Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Off Topic Thread 5.0

1268269271273274293

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    "Abortion is an option and should be"

    The second part of this statement is true. The first part is, unfortunately, not true. Or very soon to be not true.

    The specific details are here, but in effect, this Supreme Court decision will soon make abortion illegal in 13 states. 5 have already declared it illegal, but needed the Supreme Court ruling for their state's attorney general to enforce it. Others were waiting for the SC decision before declaring it illegal.

    Those 13 states sum to a population of approximately 70 million people, or ~35 million women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,925 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    I use Express. It's not free, but it's pretty good for me so far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭b.gud


    If it was up to me to be in charge of the timely regular taking of a pill to prevent unwanted pregnancy I dread to think of the amount of times sex would have been unsafe



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,071 ✭✭✭jacothelad


    Have you discovered 100% successful contraception? If so, you need to let the world know about it. There are no guarantees in any form known. Also, how many unwanted pregnancies are there in those who are really still children and who don't possess the intellectual maturity to understand the consequences of their actions. 12-year-olds, 13-year-olds, 14-year-olds, 15-year-olds, 16-year-olds. Who is going to look after their best interests? Not brainless, fascist half-wits like Trump, Cruz et al.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,624 ✭✭✭OldRio



    Well it winds up fundamentalist Christians. Your point is?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,779 ✭✭✭✭molloyjh


    Abortion can be required for a host of reasons. Unwanted pregnancies is just one of those. Contraception doesn’t work 100% of the time when it’s used and even in those scenarios where a couple doesn’t use it, why should the woman be the one that pays the price for that?

    Its very, very easy for men to comment on things like these when we don’t really have a clue about what’s involved or what’s at stake. Forcing a woman to carry a baby to term when they do not want to is cruel. The day to day impacts on them, from things like possible morning sickness to the inevitable hormonal impacts to the possible complications that can arise over the course of the pregnancy that can lead of difficulties doing the most basic things like walking to health issues to the mother etc. These are all things that no man goes through and things far too many men seem willing to ignore. Even giving birth is a painful and sometimes dangerous process. Some of the side effects to it can leave women unable to sit down properly for months such is the damage and pain they go through. When are men ever forced to endure something like that? In this scenario the man can easily have his fun and walk away. It takes two for this to happen, but only 1 person is forced to pay the price.

    And all this so that Conservatives can care so much about the unborn and then so little about those fetuses once they become children. They want more guns and more kids in a country that already has a name for kids being killed by guns. There’s really only one way this is all going. And then these same Conservatives will claim they can do nothing other than offer prayers. Kids dying is only political when they are in the womb. Not when they are out of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Boys! I'm just saying I don't think it's a right. I understand the complexities involved. I know about post partum depression etc. All I am saying is contraception would eliminate some abortions. I'm not anti abortions. I think the decision is wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭hold my beer


    Did ye watch Paul McCartney at Glastonbury last night? Some man for 80. A brilliant gig that's well worth a watch. You can get them all on iPlayer if you know how to get that.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    Do you mean you don't think it should be free or it should be banned? It's really hard to know what you're saying



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,920 ✭✭✭✭stephen_n


    The only effective contraception would be give all boys over 12 a vasectomy. Then reverse it when they’re ready to have children. Can you imagine all these white men signing up to that?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    No it shouldn't be banned. It should be free for the poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,925 ✭✭✭Dave_The_Sheep


    So you agree that people should be allowed to have abortions if they so desire/need. So almost like you're saying that people have a right to an abortion?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    No! I don't believe it's a right. If a person can afford one, then good. For the poor it should be free.



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    So you're saying you don't know what 'right' means?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,116 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Worth noting that there's no right to abortion in Ireland either, it's totally up to legislators to decide, exactly as it is in the US.

    The problem is the legislators in those states.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 34,063 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Having a right to something doesn't mean it has to be free - there aren't gun banks for impoverished wannabe gun owners in the States. I think it should be free, but in this context it just means it can't be completely restricted. Many places had already gone out of their way to make it as difficult as possible of course.

    Its something that should have been codified in federal law many moons ago of course. Though who knows whether that would have helped I guess.

    Worth noting that there's no right to abortion in Ireland either, it's totally up to legislators to decide, exactly as it is in the US.

    Fair point. Equally as bonkers as the SC decision itself.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It seems like what you're trying to say is that you don't feel it should be a constitutionally enumerated right, but the ninth amendment (and arguably the 14th) to the US constitution specifically allows for the concept of unenumerated rights, of which this indsiputably should be one.

    Are there are other medical treatments that you feel shouldn't be a right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    No. Is vasectomy a right? How about a liver transplant? Or liposuction or any medical procedure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Medical treatment is a slippery slope. What about botox treatment. Or boob jobs.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yes, individuals do have the right to obtain all of these medical procedures. It's not a specifically enumerated right, but the right exists nonetheless.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    We're going round and round in circles here. You keep listing out different types of medical procedures, that for whatever reason you think people do not have the right to obtain.

    FWIW, yes, people do have the right to obtain all of those procedures you're listing off.

    Do you not think an abortion is a medical treatment?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Off course abortion is a medical procedure. I just don't think it's a right like the others I did mention.

    It's obvious I differ than most on here. I respect your opinions, but I do differ. Perhaps I see things differently. Maybe I am wrong and don't understand where you lads are coming from. I'm not being an objectionist. It's just my opinion.



  • Posts: 2,519 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're obviously free to your own opinions and views, but virtually every major international body considers access to abortion a basic human right.

    The right to bodily autonomy is a basic human right, and therefore the right to access an abortion is a logical extension of that.

    Let me put it another way; if you don't believe it is a right, do you believe it is appropriate that accessing the service should be restricted?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,001 ✭✭✭b.gud


    I hope I'm not putting words in your mouth here based on reading your posts I think you actually feel the same way as most posters do, ie that they should be available to those that need/want them. I think where you differ from others is what a "right" is in this context.


    For instance what you say in this post here I would describe as meaning it is a right but you seem to think that doesn't constitute a right. Honestly I don't know which of us id correct and honestly I'm not sure it matters because I think we agree on the much much more important issue





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    Yea those that need them should have access.

    On another topic, I support the idea of ending your life if you are suffering. Morally, it's probably not right! But why allow unwanted or unnecessary suffering. A lot on here would likely disagree with me. Controversially enough, I believe this should be a person's right.

    I hope this opinion isn't too extreme or upsets anyone.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,760 ✭✭✭swiwi_


    I think I’d prefer gridiron discussion tbh. Where is IBF when you need him?



  • Moderators, Arts Moderators Posts: 36,501 Mod ✭✭✭✭pickarooney


    You support euthanasia for good reason, therefore it is morally right (to you). Morals aren't laws, they're individual codes of ethics.

    Someone who disagrees with you may consider the same thing immoral but that is of no consequence for your morality.

    Tbh, I'm realising that your interpretation of the word 'right' is perfectly valid (in context) but that everyone else you're (not really) arguing with is using a different interpretation.

    Just off the top of my head, in American films 'you have the right to an attorney' doesn't come with the caveat 'if you can afford one' but rather the addendum that if you can't afford one, one will be provided for you. Which I guess lines up more or less with what you're saying about abortion and the right to have one either by paying for it or, if you can't afford it, on the state's dime.


    Another example, primary and secondary education are a right in as much as the state is obliged to provide it to every citizen and those who can afford it can choose to avail of private education. Third level education is only a right in that anyone can obtain it on the proviso that they can afford it. Grants, scholarships etc. exist for poor/talented students but they are limited.

    I'm not sure where healthcare in general stands. Theoretically in Ireland everyone is entitled to healthcare in as far as those who can afford quality, timely healthcare can avail of it for a fee and those who cannot must wait for a poorer overall quality of service, often to the point where, realistically, that care is simply not available.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,819 ✭✭✭Dubinusa


    To be fair, I probably have varying morals. Your other points are true and I have never looked at things like that. The right to an attorney etc. Hmmmm, lots of food for thought.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,154 ✭✭✭✭Neil3030


    As fair as I'm concerned, it really doesn't matter what any individual thinks about abortion. It's a spectrum. Some will support unrestricted access for whatever reason, at any point in the pregnancy. Others will want the unborn to have a right to life from the moment of inception, regardless of circumstance. The rest of us fall somewhere in the middle, with varying opinions on appropriate circumstances, pregnancy duration, health risks and all the rest of it. It's incredibly complex. And the more we get bogged down in a legal/scientific debate, the more we miss the point of what's really going on.

    As with most incredibly complex ideas, the most efficient way for a nation state to arrive at the appropriate policy is to let the public decide. Let every opinion be respect, let people debate and try exert influence, but ultimately, like it or not, let the majority opinion rule. Some local regions (e.g. individual US states) will have different micro-majority views, but the nation state as a whole makes the aggregate decision. You either trust that process or you don't subscribe to democracy. You either abide by the nation state's opinion or you can leave it (and forfeit your right to free trade, federal funds, defense, and the rest of it).

    The situation in America was that 70% of the public (comprised of 87% Democrat and 50% Republicans) did NOT want Roe overturned (source). A minority of right wing Christians, through political engineering and an insane amount of luck (Trump appointing three justices), forced through this legislative decision against the will of the people. Find me a better definition of fascism enacted in a first world country in our lifetime.

    Most of us on these boards are lads. Most of us don't think about abortion that much, or have a very vague understanding of its importance to women. You're not a bad person if you've never thought about it. But every single one of us* should be very concerned right now, regardless of your views on women's rights. When these fascists are done with women, they will eventually move onto something that will more directly impact men. Contraception, premarital sex, sexual freedom, pluralism and scientific inquiry. They hate all of these things, and Roe is just their matinee.

    (*well, those of us in the US, i guess!)



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,822 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Saw it in person. Was class. I wouldn't be the biggest Beatles fan but was unexpectedly moved to tears by Let It Be. Being three days on the sesh might have had something to do with it.



Advertisement
Advertisement