Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Covid vaccines - thread banned users in First Post

1160161163165166251

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,330 ✭✭✭✭drunkmonkey


    You've a third claim though, the numbers would be higher if not for the vaccine.

    They're stating all had a vaccine. There are no unvaccinated in the figure I presume the refrence is to.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You have an OCD-like obsession with attributing exact figures or predictions to people, where only estimations can be made. You're also desperate to constantly link everyone here to the same opinion. The "he says a bit differently / why is he wrong?" tactic is very transparent and boring. I never said "40k deaths". I merely said that technically we could both be correct, after you claimed one of us must be wrong. Stop obsessing over exact figures and grouping everybody together.

    Who made you the judge and authority around here, anyway? You're lucky we even talk to you, so pipe down trying to control everything.

    As for you "keeling over" suddenly, I'd say you're more likely to just gradually rot away at that computer desk, lol. We're internet anons in a CT forum; relax yourself and have a sense of humour sometimes. I genuinely hope you make it another few years at least. Long Live The King 😄👍🏻



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    More rambling that's becoming increasingly unhinged and a little creepy.


    I didn't ask you for exact numbers I asked you for ballpark figures.

    You aren't able to even do that. You deliberately keep things vague so you have the maximum amount if room to weasel around things.

    You dot even have the conviction of your beliefs to disagree with you fellow anti vaxxer.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Dude, you're an absolute weirdo. Get off the computer and get a life. On here 24/7, ya saddo, hahaha.

    See ya later 😄👍🏻



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    You wrote that I insinuated Epstein was a "decent guy", and that I "defended" him. Now that you've found the comment you've quickly changed that. If you want to continue that, the thread is right there.

    You think at least 100,000 people have been killed/maimed due to the vaccines, alright, what is that figure based on?

    Do you think you have spotted something that global medical professionals have missed?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,189 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Just to check, you are going with the official figures that around 7,500 have died in Ireland as a result of Covid?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol yup. More ranting and insults because you can't address points.

    And again utter silence from the other conspiracy theorists about your claims and behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,181 ✭✭✭patnor1011


    No matter what you say they are always trying to be offended. And when you do not respond to childish baiting you are "dodging questions" 🤣🤣🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol of course you're supporting him now because he's railing about people you get upset by.

    But should we suggest that you support the rest of his claims, you will pitch a fit.

    People accuse you of dodging questions because you dodge questions.

    People accuse you of lying, because you lie.


    For example:

    Do you agree with his claim that the vaccines have killed or seriously harmed 100,000 people to 5 million people?


    Now watch as you dodge this very simple yes or no question.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The irony is, I'm probably paying for him to be on here 24/7 😄😄😄



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    "The vaccine programme in Ireland has progressed rapidly over the past few months with the majority of the population having received at least one dose of a vaccine by the end of June."

    "The arrival of the Delta variant in Ireland which was confirmed in June and the potential increase in infections due to the higher transmissibility of this strain. While there is still some debate as to whether the Delta variant has a similar fatality rate as previous variants, it is reasonable to expect more cases in general might contribute to an increase in deaths."

    Speculation which turned out to be false. As I've said we know the deaths from COVID. They don't account for the rise in deaths from June 2021 onwards.

    Unless you want to admit now that the vaccine rollout was a complete failure. How would you get a rise in deaths AFTER a vaccine rollout if was 100% effective?

    How could the outcome get worse AFTER vaccination than before?

    The deaths are still rising into 2022. What is causing the excess mortality?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Do you genuinely think Gates was regularly hanging around with a known convicted pedo and child sex trafficker simply to "raise money for global health"? What a noble duo 😄

    You seemed to accept his excuse and explanation of "in hindsight it was a mistake". Are you that naive and stupid? Even Melinda did a runner when this came out 😄

    Let me spell this out for you: anybody knowingly hanging around with a pedo child trafficker on his pedo island, is a POS himself.

    You and your beloved "philanthropist" 😄 Gullible fool.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    "The age adjusted figures taking into account population demographic changes dont show excesses for the rest of 2021."

    You can manipulate the data anyway you want. It is literally straight in front of you. A clear signal above 6 previous years!



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Wrong again. I said 40k.

    I'm not sure what platform you think you are on but posters are individuals we don't know each other and each has there own viewpoint and set of of opinions. Attempting to lump us all together could be construed as a conspiracy theory.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Yes, I think that's the current official figure since March 2020. Although I would dispute it since "within 28 days of a + test" is in no way an accurate or appropriate way to count.

    Most occurred in 2020, almost 5000. We had less COVID deaths in 2021. Entirely predictable as the virus mutates to be more infectious and less deadly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    OK. So then you believe that Dr frosts number is false.

    Is that an accurate assement?


    As I've pointed out you guys don't challenge each others claims and you refuse to give direct aanswers when you're asked what you believe.

    If you don't want to be lump in with other conspiracy theorist maybe stop being vague about what you believe, stop avoiding questions and start actually addressing things.


    And no, that's not something that could be construed as a conspiracy theory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Is this another fall back to you childish claim that people who don't believe you are paid to disagree with you by a global conspiracy?

    Or is it another insult on your part?


    Don't veil your personal attacks man. Have the spine to make them directly.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The insinuation is that you're on the dole (or disability) and my taxes are paying for you to be here 24/7 annoying people 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Yup. Another childish insult then cool.


    That's about all you guys have it seems to defend your beliefs and explain why you aren't posting all of your "not conspiracy theories" on the medical or science forum.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    I have never been vague. I stand over my own claims that I have produced plenty of evidence and sources for.

    If I have a problem with DrFrost I will take it up with that poster. It's got nothing to do with you.

    Now instead of meandering around with this futile nonsense perhaps you would like to address the question surrounding the necessity for children to take the vaccine. A question you have studiously avoided for days now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,885 ✭✭✭✭astrofool


    It was and you're still missing it ;) You just need to agree you're wrong if positive confidence intervals were found to see it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    See you dodged the question yet again.

    I asked if you believe his number was false. You can't directly say this.

    So I can only assume that you do believe his number is correct. Or did since you are now claiming a different number.

    If this isn't the case, just state you believe his number is false. It's not hard.


    And I have addressed your question. Several times.

    It's a silly tactic you're trying to use.


    But tell you what, of you state directly you believe Dr frosts number is wrong, I'll answer any question you'd like.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,162 ✭✭✭hometruths


    So you keep saying, but have yet to post any evidence of this claim, hence it can be dismissed as nonsense.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Lol, exactly. This guy acting like he's the moderator or chairperson of the chat. Constantly trying to bunch individual's opinions together with his "so you don't agree with poster x" bollox, lol. It clearly stems from some need for a sense of order and control, which he didnt/doesn't get in his actual life. If he put even half the effort he makes here into something productive, he'd of done alright in life.

    But instead we get stuck with him 24/7 trying to 'patrol' the forum 😄 I'd suggest we collectively put him on 'ignore', but a mod told me before that not engaging with everyone is frowned upon. Like your teachers telling you back in school that you had to include the 'special' kid in any activities, even though nobody wants him around. Lol, God bless him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob




  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    You have "addressed" it by avoiding it. To be clear I would like you to answer it, not address it.

    I am not here to defend any other poster. That is just something you dreamed up in your head in order to avoid answering questions. A straw man if you will.

    You have lost all credibility at this stage.

    I'm out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    He's very close to getting an ignore from me if he keeps up this ridiculous claptrap. He's just trolling at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol You keep misusing terms man.

    That's not what a strawman is.

    A good example of a strawman is how you were suggesting people believed that the vaccine was 100% safe and effective. No one claims that.


    Conspiracy theorists here however have been claiming all sorts of ridiculous **** and you are unwilling and unable to state that.

    You are forbidden by this weird conspiracy theorist rule to disagree with your fellows.


    And I told you, I'll answer whatever question you like if you just state in clear terms that you believe drfrost's figure is wrong.

    You could also agree with it and admit your previous objections were wrong. Either way is fine.


    But you won't. You can't disagree with him. You aren't allowed.


    So, Yea, I'm going to lump your false figure that's based on lies in with him false figure that's based on lies. It doesn't really matter in the long run.

    The fact it's only a difference of 60,000 deaths doesn't really effect the fact their both made up numbers.

    The difference doesn't effect the fact those figures expose the hypocrisy in you position where you're dismissing the much greater risk from covid.


    Also, what credibility have I lost?

    You guys have been accusing me of being a shill, being unemployed, having mental issues, being autistic and endless other things.

    What credibility did I have among the conspiracy folks before?



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    I'm hearing reports that Pfizer have pulled out of Uruguay rather than submit the requested documents. To be confirmed.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Jesus wept. That is a terrible example. People were TOLD it was a 100% safe and effective. How many believed it I have no idea. That is not a straw man argument:

    • Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 95.3% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
    • Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent

    This is where the Muppets were quoting from.

    Must I link to the video of Joe Biden (among others) stating that if you take the vaccine you won't get COVID?

    It's embarrassing at this stage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol. Yea, more good examples of strawmen.

    You are misrepresenting statements to claim they say things they don't.

    For example, look at the link you posted. 91.3 is less than 100.

    You either know this and you're doing it deliberately. Or you don't understand that's what you're doing. Either way, no point it explaining it to you.


    And again, why bother when you'll just ignore and avoid and dodge when things get too difficult for you?



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    We could all do with a good laugh. Why don't you search for "100% safe and effective" in YouTube. YT has been scrubbed clean of any of that nasty anti vaxxer stuff you banging on about.

    It's a safe space 🙄



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    in fairness, they've picked apart numerous points which have either been left unanswered, or just descended into name calling... your post is case and point, where you've assumed a collective opinion of a poster, as if you are the chairperson, it's kind of ironic...



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Also 100 = 100. It's down there at least twice.

    I guess Joe forgot to mention the 95.3%



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    they were actually correct, the vaccine was very effective preventing symptomatic COVID for the original and Alpha variants...

    unfortunately mutations happen, and the vaccine isn't as effective in preventing symptomatic cases, much like getting the bird flu vaccine, then complaining it doesn't work when you catch swine flu.

    Your biology knowledge is embarrassing.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,442 ✭✭✭bad2thebone


    Absolutely shocking to say the least. Lies and more lies being told to the people. The land of the free, freedom from responsibility too I see.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    They pulled out of India as well earlier in the year. Failed to meet local drug regulator's requirement for local safety study. That's 1billion+ potential customers.

    "The U.S. company, which was the first drugmaker to seek emergency approval in India for its vaccine developed with Germany’s BioNTech, made the withdrawal decision after a meeting with India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) on Wednesday.

    The drug regulator said on its website its experts did not recommend the vaccine because of side effects reported abroad were still being investigated. It also said Pfizer had not proposed any plan to generate safety and immunogenicity data in India.

    Based on the deliberations at the meeting and our understanding of additional information that the regulator may need, the company has decided to withdraw its application at this time,” Pfizer said in a statement.



    Keep Calm and Trust The Science



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,323 ✭✭✭✭King Mob


    Lol

    Yes. And they explain what they mean and the context of it.

    Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 95.3% effective in preventing severe disease as defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

    Vaccine was 100% effective in preventing COVID-19 cases in South Africa, where the B.1.351 lineage is prevalent

    Preventing severe disease is not the same as preventing infection.

    Preventing COVID in one variant doesn't mean that it is equally as effective to variants that come later.


    There's some other numbers in that link. Did you miss them?

    Particularly this one on the top of the article:

    Analysis of 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 demonstrates BNT162b2 is highly effective with 91.3% vaccine efficacy observed against COVID-19, measured seven days through up to six months after the second dose

    Or perhaps the headline:

    Pfizer and BioNTech Confirm High Efficacy and No Serious Safety Concerns Through Up to Six Months Following Second Dose in Updated Topline Analysis of Landmark COVID-19 Vaccine Study

    High efficacy isn't 100% effective.


    Results from this analysis of 46,307 trial participants build upon and confirm previously released data and demonstrate strong protection against COVID-19 through six months post-second dose. From the 927 confirmed symptomatic cases of COVID-19 in the trial, 850 cases of COVID-19 were in the placebo group and 77 cases were in the BNT162b2 group, corresponding to vaccine efficacy of 91.3% (95% confidence interval [CI, 89.0, 93.2]).

    Thirty-two cases of severe disease, as defined by the CDC, were observed in the placebo group versus none in the BNT162b2 vaccinated group, indicating that the vaccine was 100% efficacious in this analysis against severe disease by the CDC definition (95% CI, [88.0,100.0]). Twenty-one severe cases, as defined by the FDA, were observed in the placebo group versus one case in the BNT162b2 vaccinated group, indicating 95.3% efficacy by the FDA definition (95% CI, [71.0, 99.9]).


    Efficacy was generally consistent across age, gender, race and ethnicity demographics, and across participants with a variety of underlying conditions.

    A total of 697 cases of COVID-19 were observed in the United States; 647 cases of COVID-19 were observed in the placebo group versus 50 in the vaccine group, indicating vaccine efficacy of 92.6% (95% CI, [90.1, 94.5]).

    I count 4 mentions of less than 100% numbers.

    So yea, strawman.


    Also, I'm going to assume that you believe that all of these results are false and fraudulent because they aren't conducive to your beliefs. If this isn't the case, please just say so.

    I'd ask, but we both know I wouldn't get a straight answer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Except now we know from the Pfizer document dump they were next to useless from the beginning. Nice try though.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    See, this is why people assume you're autistic.

    He said 40k deaths. I said at least 100k deaths/serious side effects.

    So let's say, hypothetically, there was 40k deaths and 70k serious side effects, then our estimations were both correct.

    Do you understand? It's not difficult.

    This is an ongoing situation. You can't undo the shots. I hope not, but there's a possibility of many deaths and serious side effects over time.

    I know you have skin in the game, but stop obsessing over numbers we'll never have an exact figure for. You can't control it, nor can we.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    with the original and alpha variant pretty much eradicated from last year, definitely didn't work.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Nobody reads the Pfizer website. My point, which you know, is that people were lied to. They were told it was 100% safe and effective. How many people went to to the Pfizer website to check it out.

    The commentators saw "100% effective" and ran with that.

    After which it slides gradually in increments over the months down to 12% for a week and then drops towards zero. As per Pfizer's own documents that they were forced to release

    I'm sorry you fell for it but there you go.

    Pfizer have a terrible history and reputation for fraud which is turned up with a quick Google. As does the pharma industry in general.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,128 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    Your own graph disproves your claims.

    Where were the peak deaths? Match-April 2020 before vaccination & January 2021 again before vaccination.

    Delta hit in June 2021 when vaccination programme was rolling out, and many older people only partially vaccination.

    You are comparing the 2015-2019 figures with 2021 'raw'. This is not a like for like comparison as you must be aware.

    The demographics of the country shift over time and by 2021 there were more older people than in 2015.

    Otherwise, if you are looking at the raw data, the figures will look higher because there are more older people and so more older people dying off. Adjusting excess deaths for age is standard accepted practice to adjust for such trends.

    This is is basic stuff.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g



    "A good example of a strawman is how you were suggesting people believed that the vaccine was 100% safe and effective. No one claims that."

    We were told it by the media, politicians, the so called experts when in fact Pfizer knew all along it did very little.

    We were told if you take the vaccine you won't get COVID you won't pass it on.

    Why are you trying to deny this? Are you happy you were lied to? Coerced into getting a vaccine based on false promises?

    Is it my fault that I questioned it and decided to look a bit closer?

    Turns out I was right not to take it. But you want to deny it all in the face of overwhelming evidence that is both useless and dangerous

    Good luck!



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    Couple of queries, that you probably won't answer

    1) I thought we weren't supposed to trust Reuters links, as according to you earlier in the thread

    Reuters are highly connected to Pfizer through corporate relationships, and are also connected at board level 😁

    It's the same as I told you earlier re: your general mainstream media. Vanguard and Blackrock own it. Guess who's also the largest shareholders in Pfizer? Thats right...Vanguard and Blackrock. You guys never learn, lol.

    I'm curious as to why they would report negatively on a company they are in bed with?

    Do we just dis-believe the positive stories, but believe the negative ones?

    2) With this thought stream going of countries and companies looking after their own self interest, do you think this didn't have a factor in allowing any multinational company into one of the biggest generic medicine manufacturing countries in the world? Much like trying to get into the Russian and Chinese markets (although Pfizer seems to be the vaccine of choice in locations where Sinovac and Sputnikvax have failed).

    With all the calls of "safety concerns" against Pfizer, who at the time had over 6 months of phase 4 data, and by Sep 2021 when they got shot down again by India, had billions of people vaccinated, it's funny how they recently approved their own mRNA vaccine with a combined phase2/3 trial of 4,000 people....

    MRNA vaccine: Panel recommends emergency use nod to India's 1st mRNA vaccine - The Economic Times (indiatimes.com)

    follow the money as you say... you're just doing it wrong.


    for ref:




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭flexcon


    Just chiming in here as someone who took the double dose But refused the booster.

    I had a horrible reaction to the second one, my heart was doing some really weird stuff. In the end it went away after a few days, however, the thought of it alone made my nervous of the booster.

    Second reason was, as mentioned here I took a bet that the vaccine in its current form was doing a lousy job of preventing spread. I am sure I am misguided in this, however, I am not an anti vax person.

    I work with data daily and I know the power of numbers, and I also know that you can use numbers to tell whatever story you want to tell, regardless of where you stand on the subject.


    Either way, enjoying reading the content here the past few pages, the discussion is really interesting from all perspectives.



  • Registered Users Posts: 594 ✭✭✭Fr0g


    Delta was milder as was every subsequent variant since the original that is how viruses go.

    Most of the susceptible died in 2020. We didn't suddenly import a load of grannies in June 2021.

    I repeat again. There were less COVID deaths in 2021 than 2020. What you are seeing is not COVID deaths. Demographics is irrelevant.

    It is clear from the graphic that all cause mortality is steady for 6 years until a sudden rise in June 2021. Apart from the peak in spring 2020. That was the pandemic it came and went. Numbers since then are background noise

    The data is from the CSO. Any other source would be ridiculed here. You have to accept official sources or its pointless continuing. You can't pick and choose.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    can you give a crash course on the difference between credible and confidence interval...?

    Confidence using the Bayesian & Clopper and Pearson methods

    Credible using Beta Binomial

    Because there are a lot of people in here making out they understand it, but are seriously butchering the interpretation of them, and being self declared experts on something that usually takes 2 semesters of college to understand.



  • Registered Users Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    That's not how viruses go, there is no consciousness to a virus where is says "ahh, we're at a happy equilibrium, I get warm fuzzy hosts, and nobody dies"... it will mutate into other variants which may or may not be more dangerous... please stop undermining over 100's years of virology studies with stupid comments like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,128 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    I accept official sources. I don't accept the false claims and lies spun around them by using them out of context.

    If the data is from the CSO, show us the source page where it gives the context for the data.

    Is it using the same sources of data for all years?

    Is it counting total deaths? Is it measuring excess deaths? It is age adjusted?

    If covid deaths are excluded from the comparison, what is the real difference between say 2017 and 2021?

    Because the CSO will also tell you:

    A rise in deaths from one year to another is not automatically considered to be excess deaths. The number of deaths per calendar year has followed an increasing trend since 2010.


    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Advertisement
Advertisement