Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

1415416418420421757

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 323 ✭✭arthursway




  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators Posts: 16,902 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Did "she" get 44% of the vote or did the Democrat party get that vote - Would a generic (D) not have gotten elected by similar margins?

    There has to be a balance somewhere in terms of term limits.

    Enforcing term limits potentially means you are losing real legislative experience when someone reaches the limits but are still comparatively young and capable, which is why I think an upper age limit for standing for Office should apply - maybe 70 or 75 at the outside.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    I'd imagine most of what was said was for inclusion in her re-election campaign adverts.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    I believe most of those unused permits are for wells that may not be viable from a cost per barrel extracted POV, or they may not have sufficient reserves to be worth extracting in the first place. Drilling permits are the very first step to extracting oil - there are many more permits and permissions and contracts to be engaged in before a rig is set up and oil extracted.

    Also during most administrations its common for thousands of drilling permits to be unused. Most of the oil price issue is due to A) market speculators, and B) labor shortages due to consumption plummeting during covid lockdowns in 20/21 years. It took years for Trump to increase up to prev high of 12.3 million bpd, starting from 9? million bpd. The problem with current admin is that increasing oil production runs contrary to some of their environmental goals, so production increases are even harder to achieve.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,010 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    "She" got the tally, California moved to an open primary a while ago. She earned 44%, the person with 12% was Kevin DeLeon, a Democrat from Los Angeles. Third place went to a Republican, James Bradley, at 8.3%.Actually, spots 3-8 were all Republicans, combined they all received about 21% of the vote.

    The run-off was much closer, there was a substantial "anyone but DiFi" movement so DeLeon got the vast majority of 'transfers', DiFi won 54-46.

    If the current move towards transferrable votes continues to take hold, and it's still in very early stages in fairness, the term limits concern probably becomes less important.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Considering yesterdays opening statements just revealed a desire to relitigate Kavanaugh, I don't expect much from these 4 days of hearings and have switched over to highlights.

    This is probably one of her most important responses: in regard to accusations she was soft on pedophiles. Worth a watch, I would do a poor job of summarizing it. The article doesn't quite capture everything either.

    In fact, I don't think the response she gave would have even been a necessary element of these hearings if it wasn't for driveby media/social rumors about her defending pedophiles without full context.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    frankly, i think the televising of the whole process is idiotic.

    It is spun like some sort of reality tv event.

    Hold the hearings in private - there would be a lot less drama and the whole process would be a lot smoother.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    If they were held in private, then nobody would know that Amy Coney Barrett believes climate change is a 'politically-contentious' issue rather than something that is happening before our eyes.

    Although I agree with you in most aspects, holding it in private opens up a completely different can of worms altogether.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,263 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    That information can be made available to the public in multiple other ways.

    It's theatrics, and one of the reasons why we as a nation voted against giving our Seanad a similar forum.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,010 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Both statements are true. It is happening, and it is politically contentious.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,875 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    It’s only politically contentious because one side are pig headed abs scientifically ignorant.

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,010 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Partially. The other opposition to 'green policies' normally are economic and relate to losing competitiveness with other countries who are not making the same environmental efforts.



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    ACB was asked if climate change was happening.

    Instead of saying yes or no, she refused to say it because it was contentious.

    And it only is so is because a group of conservatives are putting their fingers in their ears and acting like there's nothing to see here, mostly because the oil and gas lobby has them bought out.

    If climate change is happening then there is nothing 'contentious' about it. How is that possible?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,875 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?



    Any opposition to green policies, is fundamentally anti scientific. What’s with the quotation marks?

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭KieferFan69


    I think Biden is doing irreparable damage to the dems. People must wonder how a candidate like him even gets approved. He doesn’t know his Iran from his Ukraine. Very poor speaker and communicator of ideas, trump will walk it if he chooses to run again



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,010 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    It is used to indicate a common name of a group which may or may not have an official definition and set of parameters. Nothing nefarious.

    It's not anti-scientific to say "Yes, it's happening, but these plans will leave us at an economic disadvantage.". It's simply prioritising immediate national economic gain over long-term global (and economic) stability and possible relative economic long-term disadvantage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 455 ✭✭KieferFan69


    You must admit he appears like a zombie to the world, mostly when I see him I feel pity, pity for him, and pity for his family



  • Site Banned Posts: 12,341 ✭✭✭✭Faugheen


    No, he really doesn't.

    People just got so used to the chaos that Trump brought upon anything he touched that now US politics is boring again they're looking for stupid soundbites.

    He's doing just fine.

    As for your claim that Trump will walk in if he runs again, how is that going to happen?



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 22,875 Mod ✭✭✭✭Brian?


    Ok. It is fundamentally anti scientific to prioritise short term gain do irreparable damage. Anyone who sets that priority doesn’t understand how significant the risks are

    they/them/theirs


    The more you can increase fear of drugs and crime, welfare mothers, immigrants and aliens, the more you control all of the people.

    Noam Chomsky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    A very weak leader. Anyway, the world is stuck with him for another few years at least. Hopefully the American electorate has learned its lesson, that is, take your vote seriously.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,754 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,024 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,323 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    It'd just be easier if they said they didn't like her because she's black.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 532 ✭✭✭Dingaan


    Wonderful insight! Boards.ie is really blessed with such astute collaborators.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    It is not "anti science" to take that approach - it is a political decision, science is by definition not political. Or at least it should be that way.

    Also since science is ever changing and continuously evolving as we discover our mistakes - to dispute climate change is not "anti science" in the same way that advocating for the heliocentric model was not anti science back when we thought the earth was the center of the universe. Anti-science would be taking a "faith" or "belief" based approach - which is the antithesis of science. Science is that which is proven or attempted proven using scientific methods of discovery. Self-preservation or the lack thereof has nothing to do with pro or anti science.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Someone remind Graham he's already voted to confirm Jackson at least once before (if not 3 times before - the other 2 confirmations by the Senate were voice votes). Collins and Murkowski also confirmed.


    That was 8 months ago.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Presumably weak due to gaffes like "It’s one thing if it’s a minor incursion" during the border tensions between Russia and Ukraine.

    Getting snubbed by MBS and Emirati leaders too. Biden admins energy policies have left them far more dependent on oil imports than previous, and now they have substantially less leverage over players such as Saudi Arabia, and none effectively over Russia (all sanctions deployed, what else is there for them to do?) - they just today announced oil and gas exports will need to be paid for in Rubles also.

    And of course the US continuously trying to pressure China into condemning Russian aggression in Ukraine, to which the Chinese have responded with an unequivocal backing of the Russians. Again, it makes Biden look weak.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Rubbish. Trump had no political capital with the Chinese either, he constantly vilified them. They would not have listened to his entreaty to not enter the war either - and if anything, Trump would probably shrug and say they have a right to be friends with Russia etc. (but there I go idly speculating)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,653 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    Ill concede Sinophobia was worse under Trump, but US-Russia relations were markedly better than under Obama (not Bush, Putin and Bush were very chummy). But the Russia-China axis was weakening under the last admin, China were seen as the big threat (they are from a US dominance POV), China on its own could be isolated but China and Russia together are a self-sufficient bloc with enough raw materials and military strength to put it up to anyone unfortunately.

    The price we in the west pay for outsourcing all manufacturing there I suppose.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,683 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Either way, Trump's trade war with China dispels any notion that they would have been receptive to our demands/requests they stay out of the conflict. We also still tacitly support Taiwan/Hong Kong, the Uyghurs, etc.



Advertisement