Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ukrainian refugees in Ireland - Megathread

1218219221223224452

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    The dude was going on basically about non-genuine people coming in. No system is going to be perfect. Let's agree on that. So if you want to have a system to help genuine people, then you will need to accept a certain level of scammers. Whether that is refugees or people claiming the dole or any other system.

    The scammers are part of the price you pay for having the system in place to help the genuine. You can go ahead and put all your checks into place. I'm not talking about the checks.

    Ultimately the only way to guarantee no scammers is to help nobody. For refugees, send them all back. For unemployed, abolish dole. Apply it to whatever you want. At what level of "fraud" would you just say "no more. system is scrapped". That is what I am trying to ascertain from the poster. At what level of fraud would he say "no more refugees".

    It's a simple philosophical question. It doesn't depend on the names of the imaginary people or what they had for breakfast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    No genius. I'm asking a philosophical question. You're only confusing yourself by trying to make it specific before you understand it.

    After you think about the general question, then you can later apply it to your Ukrainians or Sudanese or Syrians or whoever you want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Simple. If you are not from a place currently in a conflict situation make room for people who are. Would be a minimum easily found out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Again, you are adding your own details to the question which were not in the question. The question is that there are X people. You know for certain that 10 are genuine. X-10 are not. But you have no way of knowing which is which. At what number X do you send them all home?

    Your response is basically "send the non genuine ones home". The scenario told you that you cannot tell which is which.

    If you were tasked to write a student essay on the matter, you'd be getting zero marks. Not even attempt ones.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 687 ✭✭✭Subzero3


    How about letting the government of Poland or which ever city they arrived in worry about that.


    If people fancy driving from Kiev to Ireland its for economic reasons. We are at the opposite side of Europe and yet they drag kids along with them as they know we (tax payer) will give them FREE money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    But we don't live in the theoretical in this situation. As a thought experiment to gauge empathy or some other motivation fair enough.


    Basic stuff like X says their From x where there is a local war.

    Ok X name a local landmark. Local River. Local school you went to. Enough Questions to let lies slip in and not able to corroborate Information. Generating enough information to determine whether they are Genuine. All done in the Language they claim to speak. Or would that be to outside the box. Interviewer has access to the web.


    Add In traps. Oh I see X landmark is very popular from another country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,325 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    It has nothing to do with empathy. Given you are still having difficulty, you can assume that you started with a million billion people claiming to be refugees. You went through them all and tried to check all of their details and all of their passports. When you get to the end, you now have X left whom you cannot verify their identities or background. Of that X, you know that 10 are genuine. X-10 are scammers. You just can't tell which ones. At what value of X do you change between sending them all back or keeping them all. X can be 10 if you want to. In that case, you know they are all genuine cases, they just don't have papers.

    Does that help?



  • Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah Donald your talking nonsense man, sure we can all dream up hypothetical philosophy stuff in our heads and paint a pretty picture of whatever it is we're trying to say.

    We no nothings perfect and there is always going to be a few scammers in life.

    But there are people put into jobs and paid a decent salary here to figure out that stuff. Like Lessons to be learnt from other country's, how do they do it, what to watch out for etc. Imagine chancing your arm getting into Australia or New Zealand or North Korea, you'll be shown departure gate fairly lively.

    Your point is that because we can't figure out who is genuine or not that we should just presume everyone is genuine and let them in, or if not genuine just send them back?

    How about you think of something philosophical to how we deal with it. What would you do if you were in charge?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    Why I gave specifics. In the situation of no papers the questions I gave above would allow you to find out if they were from where they claim. Very simple. If they are not able to answer questions of where they are from they are clearly not from there.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's very simple Donald, if they cannot verify that they are genuine then they don't deserve the benefit of the doubt.

    If I went to drive a lorry I'd have to prove to someone, somehow that I'm qualified to do it, if I can't then I won't be allowed do it would I?

    Same principles as with immigration. Its entirely the fault of the Government sending out the wrong message.

    That they are bringing in anybody claiming to be from Ukraine from wherever without checks is of course gonna have people from other shitholes chancing there arm.

    If word wad that to get into Ireland is dependant on tough border checks, then those chancers probably wouldn't waste their time.

    If Australia or USA came out tomorrow that the borders are open with min checks, I'd probably chance my arm aswell.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 107 ✭✭Moragle


    Helicopter in the winter to tory the boat can't go a lot of the time. 18 to arranmore went there's 4 left. Again the 4 are genuine refugees the others wanted a bigger town. You couldn't write it



  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ireland has taken far more per capita than almost any other country.

    Is there data available on that because that doesn't seem even remotely correct



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    It is not correct Ireland has taken in far more than per capita, far from it, what our government have actually done is taken in more than this country can reasonably cope with and thats abundantly clear. The 10.5K in emergency Accommodation, Thousands on housing waiting lists, Those struggling to purchase a home and the many trying to find a home to rent could have told government, if asked, last March, this is Bonkers.

    THE UK"S RESPONSE.

    I saw mention of the UK"S response earlier ON in the Thread and there's a number of points to be made.

    Firstly the UK gov was roundly critised for its initial approach, at the time it seemed sexy to do so after all everyone else was consumed by virtue signalling. Who's critising their approach now 🤔 very few. They did what I believe was a sensible thing, processed applicants before they even left Ukraine or from other countries. They had strict rules and essentially introduced a Visa application process or Host requirement criteria.

    Secondly the UK was under no obligation to admit anyone, the are no longer EU members.

    Thirdly, the actual numbers actually admitted is very difficult to pin down as unlike Irish media, UK media rarely focus on the numbers, infact you'll find few fluff pieces in UK media. The government there do tend not to discuss the matter, it's not a priority, Shipping arms to Ukraine is.

    Fourthly, it is believed somewhere in the region of 140k visa's have been issued but the actual numbers of arrivals far less, perhaps 80k but data hard to pin down, it is actually believed the ratio of Ukrainian refugees to UK population is 10 per 10,000. I suspect this is because of realisation there'll be no hand outs in the UK and they'll send you home in a heart beat, I don't believe they permit access to Non Ukrainian citizens either but open to correction.

    Finally the actual supports offered are primarily focussed on Hosts and Relatives hosting Ukrainian refugees get NO supports. There's very basic SW allowances paid to Ukrainian refugees and the UK government certainly did not get involved in Renting hotels and offering accommodation to any one.

    It's not really wise to compare the UK"s approach, it's a non EU member state. There has been Obvious Hypocrisy, Billions in Military aid to Zelenskyy and in reality very little support for Ukranian Refugees, something Zelenskyy has been very quite about.

    Whilst the UK"s asylum policy re Rwanda are utterly appalling and there's little I'd agree with when it comes to conservative politics, I find it objectively difficult to find fault with their Ukrainian Refugee Policy and let's not forget they have very good reason to protect their borders.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,869 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    I think I will give your hypothetical reply a big X



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,215 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The UK are giving more support to Ukraine than most of the other European countries. They are giving them weapons and training. There is a reason that Zelensky always praised Boris Johnson. He knew that the UK were supporting Ukraine as really needed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I think Questions of X by a Number of who may be Genuine and X who may not be Genuine raises the most fundamental flaw with an EU directive drawn up over 20 years ago.

    How it was even remotely possible to permit, essentially unfettered access and I might add there was raging conflicts around the world, Numerous terrorist attacks on cities all over Europe and elsewhere at the time this Directive was formulated, its quite unbelievable and extraordinary.

    Let's not forget Putins attacks, covertly in a number of states, assassinations and infiltration into Ukranian society. Whilst of course doubtful any Terrorists or extremists have gained entry how in heavens name do we know there's not been.

    This Directive has also offered a golden opportunity for undesirables to head to an island nation and lay low for possibly years and get paid for the privilege. I've said it before, I'll say it again, I've absolutely no doubt some seriously questionable inviduals have literally had the door opened to them and let's be blunt, our security services have neither the resources or capabilities to look into any potential dodgy characters.

    This only one of many flaws in this absurd EU directive.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,086 ✭✭✭conorhal


    It realty isn't. How can people like yourself not see that it is actually the price you pay for having a broken asylum system that is run by idiots who stubbornly refused to fix it while at the same time stubbornly refusing to deport even that broken systems failed applicatants?

    'Tent town' shouldn't be set up for people fleeing a war, it should be where we warehouse those waiting for their one way flight home when their attempt to circumvent our immigration system has failed.



  • Posts: 17,847 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    More silly assumptions that some will take as Gospel.

    FYI, I’m an OAP. Retired after working for 50 years, with two brief spells on the dole. I volunteer in my community, roughly 6 hours a week, helping where I can, who I can and counting my blessings that I’m able to.

    I detest unfounded, unverifiable “facts” that are clearly anything but!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    We could give the job to an NGO vetting people with the hard questions. As you know it's not in their interests to have bogus seekers taking resources from actual seekers. Oh wait then we would only have One NGO. 🤣



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I've actually pointed out that Hypocrisy, did you miss it 🤔 I care not a Jot about Boris's financing of Zelenskyy"s war, which incidentally has achieved little, Boris has used this conflict shamelessly to deflect from his own struggles politically at home, that didn't end well did it.

    My points were primarily about the UK"S Policy and lack support of Ukranian Refugees and pointing out their approach to not permitting unfettered access and free for all.

    If time allows, compare a Map of what Russia Controlled of Ukraine last February and the most Recent Map of what they control today. They've actually gained Territory and initially it was the Ukranians alone that Repelled Russia, what's now happening is They are being helped maintain a stalemate, that's fine in itself but look at the consequences to the world economy.

    Time for some serious talking is long over due, wether its palatable or not.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭EOQRTL


    Interesting post from a lad i know on facebook who drives for a minibus company in Dublin that does school runs for kids during the school year. They got a short term contract for 4 weeks for 5 of the buses and drivers to do runs from Dublin airport to various locations around Ireland for refugees. Now he was told on Monday of last week it was Ukrainian refugees but he say's the minibuses are carrying 60-70% black people who are obviously from Africa or the middle east. This alone is surprising for me but what is more surprising is the fact he posted it's mostly men and not women and children which he expected to be transporting.

    What the flip is going on here? Have our borders totally collapsed and it's a free for all?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    IIRc the UK took a more pragmatic approach. Visa from a safe country yeah your not getting a place. Visa from Ukraine we will think about it. not saying the latter is acceptable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    There absolutely no Liason with the Ukrainian Government, its barely functioning and there's literally no way to liaise, check or verify anything.

    It would be easier to get info from Martians than from Zelenskyys government and even if there was info to be had, could any of it be seriously believable 🙄

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 331 ✭✭pauly58


    Here's the definition of insanity https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-40919444.html

    No plans to limit numbers, Christ I thought Biffo's Government were the worst we have had, nothing on these muppets.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl


    We know this the other poster was living in cloud land. Why I brought up bank accounts and alike. They know their talking nonsense They know they are. just gov good and all that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,273 ✭✭✭xxxxxxl




  • Posts: 15,801 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    With it looking like another offensive is going to be launched from Belarus, its highly likely we're going to see another large volume of Ukrainians being displaced and leaving Ukraine,especially if Kyiv is the target.

    Kyiv alone has a population of nearly 3 million. If Russian attack strategy is maintained, then expect to see massive artillery barrages aimed at causing civilians to flee in large numbers.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    There are just somethings that are so blindingly obvious as to what's going on, you'd think no explanations required 😉

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,197 ✭✭✭✭Dempo1


    I'd be surprised if the cowardly and Bankrupt Belarus would have the wherewithal to to manage a game of Tiddly Winks let alone be of any use to Putins war plans. Of course they are beholding to Putin and just a puppet state. If folks want to understand real hardship, vist Belarus, I have and its an appalling place and it's citizens have been brutalised by that pig Alexander Lukashenko for decades.

    Alexander Lukashenko is to busy watching his own back and worried about civil unrest in his own country, He will of course continue to kiss putins backside but has mad as he clearly is,, he knows his limitations, a vile cretin who only thinks about himself and his cronies.

    Is maith an scáthán súil charad.




This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement