seen at this age.

    Too soon to be calling him the greatest ever, hasn't done enough for long enough, but he may well get there.

    Has every skill in the game, the only area I would fault him on is his tackling - overly robust and awkward and so often gets a needless yellow card which is going to cost Kerry some day when he picks up a second one.


    Shane Walsh a clear MOTM for me on Sunday, but is not in the same league as Clifford - When you have to say "on his day" about a player, that just takes them out of that equation very quickly for me.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,340 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Only problem is many teams have turned the attacking mark into something it was not intended to be. Your team struggling can’t get momentum? The shrewd player kicks it backwards long to the centre back. Centre back hits it long to the midfielder. Midfielder hand in the air claims mark. Midfielder takes ages shaping up - hand in the air etc. Wastes three minutes hits the ball sideways or even backwards.

    Suddenly the attacking mark becomes the de facto defensive mark. Even when a forward claims a ‘handy mark’ because he is struggling. It’s main impact is stopping play. A fella might as well wave to his family and friends in the crowd while he is at it. Maybe tie his laces as well, And it becomes a slow placed ball contest.

    I was at the Mayo v Kerry match. And I can’t remember Mayo claiming many marks if any. Since Mayo were struggling for scores and could not get momentum in the game, I was amazed they did not exploit the very flawed advanced mark rule.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement