Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Attacks against Jews in Irish Free State.

  • 20-07-2016 7:42pm
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭


    Just reading something there on wiki so don't know how accurate it is that 4 Jewish men were shot by far-right extremists killing 2 of them in Dublin in the space of about 2 weeks in November 1923. 2 were shot in St. Stephens Green & another 2 near Portobello. Anyone have any more info about these or know what group was involved and if there was anymore attacks like this directed against Jewish people or business' around this time?

    Never heard about anything like this in Ireland before except for a small boycott of Jewish business in Cork or Limerick (forgot which) in the early 1900's.


Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4




  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭Arsemageddon


    There is a good article on the pogrom in Limerick here. It may have been quote small, but it was a nasty episode.
    http://www.historyireland.com/20th-century-contemporary-history/the-limerick-pogrom-1904/

    Our current minister for foreign affairs Charlie Flanagan's father Oliver was a rabid anti-Semite. It's often been suggested that Charlie Flanagan's pro-Israel stance is due to him wanting to atone for his father.

    Here's a few quotes from Oliver's first day in the Dail.
    I am very sorry that I cannot associate myself with this Bill or with anything relating to the public safety measures introduced by the Cumann na nGaedheal Government or by the present Fianna Fáil Government because I have seen that most of these Emergency Acts were always directed against Republicanism. How is it that we do not see any of these Acts directed against the Jews, who crucified Our Saviour nineteen hundred years ago, and who are crucifying us every day in the week?
    How is it that there are thousands of well educated young men being forced to take the emigrant ship, not from Galway Bay or Cobh this time to take them to the greater Ireland beyond the Atlantic, but to take them from Dun Laoghaire and Rosslare to the land beyond the Irish Sea, the land of our traditional enemy, to help England in her war effort against Germany? There is one thing that Germany did, and that was to rout the Jews out of their country. Until we rout the Jews out of this country it does not matter a hair's breadth what orders you make. Where the bees are there is the honey, and where the Jews are there is the money.

    http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1943070900009?opendocument


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Quote - 'where the Jews are there is the money.'

    In that case, why am't I rich?

    tac


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Why does Tac put his name after every post he makes?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,363 ✭✭✭KingBrian2


    That guy sounds like a real asshole.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    KingBrian2 wrote: »
    That guy sounds like a real asshole.

    You talking about me or Jesus?

    Personal attacks are a no-no on this site, Mr KingBrian.

    tac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭jonniebgood1


    KingBrian2 wrote: »
    That guy sounds like a real asshole.

    Infraction for personal abuse.
    Any queries by pm only, otherwise ban may be applied
    Moderator


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    There is a good article on the pogrom in Limerick here. It may have been quote small, but it was a nasty episode.
    http://www.historyireland.com/20th-century-contemporary-history/the-limerick-pogrom-1904/

    Our current minister for foreign affairs Charlie Flanagan's father Oliver was a rabid anti-Semite. It's often been suggested that Charlie Flanagan's pro-Israel stance is due to him wanting to atone for his father.

    Here's a few quotes from Oliver's first day in the Dail.





    http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1943070900009?opendocument

    What I find amazing is that he was a Fine Gael TD up until 1987.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    Infraction for personal abuse.
    Any queries by pm only, otherwise ban may be applied
    Moderator

    Eh, I think he was talking about Charlie Flanagan's farther.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,578 ✭✭✭jonniebgood1


    Im Open to clarification by poster in question.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭Ascendant


    What I find amazing is that he was a Fine Gael TD up until 1987.

    Including a term as Minister of Defence in the '70s under Liam Cosgrave.

    Amazing, indeed, that a man who was obsessed with the idea that Jews and Freemasons were contriving to screw everyone else over - 'cos we're just that damned special - should not only continue in public life but rise so highly.

    Different times, I suppose, but still... o_O


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Took good care of his constituents I guess. Nothing more on the story in the OP? I thought I knew every major incident in our history


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭Ascendant



    No murders involved this time, but three years later, in 1926, there was the IRA campaign against moneylenders which, as you can imagine, was accused of having certain dubious connotations:

    The 1926 IRA campaign against Moneylenders.
    In the summer of 1926 the IRA launched a campaign to rid Dublin of the scourge of moneylenders. The IRA was forced to defend these activities against accusations of sectarianism, they insisted that it was in the interests of the poor of the city and was in no way anti-Semitic. The operation involved armed raids on the homes of known moneylenders and the confiscation of their ledgers, record books and documentation. The campaign, which resulted in the arrest of several members of the IRA, reflected a change in IRA policy away from the national question towards social issues.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    I'm reminded of the one Irishman who became President of Israel - Chaim Herzog.

    He did quite well for himself, eh?

    tac


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Infraction for personal abuse.

    What?!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 196 ✭✭Ascendant


    I thought I knew every major incident in our history

    The more one learns, the more you realise how little you know...

    (yes, a cliche but true)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    A recent gubmint minister [of justice?], Alan something, is Jewish.

    tac


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,019 ✭✭✭davycc


    tac foley wrote: »
    A recent gubmint minister [of justice?], Alan something, is Jewish.

    tac

    alan shatter is the guy your thinking of . erotic novelist in his downtime:pac:

    i have italian jewish bloodline myself ,g-grandad coming over to ireland and marrying an irish lady over a century ago in munster. hope they didnt experience any hassle from these clowns. im an athiest myself ex catholic.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,500 ✭✭✭tac foley


    Hmmm, well, unless you have a female Jewish person in your direct line, then you are not Jewish. It's a matriarchal thing, I'm afraid, not a fatheral.

    tac


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 12,812 Mod ✭✭✭✭riffmongous


    Ascendant wrote: »
    The more one learns, the more you realise how little you know...

    (yes, a cliche but true)

    Well it's just this topic comes up fairly often, often with an agenda attached whenever Israel-Palestine kicks off, so if there was any more muck to be raked I thought we would have heard it already.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1 MK64


    If you are really interested in this and prepared to do a bit of digging then you should go to the Military Service Pensions website and search for two guys William Roe and James Patrick Conroy. Have a read of the descriptions and then download their files.

    Basically Conroy, a pro-Treaty National Army officer, 1916 veteran with major service with the IRA in Dublin during the War of Independence, seems to have been one of those who shot Ernest Kahn and a second man referred to as Goldberg or Goldenberg. Amazingly Roe, who was a senior anti-Treaty IRA man in Dublin - and also a 1916 veteran - claims that Kahn was shot in a case of mistaken identity because whoever killed him thought he was Roe!

    Whatever the truth I do remember reading somewhere – the Irish Times I think - that these shootings were considered so serious and so embarrassing for the government that Kevin O’Higgins and possibly others had to issue statements reassuring an understandably nervous Jewish community in Ireland.

    Meanwhile Conroy legged it to the USA from 1924 until 1932 by which time it was found impossible to convict him of the killing. It took him a couple of years more and a visit to the Supreme Court for him to finally get his service pension from a reluctant government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    That's some pretty wild & controversial stuff.

    The government & church did a good job of keeping it out of the history books.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    I await with interest your evidence that either the government or the church had any hand, act or part in keeping this out of the history books.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    Well it' not in the history books. You know Ireland was one of the worst countries in Europe for censorship in the 20th century, and I include the eastern Soviet buffer states. And like their Soviet counterparts they were very good at hiding evidence.

    This state since the 1930's - late 1980's had been run like a Catholic Theocracy, nothing could be done with the Bishops or a Cadinals approval. Dev himself felt that the arts in Ireland were to be promoted only when they observed the "holiest traditions", but should be censored when they failed to live up to this ideal. Section 31, what they were doing there was what Chomsky called "manufacturing consent".

    And people wonder why Protestants didn't want to live a Priest Ridden state.

    When you think about it, how the local priest would get info on pretty much your whole life, and if he thought you would be a threat to the state, because you might be a republican communist, socialist, anarchist etc... he reports you to a Bishop. The Church pretty much controlled large aspects of your life that's pretty totalitarian stuff,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    That's your evidence?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 648 ✭✭✭MakersMark


    Interesting Guardian article, wasn't just De Valera who missed Hitler.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Your link isn't working for me. Can you check it?



  • Registered Users Posts: 93 ✭✭iwasliedto


    There were a few free state officers knocking around in the early 20's who didn't think twice about murdering whoever got in their way. They left a trail of bodies around South Dublin. I suppose they saw these guys as a problem for whatever reason or none and knew that they could get away with it like the other officers who were at the same business.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    Are you denying the Catholic Church played an unusually high role in Irish politics in the last 150 years?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    No, but that's not what you're trying to prove. You're trying to prove the the government and/or the church worked to keep this particular event out of the out of the history books.

    As far as I can see, you've got nothing on this. But I'd have more respect for you if you'd say so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    No, of course, I don't have any type of documented evidence, nor do I believe priests & government ministers were meeting in a smokey darkroom going over a list of incidents that could or couldn't be mentioned.

    I do believe however the overall influence of the Church & Conservative politicians helped to mould the state in a self-censoring society, a "manufacturing of consent" were incidents like this or the antisemitic diatribes of Olivier Flanagan were not fully appreciated for how horrific or disgusting they actually were, and even still to this day don't seem to be taken seriously, just meh, "he was just a cute hoor" sort of attitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Well, I think there's quite a difference between "the government and the church" doing a good job to keep this out of the history books, and it not appearing in history books because "a self-censoring society" didn't fully appreciate the significance of the event. Two thoughts:

    First, I'm a little leery of a narrative in which conservative social attitudes are seen as something forced on Irish society by the government and the church. That seems to me to deny the Irish people any agency, or any responsibility. This was a very conservative society and, while we can examine the historical reasons for this, a narrative in which conservatism was simply imposed on them by a political and ecclesiastical elite doesn't stand up to scrutiny. If anything, the movement was at least as much the other way; government and church were conservative because they reflected the society from which they emerged.

    Secondly, you've assumed all along that there has to be some sinister explanation for why this incident doesn't feature in the history books. But I don't think this requires any particular explanation; there were a great many similar incidents during this period, and very few of them are noted in general histories — the general climate in which such incidents happened, yes; the individual incidents, not so much. It's only exceptional cases, like where teh victim is notable or where particular consequences follow, that attacks of this kind feature in the general histories. Most of them are much more likely to be discussed in more focused works, in articles, in monographs — as this one was, in fact. So it seems to me that you are looking around for an explanation as to why this event was supressed when, in fact, there is no particular reason to think that it was supressed at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    Some very good points there, great post.

    But I disagree with you fundamentally that the Irish are naturally a conservative people, it is a conservatism driven from the top downwards. They certainly were not conservative during the 1918 - 1924 period. When for example the Mansion House was packed out on the 18th of November 1918, when the Dublin trades council & socialist party of Ireland organized a meeting inside it, to commemorate the one year anniversary of their brave comrades who carried out the Russian Revolution & the establishment of the Russian Soviet Republic with quotes from Trotsky on the flyer. And all the Soviets declared throughout Ireland in creameries, factories, asylums, mines, etc... and it is no coincidence that was a period the Catholic Church was unable to control the mass of poor Irish & working class. It wasn't until after the civil war the Priests & Bishops reinstalled their authority.

    Kevin O’Higgins soon after the Irish Civil War (or counter-revolution) bragged “we’re the most conservative revolutionaries to ever see through a successful revolution”. The Free State Speaker of the Dail Michael Hayes who was a centrist himself had the measure of O’Higgins when he said “he didn’t understand it…… what the whole struggle had been about. He reduced it to the notion of the Irish People simply getting a parliament.” He “despised the attitude of protest, the attitude of negation, the attitude sometimes of sheer wantonness and waywardness and destructiveness which…. has been to a large extent a traditional attitude on behalf of the Irish people.” He was determined to cure the patient of the Irish character and establish respect for “the rule of law”. Anyone who’s ever read much on Kevin O’Higgins knows that that is a fair description of him in the early 1920’s.  To establish “law & order” he surrounded himself in the cabinet around ex-Clongowes Boys & member of the Catholic upper professional classes, who could barely conceal their contempt for a semi-lawless but land-hungry peasantry.


    The Irish Catholic Church had a number of features to it that helped secure its place in Irish society. The Church here had an aura of an oppressed church & it identified very much with the Irish poor, during the land wars of the late 19th century most of the junior clergy sided with the Land League, and again during the Tan War a lot of priests & even some small few Bishops supported Sinn Fein, (although most priests & Bishops were against the IRA’s guerrilla campaign) even into the period of the early Troubles again junior clergy were at the front of the civil rights marches, some even joined the Provos, like the Claudy Bomber I don't think very much but it is interesting, and even that first Provisional IRA army council was heavily influenced by the Catholic church, Sean MacStofain wrote how he took the Church's line & was against abortion, divorce & gay marriage, Billy McKee was the same, he got pissed off because the Marxist-Leninist IRA leadership banned rosary beads at IRA funerals and the thing McKee became famous for was defending a Catholic Church from a Loyalist mob with UVF gunmen in the mob. So conservativism was even imposed on the most (or one of the most) revolutionary organizations in the country, whose aim was a 32 County Socialist Republic, but they made it clear time & time again that their Socialism had nothing to do with the Soviet Socialism of Russia or China as that evil, Godless blasphemy.

     Contrast the Irish Church with say Spain, where the Church was identified with large landowners & the Monarchy, and during the Spanish civil war it backed Franco & the Fascists, so it's no surprise the CNT/FAI and other Marxists & Anarchists destroyed churches & executed members of the clergy.         The same thing happened in France, the Church was identified with the aristocracy & monarchy, and French revolutionaries set out to destroy all three of them suppressed the Catholic Church and creating the Cult of the Supreme Being. In Ireland, militants were fighting to defend churches and in Spain & France militants were fighting to destroy them.

    Irish Nationalism/Republicanism became intertwined with Catholicism, even tho I'm opposed to Ulster Loyalism, when they said Home Rule was Rome Rule, they had a point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,676 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    The Great War had a generally socially radicalising effect throughout Europe and in some countries - notably Russia - did result in enduring social and political change. Indeed, to the extent that the rise of Sinn Fein at the expense of the IPP, and the ensuing War of Independence, was contributed to by the Great War Ireland, too, is a country that experienced enduring social and political change arising from the War. However in most countries there was a postwar reaction back to the centre and right, and I think that was intensified in Ireland by the experience of the Civil War. Civil wars have a way of knocking the stuffing out of movements that depend on hope, on the expectation of progress, and on belief in the possibility of change.

    To a significant extent, this was Ireland reverting to type. Irish society had been socially and economically conservative since the Famine. (Famines are a bit like civil wars in this regard.) Even nineteenth-century movements that we might think of as politically progressive, like the Land War, were an attempt - ultimately successful - by the peasantry to acquire the economic and social status of property-owners. There's a great gap between the Land League and the Paris Commune.

    As you point out, the church in other European countries was the church of the powerful and wealthy, the landowning class. This was very much not the case in nineteenth-century Ireland; the Catholic church was the church of the people and, in some ways, was very much more democratic and egalitarian that most other social and political institutions. I won't say that social and economic background counted for nothing in the church, but it counted for a great deal less than in did in most other areas of life; the (institutional) church was a meritocracy in which talent and ability could advance with little regard to background in a way that was not true in the law, the civil service, the army, etc.

    Which means that, socially and culturally, the church was much more representative of the broad middle of Irish views and values than the public service, the police, the Irish Parliamentary Party, etc. So I don't think that Irish society was sexually puritan, socially conservative, etc because the church made it so; rather the Irish church was sexually puritan, socially conservative, etc because it reflected the Irish society from which it was drawn. And Irish society had those characteristics because - gross oversimplification, but I think there's an important point here - because of the Famine, and resulting trauma and collective post-traumatic stress. And Irish society reacted to that experience, and expressed that trauma, through the church, because the church was representative.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    I can't disagree with too much of that.

    I do think had the civil War (counter-revolution) not happened & the carnival of reaction that followed partition not taken place, then Irish society would have liberalized itself much sooner (North & South).

    That's an interesting point about the famine trauma being expressed through the church, there really was no other national organization like a Social Democratic or Communist party to express it through. The problem with groups like Young Ireland & IRB is that they're underground movements & conspiratorial, there not widespread among the populace, & don't become a nationwide movement until they carry out an action that resonates with the people.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,171 ✭✭✭Rechuchote


    Incidentally there were several heroic Jewish résistants during the War of Independence: Michael Noyek, Estelle Solomons and Bob Briscoe spring to mind.

    Here's an interesting piece about Jewish nationalist activists and also the right-wing governments up to and after 1932. Lots of religious maniacs involved in fomenting pointless anti-Jewish hatred.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/jewish-fenians-and-anti-semites-the-jewish-role-in-the-irish-fight-for-freedom-1.4526074



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,806 ✭✭✭BalcombeSt4


    "Michael Noyek, Estelle Solomons and Bob Briscoe spring to mind."

    Wasn't one of these lads part of a delegation that went to Moscow to establish diplomatic ties with the Soviet Union & the Irish Republic? I could be wrong but I do remember reading about the Soviet/Republican talks & it mentioned one of the diplomates on the Irish side was Jewish, I also remember reading that a Jewish Irish Republican who was inspired by the IRA campaign, was one of the founders of a Zionist paramilitary group in Mandatory Palestine in the 1940's to carry out attacks against the British regime in Palestine.



Advertisement