Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1107510761078108010813690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,412 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Long road to go on that. Russia are trying to shore up land bridge to crimea.

    Losing all of that coast would be unacceptable to any country.

    Ukraine will tell Russia to go swing for it. As they should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,604 ✭✭✭realdanbreen


    OK, I've reflected on it.........you probably need to brush up on your command of English .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,497 ✭✭✭AyeGer


    Will it matter though, how are they going to get that land back, especially when a lot of those people identify as Russian. The danger is Russia will come back for more. They need to be in NATO. It’s terrible they might have to do that but realistically what other options are open to Ukraine..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,895 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Russia won't accept Ukraine joining NATO unless they're totally defeated on the battlefield.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭jackboy


    It won’t be solely down to Ukraine. If the west negotiates a potential solution with Russia then they may pressurise Ukraine into accepting. I don’t think anyone really believes the west give a damn about Ukraine.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,412 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    The west won't be negotiating on behalf of Ukraine.

    Any solution will be only achieved with Ukraine's blessing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 665 ✭✭✭goldenmick


    @AyeGer - Ukraine may have to permanently give up Donbas and Crimea and sign some sort of deal with Russia.


    Would you give up half your back garden to your neighbour because he threatened to shoot you? If you did, knowing you're a soft touch he'd likely be back for the other half some time in the future.

    You don't appease bullies. You confront them.

    Thousands of people have laid down their lives in Ukraine, millions displaced and most of the country destroyed, and all for what if you just let Putin take what he wants.

    In a fair and free vote, with no recriminations, I'll wager the majority of Russians would vote against war. This is not Russia's war it's Putin's war. A devious, lying and tyrannical despot who's doing a land grab to take back what he perceives as Russian land, and to tell the world how important he is... when in reality he's not.

    The nuclear threat wont go away so how much rope do you give him? He'll use them soon enough or in the near future because that's all he's got. So why should the world wait and hold its breath, and then retaliate when that happens.

    The Ukranians are doing the right thing. They said they would fight to the last man, and by God that's what they're doing. It's their land and they'll defend it to the last.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭jackboy


    Yeah but they may be pressurised to give their blessing. They are receiving mountains of aid from the west and their refugees are being well looked after. Ukraine may have to pay a price for that. Zelensky throwing abuse at western leaders may come back to bite him also. what is going on is much bigger than Ukraine.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,062 ✭✭✭✭briany


    @jackboy

    I don’t think anyone really believes the west give a damn about Ukraine.

    You'd have to be hard-hearted to look at the situation in Ukraine and not feel quite bad for the ordinary people caught up in it, number one. Number two, the war in Ukraine is more than just a regional war, it's also a theatre in the struggle between authoritarianism and liberal democracy. As Ukraine has tried to move its allegiance westward, Russia is using force to prevent that. Russia's success there would only embolden them and would also embolden other authoritarian regimes to use force to promote their ideology, that ideology being about total unaccountable power and control. So, it's very much in our interest to see Russia fail miserably in Ukraine, and to help that outcome with lots of foreign aid to the country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    I'm not being smart but Ukraine have already paid twice over, firstly by fighting bravely, secondly by suffering the deaths and maimings of their citizens and the decimation of their beautiful cities and towns

    The West know that Ukraine is doing their heavy lifting for them. The West is also offering more by threatening a "severe response" if Spew Tin uses chemical weapons.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Hobgoblin11



    Joe Bidens call for regime change in Russia was a game changer, for 5 minutes until the white house said he was asleep during his speech, now his speech is nullified

    Dundalk, Co. Louth



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    Whether it was deliberate or not, that speech did do something. It says forced regime change is not on the cards.....yet but it is in play. Gives Putin the option to stop now before he goes further.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,039 ✭✭✭jackboy


    The west don’t care about any of that. The west or Russia do not want NATO to directly get involved so there will have to be a solution. Russia will settle for a chunk of Ukraine and the west may pressurise Ukraine to accept that. Ultimately that will be a defeat for Russia as besides their nukes, their military will not be a credible threat for decades.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,062 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Calling for a regime change isn't particularly controversial, and Moscow hasn't really responded much to what Biden said, anyway, other than giving a short statement about it being up to the Russian people to decide who gets power over there. Out of those in the West, only a few extremists contrarians would like anything other than to see the back of Putin, so there is large agreement with the statement that Putin cannot remain in power, but as ever critics will take the most extreme interpretation of the words in order to attack Biden. Luckily, those of us in the West largely recognise the need for unity at the present time and so can temporarily leave aside the petty b*tching.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,330 ✭✭✭deise08


    Just seeing a

    Northrop Grumman RQ-4B Global Hawk which is a 'remotely-piloted surveillance aircraft.'

    Doing the rounds on flight radar.

    My first time seeing it. Looks cool.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    The more I see what the Russian state forces are doing in Ukraine - the more I am of a mind that they and Putin should be bombed into oblivion and beyond



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,916 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    And hasnt Putin called for regime change in Ukraine...

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    They shouldn't give an inch to Russia they have em right where they need em, financially crippled, a military depleted of morale and growing discontent and desertions.


    I know it's easy talk but I think over all for the Ukraine it would be far better for them to fight on now that they have the complete backing of the west.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    We should just join it we aren't neutral anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,916 ✭✭✭eire4


    I would agree that we should end our military neutrality. Currently we spend about 0.3% of our gdp on defense. As recently as the early 1980's that figure was about 1.5%. I think we should be looking to work back towards that number and as a first step we should formally join the new EU defense force.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,620 ✭✭✭Padre_Pio




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,564 ✭✭✭✭machiavellianme


    In what world is it acceptable for Russia (or any other state) to dictate the decisions and actions of any other sovereign state? With all due respect, Russia can go and f*** itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,139 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Agree.

    Standing by and doing nothing because Putin threatens the world because he knows he can’t win without Nukes is shameful.


    **** him. Take him out and his 1900s backwards bunch of cowards



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭lmimmfn


    We would be idiot's to join NATO at the moment, we can't house our own, HSE is a disgrace, so it's better to spend those much needed billions on defence?

    It's completely stupid, our location by itself means neither the US nor the UK want us compromised and we're hardly in the top 10 for receiving a nuke.

    Ignoring idiots who comment "far right" because they don't even know what it means



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,395 ✭✭✭✭Furze99


    That's what might suit the 'west', but the 'west' will need to have Ukraine over some barrel to get them to agree to anything like that soon. They have taken massive damage to some of their cities and towns, lost many people, uprooted the civilian population. Short of launching nuclear attacks on their other cities and crushing them into submission, how is Russia going to force them to submit and accept Putin's land grab? His goose is cooked and it's only a matter of time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,139 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    We can’t house our own???

    What do you even mean by this statement?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭Relax brah


    This is absolutely ridiculous tbh

    Right now 0.5 GDP goes into defense, during the troubles it was 1.5 GDP and believe or not, economy and health system are in much better place than they were back then.

    We can absolutely afford to invest and should do as a matter of priority for public safety.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,818 ✭✭✭threeball


    I dont think NATO is the way to go but definitely increasing our military spending and becoming part of the EU alliance is a smart move. We don't need to be getting dragged into **** shows like Afghanistan.

    A strengthened EU alliance with strong France, Germany, Denmark, Sweden, Italy, Poland and Holland would be a serious disincentive for anyone taking liberties. It would be the 2nd most powerful military in the world. That group can then choose to support the US or not depending on the circumstances. And I don't see a possibility of the US and EU going head to head at any stage.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    If Finland,Sweden and Ireland joins NATO it would be a major kick in the nuts for Putin

    Same for any country in eastern europe thats still neutral and neigbour of Russia



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    In this world unfortunately: the one we live in.

    Or rather it's acceptable up to a point and that specific point is decided primarily by the larger and more militarised nations. We haven't reached that point with Ukraine obviously; and it's unlikely we ever will based on current evidence.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement