Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Ireland in a Federal Europe and the end of National Vetoes

  • 18-07-2022 7:30pm
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 247 ✭✭Perseverance The Second



    "BERLIN: The European Union can no longer afford to keep national vetoes when deciding on European Union foreign and security policy if it wants to maintain a leading role in global politics, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz said.

    Moscow's war in Ukraine makes unity in Europe ever more urgent and increases pressure for an end to "selfish blockades" of European decisions by individual member states, Scholz said in an article published by the Frankfurter Allgemeine newspaper on Sunday (Jul 17).

    "We simply can no longer afford national vetoes, for example in foreign policy, if we want to continue to be heard in a world of competing great powers," he added.

    Scholz has faced criticism from Kyiv and other western allies that Germany has not taken a leadership position on the Ukraine crisis, a charge Scholz has denied.

    The invasion, which Moscow calls a "special military operation", caused major shift in Germany's defence policy after decades of military restraint.

    The conflict has also pushed Berlin towards a more active foreign policy role globally, benefiting from its presidency of the Group of Seven industrialised nations this year.

    Scholz said the G7 and other countries could work together to find solutions for the world's food crisis, climate change and the pandemic if Germany takes responsibility for Europe and the world.

    He said Germany would make proposals for joint European migration policy, building European defence, technological sovereignty and democratic resilience in the coming months."


    How would Ireland react to end of national Veto's and a Federal Europe?



«1

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ireland would react the same way Ireland always reacts: blind, unquestioning obedience to the higher authority.

    I expect nothing less from the supine political class of this country.

    If this does go ahead, that would amount to the abolition of member states because all the real, significant power is concentrated in the centre - and that means as far away from ordinary people as possible. Ordinary people would be unable to elect or remove those at the core.

    That reminds me of communism.

    If the EU does go down that path, it will signal that the UK was right to Brexit, and it will trigger a new wave of anti-EU sentiment across the continent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Scholz at it again?

    Those vetoes protect small nations from getting bulldozed and bullied by bigger ones.

    Post edited by TheValeyard on

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Oh look.. German politician taking advantage of the situation to push their Federal Europe fantasy again.

    There's a very good reason why the "selfish blockades" occur and are indeed essential - there IS no European Union in a cultural or societal sense. There is a collection of Nation States with their own domestic and foreign priorities, differing cultures, histories and values, and different economic strengths, weaknesses and exposures - many of whom have historical distrusts or resentments of others in the club that are never too far from the surface.

    The EU will never succeed as a political or federal entity for this reason, and attempts to force it through will only hasten its dissolution into probably a smaller collection of alliances. For all the abuse and derision it received in the MSM, the UK's Brexit may ultimately turn out to have been the wisest option, especially with the effects European citizens are now feeling from EU mandates on climate, migration, economic and currency rules etc.

    I reckon the EU won't exist by the end of the decade. It was almost at the point of collapse during the Financial Crisis (before the rewrote the rules and bullied the weaker cohort to save the rest), and anti-EU sentiment has been building across the continent ever since.

    Only in Ireland do we remain steadfastly Pro-EU, but then we have a historical dislike of making our own decisions. After we finally won Independence, we couldn't hand control off to the Church fast enough. When that started to loosen in the 80s and 90s, we handed it over to the EU.

    Sure we got investment and jobs, but we gave up a lot too, are now a net contributor, and those jobs are largely the result of tax loopholes and entirely subject to the whims of the US economy.

    Will it be worth it in the end? I remain sceptical.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ Cassius Yellow Wagon


    I see the EU doom mongers are quick off the mark.

    The larger the EU gets the more unwieldy it gets, so I guess that something like this needs done, but it's only an opener, who knows how it'll end up. Each country has 2 vetos per year, something like that ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,773 ✭✭✭donaghs


    If the EU decided to block ALL Russia oil gas and coal imports, I’d say Scholz would be quick to exercise the German veto.

    There’s loads of articles and discussions about the lack of European demos , hence there not being possible a Europe-wide democracy. Here’s one found quickly.

    https://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/Assets/Documents/LEQS-Discussion-Papers/LEQSPaper77.pdf

    I don’t see a way around this in the next few decades.


    Macron has always been pushing for a Euro military - certainly makes sense from a financial and organisational point of view, but ultimately what is that military for?

    Looking at how France led the charge to destroy Libya in 2011, and has continued to use their military to police the African Francophonie, you can see where this could lead…



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Ireland would react the same way Ireland always reacts: blind, unquestioning obedience to the higher authority.

    Ireland resisted significant pressure from almost every other EU member state, and every single large one, to increase their corporation tax rates and only agreed to it when a global agreement was put in place.

    Ireland is far less subservient to the whims of European powers than it ever has been in its history.

    Anyway, the EU already has qualified majority voting for several matters. For anything that requires unanimity, it would require unanimity to remove the veto.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I reckon the EU won't exist by the end of the decade. It was almost at the point of collapse during the Financial Crisis (before the rewrote the rules and bullied the weaker cohort to save the rest), and anti-EU sentiment has been building across the continent ever since.

    No it hasn't




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,129 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Scholz wants to bring the Eastern Europeans in to line, they have been pushing their own approach too much in relation to Ukraine etc and that has causes problems and Scholz has been told remedy it.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Macron wants an EU military because he wants all european countries to be flying Dassaults and not F-35s. It has **** all to do with efficiencies, it is about selling French hardware.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So, we're back to fearmongering over Europe again. How banal.

    It's not going to happen, despite what the Irexit brigade would have you believe. No national leader is going to surrender their veto, never mind 27 at the same time.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    QUIET SCHLOZ!!! You're saying the quiet part out loud again and making the sheep nervous! I know they say you should never waste a good crisis to consolidate power, but you need to stick to the plan of 'slicing the salami' and eroding national soverignty little by little so that the fools don't even notice that they've sleep walked into a federal state.



  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭I Blame Sheeple


    Soon, we'll no longer be neutral on paper too. The EU Army is going to be magnificent.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I suspect many of these "fools" have a better idea of the competencies and powers of the EU then those crying about this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Coveney has said several times that he's open to the idea of looking at our stance on neutrality. Just what you want to hear from your Minister of Foreign Affairs and Defence.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,929 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_



    Looks to me that there's a fairly significant negative sentiment that has eaten into the Pro-support anytime there's been challenges. It's easy to be positive in the good times.

    The neutrals are a big problem for the EU too. A consistent 35-40% don't seem to give a toss either way, and that's not exactly a ringing endorsement of the "project" either.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Yes. people get negative when things are going poorly. Things were unprecedentedly bad and negative views never broke 30% and it has not been "building since" as it has dropped back to long term average levels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    How did the veto work out with that bailout we paid for? 😂 Vetoes not much use when Berlin and Paris have the ECB put a gun to your head

    Scholz and Merkel are examples of why bleeding execitive power away from nationally elected governments to supranational entities is so dangerous, its too easy for a few key players to be compromised or go rogue. The EU is determined to head in one direction: a fully federal Europe without the checks and balances on power of the American system, imagine someone like Sholz dancing to Moscows tune in that scenario

    We would probably have had more self government under Home Rule than we have now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    "We'll never give up our corporate tax rate" 😂

    "Not another red cent" 😂

    They'll do what they're told and you'll reprogram yourself to support it without missing a beat. It's almost impressive.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,184 ✭✭✭85603


    Using Russia as the boogieman just shows up that its all bullsht.

    That doesn't work anymore, everyone has seen they're a complete mess.

    Russia and its many accidental fires is coming to get us.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Committing to the OECD move on corporate tax rates had nothing to do with the EU. They have been trying for decades unsuccessfully.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    “The veto” had nothing whatsoever to do with our inability to access international bond markets.

    Again those anti eu have no clue what it is.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Reminds me of the Brexiters who voted Leave because there are too many Indians.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 247 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    Additional steps towards An EU Common Defence policy

    Brussels to finance joint EU weapons procurement for the first time under Commission plan aimed at directing surge in new arms spending at joined-up, collaborative weapons deals



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Who said it was, I was bursting the bubble of your man who said no Irish government would cave on a veto,anyway I see he's ranting about Brexiteers again now, even Kier Starmer has moved on at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    This is one of the most brief rational articulate summarizations of the EU state of affairs as I've ever read on this site.

    I was just listening to an obituary commentary on Boris Johnson today, and in it it was said that Johnson did not have a problem with economic alignment with Europe, it was the political alignment that he had the problem with. For all the reams of chatter about Brexit over the last few years, the whole problem with the EU is simply down to political alignment. It's not in the slightest bit complicated what the problem with the EU is, it couldn't be more simple.

    And what kind of political alignment?... a left wing political alignment, which would chock out dissent. That can only end in tears, because it's essential not based on democracy. And if one would argue that is not the case then do you think there could ever be a right leaning EU, if the EU is democratic? Not a hope. That is not to say I'm arguing for a right wing EU, just that I'm saying if it's not possible then it's not democratic.

    When citizens of Europe in the EU say they feel they are 'European' what they really mean is they are left wing Europeans in solidarity with other left wing European countries. If Germany went Nazi again, they'd hardly say they are still European at heart. No they are only European when they feel their political views are in charge and would drop the idea they are European if they weren't getting their way.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    I imagine the conversation with the USA. Right lads the Gig is up you put up the rate or we pull out. simple as simple. Resist lol. Rate seems to Favour the USA now.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    How is it relevant? The Irish government were under severe and sustained pressure on the corporate tax front and never caved or even looked likely to.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    "The USA" is not investing here, US companies are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    I'd be in favor of an EU wide military alliance, it just makes sense. You can't be neutral when the western civilized world is on one side and Putin, China and the middle east is on the other. It took the second civil war of 1812 to change the US from a collection of states to a union, I hope we don't need a war to change.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So basically NATO without the US, UK, Canada and Turkey but with Ireland, Austria and Malta?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    We should be in NATO too by the way but that's another story.

    An EU wide centralized foreign policy isnt necessarily the same as an EU army, not that I'd be opposed to either. We are essentially the baby with the candy, if anyone even sends 10 men to attack the country our candy is easily taken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Thats what NATO is for and its a damn sight more effective than some military grouping that would be run by france, germany and italy, on their current performance



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Well we're not in either right now and we should be in both.

    What are we going to do to defend ourselves, tell sergeant john to put down his cup of tea and toy guns to mount a ten man defence ? We have no army, we have no navy, we still rely on UK radar and anti aircraft tech. We are a laughing stock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Who knew that Brussels could mandate gas rationing? 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,780 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Never going to happen this EU army thing. It will take them 10 years to decide on what language to speak.

    If a conflict started with the EU army and Russia they would still be funding the other sides war machine to kill it's own soldiers and bomb it's own citizens.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    If the war in Ukraine has proved anything, it's that Russia are a paper tiger that can't beat a third world nation let alone take on a first world power armed to the teeth with next gen weaponry. As for China, like the oligarchs of Russia, they are more interested in buying you than invading you. Our real problem in that regard is the willingness of our governments, universities and 'businessmen' to sell our asses to them, that's your real threat right there about which few are complaining (can we kick the ‘Confucius Institute money out of our colleges please, no?).

    I have no interest in seeing Irish kids die in a field in Flanders because some arch-duke in Bosnia gets shot and it causes a squabble between 3 cousins that rule empires. That's where such treaties get you, dragged into the business of others that happens to be none of yours, fighting for interests that are probably counter to yours.

    Recently I had a good friend shrieking "the Russians are going to nuke us!" in my face, all on account of my general disinterest in this war. All because of a Russian TV station’s animation, that was so laughable that Iraq's 'Comical Ali' would have been embarrassed by that bit of bald faced propaganda. Never-the-less, the media managed to whip said friend into such a frenzy over nothing that I seriously thought he might stroke out. This is nothing but fear mongering and propaganda to allow the EU to further consolidate power in their own hands. The very epitome of 'never wase a good crisis' and to make the 1% richer (the 2008 recession/Covid) and the unaccountable , more powerful and less accountable.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,270 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    By July 26, when EU energy ministers are expected to rubber-stamp the new rules

    Somewhat bizarre and deliberately misleading way of framing "when all the member states agree to it"



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    So you identify China as a hostile foreign adversary and, because you have a gullible friend, you wish to return Europe to it's precious state of squabbling powers which would be vulnerable to exploitation by China and other hostile powers.

    Curious.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Those squabbling nations that created the modern world. Turns out that competition is important.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Yeah it kinda took an internal war in the 1860s to cement that relationship.

    Neutrality would be possible if taken seriously like a country such a Switzerland which has impressive military units and infrastructure.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I don't think Switzerland is a great example of very much. Invading the place means essentially cutting through a large chunk of NATO units first and then you've the horrible terrain that helped it stay neutral in world war 2.

    No disrespect to the Swiss of course.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,729 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    That horrible terrain as you call it has built in bunkers and aircraft caverns bridges and mountainsides wired with explosives and high tech gear like the upcoming F-35. And historically before NATO they were neutral and playing off very aggressive regimes with a very robust defence system. Huge gun ownership amongst the general pop without mass shootings.

    If Ireland wants to take neutrality seriously, it should look at the Switzerland model.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Invading mountains and navigating them wrt supply lines are logistical nightmares. It's surrounded by NATO member states with no direct access to the sea.

    There's nothing for Ireland to learn from the Swiss about neutrality. Irish neutrality is nearly a century old. We're doing fine.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    But that sounds like you're going on about conscription? Why would there be conscription? People who want to fight can go fight and those who wouldnt can not. We gain a defense force (which we currently have nothing) and lose nothing.

    The older I get, the more in favor of a federalized EU I'm getting. The half in half out approach simply doesnt work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,319 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The "I'm alright Jack" approach that only works until there's a problem.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,561 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Been fine for a century, survived Churchill's threat to invade but I'm sure Ireland's clandestine enemy will show his hand any day now.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users Posts: 7,004 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Old men sending young men to die in pointless wars to satisfy their imperial ambitions. Same as it ever was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,217 ✭✭✭✭ELM327


    Yet again, there is no conscription and joining the military would be voluntary as it is now. Dont like it dont join.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    Well groomed cleancut foreigner's trying to push their agendas on folk always backfired.

    Happened throughout history,and if you equate the past with the present it's not hard to see the pattern.

    Weak men trying to prop themselves up and going senile in there old age.

    In the big scheme of things it doesn't bother me, but when will we progress and evolve into a more peaceful species.

    The Roman army metaphorically fucked itself out of existence,and we're not far off again by the looks of it.

    Lust is a powerful character defect, it drives men mad....



  • Advertisement
Advertisement