Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Waterford Cencus 2022

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Great performance by Waterford again. However, would nearly put money on it that we will have boundary changes so Waterford ends up with still having four TD’s. Can see it now “new constituency of East Cork/West Waterford to be created”.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,754 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    KK/Carlow also require a 6th.. Bring Ferrybank into Waterford would be the most logical option but I cant see that flying with FF, FG or even SF.

    Not sure adding West Waterford with Cork would be good because Waterford would likely become 3 seats if Dungarvan moved to.


    Interesting to see what happens.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    So since when did logic ever come into it when it comes to Waterford and the government? Can't see Waterford ending up in a stronger position. Never does when it comes to the government. Remember this is a government/state that is willing to let people in Waterford die in order to maintain the status quo. Constituency boundary changes is hardly going to stop them.

    Post edited by BBM77 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 557 ✭✭✭Taxburden carrier


    A 5th TD!

    Have we not suffered enough?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 418 ✭✭GandhiwasfromBallyfermot


    It makes absolutely zero sense for me living in Ferrybank to have to vote for KK councillors and TDs. What goes on across the bridge in Waterford council and the actions of Waterford TDs impacts me far more, and I'm a Kilkenny man. Its time peace talks were initiated and a Good Friday type dual citizenship deal was enacted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Time for a Waterford/South Kilkenny constituency. The county boundaries are not giving accurate population records of some towns and cities such as Waterford, Limerick, Drogheda that border neighboring counties. Time to redraw a few maps to get correct representation and population records.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Ireland must be the only country in the world where current local authority boundaries are based on medieval county boundaries. Its just absurd!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 418 ✭✭GandhiwasfromBallyfermot


    It's crazy alright, Waterford local authority should really include all of Ferrybank & Slieverue, maybe even Kilmacow. I wonder is there a way to leave the county boundaries the same to keep the hurlers happy but still bring these areas into Waterford local authority and electoral area.

    In fairness though, playing devils advocate, the one piece of Ferrybank which Waterford control they knocked half the village and built a motorway through it so maybe there's a reason a lot of Ferrybank people are happy to stay in KK....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Of course there is. But the reality is like nearly all government decisions relating to Waterford maintaining the status quo and or weakening Waterford as a city is the main driver of the decisions. We have seen this time and time again. TD’s from politically stronger counties, particularly from Cork, Kilkenny/Carlow and Wexford, are making these decisions and they are rarely in Waterford's favour. As you say, bringing these areas of Kilkenny into the Waterford local authority and electoral area would make Waterford stronger as a city. Current political thinking just won’t allow that to happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Majority of people living in Ferrybank are fully aware that Kilkenny CoCo have no regard for Ferrybank itself, its seen as a cash cow for the county, the shopping centre is an example of this and look at the mess that is. Ferrybank is a suburb of Waterford City and should be governed by Waterford. Ferrybank would not exist in its form today if the city wasn't there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 769 ✭✭✭Dunmoreroader


    Boutros Boutros-Ghali and George Mitchell couldn't sort this one out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,218 ✭✭✭Junior


    BUT HURLING ! <que JP Phelan comparing us to Nazis again>



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    The extra TD is very unlikely in the near future as a number of other constituencies already have a bigger population per TD and are ahead of Waterford in the queue.

    It'll be interesting to see if those numbers are driven by migrants or those who relocated from places like Dublin since Covid. The city v rural spread will also he very interesting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    It's frustrating that as the city and county council are merged there are no specific city figures for the moment from the CSO. I had some spare time on my hands so I made a stab at putting them together from the electoral district figures given in the preliminary report. It seems that the city has been driving the overall big county population growth. The city growth seems to be nearly 13% compared to the overall figure for city and county of 9.4%. This in itself is the 5th highest growth rate in the state.

    I wasn't too sure which electoral districts were part of the city before the councils were merged so the below table might not be 100% correct in terms of areas included. The figures are taken directly from the CSO though. Let me know if I need to add to delete anything. Regardless of that, I think it's safe to assume that Waterford is now by far the fastest growing city in the state, over double the rate of Galway, reversing a decades old trend. The table then adds the Co. Kilkenny suburbs which will also be done by the CSO in a later report next year. The city and suburbs are now nearly 60,000 and by adding Tramore, the metropolitan area will be over 70,000.

    It a very positive result for Waterford and hopefully it will help to ensure that we get the share of state resources that we are entitled to.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭914


    Nice work on the above although Cork recently extended their city City boundary pre cso so no doubt they will also have a large population increase.

    South KK and Tramore numbers won't be included in the city that way government can keep us down and also sell cork as the fastest growing city in Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Everything will be done to keep the citys population as low as possible to justify the lack of investment and delivery. Tramore Waterford City West is combined for local elections but they count Tramore separate for census, this makes no sense. The LEA map should be the city boundary like a Greater Waterford area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Yeah the Cork city population will be much higher due to the boundary change, but on a like for like percentage basis the increase will be lower than Waterford and it is significant that Waterford is now growing at three times the rate it was at the last census.

    The final census report next year will include city and suburbs This is shown below for 2011 compared to 2016, Limerick includes part of Clare and the Waterford figure includes part of Kilkenny. It will be done for every town as well.

    Comparing the change between 2011 and 2016 (obviously figures will be higher for 2022)

    Dublin city & suburbs 1,110,627 to 1,173,179 Increase 62,552.

    Cork city & suburbs 198,582 to 208,669 Increase 10,087

    Limerick city & suburbs 91,454 to 94,192 Increase 2,738

    Galway city & suburbs 76,778 to 79,934 Increase 3,156

    Waterford city & suburbs 51,519 to 53,504 Increase 1,985

    As show in a previous post, the increase of over 6,000 in the 2022 census for Waterford city brings it to close to 60,000. I agree that Tramore should be in the Waterford figures and there has been a lot of gerrymandering in healthcare, education etc to deny us an equitable share of resources. We now have more ammunition to fight back though.

    This census also cements Waterford as the only real city with the critical mass to drive growth for the SE region. Kilkenny's growth has really fallen back. God knows there are always issues to be overcome but these figures make me more optimistic for the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Agree with all you say. Galway has been artificially inflated because of the FDI investment tax break they had that Waterford did not have, amongst other things. Now that has been removed things are beginning to level out. Historically Waterford was always bigger than Galway. (PS, not having a go at Galway.) But as I said above and others have said the reality is political thinking is going to view Waterford’s growth as a threat to their status and do all they can to gerrymander the figures. For example, Shannon gets included in Limericks metro area but Tramore is prevented from being included in Waterford’s metro area. It's bare faced self-serving nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,582 ✭✭✭Asdfgh2020


    there is a serious ‘chip on the shoulder’ tone in a lot of the posts on this topic……politicians and now it seems the CSO are conspiring to keep ‘waterford down’ etc…Galway/cork get everything…….the glass is always ‘half empty’….😡😡



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,901 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Unfortunately decades of evidence suggest the contrary. The SE region has been continually undermined to move resources elsewhere. For healthcare purposes the region ended in the middle of Kilkenny while resources were diverted to Cork. For education, it was suggested by Simon Harris that Wicklow is in the SE and that it should be part of the region to share the Technological University resources. Carrick on Suir for example is now part of the Mid West region.

    I agree it's not a CSO or government conspiracy though, it comes from the regions politicians' attitude that anything going to Waterford is bad for them. Brendan Howlin and Phil Hogan were two SE politicians that had a real chance to improve the regions prospects but rather than giving resources to Waterford they were happy to see them go elsewhere.

    The census figures confirm that Waterford is the only place in the SE to generate the critical mass to compete with the other regions. I know people tend to concentrate on the negatives but like I agree, the figures can only be viewed in a positive light. I'm a glass 'half full' person and I haven't been 'home' in a while. Looking forward to a visit next week!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    We are well balanced here, with justifiable chips on both shoulders. There are too many instances to even bother recounting but poor politicians in the south east who pursued an ABW policy in the belief that this would strengthen their own counties has been at the heart of teh matter. In the fa ce of division its easy for government, permanent and elected to ignore justifiable claims from this area for investment. Dexpat has put the matter very well. Our glass has always been half full but persistent actions by government over the years seem intent on emptying it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Theres no chip on our shoulders here! Its a reality that we experience here of being discriminated on whether it be in healthcare, Education, transportation, Employment, the list goes on. Galway benefited for years with the "poor west" hand outs. On a positive note great to see Waterfords population growing so quickly, time for the government to actually deliver here and the South East.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭914


    It's not a chip on our shoulder or that the CSO is conspiring against Waterford. It is regional politics which holds Waterford back.

    Just look at the "regional" support for SETU as regional representatives saw them getting a slice of the cake, where is the same "regional" support for 24/7 cardiac care or the hopping up and down in expanding the airport?

    It issues such as Oranmore included in Galway cities population (located 10km from Galway)

    Yet Tramore can not come under Waterford city's population (located 12k from Waterford)

    Cork being able to click their fingers and extend their city boundary while government went to the hassle of obtaining an independent report which recommend Waterford extend it's city boundary and it's shut down.

    Should Waterford include Tramore and parts of south KK, then we would be in a greater position to apply pressure on obtaining better services such as heath education etc...



  • Registered Users Posts: 330 ✭✭mart 23


    Shannon is not included in Limerick metro figures .



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Can someone fix the spelling on the title at the very least!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Well it says here for example it is. Pretty clear example of what I wrote above.


    Post edited by BBM77 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    How is the 24/7 Cardiac care issue and what happened to WIT and university status for example and my previous post a bloody chip on our collective shoulder? There is undeniable proof that we are just not getting our fair share. People in Waterford need to take their head out of the sand and realise the way the government is treating Waterford. If you are from Waterford, that means you to.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    Any chance of some discussion regarding the census?

    Population growth of 7.6% nationally continues population growth which started in the 1990s. However, the counties in Leinster around Dublin continue to far outstrip the national levels, and only Offaly and Kilkenny grew by less than the national average.

    On average almost 32,000 people a year moved or returned to the State between 2016 and 2022. It'd be interesting to see if Waterford had large numbers returning from emigration or if new arrivals accounted for the increase, or a mixture of both.

    All but one of the 39 Dáil constituencies now have more than 30,000 people represented by a TD. Ireland is apparently highly over-respresented in comparison to other countries, so there may be a debate as to how many we actually need as the population will keep growing.

    Nationally the number of constituents per TD is 32,032, while in Waterford it's now 31,771. I think there's 22 constituencies with a higher population per TD than Waterford, including local rivals like Carlow/Kilkenny, Wexford, Tipperary and most of Cork.

    Waterford's population will continue to grow and it's time to start planning ahead as infrastructure can take 20+ years to be built with the planning involved. It's a good sign that agencies like the NTA were just recently announcing efforts to map out what types of transport etc. will be required over that timeframe.

    I'd like to see much more density in Waterford and I feel the Council should be restricting new development outside of the ring road to encourage more infill and less sprawl.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Most of the new housing developments currently under construction are all within the Outer Ring Rd so its mostly infill at the moment.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    That wouldn't be my understanding of infill. I'd be talking about sites in the city centre like the gasworks site.

    If they're determined to pump more houses into these locations there should also be some investment in things like schools and public transport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    What is the point of the census if it is going to be ignored? The discussion has been valid considering things like the reports on university status, 24/7 Cardiac care, boundary extension etc have all found in Waterford’s favour and were tossed in the bin by the government because they were too threating to the status quo. If you want to make somewhere better you have to look at the problems. Waterford does not have a population problem, it has been growing in all past census, the latest showing particularly strong growth. Waterford has a politics problem. Which is relevant to the census results.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,174 ✭✭✭hardybuck


    What about whataboutery? Come on pal, the preliminary results are only just released.

    Just to pick up one of your points, the Irish population has grown exponentially since the 1960s - by around 80% in fact. However, in the 2016 census Waterford grew by just 2.1%, well below the national figure of 3.8%. This time Waterford is well ahead of the national average.

    But the census will give much more relevant information to enable future planning like what mix of industries are here, ethnic diversity, household composition, geographic spread, religion, income levels, fertility rates etc.

    Please let's avoid another classic 'everyone is out to keep Waterford down' threads, and maybe instead we can discuss the actual results of the census.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,881 ✭✭✭BBM77


    Well if you want to talk about past census how about Waterford cities population has always showed an increase. Cork and Limerick cities actually showed a fall in population in recent past census.

    But yes, they are just preliminary results. However, still stand by what I wrote. If the census results now and in the past is not reflected in the actual government actions we see, I ask again. What is the point of the census if it is going to be ignored? The reality is government actions do not reflect the census results in Waterford. As I said, positive things like this are usually tossed in the bin by the government. It is not an “everyone is out to keep Waterford down” attitude if there is proof of it happening in reality, which I pointed out already. Sure, university status and 24/7 Cardiac care issues I mentioned are directly related to the population as counted in the census. Is the census just an academic exercise or is it actually for “future planning”? WMADTS I posted above show the census is just an academic exercise. For god sake, you would be quicker driving to Tramore and Dunmore East from parts of the city than you would driving from one side of the city to the other. Yet Tramore and Dunmore East are not included in Waterford’s metro area. But Shannon, which is further away from Limerick city and is a town with it’s own employment, is included in Limericks metro area. It is a farce.

    Post edited by BBM77 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    I share your frustration somewhat about 'everyone is out to keep Waterford down' threads. It has been done to death and they can be depressing but it doesn't mean the issues can/should be ignored. I agree with BBM77 that it's important to discuss the Census with reference to the public policy issues. Otherwise it's just statistical analysis.

    Even with the relatively low growth of previous census results Waterford in the context of the SE region, had the population to justify educational and medical resources that were taken for granted in other regions. The catchment area for UHW for example was artificially constrained and ended half way into Co KK. This was deliberate policy to direct resources elsewhere. In this context, the large increase in Waterford's population will at least make this more difficult to do. We should still be able to highlight the issues though.

    In terms of the results themselves, I agree that building up density is important. In previous Census some of the city centre areas had decreases in population. This census shows big increases; for example Ballybricken West up 34%, Bilberry 15%, Centre A 16%, Centre B 25%, Custom House A 27%, Custom House B 22%, The Glen 36%. Now these are for relatively small absolute numbers but the trend is good. If the north quays gets up and running? well we won't go there!

    It's interesting also that the Kilbarry population has exploded by 239%. While not in the centre, it is positive for density in the city. Previously I suspect a lot of this growth would have gone to Tramore, Kilmeaden etc

    Overall the results are very positive and instead of looking over our shoulders at the likes of Drogheda we can have a realistic aspiration of competing with Limerick and Galway. It as always requires that the politicians of the region acting in unison. There are some signs of that in relation to the Airport. I won't hold by breath though.

    To a large extent though it doesn't come down to population, but being an attractive place to live with good employment prospects and access to services. We're much closer to that now that when I was growing up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,246 ✭✭✭friendlyfun


    We had glass but they took that away to Eastern Europe. Absolute disgrace



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭azimuth17


    On reading the list of electoral divisions in the city I think you have left out Ballymaclode, the area around the River Cottage pub (Orpens) which contains 1301 people. When added to your figures this brings the population (incluidng co Kilkenny suburbs which CSO will include anyway) to over 60,000.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're a little late lamenting the closure of Waterford Crystal!

    13 years ago now & yes, it was an absolute disgrace & the consequences of its closure.

    I worked there & I still have issues that still affect me in my everyday life even after 13 years!



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,071 ✭✭✭Finnbar01




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The aftermath of it Finbarr. How to deal with where I was then & what was I to do next?

    It wasn't easy & I wasn't on my own! There were so many others that felt deserted & lost!

    It also wasn't the most opportune time to be trying to start a new career especially in your 40's!


    I remember the recessions in the 70's & 80's but I had no responsibilities then & I couldn't

    understand or appreciate what it was like for my Father or Mother at that time.

    Our most recent recession in my opinion was a lot worse & harder to manage.


    We're still coming out of the 2008/09 recession & according to forecasts they're predicting one for 2023.

    How will people fare with more cost of living increases? I'm reading that electricity & gas prices are set to

    increase again!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Cheers azimuth17. I wasn't sure and suspected that it wasn't 100% correct. I'll add Ballymaclode when I get a chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    I've updated the city census results by adding Ballymaclode. Percentage changes have also been included and I'm confident the figures for each electoral division are correct. There is still a slight discrepancy between the final 2016 CSO reported city and suburbs figure of 53,504 and the electoral division figures added together which give 54,038.

    Regardless of this, the difference of only 534, means the final 2022 city figure looks certain to be over 60,000.

    The difference could be due to the CSO using a different methodology for city and suburbs than electoral divisions. Only including urban area for example would exclude some isolated housing in electoral divisions. It might also be due to some of the Co Kilkenny division of Kilculliheen being excluded. It could also be due to incorrect divisions being included/excluded. Fell free to point out changes to be made.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Apologies, a final edit as I've seen from an older Census when the city was an independent entity that Killotern should be excluded. It had small numbers so doesn't make much difference. It does reduce the error between quoted figures in the 2016 final report and the 2016 figures that CSO included in the 2022 preliminary report, to 40, which is statistically insignificant. It may have been due to small revisions made by the CSO between each census

    I'm confident now that it's pretty much spot on and once I started it's important to get it right. The end.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 654 ✭✭✭Pablo Escobar


    I can’t speak for Limerick on this point but the reason the Cork census showed declines previously was because the boundary was so small. It fell well within the urban area so as the urban area grew, the traditional ‘city’ became less dense. And despite the “ease” or extending the boundary suggested in another post, it was far from that. It basically only extends east as far as just beyond the tunnel due to the conflict between the city and country councils. That whole eastern corridor is fairly build up, will have large residential developments added to it over the next few years, yet it is still in the county figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 451 ✭✭Valhalla90


    Still confusing for the cities of Limerick and Waterford as there is technically no city/county boundary anymore with the amalgamation of the city and county councils, this surely needs to be clarified since Cork & Galway have clear boundaries. Another mess by Big Phil.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Some census analysis from John Fitzgerald from the ESRI. Positive highlighting of the Waterford figures which is primarily as a result of inward migration. Not a premium article. Can be accessed as part of free weekly articles.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,196 ✭✭✭fuzzy dunlop


    I used to spend a lot of time crunching numbers like this but resposnibilities deny me the time. Good work dude! Or dudess if that is the case......



  • Registered Users Posts: 26 The CW


    Waterford City and Suburbs population 60,079. New methodology called Built-up Urban Area(BUA) used to define the boundaries using landcover. Results in a slightly lower population than the 2016 census definition which uses population only. That figure for Waterford City and Suburbs is 60,200. You can view the new BUAs using the Tailte Éireann website which has replaced the OSI as of March. The link to the map is here: CSO Urban Areas - National Statistical Boundaries - 2022 - Ungeneralised | CSO Urban Areas - National Statistical Boundaries - 2022 - Ungeneralised | Open Data Portal (arcgis.com). Census populations for other Cities and Towns can be viewed here: https://data.cso.ie/table/F1013.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭Dexpat


    Thanks to The CW for the above. As was said, the methodology for showing town and city population has changed which means that a direct comparison is not made in the census between the 'settlements' populations which was used in the 2016 census, and the Built Up Areas (BUA) which is now being used. (They are quite close in most cases though). However, an appendix given does show what the 'like for like' population of each town city would have been using the 2016 methodology. I've included those figures in the above table.

    When showing increases I've used the 2022 BUA compared to the 2016 Settlements which is not directly comparable but does give a good indication of growth. Waterford's growth has been very strong and has matched Carlow and Navan which in affect are now overspill areas from Dublin. It is well above the other cities in the country and the largest town Drogheda.

    Interestingly Carlow has now overtaken Kilkenny in population.

    All the information in the tables above are in the latest census release but had to be put together. Later in the year the small area statistics will be published which will show the information in a similar format to above. However as I said the CSO probably won't show percentage changes due to the change in methodology. For some reason today's release concentrates on towns and largely ignores the cities.This will also be addressed in later publications. Feel free to point out any errors in the information provided and I can correct it.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement