Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1115711581160116211633690

Comments

  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 24,472 CMod ✭✭✭✭Ten of Swords


    Footage purporting to show a single Ukranian tank taking on a Russian armoured convoy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    You're advocating the summary execution of prisoners of war. You're not even entertaining the possibility that isolated Ukraine units could be committing war crimes; or maybe you're saying that it's fine for Ukraine to commit war crimes because Russia is committing war crimes? Is that it; tit for tat is perfectly fine in your view?

    If your position is that I support Russia purely because I don't want Ukraine to commit war crimes; you and those who thanked your posts are idiots. This kind of behaviour and logic is exactly the kind of knee-jerk emotive reaction that Kremlin propaganda uses on its population.

    One of the main reasons I don't want to see Ukraine commit war crimes is because it hurts Ukrainian people and the Ukrainian nation:

    • Ukraine loses credibility in every single international arena where it might try to pursue Russia: International Criminal Court, United Nations, G7/G20, and even just 1-1 diplomatic efforts.
    • Ukraine gives Russia actual credible evidence which they can use to further their own domestic and international propaganda efforts.
    • Ukraine may risk its access to better and more advanced weapons which it can use to actually drive Russia out of Ukraine.
    • War crimes committed by Ukrainians will allow Russian troops (who are using almost exactly the same idiotic **** logic as you and your mouth-breathing pals) to feel more justified in raping/executing Ukrainian detainees, civilians, and prisoners of war.
    • War crimes committed by Ukrainians may harden the directives given by senior military leaders to troops on the ground.

    Honestly. Advocating for Ukraine to commit war crimes is idiotic; you should all be ashamed of yourselves.

    And to be perfectly clear: I abhor the Russian state, I condemn the war crimes they have clearly committed and likely continue to commit in Ukraine, and I want every Russian soldier and officer in the entire chain of command right up to Putin to be dragged before the Hague and prosecuted for every single civilian death, every single war crime, every single cent of damage done to the Ukrainian nation and Ukrainian people.

    But I still absolutely and unequivocally condemn any war crimes committed by Ukrainian troops or any and all troops fighting on behalf of Ukraine; and every single incident should be fully investigated and those people should also be punished after the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    I absolutely agree. You cannot equate the behaviour of Ukraine and Ukrainian leadership with that of Russia and Russian leadership.

    Russia and its war crimes to me are an organised and institutional effort; from the top down. It is part of their plan for Ukraine, it is part of how they have conducted every war they have ever been a part of. They do not value civilians or civilian lives, they prioritise the completion of military objectives far and above that of civilians or of the rule of law. They do not seem to care nor punish their soldiers; and whenever evidence comes out they simply obfuscate and lie.

    Ukraine's war crimes (assuming the videos we have seen are legitimate and accurate) are much more likely to be smaller local units who have lost loved ones or seen Russian atrocities.

    I can understand the motivation and have some idea the kinds of emotions going through the Ukrainian soldiers if/when they commit such acts. However that is not the same thing as condoning it; and it is as I've stated before only going to hurt their resistance effort.

    The other thing to bear in mind is that there are many volunteers, foreign fighters, and opportunists who are also fighting on Ukraine's side. Ukraine isn't in a position to refuse this help; and this also increases the risk that isolated incidents may be taking place which it will need to address after the war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 378 ✭✭Slava_Ukraine


    Over my few weeks here, and as much as I do sometimes enjoy the debate, I generally skip over the long winded essays. Keeping it short, simple and to the point is the key. Directed at both sides (okay I get the Moskovite botcentre part of it), what kind of job allows you to take part in this type of debate day in day out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭deise08




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Incorrect!

    You might be happy to know that these Bushmasters were actually designed, made, and built in Ireland:

    Edit: Seems they were only originally designed in Ireland but manufactured under license in Australia. Possibly suspension components were manufactured in Ireland.

    Post edited by ronivek on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭jolivmmx


    Christ, to all the pro-Russian lackies, saying “but, but, but, Ukraine did…”, remind me which country it was that invaded another country forcefully?

    If my house is burgled and that burglar is raping my wife and the kids, should I just let him proceed and not try to defend ?




  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    What are the officer class in the Russian Army like, are there free thinkers, are there ones who see Putin as a great leader to restore the glory of the Red Army or ones that see him and his cronies as the ones literally selling out the successor to the Red Army?

    All the way back to ancient Rome and beyond, autocrats never trust the army*, unless they come from it as part of a military coup and even then... The army are a dictator's biggest fear because they pretty much alone have the power to take a country(even in "common man" revolutions the army either stood aside or backed them). That's literally their job and Russian leaders have known this for centuries and have adapted to that reality. In the Czarist system it was through fear of god and king, family members in top positions, keeping generals fighting each other for favour, keeping them sweet with vast wealth, or keeping them in the far provinces where they could do the least harm, or just having them killed.

    After the 1917 revolution(and remember one of the first steps in that was when the sailors on the Potempkin mutinied) and a period of confusion Stalin just copied the old Czarist way of things. With cult of personality instead of god and extra murder. To the degree that when the Germans invaded he had killed damn near all his good generals and what was left were political appointees and "safe" morons. One that did survive the purges General Zhukov, a very clever tactician and leader, a man without whom the Soviets would have been in serious trouble helped win their Great Patriotic war. And what happened after? Stalin soon stripped him of his ranks and positions and send him into internal exile. Too popular to kill, too popular to keep him around.

    After the fall of the USSR and that period of confusion putin went back to the basics of what worked. With some additions, like getting organised crime types under his command to weaken the army from within, steal military stuff wholesale, keep higher ranks under his thumb, constantly rotated, or members of his closest inner circle, or "retired". Somebody who was into the military world as a hobby/interest could probably name a few American, German, British high ranking bods, but would likely struggle with any Russian ones. The Americans on the other hand, for all its faults a democracy has a long list of generals many could name. A "Stormin Norman" Schwarzkopf, or Eisenhower or McArthur figure would never be let get so well known and popular in Russia.

    Even how their military is set up precludes imaginative thinking in the lower and middle ranks. It's orders from a centralised on high, the lower rungs just pass them on and follow them. Individualist thinking at the point of the spear is frowned upon. Their air force a good example. Their fighters are directed onto a target by the ground and the pilots follow that. Other air forces ground direct onto a target too, but the pilots are far more free and are encouraged to think on their feet. If you read about the early 80's shooting down of Korean Air Lines KAL 007 by the Soviets you can see that thinking from the back and forth between the fighter pilot and his ground controllers. They ordered him up to attack he caught up, saw it was a Boeing airliner, but didn't tell the ground as "they didn't ask me" and he reckoned so what, I've been ordered to shoot it down.

    This daft way of thinking and the gutting of funding and widespread graft and thievery mixed with raw recruits who drink the Kremlin Kool Aid(and vodka) and TBH it's actually surprising they got so far in Ukraine. Sheer weight of numbers, who the higher ups don't care if they live or die and a population primed for sacrifice to Mother Russia**. The Russian way. As usual.




    *Hitler was actually a bit of an outlier in this. He did let generals and field marshalls get popular and even promoted their popularity. For different reasons. He gained power very quickly and with a new party and he needed the army and industry behind him and he treated both very well and they in turn made bank on him and his early successes that shocked even his supporters bolstered that faith in him. Though Hitler wasn't around for long and didn't win. I suspect if he had, chances are if he had then gone "too far" it would have been the army that would have retired him.

    ** IMHO this is why hoping for Russian mothers to gather en masse against putin or the war because their sons come home in boxes or don't come home at all is a vain hope. The numbers would have to be truly staggering before that would take effect. The British might die for Queen and country, the Americans for the flag, but both have a significantly lower threshold before the numbers of flag drapped coffins cause an uproar.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,736 ✭✭✭20silkcut


    I suppose it was more a question of how much opportunity is there for manoeuvre once a nuclear exchange has began. When I was a child the narrative was that world war 3 would be over in a matter of hours. That was the MAD doctrine. Is that still the doctrine? Let’s assume that Russian first strike nuclear strikes on western targets is impossible to hide from the Russian people. Could the west/NATO at that stage make clear to residents of Moscow/St Petersburg etc that their cities are about to be atomised if they fail to deliver Putins head on a platter or show definitive cause to wrest control from him in a reasonable time. Probably wouldn’t make a difference. Have visions of chamberlains 11am German withdrawal ultimatum on 3 sep 1939. But it is to put it mildly, incredibly disquieting to think that an automatic tit for tat exchange to obliteration is the only course. They really are the dumbest weapons that man ever created.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Yes yes; keep spouting your emotive nonsense and failing to engage with even a single point or question in my post.

    Carry on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,178 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui



    "The Bushmaster armoured vehicle, developed by Thales Australia (formerly ADI Limited) is in full production at ADI's engineering and manufacturing facility at Bendigo, Victoria.

    "A double wishbone independent suspension system designed by Timoney in County Meath, Ireland provides good cross-country mobility across difficult terrains."

    So, correct, as originally stated. Designed and built in Australia, mate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭jolivmmx


    If somebody breaks into you house, beats your kids, rapes your wife, should you be expected to act with sang-froid?

    This is not a game. Ukrainian people are watching their families, friends, homes annihilated for a war that the Russians could never win. And you expect that they won’t hit back?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Actually it seems we were both incorrect.

    The original was designed by Timoney and based on its MP44. However it was built jointly under license from Timoney by ADI and later Thales for Australia. So Irish design but Australian manufacturing.

    Either way happy something with Irish roots might be going to help Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Timoney do produced various vehicles and suspension stuff for vehicles they do not produced military vehicles here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,149 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @Curious_Case

    You are assuming that chains of command would unquestionably obey the orders of a fruitcake. We know that in the US, plans were in place to circumnavigate Trump if he decided on anything rash towards the end of his tenure.

    The chain of command may well not obey Putin's command if that command were to launch a nuclear first strike, but I don't think any serious military strategist would be planning any escalation of conflict on the basis that Putin's chain of command would possibly be pragmatic about being told to launch a nuke. When the stakes get that high, they must surely looking for extremely high or low probabilities before deciding on a course of action.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,507 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Also, this is not a UK & France vs Germany in September 1939 scenario, where two similarly matched sides effectively declared war on each other on the same day. Rather, a very large dictatorship / pariah state brutally invaded its smaller neutral neighbour without any advance warning or provocation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    Your constant anti European rants are extremely tedious.

    Let's not forget that the UK and especially the Tories have allowed the same Russian oligarchs who benefit from and prop up Putin to use London as their playground for the last two decades, and they also continue to do business with Saudi Arabia, a country whose conduct in Yemen is very comparable with the Russians in Ukraine.

    Yes, Germany and France have made mistakes and put money before people, but Britain has lots of blood on its hands too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Well they seem to have manufactured APCs for the Irish Defence Forces in the past but yes: it seems they only actually manufacture drive-train components (and prototype vehicles) in Ireland and otherwise they design and license out manufacturing globally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    I think you make the mistake of assuming being a pariah in the West means Russia will become the new North Korea. It won't. It has massive markets and friends in China and India, among other places, it has products and services other countries want and need, they will happily fill the gap the West leaves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,042 ✭✭✭jmreire


    Wonder what kind of tank it was? One of former Russian tanks, now under new management? Or one of the old reliable?? If so its a pretty lethal piece of machinery. I once read a comment from a farmer British tank commander who said that pound for pound, the Russian T34 was the best all round tank in the ww2. Way better than the British, American and German tank's in the same class.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    You mean "anti EU rants" not anti European. The days of getting away with equating the EU with Europe are truly gone now.

    "have made mistakes" 😂

    They were not mistakes though were they? They knew full what they were at and are still at it regardless. Thats policy, not a mistake

    The pillars of the EU turned out to not to give two **** about Europes security and it's stinging certains peoples holes that its now apparent. "Ehh...look over there at the middle east, where no fooker is invading Europe" If the UK was funding this war you wouldnt be quiet about it would you? I imagine you'd be "extremely tedious" 😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    A better analogy would be something like:

    (Apologies to anyone actually from the Ballymun Flats, I'm just trying to make a point)

    Someone from the Ballymun Flats breaks into your house, beats your kids, rapes your wife. You find out later that this happened but you don't know who from Ballymun actually carried out the attack; you just know it was someone from the flats.

    Later on you come across several random men from the Ballymun Flats. You threaten them with your weapon and they surrender to you. You bind their hands. You then execute them without any evidence these were the actual men from Ballymun who carried out the attack. In fact statistically it's highly unlikely these were the same men who did so.

    Is this okay; in your view? Because that's the scenario that started this whole discussion.

    If you do think that's okay well I wholeheartedly disagree with your view of the world.

    And you expect they won't hit back?

    Eh? Of course I expect them to hit back. And when Russian soldiers surrender I expect them to be treated the same way Ukraine want their own prisoners to be treated. And then later they can be used in prisoner exchanges to get Ukrainian prisoners returned back to their families and country; or if there is evidence of war crimes they can be tried and punished appropriately. What about that is so hard to understand?

    I mean personally I don't even find that a quick death is even a just punishment for raping children. They should spend their lives terrified that Ukraine or someone else will catch up with them; and when they are caught they should be jailed and forced to confront what they did every day in the confines of a prison.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,507 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Q raised on Twitter/Reddit earlier.

    Where are those Antifa lads in all of this?

    There's literally a fascist invading a peaceful country. Why are they not counter protesting the lads in Berlin for example?

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,332 ✭✭✭✭Donald Trump



    Just to point out that, technically, one could argue that any soldier of the Russian army is an accomplice to crimes they commit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 547 ✭✭✭shillyshilly


    because Antifa originates from the usual dis-information which was churned out during the info war while Trump was being elected and in his early office tenure...

    can't exactly have them shooting themselves in the foot



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,586 ✭✭✭rogber


    As someone else already said, you sound like some Farage-loving Brexiteer. The fact that Zelensky desperately wants Ukraine to be fast tracked into the EU is a point you conveniently ignore, the organisation can't be all bad, though it certainly has its flaws



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,029 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe



    Just another story of another killing in Bucha

    "Speaking to the BBC by phone alongside his mother, Alla, the 14-year-old gave his account of what happened next. "We told them that we weren't carrying any weapons and that we didn't pose any danger," he said.

    "Then my father turned his head my way, and that's when he got shot… He was shot twice in the chest, right where the heart is. Then he fell."

    At that point, the teenager said, the soldier shot him in his left hand and he fell too. While he was on the ground, he said, he was shot again, this time in the arm.

    "I was lying on my stomach, I couldn't see anything that was happening around me," Yuriy said. The soldier, he said, shot again, aiming at his head. "[But] the bullet went through my hood."

    Yuriy said the soldier shot again, this time at his father's head. But Ruslan was already dead. "I had a small panic attack, lying there with my wounded arm underneath me. I saw that my hand was bleeding," he said.

    It was only after a while, when the soldier went behind a tank, that Yuriy got up and ran, he said."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    With noting that antifacist was a term dreamed up by communists as a PR cover for their actions, used a lot in in East Germany fittingly enough. Them boys wont have anything to say about defending europe from anti democratic forces.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,173 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    And people here still argue that Ukrainians should take a minute to think of the Geneva Convention before shooting Russian soldiers



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement