Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

BoJo banished - Liz Truss down. Is Rishi next for the toaster? **threadbans in OP**

13435373940297

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭StevenToast


    The story is already over....the snake has slithered away again.

    "Don't piss down my back and tell me it's raining." - Fletcher



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Seems like the delay in Sunak's apology was likely down to him having to be convinced not to resign, as it would have put too much pressure on Johnson to have to do the same thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,598 ✭✭✭Cody montana




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,088 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    There doesn't appear to be any appetite from the Tories to try to force him out. He isn't going to go unless forced to.

    Despite having such a large majority, and thus being able to handle a change of leader, the opposite seems to have happened. Such a large majority has actually crippled the Tory party as they believe that only Johnson can deliver electoral success.

    That without Johnson, they face electoral wipeout. Doesn't say much about the party and what it offers, but that seems to be the case.

    They have all backed him so much at this stage that its almost too late to save themselves



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    If he's not resigning after literally being fined by the police for breaking the law, he's not going to resign after a report saying he broke the law.

    The time for him to resign has now passed. The fine has been issued, everyone knows he literally broke the law, and he knows there's not enough support for a motion of no-confidence to remove him (especially how tainted some of his possible successors are now too).

    He's staying. He got away with it. It's absolutely f*cking disgusting, but I can't see him going now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,131 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    He was never going to resign under any circumstances. It has to be a push but there are few left with any credibility who can push him.

    The elections in May are the next big possible turning point. If they are not willing to shove him after a disaster there then he probably makes it all the way to an election.

    Still in power and "gotten away with it" are two very different things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,598 ✭✭✭Cody montana


    The Uk might as well give up on the rule of law if he’s allowed to stay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Unfortunately it's the same as what's happening in the US. So many of the "checks & balances" require on people following accepted norms and unwritten rules. But when someone just says "No" to those, there's nothing in place to force it. And once it's made clear that you can do that and get away with it, the next person will be inclined to push those limits even more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,296 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    "I paid the fine" as if to him, a £50 fine is any penalty at all, even more so for Sunak

    The British need to look at Johnson and Zelenski side by side and wonder if they might have gotten short changed in the leadership department

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Damn, just realised there's no PMQs today. Not back until next week.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 43,138 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle




  • Posts: 3,127 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Nonsense, would you say the same if he got a speeding fine?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,018 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    Not next week, I think - no new civil service reports in the period before the elections. SO it will be after that.

    Johnson must have sold his soul to the devil, to have this much luck in escaping the consequences of his deeds. The war in Ukraine being only one of the most noticeable ways.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,131 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Nonsense. This was a once in 100 years pandemic where the entire country shut down.

    I suppose next you will remind us there is a war on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,018 ✭✭✭✭volchitsa


    That's really not comparable: old people were effectively kept prisoners without family visits, women gave birth without family or partners, sometimes suffered miscarriages alone, people died alone, were buried alone - all because this was supposedly so important to save lives. Nothing like a minor speeding fine.

    ”I enjoy cigars, whisky and facing down totalitarians, so am I really Winston Churchill?” (JK Rowling)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    There's a significant difference in that it's now pretty clear he knowingly and repeatedly lied to Parliament. That's a breach of the Ministerial Code, and the minister or prime minister is expected to resign their position if found to have lied to Parliament.

    The laws the PM broke were also laws he made, imposing huge restrictions on the people of the country. People lost the chance to be with dying loved ones, missed out on huge family events, postponed weddings, didn't see family for months. The idea that he then broke those rules for small parties is going to be hugely unpalatable for most. He pays a small fine, but facing no political consequences for it is going to cause a lot of resentment and with current or possible future Covid restrictions, is going to lead to a lot of people asking themselves why should they bother following the law when the guy who made the law didn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,296 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    The convention in Parliament is that a minister who knowingly lies to Parliament should resign

    Johnson, in breaching this convention should see a parade of parliamentarians breaking that other convention and accusing him openly of lying, one after another and dare Lindsey Hoyle to enforce one convention or the other

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Well his claim re the birthday 'party' at any rate is that it never occurred to him at the time that it was against the law so when stood up in parliament and insisted no rules were broken I suppose he can maintain he believed that when he was saying it...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah this is it. He's insisting he didn't know he was at any parties at the time. That would be consistent with what he said to parliament but it would also mean he's incredibly stupid. So he's playing dumb. Neither his supporters or detractors will believe him, but he's out of the position of needing to resign for lying to parliament. That rule relies on the politicians having some shred of decency and caring about the convention of parliament above their own self interest. Lying to get out of it is easy if you have no sense of decency or shame.

    Bottom line: he's safe again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,131 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It was illegal to have any sort of gathering whatsoever not just a party. Even being in a room for a non essential cake was illegal. It doesn't matter if the cake was eaten or cut or whatever it was illegal. Any gathering of that size was illegal and everyone knew that nevermind the guy who made the rule



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    The report won't force Johnson to resign but if it's sufficiently damaging it might prompt his overthrow by his party.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,907 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Well he is somehow insisting he didn't realise that until the police pointed it out so that gets him off the hook for lying to parliament. Very hard to prove beyond reasonable doubt that someone knowingly lied



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,131 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    He wrote the law. It's easy to prove because he was on TV almost every single day telling people the law.

    It's like me saying I didn't know my name is breezy1985 until someone told me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,102 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeah, it's ridiculous but it won't be proven and that's the end of it. Almost anyone else would have resigned early in the process (or would have disallowed parties in No.10 during lockdowns to begin with). But that's not the case.

    The Torys are now in a the tricky position of pretending the PM is so daft that he didn't know he was at parties and also pretending he's the best person to run the country...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,088 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    To believe he didn't lie to parliament, one not only needs to accept his claim that at the time of the event he wasn't aware he was backing the rules, one also needs to further accept that once the issue was raised he never checked the rules to see.

    He repeatedly claimed that no rules had been broken. Not that nothing had happened, but that if something happened he was happy that he was within the rules.

    He lied. No way out of that. No question. Which is why the Tories aren't fighting that, they are attempted to say that with Ukraine at war its not time to hold Johnson to account



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,832 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Johnson can possibly claim ignorance for the birthday event. But there are rumours there could be further fines yet to come. If so, Johnson either has to resign as he has no possible excuse left and the Tories might feel he's now definitely too big of a liability, or he just says f*ck it and refuses to go. Unfortunately the latter is most likely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,131 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    No he can't. The law was so strict at the time that having any gathering whatsoever even your own family in your house was illegal.



  • Posts: 1,877 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The pressure is mounting,,,

    "Justice minister resigns over No 10 Partygate revelations"

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/apr/13/justice-minister-david-wolfson-resigns-partygate-boris-johnson



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,414 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    Boris is expected to announce tomorrow that migrants crossing the channel will be processed in Rwanda, that might bring him back in favour with some people...

    https://news.sky.com/story/asylum-seekers-to-be-sent-6-000-miles-to-rwanda-for-processing-under-government-plans-to-halt-channel-crossings-12589616



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,296 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    If the opposition let him get away with it, he will survive. If they decide to apply the political pressure, they will win

    Every time Johnson says he didn't know it was a lie he'll look like a bigger idiot.

    His own party doesn't care but the voters will be swayed by repeated weaknesses being exposed repeatedly


    If I was Starmer I'd go into the HOC with 3 life sized posters. 1 of Johnson, 1 of Zellinski, and one of Neville Chamberlain

    I'd say Johnson could not even keep the lights out in his own flat during the blitz that was Covid.

    That a true leader puts the people first, and Johnson always puts himself first, and then say Johnson cosying up to Russian Oligarchs is like why Chamberlain was replaced by Churchill (appeasement)

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



Advertisement