Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Given the link you posted as 'verification' stated

You might want to consider revising that 'not reading the whole of the article' policy

Read the whole article. They were able to verify 22,000 emails on it, not just with the Google metadata that is almost impossible to fake, but by cross-referencing them with known documents, bank records etc. The emails have metadata spanning up to five years. It's real.

From the main article: "The Post analysis included forensic work by two outside experts who assessed the authenticity of numerous emails related to the CEFC matter. In addition, The Post found that financial documents on the copy of Hunter Biden’s purported laptop match documents and information found in other records, including newly disclosed bank documents obtained by Sen. Charles E. Grassley of Iowa, a senior Republican on the Senate Finance and Judiciary committees."

It's his laptop. Worse for Joe and hunter though, is that the FBI have a copy of the hard drive from before it was distributed, most of the press have the same distributed one. Which means the FBI will be able to verify a lot more on it than the degraded copies that were going around. Now another source claims to have undeleted 450gb of data off the disk image and is going to publish it online.

Hunter has not denied it's his laptop.

The worst part is Kamala Harris looking back and then awkwardly blanking him. The main point wasn't that he was 'lost', it was that no one seems to have wanted to talk to him. It's crazy really that the most powerful man in the country is standing in a packed room and struggles to get any attention.

Huh! Biden Phones are a completely real talking point. But you know what? I like it? Why? another tale told in a comic strip of images...

But, will the mark of the beast people do a concern? Probably! Maybe? They are immigrants after all.

Regarding the Joe is Lost video(s) above, they take on whole new context when a few seconds are clipped on or off:

.

If that's done, there'll never be the reform done in higher Ed in the US. It's an incredible gravy train, there's no incentive to educate well, it's all about moving the bodies through and minting crap degrees. One of the things I am concerned with is the influence of "Dr." Jill Biden, who fed at the higher Ed trough and still plays at being a professor.

As a US citizen and voter I'd vote against anything that forgave the student loan debt without some concomitant change to higher ed- like some accountability visibility to university budgets, some truthful (audited) data on placement of graduates in jobs by educational institution, disclosure of salaries including pensions and various benefits (sabbaticals, for example) that instructors and administrators get, and so on. American higher Ed is bonkers, and making it free won't fix it. Yeah, I know, I voted for Biden and this came with him, but it's not done yet and hopefully can be reformed. Loan forgiveness would be a really bad thing.

The fact that she sat through the utter bullsh1t spewed by the reps without snapping shows that she has the judicial temperament to sit on the SC.

Can she define what a woman is yet??? @Cody montana

Why folks give 2 sh1ts about this I don't know.

You know you can live your life without getting worked up about stupid fox talking points, don't you?

^ that's a whole other mess we've yet to resolve.

Ghost Gun segment shows NBC able to purchase a gun which is 99% functional (80% functional?), sold alongside the tools to make it 100% functional, without background checks or serial numbers.

ATF is interested in the segment as a matter of what they then did with it, not because the report was incorrect: the reporter bought the gun, but he later brought it to another state to have others complete. "But we also could have done it ourselves" NBC reported. This type of transfer is what ATF is investigating NBC for now.

re the student loan debt, i presume this is debt owing to the 3rd level institutions, so writing it off essentially means the taxpayer pays the debt to those institutions.

as far as i know even if you declare bankruptcy your student debt can never just be written off even via personal bankruptcy?

TBH this doesnt even belong in the JB presidential thread as its a problem that predates him by i don't know how many years.

did the US government do something at some stage (maybe the above not allowing bankruptcy, or by guaranteeing repayment, or no private loans allowed?) that has lead to a huge inflation in fees cos there is no competition in that particular loan market?

at the same time, you cant just write off the debt and put it on the taxpayers. as in, why should i, a carpenter for example, take a hit for your college debt?

the problem is 3rd level institutions (certainly in ireland, and i presume that model was taken from the US) offering useless masters courses for 10k a pop that lead to no jobs. just a few more letters after your name that mean nothing. like how is a masters from ucd for 10k (in some obscure field) more expensive than a tax qualification at 2k from the ITI? (for the most part, some masters are necessary).

they shouldn't be, but they took it on knowingly.

no way should the non-going college people be made subsidise it though. if you didn't go to college, and the average worth of debt forgiveness is 5k per student that did go to college, should everyone that chose not to go get a 5k rebate?

what about the people who have already repaid their debt - do they get a rebate?

this is a function of useless, very expensive degrees that lead to no job. so now we want someone else to pay.

Hey, conserving fascism is still conserving