Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

1103610371039104110423690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,934 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    Why are we still entertaining Russian embassies/diplomats in the West ? They should all be kicked out and sent back to the motherland.

    Watching Sky interview sycophantic puppets talk pure $hit is infuriating. These "diplomats" shouldn't be given the airtime to talk nonsense.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Tens of thousands died to do it, the Japanese lost that war the second they hit Pearl Harbor, were fighting to the last man as the Allies got closer to Japan herself and they didn't have nuclear weapons. They didn't surrender after the first atomic bomb flattened Hiroshima and 70,000 people were killed instantly, thought the Allied surrender terms showed weakness on the Allied side and only "saw sense" after Nagasaki was flattened and 30,000 people were killed instantly.

    And those bombs were minnows in today's nuclear terms. Today there are "small" tactical nukes that you can fire from the back of a glorified lorry that are more powerful. There is no way to neutralise Russia's nuclear arsenal, nor America's or France's or the UK's or China's for that matter. I think today because we've only seen nukes going off in grainy films from the 1950's or Hollywood CGI, I really think people can forget the truly horrific magnitude of these weapons. If Russia was only able to detonate ten of the six thousand devices in their arsenal that's ten cities and hundreds of thousands of men, women and children obliterated in an instant and hundreds of thousands more men, women and children injured and dying for years. Unimaginable is too small a word.

    And it's one reason why I don't think putin and certainly the men in the nuclear chain below him would order such a thing, or follow that order.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,642 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey



    Anyone who believes an all out nuclear war is required, or is even a thinkable option, which is what the above will result in, needs to turn off all forms of media with the upmost urgency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,559 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    I imagine a time will come where that will happen to some extent.

    But while there is citizens of other countries in Russia and some of these citizens are been snatched and imprisoned, it's wise to keep diplomatic channels open for their sakes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,089 ✭✭✭✭briany


    The argument would be that if we kick out theirs, then they kick out ours, making the situation of nationals that much more precarious.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    I didnt advocate for "all out nuclear war" if you check btw



  • Posts: 2,015 [Deleted User]


    We should kick out anything Russian untill that lunatic Putin stops the war,same with the chinese for supporting it.

    Their media can cry as much as they want about the evil west

    We need to become less dependent on these countries,cause we are only feeding their genocide and war machine.

    Their propagada is made to hate us,let em,but without our money,see how long they last.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,128 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    First time since that twat Gormley that I might be on a winner for still driving a petrol fueld tax collection station.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭storker


    I wonder if the US has a submarine in the Black Sea providing position, course, speed and classification info... Maybe it was close enough to enough the shore for the Ukrainians to acquire it anyway. Do we know how many more of those Alligators are in the area? Will Vlad's little regatta off Odessa have to be cancelled now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    Agreed. But not a completely impossible scenario. And agreed it would have to be clandestine. I reckon the Japanese had no idea what was about to happen on the 6th of August 1945. I would also think there are now other possibilities than simply lobbing a load of nukes at known Russian silo or submarine locations and hoping to get them all.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,327 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Oh I hear you. We're in some uncharted teritory here alright, especially on your points from 3 to 6. On your point 1; Russia/putin alone has invaded the sovereign nations of Georgia and Chechnya for no obvious reasons. Well they gave "reasons", but the reality was for the same reasons putin's invaded Ukraine. To take out opposition to Russia, install a puppet and claw back a tragic semblance of his beloved USSR. America with a few of her allies have invaded a fair number of sovereign nations too. Their "reasons" for Iraq in particular were bogus in both cases, especially the second time out. Their real reason was oil and demonstrating "shock and awe" to the world.

    I do think the biggest differences are your number 5. The real time aspect of it on ICT(I had to look that up 😁). Another is that let's face it it's happening "closer to home", rather than happening to Brown people from an "alien" culture, in whose faces the West doesn't see so much of a reflection, or enough of a reflection to care so widely and vigorously. Plus Russia is more sanctionable. Big country, small economy and if they didn't have gas and oil those sanctions would be even more complete. If America did similar in say Mexico, the UN et al would rightly lose their shít over it and strong words would be very much in play, but the world would be much slower in applying the same level of sanctions nearly so quickly. Ditto for China and Taiwan. Sad to say the world couldn't afford it.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭storker


    I seriously wonder how much sleep he's getting and suspect that the answer is not nearly enough for the responsibility he carries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    It certainly will reduce their ability to launch a landing to capture Odessa.

    We know that one ship is destroyed/sunk but what we don't know is if the other two ships that were docked beside it suffered damage.

    If they did then the Russian Capacity in the Black Sea is diminished even more.

    What I don't understand is these ships docked days ago surely they troops and equipment they carried disembarked days ago. Were they filling up with war booty or something? Because it doesn't make tactical sense to me that they stay tied up in an area that they could be attacked easily and I'm only an observer from afar with no military experience at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,919 ✭✭✭GM228




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    That's just North Korea jumping up and down to try and get some attention....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,723 ✭✭✭storker


    Two can play at the we-can-expand-our-definition-of-an-attack game. 😃



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,128 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    With their form the Ukrainians would probably turn up with 4m lances.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    I don't have your confidence in Putins rationality not to use the whole or part of his nuclear arsenal. And I know full well what nuclear weapons can do and the scale of destruction.

    The idea of neutralising Russia is just me thinking out loud btw.

    The fact is if Putin is not stopped by whatever (non nuclear) means, he will be responsible for the deaths and displacement of huge numbers of people and the destruction of an entire country and the creation of a refugee crisis not seen since WW2 but perhaps more importantly his ongoing threat to world peace and the risk of an all out nuclear war whether incidental or deliberate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,919 ✭✭✭GM228


    Best stop embedding NEXTA Tweets, seems their a terrorist organisation just like Facebook and Instagram, Belarus getting in on the Russian propaganda type of antics:-




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,919 ✭✭✭ronivek


    Russia has been using the harbour to load and offload ships; RT News even did a piece on it. Even better they did a piece on the fact that Russia shot down a Ukrainian missile which tried to attack the port... the same type of missile which reportedly hit successfully this morning:

    So no I don't think they even needed to do anything complicated: Russia were complacent and kept their vessels tied up right alongside the offloading piers and assumed Ukraine had nothing that could hit them.

    NATO have been overflying the Black Sea and can surely detect all the surface vessels present though; whatever about submarines.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,903 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    You tell em Dank. Roosky faces down the Russkies!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,822 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    Hopefully a few Russian sailors drowned ? Or was it an empty ship ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    Anyone have the venn diagram of the Biden admin, global chaos and Trump? would be interesting to see.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,299 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,525 ✭✭✭Curious_Case


    The term "Nuclear War" can describe many different potential scenarios - hundreds in fact.

    Comparisons are not possible, this situation has never happened before. The WW2 use of nuclear bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasaki is completely incomparable so we're left with a handful of tense, stand-offs such as Cuba. Again, nothing like the Ukraine Invasion by a Nuclear Swinging Russian has ever happened before.

    So, who strikes first and who do they strike?

    Is there a tit-for-tat retaliation or an "all-in" response?

    If the West strikes first, Russia is the obvious target, but where and what kind of target?

    If Russia were to retaliate, would they strike the US, or another NATO country, or Ukraine, or a neighbour of Ukraine?

    As I said, hundreds of combinations of sequences are possible.

    Either way, Putin must be faced down until he's deposed or assassinated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,798 ✭✭✭✭DrumSteve


    The reality is Putin has to be faced down on his threats otherwise he is free to do what he likes across Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,903 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    hundreds of combinations of sequences are possible.

    Are there really though? Seems to me it's like when a shemozzle starts in a GAA match: one in all in until we reach

    Untitled Image

    The only way it might be limited is if Russia fired a tactical one-off or two-off at Ukraine while simultaneously assuring the West through back channels that it no intention of widening the conflict. That would leave NATO leaders with a teriible choice...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,066 ✭✭✭HerrKuehn


    You keep implying that Trump was some sort of strong man deterrent. I don't think you will find much of an audience for that here. He tried to pressure Zielinsky for dirt on Biden by withholding aid, he believed Putin rather than his own intelligence services, he divided the allies and was looking disband NATO. The one crisis he had during his presidency he handled terribly, by trying to wish it away, or suggesting to injecting bleach FFS!



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement