Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Brexit discussion thread XIV (Please read OP before posting)

1245246248250251333

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Why what ?

    I don't understand what you are asking me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,597 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The other option is a border poll to unify Ireland and then the border will be fully down the Irish sea.

    If the EU legal actions take 12 to 18 months, that would allow enough time for a referendum campaign



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,229 ✭✭✭Nate--IRL--


    That assumes a cooperative UK.

    Nate



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    The border in Cyprus is legally "internal" as northern Cyprus is an occupied territory. EU law does not extend to Northern Cyprus, despite it being legally a part of the Republic of Cyprus.

    No, I don't for a moment believe Ireland could end up like Northern Cyprus, outside the single market and customs union. Cyprus's division predates their accession. The UK has too much to lose and the republic would implement checks at the land border before we'd even contemplate leaving the single market. Don't see any of this happening though.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'm really struggling to understand your logic, B.

    The UK-EU trade contains provisions for one side violating it. This includes the protocol. There will not be a hard border on the island of Ireland for the simple reason that the Tories will not violate the deal. They can't afford to or they would have done so by now. Remember all that talk of Article 16? Same thing. All talk designed to appeal to Express readers.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    And a vote going in favor of unification when NI see no real pain from the decision (since the border has to remain open no matter what according to some posters the impact of that would be non existent) triggering a reason for people to reconsider their world view.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Kind of worrying if that's the thinking in FG.

    They'd do well to remember their mandate is for the good of this country, its people and their future prosperity and wellbeing, not for Northern Ireland, not for preserving a scared cow Good Friday Agreement (which the British govt. now have contempt for, except as a rhetorical prop to sell their policies), not for keeping all nice and "diplomatic" with the big truculent neighbour next door at any cost.

    Talk of "diplomatic solutions" and that the UK are "missing the point" etc. is delusional and ignoring reality as the UK is doing this on purpose with full understanding and possible end goal(s) in mind.

    Their (UK gov) thinking about all this is very, very old empire that hasn't gotten over its hangups about rights, where its writ should run + the respect it is due from others who are lesser (like us) and should be able to be bullied with impunity, sort of Russian really.

    e.g. see this opinion piece, which calls it for what it is. Thankfully some of our EU neighbours may be twigging what is going on here.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    I read the article twice and I can't see where he says checks on goods coming from Ireland are a possibility. He could equally be talking about checks at the Irish land border, indeed to me it reads more like this is what he's talking about.

    If the UK goes postal and eliminates all checks then I see no immediate alternative to this sad reality either. We cannot risk our agri-food exports being treated like stuff from GB. The Northern Irish will lose the benefit of the protocol and a hard border is inevitable. They then must really choose which market they want to be inside, which country they want to be a part of.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    I completely agree with you.

    Someone was musing earlier about what would happen if the deal was pulled and said the hard border is a "no go" and is trying to say we should leave the SM. I am saying the hard border is more likely than leaving the SM. I'm not advocating for a hard border.

    But yes like you I believe it won't get that far.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    If the UK break the protocol/trade agreement with the EU then there will be a trade war as the UK have broken the existing trade agreement.

    In that scenario to protect the SM integrity the EU will need to implement checks with the open UK border ie NI. If the Republic say we don't want a land border the EU will say OK the default border will be the Celtic sea.

    I'm not following your logic were you think 'blame' or 'GFA' come into it really. It will just be a series of systamatic reactions to the UKs actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh



    Nonsense and faux concern as usual


    You forgot one thing, Sinn Féin will soon be in power and will not allow any dilution of Irish sovereignty in order to appease the British “friends and colleagues” of FFG


    I would say SF would push the EU to ground British planes and be done with it, enforce the protocol from Stormont and go on a tour of the US about highlighting British nationalism/imperialism


    We both know Britain will back down, they always do



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    Séan Kelly is a rural Blueshirt - pro Eoghan Harris, Tan commemoration, etc - anything to get his name in the paper


    Why would we change our law/arrangements because Britain broke an international treaty, then expect the same people who broke the international treaty to be receptive to diplomacy MEP Kelly?

    Diplomacy for 6 years has not worked.


    Kermit is right about one to thing, FFG are so used to being on auto-pilot that they merely accept British sleights and react, rather than actually whip up and lead the EU to force Britain into its international obligations, no doubt helped by their fear of a re-unified Ireland


    Get ready for FFG and their media to blame SF when Brexit Britain continues to damage relationships and the Irish economy when they are in power despite FFG doing nought for years only begging for more “diplomacy”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Can't tell if that's satire or not.

    How would Holland and France hurt their economies but having a border around the 6 counties ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    We have spent significant political capital thanks to the behaviour of our neighbour telling the US and the world there can never be a border on the island of Ireland.

    Are we suddenly going to do a 180 and set one up ourselves?

    At the end of the day I just think it is appalling that we are supposed to be a member of a club that is powerful and gives protection yet here we are depending on the votes of British parliamentarians to decide our future.

    We are not getting the protection we should be getting. We have had nice words but it's not enough.

    I'm surprised by Sean Kelly's statement but there is no way a Fine Gael MEP is saying that without the approval of the party. I worry this is the thin end of the wedge now and we'll be buttered up over the next few months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's already been proven he didn't say what you accuse him of. Practically every word a lie just like every time before



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    He did say exactly what I have said. There is a screenshot of the article above.

    He is telling the truth, which I welcome, but it's not getting the coverage it should be and that's what the government intends. There will be more of this in the next few weeks. It will be drip, drip. Testing the waters.

    They can come back to us in a few months and say "we told the public".

    Decoded: "We are going to fix the problem by forcing Ireland out of the single market"

    Post edited by Kermit.de.frog on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    I presume you only read the headline. Not surprising but if you actually read the full article, its not long. You'll see the headline is click bait and he is not quoted I'm the article sating anything remotely resembling the headline.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    What constitutional mechanism exists to force Ireland out of the single market? Source please.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    If the protocol bill passes in to legislation our position in the SM is untenable. It will leave a gaping hole. It's not a question of the EU forcing Ireland out. It will just be the default position. France, Netherlands etc will most likely put up checks immediately between Ireland and themselves.

    I see Johnson being wined and dined at the G7 talking about Russia. His own government is in the process of ripping up an international treaty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭murphaph


    None of the other single market members would countenance kicking another out, even if it were legally possible, which it isn't. Why? Because they'd forever be looking over their own shoulders if it were possible. If it ever happened it would signal the end of the European Union and too many hundreds of millions of people in the EU would consider that a very bad thing.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There is no such mechanism. You're just looking to see your own country suffer for amusement.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    You keep mentioning a mechanism. This is nonsense. It is a simple statement of fact that if there is a hole in the SM it's going to have to be filled and there are only two choices. Either it's in the Irish Sea or it's in the Celtic Sea between us and the continent.

    Take your pick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    The UK tearing up the trade agreement they negotiated is not the check mate you seem to think it is. But you've gone blind from pulling yourself off round the clock to Express headlines. So there's no use debating with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    Ok, whatever. It will be terrible for the country but at least I'll have the consolation when the "I told you so" moment arrives 😊

    Let's see what happens over the next few months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,773 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Why would it be a consolation to be right if something terrible happens?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "Few months" but you told us your I told you so moment was going to come on a Monday last month and back in January and before that periodically for 6 years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,720 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    You have not been paying attention,

    We have all chosen the Irish Sea option



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,711 ✭✭✭roosterman71


    It's easy know Kermit has been here when the thread explodes for a few days!

    Anyway, the last place that there'll be checks is between Ireland and the continent. That's the EU putting up a barrier in itself to placate the UK. Won't happen. If checks have to go in, then unfortunately they'll be on the border with NI. That though, will be many years away with many tantrums, legal cases, bitching and moaning too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,890 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    Regarding Kermit's headmelt arising from the citation attributed to Sean Kelly, I'm surprised that no-one has picked up on the more meaningful paragraphs at the end of the SBP story:

    "... the new EU legislation would consolidate the retaliatory powers of the European Commission in the event that the British government passed its bill and activated the powers under it to override parts of the protocol.

    ... there will be clear regulations here on what restrictions on trade [between the UK and the EU] will have to come in ... It will say these are the measures and this is how it will happen"


    "By passing this pre-emptive regulation, we will have in place exactly what is going to happen ... It will only then be a matter of implementing it."

    So Kermit's getting his wish: the EU will, after all, be laying down in front of the British people, or anyone else who cares to take an interest, exactly what consequences they'll face if their government breaches this particular international law, and the speed with which those punitive measures come into effect. Will the British people ever read them, or take heed of them? Probably not.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Glad to see you're still here.

    Essentially, what we all knew all along is indeed true. The EU didn't just negotiate a deal with the UK naively assuming that a man who has lied to the British people, the sovereign, Parliament and every woman he's ever touched would just adhere in good faith. There are provisions for the UK reneging and it's refreshing to see that highlighted.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,333 CMod ✭✭✭✭Nody


    The problem is the people who would read it are, in general, already well aware of the consequences. The people who will see the Telegraph headline of "EU punishing the UK" are as well set in their mind. The UK government as we've already seen are incapable of thinking beyond what to order for lunch while standing at the bar, let alone read or listen to advise from civil service etc. In a way I'm wondering if Trump was not more well read up than the UK government appears to be because at least he'd read the daily brief because they filled it with his name in it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,587 ✭✭✭Working class heroes


    If your weather forecasts are anything to go by your political forecasts don't hold much weight.

    Racism is now hiding behind the cloak of Community activism.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    The EU were able to get a decision from the ECJ in a hurry when they needed it while May was having difficulty making up her mind, so if they need the decision on the NI Protocol in a hurry, and its lack of implementation to date, they will get that as well.

    If the EU take action in the form of sanctions, it will not be in the form of checks on Irish trade. It will be to attack the UK's soft underbelly, and that means attack the choke points of their international trade. Read that as - City of London, Dover, airlines.

    The handling (and delay) of British tourists and British residents in the EU would be a good way of getting the British (English) population riled up. So long queues at passport control and customs clearance would certainly make an unmissable point.

    The EU will follow the Sergeant Major's advice to recruits - 'First I asks you, then I tells you, then I makes you!' We are getting close to stage three of that advice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,426 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    I enjoy their weather contributions. They're thought out and backed up by data. It's a fickle science though so no blame for the outcome being different to the original fore ast.

    Difference here is their contributions are pure pony. The sum total of which amounts to the original Brexit war cry of 'They need us more than we need them' crap. Even though its dressed up up to appear different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    I don't think Sean Kelly has said anything we have not been saying on here. If push comes to shove we could be forced out of the SM as checks will need to be done. But our hope, and it seems like his as well, is that the actions of the EU, should the UK actually pull the trigger, will lead to a quick backdown from the UK due to the consequences they will face.


    I will note as well that you have said we are in the process of being forced outside of the EU already. I am sorry but for me that means some checks and customs posts to check goods heading to the SM in Ireland which is not happening. You seem to be throwing a lot of mud at the wall to see what sticks and when one of your predictions come true, a possibility, then you will claim to have been right all along. That is very much like JRM claiming the UK should ignore forecasts from the OBR because they are never 100% correct, failing to account for the fact that actions has been taken in the meantime to change the course to avoid those same predictions coming true.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,266 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I don't think Sean Kelly has said anything we have not been saying on here. If push comes to shove we could be forced out of the SM as checks will need to be done

    I do not think that is true.

    Ultimately for now, there is not a massive risk of divergence with the UK (if they did this in 5-10 years time it would be a different story). I suspect very slow attempts to enforce some kind of check for goods coming from NI that originated in GB will start, while very quickly a veritable blockade will go up in France - which has more or less been flagged already when the EU mentions they are putting the TCA at risk.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    Ultimately Ireland would stick a border between it & NI.

    Aside from the fact that Ireland did so previously if Ireland failed to do so, it would simply be submitting itself to British rule - permanently.

    There is no chance that if a border becomes necessary (as a consequence of British reneging), it won't be implemented between Ireland & NI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭54and56


    The GFA was constructed on the basis that both UK and RoI were members of the EU (Single Market, Customs Union etc) thus enabling the total removal of any form of hard border between RoI and NI.

    Brexit (in particular the hard Brexit chosen by BoJo and Frosty etc) removed that cornerstone of the GFA requiring a border to go somewhere.

    BoJo and co proposed and the EU agreed for there to be a border in the Irish Sea thus ensuring no need for a border between RoI and NI.

    Turns out BoJo and Co were duplicitous and in fact only agreed to the Irish Sea border on the basis that they intended to renege on it as quickly as possible, see Ian Paisley Junior's confirmation of same.

    BoJo and Co are now, in true Perfidious Albion style, reneging on the deal they agreed and planning to pass legislation which will effectively remove the Irish Sea border as the impact will mean goods can flow into NI freely without any meaningful scrutiny.

    Should this come to pass the RoI will be unable to prevent entry of non-compliant products into its market and thus into the EU.

    RoI will then have to choose between implementing a border with NI in order to secure the EU market boundary or allow an open border to continue with NI but accept that the remainder of the EU will have to impose checks on goods being shipped out of RoI into EU in order to prevent the total free flow of dodgy goods from the UK flooding into mainland EU via the open border between NI and RoI.

    If the outcome of the UK NIPB legislation is either a hard border between NI and RoI (unlikely) or restricted free movement of goods between RoI and mainland EU that will only be a temporary measure until the EU response ramps up to a point where the UK Govt is forced (or pretends to choose) to re-instate the Irish Sea border and adhere to the agreement it signed up to or there is a change of UK Govt and an amended NIP is negotiated which also sees a return to the Irish Sea border as that is the only solution which preserves the GFA and sees the promoters of Brexit take responsibility for their actions rather than the diplomatic vandalism they are currently pursuing whereby they initiate Brexit and cause havoc but take zero responsibility for the consequences.




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    But the uncertainty is happening. And that is bound to be a topic of conversation in the board rooms when deciding Irish investment. Particularly export oriented companies.

    Madness that a country's border either sovereign or single market is in the hands of a third country.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,275 ✭✭✭fash


    Ireland isn't going to accept even a temporary solution where Ireland is cut off from the rest of the EU.

    If it did, then that becomes the permanent solution.

    A border between Ireland & NI (it may not be well policed to begin with) in place unless and until the UK government is broken is the only viable solution - as Ireland's history shows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,700 ✭✭✭54and56


    Cut off from the rest of the EU?

    Bit dramatic!!

    People traveling from RoI already have to show ID to enter the rest of the EU as we're not part of Shengen, does that mean we're not already cut off? Would checking goods from RoI entering EU really cut us off?

    What would we be cut off from exactly?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,788 ✭✭✭Enzokk


    How long will it take to set up the infrastructure to initiate the checks from Ireland into the EU? Surely that will be the time that uncertainty is created and not in a hypothetical that we are discussing. Now hypotheticals could turn out to be true but much like OBR reports/predictions they rarely do as actions are taken to avert it from happening.


    I mean hypothetically Le Pen could win the French election and a majority to run the country and could take them out of the EU or change their relationship with the EU, but I don't see us starting to prepare for that at the moment based off what could happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Its not in the hands of a 3rd country.

    This thread is really turning into a masturbatory session for deluded Irexiters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,029 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Le Pen dropped the Frexit nonsense when Brexit showed it to be a sham but she is still anti Euro.

    Although much like her buddies in Italy and Hungary she will probably chicken out of any real action on the EU.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    French pensioners won't wear their savings being trashed and that's precisely what Frexit would do.

    I can't believe we still have people believing that there's going to be a border between Ireland and NI. I still remember when Article 16 was the "own the Eurocrats" button and they never even pressed that.

    This appeared in my Twitter feed. Sounds about right.

    The man is completely deceitful and incapable of anything but lying. He's the worst prime minister since Eden though Eden at least cared about the country.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The NI Protocol Bill took a second step in HoC yesterday. Comment from Labour MP was revealing: the Tories want to take Ireland out of the EU.

    No one seems to realise that the danger is that with Bertie Ahern on board with the idea (see recent comments ), with what are effectively unionists or at best Home Rulers in FG/FF that it is now a definite possibility.

    Incredible that a decision by 52% of voting Brits will possibly determine the future of this country again 100 years after independence. The obsession with the North and appeasing unionists, ex UVF, and ex Provos has distorted politics for far too long.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 39,543 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Any day now. It's been six years and every single day has disproven this. Desperately alluding to something that Bertie Ahern probably didn't even say doesn't change this.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Why would a British Labour MP have aany insider knowledge about what Ireland's status within the EU was? Or indeed, Bertie Ahern, a man 30 past relevancy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,194 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    I can't believe we still have people believing that there's going to be a border between Ireland and NI

    I hope you're right. I'm not an Irexiter by any means but if the UK renege on the protocol and leave a hole in the SM, I fear that it may be a choice between a land border or a Celtic Sea border, at least temporarily.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement