Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1152515261528153015313690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,242 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Does it matter if Merkel served Russia for ideological reasons, for personal advancement or being compromised.


    Same result.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,074 ✭✭✭eire4


    I have always been of the opinion that what you say in the last paragraph there was the real core reason behind Russia's invasion. The fact that Ukraine was moving towards what likely would be a more free open and prosperous future at least relative to the authoritarian dictatorship in Russia was a direct threat to those in power in Russia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,647 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I basically agree. It might be justified, as much as these things can be anyway, to hit a Russian city 'just because' in order to bring some of the pain of war home to Russia, but it would be unwise from an overall strategic point of view. It would only help gain support for the war among the Russian public, and something Ukraine really doesn't need is ever greater numbers of Russian troops being poured into their territory.

    On the other hand, hitting strategic targets within Russia's territory, like supply depots, transport infrastructure and so on, especially near Ukraine's borders would be uncalled-for and is something they've already been doing to an extent. Frustratingly, this is one of the things that longer ranged weapons would help to do more of, only such weapons are being withheld for the very (ostensible) reason of not allowing Ukraine to wage an offensive war and possibly provoke Putin into an escalation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,074 ✭✭✭eire4


    I would certainly put myself into that category of despising everything about Le Pen but also been disgusted by Macron's recent public statement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,074 ✭✭✭eire4


    I agree. We should send what weapons we have even if it is only a small amount.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,449 ✭✭✭nigeldaniel


    I agree with the other posters, we really can send on some military hardware. Those Steyr rifles are not doing much over here and according to wiki, we have a few RBS 70 anti-aircraft systems. I know for a fact the rangers have a good number of anti-material sniper rifles. I don't know how our small number of anti tanks weapons are and even if we have any left from all those training programs.

    Dan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,770 ✭✭✭rogber


    Chances are zero, they would be losing the moral superiority and nothing to gain from it militarily and would probably be nuked in response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    During the day, six people were insured in Kharkiv region - in Chuhuiv, Chuhuiv district and Balaklia, - the head of the Kharkiv Regional State Administration Oleh Sinehubov

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,247 ✭✭✭✭pgj2015


    Would there not be a chance that bringing the war to Russia, would make them rally against the war? no one wants their city bombed or their family and friends killed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    what war? only a special K operation here, nothing to see

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Bizarrely you present your personal viewpoint as some type of universal truth. Hate to break it to you - its not.

    I could just as easily claim you're substituting your own reality for "the dirty world of geopolitics and what is tolerable"

    And the most bizarre thing is that I only occasionally post in this thread so I would go as far to say you are projecting when I repeat that 'you seem very irked by people looking at this situation differently'

    Macron indeed is out on a limb with Scholz.

    Whatever about Macrons version of appeasement it should not be suggested that this is the sole model of diplomacy.

    "He's not alone in calling for a diplomatic result, even Ukraine have signalled it"

    But maybe you haven't read the news?

    "Ukraine's foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba says "calls to avoid humiliation of Russia can only humiliate France and every other country that would call for it."

    if you can't figure out how Macron is acting as an appeaser to Putin, I really can't help you.

    But plenty of experts have already spoken out against such an idea. This is just one. There's lots more.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,719 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    A lot of chatter on social media that the mood among Russian military analysts and observers is grim and depressed (from listening in to Telegram channels and so on). The regime is bogged down in the Donbass (the place it is supposedly "liberating"), making virtually zero progress and taking heavy-ish losses. No prospect of any sort of a victory in the next few months and many now wondering just what is the whole point of the special operation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,200 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Latest map shows Russians pushed a good few blocks back into the middle of town. Previously Russia had the whole town minus the large industrial plant there. Ukrainians are doing an excellent job in this fight. It would be a hard slog, but I hope Ukraine manage to push them all the way out of Sieverodonetsk.

    It would probably seriously sink an already reportedly low morale amongst the Russian forces. My guess is that Sieverodonetsk & Lysychansk were probably a sort of “Finish Line” for them so that they could claim an early “victory”. If Sieverodonetsk is’nt even falling easy for them…the end for them just slips off to the depressing distance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Bizarrely you think that your opinion’s are the only ones that are correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Nope. But bizarrely thats seems to be yet another contrarian comment in reply to others here - where you have a go at whoever is posting and ignore the topic under discussion. And no thats not a 'victim" mentality as you've previously came out with - it's simply an observation. But hey whatever.

    But yeah once again you're incorrect there. What I posted was not "opinion" rather the fact that Ukraine is not supporting Macrons version of 'diplomacy' as was suggested and as detailed Macron appeasement is considered a poor idea by plenty of experts.

    But then from your comments here I see you seem to think that Putin and friends are nice lads. Do I think you're correct? No. No I don't funnily enough.

    I'll leave you at it.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,809 ✭✭✭maebee




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11


    Russian troops shelling Kharkiv

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭techman1


    Who do you think will last the longest Putin or lukashenko? On paper you would day Putin however lukashenko is a wily operator he did not accede to Russian pressure to join the war early on. He is more like Franco getting as much as he can from Putin with the least commitment



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,767 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    I can see it happening very soon.

    Putin has been dictating the terms of this war. Using the safety of Russian soil to launch missile and air attacks on Ukraine.

    If Ukraine launches counter attacks on these sites. It's game over for Russia they'll have lost their advantage.

    It's why Putin is getting ancy now at the thought of targets getting hit in Russia proper now with these new long range artillery coming in to Ukraine. Threatening death to American and European sites.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    I believe Putins thinking is that the launching of attacks on Russia from Ukraine would be a declaration of war by Ukraine.

    Because as we all been told - Putins "special operation" isn't a war

    So by Putins bizarre up his own end thinking - he's doing nothing wrong bombing the shite out of Ukraine from Russia and murdering Ukrainian civilians, but if the Ukrainians bomb Russia even if it's military sites responsible for bombing Ukraine - that's justification for anything Putin can come up with.

    The fact that some other countries are playing along with Putins mind games is just one of the crazy parts of the illegal invasion, ethnic cleansing and destruction of a neighbouring country by Russias armed forces under Putin

    Thing is this won't end until Putin is taken out. And that has to be sooner than later in view of the barbaric war crimes Putin is perpetrating against the Ukrainian people.

    The neighbours wouldn't sit around and scratch their heads as the local thug repeatedly beat up the family next door and refuse to do anything because everyone is afraid of the local thug's big stick. And yet Putin not only able to do this, he has asshats like Macron who state that the local thug should not only get what he wants, but he shouldn't be embarrassed by others once he's finished beating up his neighbours, thrashing their house, taking their kids and a portion or all of the garden because he's decided its now all his.

    Its not like despots haven't been taken out previously. If not by his own then its going have to be someone else imho.

    Post edited by Mecanudo on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,823 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Yeah tit got tat response, bomb Russian then Kyiv will be levelled to show the Russian people a response



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 18,569 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    Which is all rather pathetic - we can do what we want to you but if you attack Russian soil you are declaring war and gives them any excuse to do what they want



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,033 ✭✭✭✭Richard Hillman


    Ukraine have already fired into Russia. They went after fuel depots in Belgorod and Bryansk



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,146 ✭✭✭Polar101


    Doesn't seem very likely that Ukraine would just randomly bomb Russian cities. There are plenty of targets inside their own borders, munitions are limited and there would be very little to gain. Targeting artillery sites or fuel depots - maybe, if they happen to be in range.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,315 ✭✭✭Banana Republic 1


    Bizarrely you thing I’m posting contrarian opinions which given the topic could only mean that I’m pro Putin. Find one post we’re I’ve backed Putin or this war. You won’t cause there are none.

    Just because I don’t post up other peoples Twitter feeds of tanks been blown up or outrage at the latest event doesn’t mean anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,547 ✭✭✭Fiery mutant


    This is a discussion board. People post up links to others Twitter feed or videos as discussion points. That's what it's for.

    You labeling people as mercenaries because they thanked someone else's post is contrarian and childish to be honest.

    We should defend our way of life to an extent that any attempt on it is crushed, so that any adversary will never make such an attempt in the future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,741 ✭✭✭20silkcut



    The posting of twitter articles, you tube videos, telegram feeds etc and discussing them is very interesting and what most people want to see here in this thread imho. There is nothing worse than two posters going over and back endlessly page after page arguing for the sake of arguing trying to have the last word.

    When the thread gets real busy I just skip to the posts with Articles.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    It's just an opinion and you have one too. I understand why he does it just as I understand that geopolitics at times rarely squares with personal mores nor illusory views of what the world should be but it really does not make him nor anyone else who suggests it the bad guy. Not sure why you are linking to rest of this stuff, it's just a bunch of links to people who agree with you.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,132 ✭✭✭✭is_that_so


    Except that they have shown that they won't let hm take Ukraine, he's pretty incapable of it anyway. How did respect ever come into this? It's looking to the peace and putting out that notion, however currently pointless that might be. Someone has to do it while others are busy shouting kill and no mercy.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So, what are you worried about, if they (and they doesn’t include France very much) won’t let Russia take Ukraine.

    If Russia is humiliated by complete defeat in Ukraine, are you okay with that?



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement