Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Ukraine (Mod Note & Threadbanned Users in OP)

1152153155157158322

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,146 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Cowardice? Best recent example is a recent American president who scuttled away into a bunker because of a mere riot near the White House.

    Post edited by ilkhanid on


  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'm finding this extremely difficult.

    I know what is happening in Ukraine. I investigated war crimes in the former Yugoslavia.

    War, and what happens in wars is unbelievably disgusting and heartbreaking. I cannot even start to explain how devastating it is for people living in conflict. I can't deal with people trying to defend Russia. There is no defending rape, looting, assault on ordinary citizens, and that is what is happening. I can't follow any of these threads anymore. I cannot understand how anyone can defend what is happening to ordinary citizens in Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,492 ✭✭✭McGiver


    You're a Russian apologetist and didn't bother to provide any rational argument as a response to any of my points. Only waffle and argumentum ad hominem. You do not discuss, you polute the thread with nonsense and conspiracy theories laced with Russian propaganda. Either you are a Russian troll, deluded person or a useful idiot in Russian service. The latter group are common, unfortunately. Creating chaos in the democratic world, and making us argue with each other while Kremlin steals en masse and wages various wars and "operations".

    It is pointless to engage with you. You live in a delusional reality. And you're on going on the ignore list 😎



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,492 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Mariupol is a Russian majority speaking city. Just for everyone's reference.

    Completely crazy if you think about what's going on there - it's a ghost town, everyone left, being razed to the ground and besieged.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,984 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    I watched it. Andrew Bacevich? He places the majority of the blame on Putin. I told myself I'd stop watching the moment he mentioned Iraq, he almost made it.

    As for the Burns quotes, they are observations. Russia does feel provoked by NATO, many are keenly aware of that, which is why there's been an appeasement policy for years. It took until 2014 for NATO to actually react to Russian expansionism. Russia expands through force, NATO expands through voluntary membership (slight difference)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Your posts are the epitome of the directionless Anti-western Leftist -

    If they had dealt with Putin more firmly 15 years ago, - Then my friend you would have been up in arms about 'western imperialism'

    USA come to Europe's rescue with LNG shipments, as Nord Stream 2 is shelved and Russia is bled dry in Ukraine - The US supplying LNG to Europe allows Europe to further punish Russia - of course a hysterical anti-western poster like yourself, just sees this as helping America - as though that is the point

    I also firmly believe that this war could have been avoided had Ukraine, US and EU acknowledged publicly that there was no possible chance of Ukraine joining NATO in the short term. - of course you do. Your central thesis has always been that NATO (a defensive organization) is responsible for Russia (Non-Member NATO) invading the Ukraine (Also Non-Member NATO) -I have visions of Mearsheimer running away from you in a seminar - you may think he would be on your side - he wouldnt be - trust me. He has no time for hysterical Anti-capitalists - he is a Realist (literally

    By the way, do you think the billions in military aid going to Ukraine is for free? The weapons industry is making a fortune and every penny will have to be paid back by Ukraine. - Did you think they were free? Did anyone state they were free? Has the Ukraine demanded Free weapons? @Nordner we get it - you hate capitalism - bravo

    The number of Western geopolitical goals being achieved as a result of the war in Ukraine is striking. One might almost think the whole thing was planned.... - Absolutely - it was planned - along with the Plandemic/5G - and the fake moon-landings (which were faked ON THE MOON USING THE ROSWELL SAUCER - Which is why the pictures seemed so real! The fake landing was filmed there)

    @Nordner you make me pull my hair out - you really do. I can tell you are intelligent. But you are not at all critical of your own biases - you mistrust/dislike USFP, Capitalism, NATO and the west in general. Everything that goes wrong in the world is their fault. When its not their fault, you struggle to find ways to MAKE IT THEIR FAULT. Nothing you are saying is credible. Every post is just Anti Western Bile, without an ounce of objectivity. You are not approaching this conflict, to discuss, debate, and come to a conclusion. If you are honest (seriously honest) - you decided, the moment it started, who was to blame. And you are finding distorted and garbled stuff (including Mearsheimer) to make it so

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    it's just so hard, I'm finding it so difficult, I know how this effects ordinary victims of war crimes. I just cannot deal with anyone trying to justify Russian war crimes ......



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭Nordner



    Must be nice being so convinced of your opinion....you are in good company on this thread anyways! 😅



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭Nordner


    You are the one unwilling to explore honestly any opinion that does not correspond to your own.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 29,569 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    By any reasonable definition of the word, the military aid begin to Ukraine is indeed free.

    Will countries exert political pressure in future on the back of having given it? Probably, but such is true of basically everything. There will be no bills sent to Ukraine and no demands on pain of invasion or isolation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 125 ✭✭Nordner


    Greed is to blame for all of it...simple as that.

    You seriously need to take a look at this doc

    I honestly think it would open your eyes.

    As usual it is poor working class kids on both sides, killing each other and dying for the good of their respective masters who give no **** about them...

    This thread is proof positive that western society has become a heaving mass of dumbed down, easily manipulated, narcissistic morons....



  • Posts: 18,749 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What is this post about?

    That there are people working in the army from RussiaThat are from the lower Russian classes? Im. sure everyone knows that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭liamtech


    If greed has anything to do with it - its the Greed of Putin and his regime. We live in a capitalist society. Everything is done with self interest in mind. But there are standards, and ethics and morality too. The US will give us LNG - will they turn a profit? Yes. Are they doing it with that in mind? Yes partially. But the main reason is Europe's willingness and need to disconnect from Russian Energy imports.

    Are their working class people in armed forces? Yes, absolutely. Why are Ukrainian working class soldiers killing their Russian counterparts?

    • Because Russian invaded Ukraine
    • Because their forces are raping, murdering, and looting
    • Because they have been brainwashed into thinking Ukraine is a NAZI state

    How does any of the above have anything to do with NATO?

    @Nordner your type of left wing politics is ruining the left en masse. This is Corbynesque type nonsense. Yes Jeremy sounded wonderful when he gave speeches. Unfortunately as a political leader, my 12 year old could have beaten him.

    You are not posting anything credible. And when you are called out, you revert to this sad, tired old fashioned socialism. It sounds lovely. In a speech. But its not credible. And you dont have the excuse that you are not intelligent - you clearly are. You are misguided, and morally confused.

    Do you know what i will say? I blame GW Bush, and the Post 9/11 Iraq War, for creating the environment in which your mind has been warped. They made hideous mistakes, and went to war on faulty grounds, and weakened the standing of the west. And you @Nordner , you are Collateral Damage. And the damage manifests years later, with you, sincerely holding your beliefs. And blaming the west for the actions of a non-western state. Hideous actions, including rape, murder, torture and looting. Horrors. That cannot AT ALL be equated with anything a western power has done in generations.

    And nonsensical as it is - you blame the west. Its a moralistic hangover from 2001-2005 - you need to snap out of it

    I shouldnt have even posted - its just, something analogous to embarrassment, but without the arrogance. Its fear, perhaps concern. That this anti western leftism is dangerous, and is gonna further warp the left. And have the right wing laughing at us on election day. Just as BJ did at Corbyn's expense in 2019


    EDIT - im watching your YT link - i cannot at all see what it has to do with this war btw but il reply none the less

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,327 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    @Nordner

    I did listen to your earlier youtube video (Andrew Bacevich interview).

    The man blamed Putin/Russia for this war and said at one point he was "the criminal" here. He was loud and clear on that, more than you've been. He said that a promise from US/NATO and perhaps from Ukraine's leaders that Ukraine would not be joining NATO, "might" have prevented war, not that such promises were almost certain to prevent the war as you believe. This seems more unlikely to me now, given the events since that interview was published (11 March) and some important goals Russia appear to have or had (their "de-Nazification" - code for a Stalinesque purge of Ukrainians). They would never get this from Ukraine's leadership just forswearing NATO membership. Russia must invade and then brutalise the population of Ukraine to achieve this. 

    He also did not mention your simplistic 1-d pet theory from your "own research", that energy and resources and the US/Western greed to control them is the main cause of every conflict including this one. That was not surprising.

    On NATO expansion Eastward and it provoking Russia, he also said that the Baltic states, Poland etc. seeking NATO membership (he kind of conflated it with their EU membership) was understandable and it was perfectly logical of them to do this. I have hever seen you or the others that go on about the NATO "expansion" etc. ever admit that it made sense for these countries, and that they were the supplicants. NATO or the US or the Western Europeans were not holding a whip over them all to join.

    He did say they should not have been granted that NATO membership because it provoked Russia. I can see the argument, but there is a sort of chicken and egg quality to this. They sought NATO membership post Soviet collapse because they wanted to embed themselves fully in the "West", were still scared of Russia and did not trust it + wanted insurance. I'm sure the US and European NATO members thought it was very unlikely Russia would be going back to open aggression towards its neighbours in future. On the evidence of Russian behaviour in 2022, these countries were wise in hindsight to have gotten NATO membership.

    As for the EU, well the US has no say let alone a veto on who can join it. Whatever about NATO, don't think the US would have gotten very far throwing its weight around in the 90s/00s to try & roadblock the EU memberships of the former Warsaw pact states states to avoid angering Russia. The potential future EU membership of Ukraine is as much, if not more threatening towards Russia & Putin here, and a huge factor in Russia invading the country IMO.

    At the end he claimed the "900,000 deaths caused by the US in Iraq and Afghanistan" meant there was no right for US govt. in particular to "point fingers" at Russia during their war in Ukraine that had (acccording to him) only "miniscule" casualties.

    His figure is from https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/figures/2021/WarDeathToll This seems to include all violent deaths in wars and conflicts in the ME/Asia where US has been involved during the "Global War on Terror"- so as far as I can understand it, this attributes deaths caused by ISIS, Sunni-Shia communal violence in Iraq while occupied by the US, the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan while US forces were there, Yemen war etc. directly to the US). It is not a fair comparison with Russia and Ukraine, & I just don't think he'd perhaps be making it today (10 April), given what we know now.

    Post edited by fly_agaric on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,335 ✭✭✭Field east


    It is not crazy. . You are basing your comment on the kind of rant Putin is putting out there , eg we are all the one, we are the same, we are all brothers etc, etc, etc . The sole reason for this war - and Putin has said so himself in various ways- is to pull the 13 independent states back into a reconstructed USSR. Remember when he said that the MAJOR MAJOR mistake made by Yeltsin in splitting up the USSR. This idea of getting rid of nazis, failed state , or whatever you are having are all smoke screens



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    And there it is. Only I know The Truth, only I am enlightened among "morons". As expected this entire "both sides" angle is a play for intellectual superiority and condescension towards those who see this as less Empire Games (which among other fallacies, patronises Ukrainians' suffering and fight for existence as mere naive, idiot pawns) and more brazen belligerence from someone on recording as believing Russia should re-form the USSR.

    Buh-bye.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    Mod note:

    Despite multiple posters being warned, people continue to make personal attacks on others, or talking about the low quality of discussion, but not discussing the actual topic i.e. Ukraine.

    The next stage is posters being banned.

    Discuss about Ukraine, or dont discuss at all. Your choice



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,492 ✭✭✭McGiver


    Greed indeed. Not a big revelation.

    Putin is probably the richest man on earth, he stole it all, hid it in tax havens and various assets in "the West". The estimated worth of his is $150-200b, technically more, basically anything in Russia could belong to him.

    Anders Aslund, Swedish economist and author of Russia’s Crony Capitalism: The Path from Market Economy to Kleptocracygives a higher estimate, arguing that Putin has somewhere between $100 billion and $150 billion in assets. Aslund based his calculation on the wealth of Putin's confidants. The economist estimates Putin's friends hold between $500 million and $2 billion each on behalf of the Russian president.


    Perhaps the most extreme estimate of Putin’s wealth came from financier Bill Browder—a fierce critic of the Russian president and one of the main proponents of the Magnitsky Act—who testified to the U.S. Senate in 2017 that he believed the Russian president to be “one of the wealthiest men in the world,” with assets totaling up to $200 billion. That sum would make Putin richer than Jeff Bezos, Bill Gates, and Elon Musk. Browder based his calculation on his belief that Putin ordered Russia's richest oligarchs to offer him half of their wealth in the wake of the 2003 arrest of Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the founder of oil company Yukos and once Russia's wealthiest person, who was jailed for fraud.


    Others argue that trying to calculate Putin's wealth misses the point. They say that the Russian president controls so much of the Russian economy that the exercise is meaningless. As exiled Russian billionaire Sergei Pugachev argued in the Guardian in 2015, "Everything that belongs to the territory of the Russian Federation Putin considers to be his…Any attempt to calculate [his net worth] won’t succeed."




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,904 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    What are Ukraine's chances of repelling the coming onslaught in the east/south of country?

    They'll be massively outnumbered probably 3-1.

    The Russians won't go for column like attacks but just obliterate anything with artillery and they have almost free air space



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 14,567 Mod ✭✭✭✭johnnyskeleton


    I would expect it to be similar to what weve already seen. The Russians will commit more troops to Donbas or Kherson, but the Ukrainian forces in the East will be freed up.

    Destroying cities and towns with artillery takes time and large amounts of munitions. They could well try to do that but their progress would be slow.

    The big risk for the Ukrainians is that they could get cut off by a corridor from Kharkiv to Melitopol. However, its not clear that the Russians have the troops to do this and they could become overstretched.

    Russian morale is probably still very low, and their logistics are probably still struggling, so I can see them settling into a protracted war of attrition.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 440 ✭✭myfreespirit


    Agree with the opinion that the war in Eastern Ukraine may well develop into a prolonged war of attrition - assuming that Putin has postponed (for now) the attempt to occupy all of Ukraine. The possibility is that the Russian forces will now focus on taking a corridor from Donetsk/Luhansk to the Crimean peninsula and cut Ukraine off from the Azov Sea entirely.

    It must be hoped that NATO arms supplies will tip the balance in Ukraine's favour:

    US national security adviser Jake Sullivan told ABC News: "We're going to get Ukraine the weapons it needs to beat back the Russians to stop them from taking more cities and towns."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    The big risk for the Ukrainians is that they could get cut off by a corridor from Kharkiv to Melitopol. However, its not clear that the Russians have the troops to do this and they could become overstretched.


    By all accounts they do not (especially with the way they have been losing them up until this point). They have been really scraping the barrel by moving troops from the likes of South Ossetia and Kaliningrad and also trying to get recently retired servicemen to rejoin. At some stage though Putin is going to have a decision to make. He could finally declare this the war (that it clearly is) and try and mobilise more troops from their reserves. They have an estimated 2 million of those but the reality is that only something like 5,000 of those are considered active. There are also other concerns:

    • He needs to keep enough troops stationed all over the country to maintain order - this is especially the case in some of the ethnic Republics whose men are disproportionately dying in Ukraine fighting for the Russian army.
    • Related to that he wants to reduce the likelihood of children in the power centre of Western Russia being sent to Ukraine as that could potentially stoke up resentment against the war in the parts of the country that are politically more influential. (people in the Moscow regions don't care about body bags going back to Dagestan, Bashkortostan, Tatarstan and Chuvashia)


    Another thing is that even if they were able to create the corridor and encircle the Ukrainian troops in the Donbas, that corridor would then be exposed to attack from the Ukrainians coming from the Kyiv direction - one of the many downfalls of them giving up on Kyiv.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,369 ✭✭✭liamtech


    The Ukrainians have a chance - a good one in my opinion

    • There will be one front now - to the southeast and East (Donbas and around Crimea/Mariupol region). Compared to having another front North of Kiev, and also to the North East. Equipment and manpower is all going to be flowing in roughly one direction
    • Heavier more advanced equipment is en route and being deployed. including APC's, Drones, Antitank weapons, and shoulder mounted AA (to say nothing of abandoned Russian Equipment)
    • Western Intelligence will be handed over to the Ukrainians en masse - they will be receiving 'tips' on a daily, perhaps hourly basis
    • I cannot see Russian Morale being anything but poor at this stage
    • Ukrainian Morale will be strong atm - regardless of whether Russia wants to continue talking nonsense (never intended to capture Kyiv, Donbas was always the goal) - we know that Ukrainian Resistance forced Russia to re-evaluate and in the case of Kyiv - retreat
    • Ukrainian Will to fight is at an all time high given increasing evidence of Russian atrocities

    ALL IMHO of course -

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 568 ✭✭✭72sheep


    For decades diplomats have been tormented by the geopolitical implications of NATO actions regarding Ukraine. Zelensky, a professional performer and in politics for less than three years, is broadcasting incessantly, during a war! Of course he's making up his own mind and writing all his own scripts ;-)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Don't really see unity in Europe that's often been mentioned the last few weeks. I don't really view a president of one country calling the PM of another a far right anti semite as unity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,048 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    he's being a pain for a reason and it's working



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,722 ✭✭✭saabsaab


    It seems that Putin will go for an all out 'shock and awe' from the east to break through Ukrainian resistance. If so the Ukrainians should allow Russian advances in sertain areas and draw them out and into prepared zones (minefields and ambush positions). This could allow them to conserve their forces and allow much of the Russian attack to fall short of the real line of resistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,849 ✭✭✭Brussels Sprout


    I know that the end of the final Ukrainian resistance in Mariupol keeps being announced (I was guilty of posting a tweet about it nearly 2 weeks ago in this thread). However it really does appear to be end times now. The final remnants of Ukrainian forces appear to be holed up in a giant steel plant.



    They seem to have accepted their fate:



    Apparently this has led to calls within the Russians forces to eliminate this pocket with chemical weapons.



    It's absolutely incredible that they managed to hold out for so long. I know there was a lot of Azov Batallion there and perhaps people didn't want to be lauding them due to their far-right links but I suspect when this is war is over, some day, there will be movies made about these Ukrainian soldiers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    That is all based on a Facebook post. There are now claims that the Facebook account was hacked, and that it’s Russian lies.

    I don’t know where the truth lies, but there will be movies made about the hero’s of Mariupol.



Advertisement