Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cut to speed limit might be on the cards.

«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,230 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    I have no problem with that, I have been doing economy driving for many years, and I am not a nuisance on the roads doing it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    And then Dublin airport has queues out the door for flights.


    this is Green Party bolloxology, which they’ve always gone on with, before any war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,407 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    It's a good job Ireland has a public transport network 2nd to none 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,187 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    It's a good job that the current speed limits are rigorously enforced 😂

    I don't think there'll be much more enforcement of 110 on a motorway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,230 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    I detest the Greens, but this happened previously before they existed. In 1979 the 60 mph limit was reduced to 55mph to save fuel during the oil crisis back then.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,005 ✭✭✭✭AlekSmart


    An integral component of this nonsense is now surfacing regularly in each doom laden piece of reportage,focusing on getting people into sacrifice mode,which of course will not apply to members of the Oireachtas or associated quasi-criminal followers.

    It comes as Minister for the Environment Eamon Ryan urged consumers in Ireland to take smaller efficiencies when it comes to cutting their daily use of power.

    "That saves consumers' money, it reduces the amount of gas that we buy from the market and therefore revenues going to the Russian government," he told a meeting of the International Energy Agency, adding: "It's a step in the efficiencies direction where we need to go anyway."

    Minister Ryan said all these smaller efficiencies could quickly add up.

    Either this gentlemans policies stack up in their own right or they do not. Invoking Russia or Ukraine in any of this is just cringeworthy,particularly as it is aimed directly at those of us who would rather spray the man and his party acolytes with DDT or Jeyes Fluid,before giving him the benefit of taking any of his twittery seriously.

    Even more anger inducing is his slavish buy-in to this little gem.....

    The IEA released a ten-point plan yesterday including measures such as adjusting your boiler settings, driving more slowly and swapping short-haul flights for trains which it said could help consumers reduce their reliance on Russian energy and cut their bills.

    It took Michael O Leary to point out the bleedin obvious,that Ireland being an island outlier to the European Continent does'nt actually have ANY road or rail links to ANYWHERE.

    When will these eejits take their heads out of the clouds and embrace reality ?


    Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

    Charles Mackay (1812-1889)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    This applies to all fuels.

    If you burn less you save money.

    If the fuel gets more expensive you save even more money.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,009 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    The reduction of the speed limit from 60 to 55 was in the US as far as I can recall. I don't remember it being done here but I'm open to correction.

    You seem to think it's a bad thing which is puzzling.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It was.

    The ROTR until the mid/late 1990s insisted NSL was still 55, even though it was restored in about 1990.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,709 ✭✭✭jd




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Amazing how those changes too until 2005 to come through with metric - the 55mph to 60mph was actually 1992 looking up the SI.

    That 50mph for HGVs was also brought in in 1992, but was still less than 56mph on motorways that equivalent vehicles were allowed do in the UK, and it was ~2013 before we changed to that (90km/h by then)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,009 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,741 ✭✭✭Phil.x


    This is just speak down talk from school teacher salad box ryan & Co.

    Less wash more walking.

    Less meat more salad.

    Less car more bike.

    Less road space for cars.

    Less bnm briquettes more imported briquettes.

    More charges for air travel on an island.

    More charges for recycling.

    Calls for Water charges.

    Calls for Higher property tax.

    Less coal, oil, and gas more expensive heating options that only the rich and stay at home social merchants get with grants from the carbon tax while I stay in arrears.

    The list is never ending.

    This breed of green need to be flushed out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,536 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There is just a slight problem with this proposal. We don't have NSL anymore, except when signed on some side roads where signing 80 would be ridiculous. The intent is definitely going to be cutting 120 and possibly 100 limits, not the 80 on a subset of roads. In '79 they just need to promote that the NSL sign now meant 55.

    Replacing lots, and lots, and lots of plastic faced metal speed limit signs would have to be quantified for its resources impact.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Greens wanted to cut speed limits in 2020


    The sixteen largest ships emit the same amount of CO2 as all the world's cars.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    dropping from 120km/h to 100km/h on the motorway between dublin and galway means the journey would take 1h48m rather than 1h30m, so not exactly onerous; probably would save at least 20% in fuel i suspect.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 716 ✭✭✭macvin


    It's just too simplistic.

    The most "efficient" speed for me on a motorway is 115kmh.

    That includes time which has to have a value.


    The biggest waste of fuel is needless use of brakes due to poor driving manner as in cars aggressively accelerating only to meet traffic and hit the brakes.


    "Easy does it" would be a better campaign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,392 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    My first car in the US was an late 80s Honda and it had 55 marked in red on the speedometer, every other number was in white.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,921 ✭✭✭SouthWesterly


    Too right. I'm tired of going at 20kmh behind a tractor. I can go at 15kmh no problem 😁



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Replacing lots, and lots, and lots of plastic faced metal speed limit signs would have to be quantified for its resources impact.

    i'd say if the drop was successfully implented, the resource impact would be 'paid for' within less than a day. that's an absolute finger in the air guess though!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭JayPS 2288


    Don’t forget that the kinetic energy of the car is E=1/2 mv^2.

    The energy consumption increases by the square of the velocity of the car. The kinetic energy is 70% if driving at 100 km/h rather than 120.

    That’s some fuel saving for little extra time.

    And the calculation from @magicbastarder seems to be based on the assumption of driving flat out at 120 km/h from point to point. Much of that journey will involve slowing for tolls, stop start in towns. Reducing by a modest 20 km/h will have little impact.



  • Registered Users Posts: 269 ✭✭JayPS 2288


    Taking the extreme example of driving from Malin Head to Mizen Head (even if the whole stretch was 120 km/h, which it isn’t), you’d still only “waste an hour”.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Don’t forget that the kinetic energy of the car is E=1/2 mv^2.

    The energy consumption increases by the square of the velocity of the car. The kinetic energy is 70% if driving at 100 km/h rather than 120.

    you're right, but for the wrong reasons; burning fuel to increase kinetic energy only really matters during acceleration, but when at a steady speed, i.e. when kinetic energy is not changing, it doesn't take fuel to maintain KE, it takes fuel to push the air out of the way. the vast majority of fuel burn at 120km/h is overcoming air resistance, and air resistance squares with velocity.

    IIRC the bugatti veyron, which develops ~1000BHP needs 150BHP (could be 250BHP?) to get to 150mph, but another 850BHP to get to 250MPH, and that's down to the air.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    While at the same time banning the sale of turf and Smokey coal, timber for firewood will be next in line on the hit list. Then they can control oil gas and electric heating by limiting it, same with food, wait and see.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    yeah, and soon after that you'll only be allowed go from dublin to galway if there's a good strong easterly.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    This link suggests that there may be more than meets the eye when it comes to marine vs. motor car emissions.

    http://www.oldsaltblog.com/2021/04/no-sixteen-large-ships-do-no-pollute-more-than-all-the-cars-in-the-world/

    Whatever about ships we actually have to pay to fill up our cars at the pump and slowing down can save us money.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    The sixteen largest ships emit the same amount of CO2 as all the world's cars.

    not only is that wrong, you're even getting the incorrect claim wrong.

    the claim you're parroting was about sulphur dioxide, not CO2. and even with that, the claim about SO2 doesn't stand up.

    anyway, the world's cars are estimated to produce two to four times as much CO2 as the entire global maritime fleet.




  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    huh, i should have refreshed, elperello got there before me.

    also - the claim, originally made in 2009, and based on faulty assumptions, obviously couldn't take into account that sulphur limits were dropped from 3.5% to 0.5% in 2020.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,771 ✭✭✭Dakota Dan


    Curtesy of the BBC f course you won’t find any independent source because it doesn’t fit the narrative.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    This is not the conspiracy theories forum? The chap who originally formulated the claim was interviewed for that, how much closer to the source do you want?



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's a pity we designed motorways with 160km/hr design speeds. Some amount of money wasted. Meanwhile in most of Europe it's 130 on far worse (some of them) motorways than ours.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,477 ✭✭✭✭colm_mcm


    Ah yeah, I had a fair idea that stat was a bit wonky 🤭



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,187 ✭✭✭mikeecho


    In reality, they could just cover up the reminder signs, and just replace the speed limit signs at the motorway entry points.

    There is no legal obligation to have all of the reminder signs.

    In fact, I dont see reminder signs when driving abroad.


    Yes there will be a cost, but not as much as you might think.

    Btw . I'm opposed to any to reduction, in fact of like to see motorways increased to 130km/h. ( Or even 140 like in Poland) but haven driven in Poland... 140 with their standard of driving can sometimes be a bit rediculas.

    But I'm sure no-one would have an issue with the cost of replacing signs with higher limits... Strange isn't it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Not to worry.

    Besides we need all those ships to deliver the cars 🙂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,230 ✭✭✭TheRiverman


    It was introduced here in Ireland in 1979. I do not think it is a bad thing, I have been doing economy driving for many years, reducing speed is just one of the many ways to save fuel when driving.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 109 ✭✭Ceramic


    How about actually enforcing the existing speed limits. My observation of urban driving in Ireland is that almost 100% of the drivers completely ignore the 50 limit once they're outside very narrow streets and if you're doing 100 or 120 you get overtaken all the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    I have an electric car so I can drive at 140 then right ?

    Eamon Ryan is making it very difficult for folks like me (who would normally try and make an effort to be green)not just give up and say fook that.

    It also says a lot about boards motoring forum that so many dont see this as a totally ridiculous pile of shoite. If I want to save the planet I can drive at 100 if I want - but if I dont then I should be allowed do 120 ( or more )



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,434 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    We all share the planet. You don't have your own planet.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,863 ✭✭✭RobAMerc


    "It also says a lot about boards motoring forum that so many dont see this as a totally ridiculous pile of shoite. "


    thanks Eamon 🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 83,407 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    M


    I see a possible money maker for government, average speed camera's where you pay more to drive over 100 km/h.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,472 ✭✭✭✭road_high


    People are cripped with extra costs, much of it fanned by government taxes and levies. And the latest they come up with is yet more nanny state rules to make your life even more miserable. They can fcuk right off. We need a revolution here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,869 ✭✭✭John_Rambo


    I have a Campervan with the bunk on top of the cab, possibly the worst vehicle for aerodynamics. The amount of fuel saved from driving slower is shocking!! Up to 40% with a small reduction of motorway speed. The extra time on the road is minimal (as you pointed out).



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Drove from Dublin to tipp yesterday,

    People absolutely crawling it on the motorway doing 80kmph

    Trucks were overtaking them even

    It's absolutely infuriating and dangerous



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,434 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Funnily enough, there's more than just Eamonn that sees the need for dramatic change.

    Is driving fast a significant joy in your life, overall?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    'we need a revolution' over motorway speed limits. you mean we need to overthrow the government because of this?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,963 ✭✭✭Chris_5339762


    Europe saying "work from home 3 days per week" when I'm not even allowed to work from home for one. And they want to cut the speed limits on my commute? Out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    In a way you might be making the case for lowering the upper limit.

    If 80 is widespread the gap to 120 could indeed be dangerous in some circumstances.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's not widespread only a few, usually elderly fair enough but enough to cause enough hassle for everybody else

    120 is absolutely fine, if some people wanna drive a bit slower than 120 that's grand but when trucks are over taking you that's taking the pissh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,560 ✭✭✭✭elperello


    Trucks pulling out to overtake slow traffic and cars doing 120+ in the right hand lane is bad news all right.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,158 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    irish people are terrified of driving in the left lane. i drove to cork the evening of the all ireland last year - loads of cork and limerick fans returning home - and the M8 was clear for over 1km in front of me, and 1km behind me - and the right hand lane was essentially full. i was doing the same speed as the cars in the right hand lane too, probably 100km/h.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement