Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

How can we integrate Unionism into a possible United Ireland?

18283858788128

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Oh absolutely. That’s called sectarianism and yes the Uvf were up there with the Ira. I am not in denial like you.

    i suggest you go and research the actions of the Ira in areas where republicans were in the majority. Thank god there were lots of areas they were not dominant



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    No I didn’t. Everyone accepts the Ira were violent. I said nationalists need to accept the sectarianism of the Ira



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Well in my town the burnt the Protestant churches. The didn’t March on the Shankill, that would have required courage. They sent someone with special needs to risk blowing himself up as the slaughter men women and children. The Ira leaders were probably in the holiday homes in Donegal



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭briany


    There's a certain class of Ulster Unionist who will never accept a United Ireland. They'll either move away (as Arlene said she would) or else get violent. But this is only a percentage, and I'm not even saying it's anything like a majority, but just to point out that there will be a group who should not be engaged with in the event of a UI because they cannot be appeased in any reasonable way. That'd just be one of the realities of a UI.

    So, it falls to pragmatic Unionists and Nationalists to be swayed and to be able to say to them why a UI makes more sense from an economic and political perspective than to remain a part of the United Kingdom. If one wants to actively bring a United Ireland about, it's drafting this plan down to the finest of detail that they should be putting their energies into. A plan to make lives almost immediately better, north and south. If this proposal cannot be made, then the only way a United Ireland comes about is A) the Irish Nationalist contingent grows to an overwhelming majority (happening, I think, albeit quite slowly) B) the UK tanks economically and Ireland becomes the more attractive option without actually doing anything C) the UK government gets sick of NI and boots it out. Probably unconstitutional, but the UK doesn't actually have a constitution...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I don’t think Arlene said she would move. I could be wrong. When I heard her I thought I was completely in agreement with her.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    If you follow politics in the south the FF/FG reference it anytime they get asked an awkward policy question.

    I've yet to meet anyone who thinks one side is blameless in any area.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Mrs Foster was speaking on comedian Patrick Kielty's documentary My Dad, the Peace Deal and Me' was aired on BBC One last night.

    The documentary marked 20 years since the Good Friday Agreement, in which he opened up about the loyalist murder of his father.

    During the programme, Mr Kielty asked the former first minister: "If the majority did want to join the Republic of Ireland how would it feel to be a unionist, outside of the UK?"

    She replied: "First of all I don't think it's going to happen. If it were to happen, I'm not sure that I would be able to continue to live here, I would feel so strongly about it.

    "I would probably have to move."

    https://www.irishnews.com/news/brexit/2018/04/05/news/arlene-foster-says-i-would-probably-move-if-there-was-united-ireland-1297022/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,116 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    Why are you trying to sectarianise this issue? There is no reference to Catholics or Protestants in the Good Friday Agreement. Unification will not be about which church people attend but what they want for their future. Catholics and Protestants are equally irreligious in the north.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,116 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1525135801264263169?s=20&t=FKBNsinx-ZfebWVB7NkKww

    The people who voted for this party above will be the ones who will tip the balance in a Unification Referendum. I could not tell you the religious breakdown of 'others' for the life of me, nor do I care.

    Here's one thing to understand when it comes to choosing NI/UK or Ireland/EU; 'others' are observing what unionism is doing to the north bolstered by the treacherous behaviour of the British ruling classes and they will be contrasting it with the cautious maturity of Dublin/Brussels.

    So partitionists can keep crying for perpetual partition disguised as 'unionist buy-in' but you'll be howling at the moon, as per usual.

    Post edited by Junkyard Tom on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Yeah that’s exactly what I thought she said. Very different from a categoric I WOULD MOVE. But sure don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    ‘As per usual’ you are delusional. The polls say something very different



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭briany


    You can talk about the semantics of it, but the fact that she talked about the idea of moving away as the most likely outcome in the event of a UI, without any qualifier - any idea of what that would even be like, other than it would no longer be a part of the UK, strikes quite an intolerant tone. Hey, if Irish Nationalists have been able to peaceably tolerate living within the UK the last 20+ years, I think a dignified stateswoman like Arlene should be able to at least give it a shot before talking about the idea of moving away. It was a bad form comment from her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Let me be really honest. Ironically, having wanted a big win getting the protocol scraped, I am slightly nervous that too much success for unionists on this issue could weaken the union. Posters have scoffed and laughed at the idea that unionist action could disable the protocol. Starting to look like I might be right and the scoffing posters may be wrong. But I am keen we don’t go too far. I want both communities to continue to be content with quality of life in ni. There is nothing to be gained by a big unionist win here. I want just enough to remove sea checks and any European control but I don’t want nationalists noses rubbed in it. I hope the dup have that much sense but I doubt it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,687 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Thought she had left already. Is she not wotking for GBNews



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,687 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    A 'big win'???

    You are being used again downcow. It is so tragic you can't see it. But hey, you make your bed etc etc.


    BTW Nobody denied that Britain might be stupid enough to take unilateral action and here we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,116 ✭✭✭✭Junkyard Tom


    You are completely boxed in, if you 'win' you lose.

    If the British Government refuse to operate the checks on goods crossing from GB then I think the entire TCA should be suspended with a few months notice. We in the south should prepare for stepped-back mobile customs patrols on approved roads for all goods coming from the north with severe consequences for businesses not fully compliant. Let the north be at the wrong end of severely impaired UK supply-chains and we'll see how it goes for Unionism. I'd give 'NI' fewer than 5 years before it's voted out of existence permanently.

    Post edited by Junkyard Tom on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭Speedline


    Unionism has been told in no uncertain terms that it's the protocol or nothing. What you are describing is having your cake and eating it. And to be fair, it seems to be dawning on you what's about to kick off.

    I get a sense that you think that removing the protocol would be rubbing Catholics noses in it. I can't see why. It would be fcukking over all residents of NI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,635 ✭✭✭votecounts


    First of all there will never be a big win for unionists on this. Secondly, if Britain scraps the protocol unilaterally then a Trade war could initiated by the EU who have been more patient with Boris and his ilk. Also alot of farmers both Unionists and Nationalist won't be to happy having to restrict their sales with the south and the EU. You do realise that there was a report out recently that the North was the best performing region in the UK, that was down to the protocol. I hope you are not one those nutter unionist who'd prefer to lose 40000 jobs just to get the brexit they wanted. Unionists seem to mention that there is no cross community support for the protocol, exagerated due to unwillingness to serve as DFM under SF, but they never seem to mention there is also no cross community support for getting rid of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,687 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    'We're going to legislate, we are, we are, we are, we are, we are...........maybe




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    No at all. I want the sea checks etc gone. I just want the dup types to show a little humility if/when it happens - not a quality of theirs or SFs

    I fear SF have turned it into a win lose whereas it can be a win win

    but hey. Sure everyone told me it wouldn’t happen so you don’t need to worry.

    now if it happens just watch Eu suddenly find solutions to a hard border. Then we will be sitting pretty

    we just need to call it a draw



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    You have massively skewed that report. But that aside, can you imagine how good things will be when we also get free access from gb. Win win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    I was very aware of that report. Unionists won’t wear that this time - I trust



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 567 ✭✭✭Speedline


    Its not a competition, Downcow. This is thousands of people's lively hoods on the line here. There are no winners save for some unionists feeling warm and cuddly, safe in the knowledge that the Queen loves them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    We can all be winners in the north if Uk removes Eu control and Eu find a way to avoid hard border. It’s that simple. That’s win win



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,680 ✭✭✭✭downcow


    Her is a two minute interview, coincidentally the interviewer is Arlene, which demonstrates the challenges of unionists feeling integrated if nationalists were in charge in a UI. Coincidentally his example is about my home town.

    can you guys down south try and think of an equivalent. I’ll find one for you if your minds won’t go there

    https://youtu.be/IXQYAAZ_Yo0



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 54,250 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Bull. The Loyalist terrorist murderers were probably in uniform patrolling Belfast.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,939 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Honestly, the relationship between Unionists (at least those Unionists who haven’t gone to Alliance) and the Conservative Party reminds me of one of those reality TV shows my girlfriend seems to love where you hear some guy give vacuous stomach-churning platitudes to a girl while my girlfriend screams at the TV “don’t get back with him you idiot!”. How many times do you need to be thrown under a bus by these people before you cop on that you are being used?

    Campaigning for Brexit to schism NI and the Republic was a strategically stupid idea, having faith in Boris has led only to the Protocol, and trusting the Tories again to make meaningful change to the Protocol is only going to lead to disappointment — or something worse than the Protocol which will only fracture Unionism further. It is as clear as day that, following some of the thumpings they took in the election, the Tories have sniffed this Protocol issue as a great way to resurrect the old Europhobia battle lines which have worked so well for them in recent years. It is all designed to keep Labour at bay in England and make them look like Brussels Bootlickers — and in that endeavour they will happily charm the Unionists of NI before unceremoniously flinging them under the bus again.

    The only smart move for the DUP now is to cut their losses, accept the Protocol, and silently reflect on how badly they have got their strategy wrong from Day One when it came to Brexit. Instead, they keep looking for this “win” you mention that is never going to come.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,051 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The DUP won't want to climb down from this particular hill. They've staked out their position very publicly. Maybe they would climb down after enough time has elapsed and something else happens that distracts their voters from the fact that they went back into government, but that won't be happening shortly unless Westminster can find some way to strong arm the DUP back into Stormont. What progressive laws could Westminster foist upon the North that would have Sammy Wilson's face redder than a ripe tomato?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,973 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Why is it up to the EU to find a way to avoid the hard border when its the UK changing the status quo? Also what do you suggest they do? Or are you gonna go with the typical unionist of say NO and refuse to offer any alternatives?

    I hope its not more magic "technology" that doesn't exist anywhere else in the world.

    Also the Tories have shyed off everytime theyve threatened something like this, they are absolutely gonna do the same again this time as all it is is an effort to stop Boris and partygate being the centre of attention.

    Carsons quote has never been more apt and with every passing day of the DUP and unionists falling for the Tories lies it becomes more and more so.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,880 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Okay you're saying that the rise of the Alliance reflects the emergence of a substantial body of genuinely 'neither Orange nor Green' voters in the North and that the UI referendum will be won by the bulk of these opting for Ireland/EU on a pragmatic basis.

    I don't believe this is the reality of NI, although it might be in another generation. IMO nearly everyone there, even if they vote Alliance and describe themselves as 'Other' in an opinion poll, has a sense deep down of themselves as belong either to the Catholic/Nationalist or Protestant/Unionist 'tribe'. And for a UI referendum to be won a sizeable chunk of the latter would have to 'cross the floor' and definitively reject the tribe of their upbringing. And I don't see that happening anytime soon...



Advertisement