Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Good news everyone! The Boards.ie Subscription service is live. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

17071737576137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Williams Renault has been a winning combination before, but then again, so has McLaren Honda.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,351 ✭✭✭✭Wanderer78


    yea they seem stuck, they clearly approached these new regs in the wrong way, its actually great for us fans, but the mighty certainly can fail, spectacularly



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,118 ✭✭✭muckwarrior


    Seems a bit harsh to drop someone who demolished their team mate last year, before even the midpoint of the season. Either Mick is going through a bit of a rough patch or Mazepin was just really really bad, which of course is entirely possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    He demolished somebody who had no business in f1. Unless he improves as season goes on, he does not deserve a seat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,186 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    What happened with the HAAS funding after the Ural Kali thing??

    Was there an injection from other sponsors? Is there still an injection from sponsors? How much has funding dropped? Is Ural Kali still looking for their money back?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    It does bring back a certain nostalgia however. Be nice if they designed the livery around the white / blue / gold colours (without it being overtly an ad for Rothmans! (is Rothmans still even a brand??)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Think rothmans is still going. Never really took off in Ireland though.

    The look was iconic but it's a bit cringe when people are nostalgic for old brands in F1. Like, the brands are part of the funding but they're not part of the sport.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    I think they are trying to make the concept work because the wind tunnel data backs it up. But if the concept is inherently flawed it might never work within the current rules


    If the data above is correct, then Merc should raise the ride height and add a few 50kg sandbags to the car.


    I reckon the Toto comments pre race last week were a pre conceived idea and If Hamilton was stuck in 8th or 9th place around lap 45 he would have retired from the race.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Hamilton would be mad to retire form a race as a gesture. The demands to retire permanently would be massive, and justified. If he can't drive the car then he needs to retire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    I dunno, I think the comments from Toto are very strategic. He wants FIA to change the rules so they can get the most out of their concept. And the possibility of Hamilton having to retire from races or miss a race because the car is a donkey is being used to scare the FIA IMO.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    You're right that's what they're doing. It's a bluff l, I'd say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yeah but Merc are 90 points ahead of 4th so sacrifice a few points for a race to pull Hamilton into the pits to retire because the bouncing is so bad

    I'd say if he was stuck in 8th or 9th it might have been on their mind to do just that. They aren't going to win the constructors but they might get a rule change which helps them maybe not in 2022 but in 2023.

    Toto was saying Hamilton might miss Canada because of his back and at the same time Hamilton was saying he would definitely be in Canada.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah maybe. But I doubt it. Doesn't the fact that Hamilton and Toto weren't on the same page suggest they haven't seriously spoken about it or coordinated their responses?

    I suppose we'll see if they're singing from the same hymn sheet at the next race. But I'd say it's a bluff. If hamilton is the only driver to retire because of back pain, it suggests he's too old and an older driver will be acutely aware of that. He's probably already acutely aware that he's being soundly beaten by his younger teammate. Russell is scoring the odd podium (when enough from the top 2 teams retire) and Lewis is retiring from races with old man pains. Lewis is really unlikely to agree to take part in that conspiracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yeah i get what your saying bit Hamilton also wanted to give up after 3 laps in Barcelona and then was spouting crap about never giving up after the race in the media pen


    They don't want to give up their concept because they obviously feel if they can get their way for "safety reasons" it might put them up front again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    That's true about Barcelona. He was proposing retiring the car to save the engine in thst case. I heard his radio in FP3 last weekend in Baku and he asked the team if the engine was ok and they said they turned it down to save it. So saving engines is important but he was still in a position to score good points in Barcelona so the team was right to not listen to him.

    And its worth pointing out that he had a good race after that. Overtaking is usually difficult in Barcelona but between the new car regs and a good performance, he finished 5th, 20 seconds behind Russell in 3rd. Considering he was at or near the back after the first few laps, he did well.

    It sounds nit-picky, but retiring the car to save the engine is different from retiring because the driver can't physically drive the car.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,812 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Remembering how Toto pretty much screwed Ross Brawn when taking over at Mercedes, I'd say Brawn is calmly waiting in the long grass to trip him up and as such would strongly resist any attempt to bring in changed that would benefit Mercedes only.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Hamilton has moaned suggesting retiring from plenty of races in the past, maybe he'll finally follow through if he has an early spin some time this season



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,265 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    I hope it’s to maybe get Mick performing better, more than an actual thing that might happen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,829 ✭✭✭quokula


    Has Magnussen called for an intervention? I haven't come across that anywhere but I could have missed it. What I have come across is media outlets taking things his physio said completely out of context in order to misrepresent them. The gist of what the physio said is that it was painful in Australia but it's no longer a problem as the team have worked it out. The majority of the reporting left out the second half and implied that he was talking about the most recent races and that it's an ongoing issue, which was not the case.

    Gasly seems to be the only one outside Mercedes calling for an intervention that I've come across. I wonder if he's angling for the Merc seat if Hamilton retires after Perez had his contract extended.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,543 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Sainz has commented on it, and he only did 9 laps in Baku:

    “We kindly asked the FIA to look into it, not listen to the teams so much and to listen to us,” said Sainz, quoted by The Race.

    “We are saying it’s getting to a point where we are struggling to handle this.

    “I don’t think we need a medical commission, we just need something smarter on the suspension or the way the cars are being run, where the FIA controls a bit better the possibility of the teams running that stiff, that hard, that kind of ride you see on the straights.

    “I’m pretty sure if you ask two or three engineers down the paddock, they will know the answer and what can be done to limit this and regulate it.

    “But we need the FIA to act as soon as possible – if not, it will start accumulating.”



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,543 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    Ricciardo too:

    He told The Race that while drivers “can macho it if you want”, they can only do that for an individual race, not a season.

    He added: “Obviously, like the compression, you are sore and you feel like you are kind of getting squeezed, so it’s not good.

    “I’m, like, stiff now and painful, but also like getting out of the car – and I’m not exaggerating – I just felt, like, shook, so just, like, a bit rattled.

    “So, it’s not a normal thing, and I think also the frequency, this kind of shaking of the brain and the spine, I don’t think it’s good long-term.

    “It’s one of those ones where we don’t want to be naive or ignorant and just tough it out when there could be some kind of long-term damage.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,543 ✭✭✭recyclebin


    The cynic would say the drivers doing badly are complaining the most but then again if you are winning the pain is going to be a lot more bearable. You're not going to want the FIA to change the rules and risk losing your advantage over other teams and drivers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,911 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Melbourne gets new ten year contract for F1. There will also be F2 and F3 support races.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,711 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Not F1's greatest track but definitely one of F1's better city destinations.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,137 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    I wouldn't say I'm particularly nostalgic for the brands; cigarettes and F1 were always a strange match. But nostalgia is everywhere in F1. It's why Mercedes are "the silver arrows". Why Aston is green / Ferrari is Red / McLaren is orange etc. People love that stuff.



  • Posts: 25,909 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's thrown up some of the top 10 races in my lifetime though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Papaya, not orange...


    Wouldn't be nostalgic for the old cigarette brands, but the yellow Jordans were lovely looking yokes (not the gold one though, that was muck)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    The teams are actually part of F1. The advertisers are not. I remember at the start of the 2021 season, there were peope saying it was great to have the name Schumacher back on the grid. That's the silly side of nostalgia. Nostalgia is fine to an extent, bit F1 is way too inclined to be held hostage to tradition and nostalgia.

    I think things are usually best left in their context. The cigarette sponsored cars were iconic like the B&H Jordans and the Rothmans Williams and the West Mclarens were good looking cars. But they made sense in their context. Reviving a cigarette livery from 30 years ago, in 2022, is the silly side of nostalgia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,439 ✭✭✭Killinator


    If done right, the occasional 'historic' livery can look fantastic, even if it is an old cigarette brand.

    Porsche ran a 'not Rothmans' retro livery at Le Mans a few years back and it was beautiful:

    lemans-24-hours-of-le-mans-test-day-2018-91-porsche-gt-team-porsche-911-rsr-with-special-l.jpg




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,154 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah an occasional nod to history can be nice. It's not something to aspire to though. F1 is about the cutting edge of motorsport. Harking to a tangential aspect of the past, like a sponsor from 30 years ago, is a bit silly.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement