Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Free houses or not Free houses ... "tenants" to be sued

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    €50 a week... the rest of us work our asses off to fund this.



  • Posts: 3,689 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm sure these tenants are paragons of virtue in other aspects of life: what fraction if any own a TV Licence?

    How many times is the same Netflix password shared I wonder between them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,922 ✭✭✭Grumpypants


    Great little country. The rent is 10% of the incone. So that's €500 a week.

    To have a take home pay of 500 a week you need to earn over 37 grand. Which is decent enough money.

    Imagine someone earning 37 grand a year saying they can't afford €50 a week rent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    What works is when an example is made - evict them, have all the cameras there, fully expose these freeloaders to the public. Give it loads of air time and as much publicity as possible.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Knowing this country it would be a scandal to kick them out.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,563 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Sure DCC is owed 50 million in arrears from these type of wasters.


    Ah sure there is no free houses blah blah.


    No one is scamming the system blah blah.


    The usual army will be along soon to make excuses for these poor unfortunate souls.



  • Registered Users Posts: 12 JuanGreen


    I guess we don't have to imagine it... This is the world we live in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,284 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    I lived in a council house for years I can't fathom how you could run into arrears. The rent is calculated so there is absolutely no hardship on you, your looking at about 15% of income. It should be deducted at source anyway to avoid this crap (by revenue or social welfare).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    There should be no way it could get that far.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,284 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    It shouldn't but it's way too lax the system. These are people flat out refusing to pay rent, 20k in arrears is a **** joke. Deduct it at source is the best solution, I can't understand why it's not done already.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,001 ✭✭✭✭zell12


    Only 10% of income is rent? I thought it was closer to 20%. SDCC must be one of the cheapest accommodation providers in the State



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21


    The dole and council houses money tree badly needs pruning.



  • Registered Users Posts: 273 ✭✭Galwayhurl


    It's absolutely galling.


    What's the point in working? Paying 1500 a month in rent for a 1 bed here and could be evicted due to landlord selling up at any stage.



    This country really is no country for working men and women.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,724 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    The main reason for arrears is extra income in the household not being declared, or being declared years later, and then the differential rent is adjusted upwards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,092 ✭✭✭DubCount


    So, after the tax payer pays a load of money to chase this through the courts, they get a fiver a week court order.

    If the tenant still doesn't pay, they get evicted and become homeless - then the tax payer pays for their homeless accommodation.

    What a great deal for the taxpayer - heads they lose, tails they dont win.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,284 ✭✭✭✭rob316


    Na the main reason is they just don't want to pay it. The council's are unbelievably reasonable if you get into arrears, they'll put you into generous repayment plans provided you engage and stick to them.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    For information on how rent is calculated in SDCC.

    South Dublin County Council Differential Rent Scheme 2021 (opens as PDF).

    I do think Differential Rent Schemes across local authorities need to be standardised.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think getting people to pay what they owe should be the first priority.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,699 ✭✭✭Gusser09


    Amazing that it cant be deducted from welfare payments. Madness. Zero point taling it to court. Just start deducting it source including arrears.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I don't disagree, and they should have a robust method of collecting arrears.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,261 ✭✭✭Gant21




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Social Welfare recipients can sign up voluntarily to have their rent paid automatically, (The Household Budget Scheme) but the issue is those who don't pay.

    There's a whole quagmire of legal complications around debt - and I don't have the links to hand but in a nutshell, social welfare is considered a substistance level of income, and if the State were to take involuntary deductions from social welfare payments, it could put someone below the level of income they need to sustain themselves - so they won't do that without a court order.

    Getting a court order is another story.

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,084 ✭✭✭✭Mrs OBumble


    As for evictions for non-payment, all it takes is for one eviction order to be followed by a (non-paying) tenant suicide, and no judge has the balls to evict again for years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,474 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    Emotional blackmail should never be allowed as a cover for law breaking and theft.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,031 ✭✭✭✭Del2005


    This is the reason why all our councils got out of social housing. They can't evict and the debt hangs over them for ever, much easier to fob tenants to private landlords and let them take the blame for the state of the market.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    What chance do landlords have when this can go on with a public body with all the resources at its disposal.


    The annoying thing is the little rent that is to paid month on month most likely is also tax payer money



  • Registered Users Posts: 497 ✭✭PalLimerick


    A lot of bitter Brendans and bitter brendas in here. I repeat again, there is no such thing as free houses. Again, there is no such thing as free houses, no matter how much certain People spout it.



  • Registered Users Posts: 210 ✭✭Mr Hindley


    But if someone has a house and they're not even paying the 50 euro a week for it i.e. they're paying zero, then it's a free house, right? I mean, it shouldn't be, by the rules, but if they're getting away with breaking the rules, then they're getting the house for free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,629 ✭✭✭jrosen


    It should be deducted at source, perhaps not at first but if there is rent not being paid rather than wait and allow the debt to rise the local authority should be more proactive in tackling the non payment.

    I work with a girl on lone parents living in an apt, I think HAP. Anyway she pays 100 per week towards her rent out of her lone parents payment and its deducted at source.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,003 ✭✭✭handlemaster


    Double post



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cuddlesworth


    If you're the council and you evict them, you have to house them again.

    For the same reasons social welfare tenants are not wanted by private landlords, when they are in arrears you will never get it back via the courts. Most court judgements I have seen were 5 Euros a week restitution, which was not paid.

    I'm going to make a assumption and say the tenants being sued are working and clearly have the means to pay but choose not to. South Dublin has no "cap" on payments, unlike others, and I have seen some higher earning tenants getting salty about this.



Advertisement