Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

19879889909929933690

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    Thats what they should be doing, taken the gloves off and burying Russia every which way. Ram Putins own medicine down his throat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,496 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    It's become a real game of bingo hasnt it. Which commander/general/etc is getting killed today.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,484 ✭✭✭zv2


    The Ukrainians are dispersed and hard to pin down. That's one of Russia's main problems.

    Post edited by zv2 on

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,118 ✭✭✭✭briany


    That probably wouldn't work. NATO wouldn't go in unless they had confirmation that it was a hostile act on the part of Russia, and somehow I don't think finding a Russian serial number among the debris of a rocket attack would be enough. Ukraine attempting a false flag risks damaging the goodwill from the West and play into Russian hands, who could probably then strike a supply base in Poland and claim it's Ukraine doing more of the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,166 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The Article is 2 years out of date The US currently has tanks and troops and F-35s in Lithuania and those other baltic states. Not to mention it being a real attack on NATO.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 5,121 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    Why wouldnt it work? NATO just puts out media they ve been attacked straight up lie, and go in and do it, beat the russians at there own game take the gloves off completely, no need for our rules and regulations just skip all that and get stuck in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    This thread has become quite a long chronolog of this war hasn't it! :)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,166 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    How about you explain why you think your assessment of the risk is superior to that of Gary Kasparov, Andrei V Kozyrev, The Latvian Parliament, the Polish government and General Wes Clark, former commander of NATO. I'd put their opinions way above your craven Chicken Little witterings.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    Id be far more concerned about Russias ability to attack 3 baltic states with its rag tag bunch of gobshites it calls an army than NATO's ability to defend it 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    The risk is that Putin goes full retard and launches a nuke. Very very unlikely but anythings possible. The reality is though that the very same threat is there when he defeats Ukraine and moves on to Moldova. We'll hear they're not nato either so nothing will happen so he'll move somewhere else. Eventually after killing hundreds of thousands we end up at end game where he attacks a nato country and we'll get our answer as to whether he was ever going to launch a nuke.

    In the meantime, Europe will be swamped in refugees, feel under compliment to rebuild these countries when Putin eventually is defeated because Russia won't and have to explain how another genocide was allowed happen on European soil. Add a food crisis on top and the pertinent option is to stop him in his tracks now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,118 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I'd like to see NATO get 'stuck in' myself, and stop what that b*stard Putin is doing to Ukraine, but it's not really that NATO want to do this. NATO leadership has been pretty consistent on the point of further escalation that could be caused by wading in, so they're probably not going to manufacture an excuse to do that.

    I don't think that Putin would press the nuclear button from NATO forces entering Ukraine and pushing the Russians out. I don't think so. I don't know so. This is the problem that NATO faces. I can understand the need for absolutes when facing the potential for nuclear war, even if it's only a small chance, but it's definitely very frustrating to watch what Russia are doing to Ukraine and a force that could easily defeat them in conventional warfare not directly intervening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,166 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    That part is probably wrong: "I argue in this thread that if we “blink” on Putin’s nuclear threat, we will increase the risk of WWIII."

    “The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.”


    ― Albert Einstein



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,039 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    How are they killing naval commanders? I didnt think the Ukranians had attacked any of the Russian navy. My impresdion was that their navy were sitting outside striking range. Was he ashore at the time maybe?

    He was born in Kyiv.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    They absolutely shouldn't, if Russia was sat shelling civilian's in every city and town in Ireland id expect The west and NATO to do nothing but watch as we are erased from the planet, because we arent in NATO and remember putin has nukes so grab the popcorn and get a good seat for a good auld genocide.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,082 ✭✭✭thomil


    I can just see the HR-Speak for that:


    „We offer a fast-paced, dynamic working environment with numerous opportunities for personal development and career advancement“


    Sorry, not sorry 😏

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭CB19Kevo


    If this was an attack on our country how would we feel if the UK did not provide a no fly zone, did not provide troops or the EU did not intervene militarily and instead tried to ship in aid from Northern Ireland and accept our refugees.

    How would you feel about NATO not intervening if Dublin was being bombarded, The mater hospital in ruins, Apartments burning. Galway invaded and rights taken away, The Curragh wiped out.

    Leaving your homes in fear, leaving loved animals at home to die as you cannot bring them abroad, your homes and possessions left to burn or be raided by foreign invaders.

    Our leaders bundled into vehicles and taken away, values and culture destroyed.

    All the while the sanctions mount up against our aggressors and weapons flow into our small army through the NI border. Yet our calls to defend our people are met with " Ireland is not worth risking WW3 for " and " Ireland is not part of NATO, but step a foot in NI and we will wipe you out ".

    Not much good as Ireland and it's people are wiped from the map and our ports and airports taken over by ruthless invaders.

    Would you all be accepting of NATO and the West's position then?>

    Or do people just think we in Ireland are worth more than Ukrainians, that's some f^^king sick ego if that's the case.......!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It really has ,to lose that many senior officers is damaging in the short and long term view especially when it comes to morale on the ground



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 515 ✭✭✭TheTruth89


    Yeah thats a fair point i know its the whole nuke threat but id still wager scum like putin are too self serving to kill themselves in a nuke war, thats why i think NATO should go in, in sneakier ways ala "little green men" with covered armbands or to peacekeep.. ect they need to do more anyway but in a more creative way than offically going to war imo anyway.



  • Posts: 7,946 [Deleted User]


    Can you/others debate without pejorative? It's this childish boorishness that makes me wonder if it's kids I'm debating with playing with toy soldiers.

    We can each pick advocates for our positions...https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/mar/08/mad-or-bad-a-deep-dive-into-putins-psyche

    On balance I don't think Putin would launch nukes, but there's a statistical chance.

    The problem with this is that if it comes to pass its effectively the death of 8 billion people and untold unborn. All these people won't die immediately some may take weeks/months to die slowly.

    Now, can you answer my question why do you think NATO command have decided not to engage directly? Can you answer me that? Are they, with all their intelligence, chicken littles?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    He was killed in fighting in Mariupol,he was on the ground and not aboard the safety of a ship



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    The problem there is the damage that would be done to this small countries would be significant and unlike Ukraine where we saw troops heading in first this war would be through the air, like the Americans did in Baghdad. Any retaliation would be on Russian soil which massively increases the chances of a nuclear reaction.

    In Ukraine they have the chance to give Putin a right good kicking without ever threatening the motherland. They'll never get this chance again. They don't even have to commit a signal soldier on the ground. There's more than enough Ukrainians to do the grunt work. Nato would just work the machinery end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,335 ✭✭✭RGARDINR


    Let's be honest I can't see Russia invading any other country after this Ukrainian invasion. Its still ongoing in Ukraine and there still loosing a ton of material and soldiers the longer this drags on. If they had of won the war after a few days then a different ball game, might of moved on other non Nato countries . It will be years and years after this ends before the Russian military will be back up to levels in material and proper training for the military to invade a country again and that's before there loosing more and more each day. Hearing on this thread they will invade Poland etc. after Ukraine, I honestly can't see that happening. It won't, not chance it will so no point going on about them invading a country in Nato as that won't happen, even non Nato countries they probably won't as they will more then likely military be in any position to do so.



  • Posts: 7,946 [Deleted User]


    No. I think NATO have to hold to their stated aims of defending NATO soil.

    In the mean time sanctions will continue to severely damage Russia's ability to wage war.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    In the end though they will have to negotiate with Putin and Russia will still exist. It's about minimizing suffering now but also not rewarding Russia for it's aggression. This could drag out for a long time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,856 ✭✭✭threeball


    We've been through this and it's waffle. Could take 12 to 24months to have an effect. Ukraine won't exist when your sanctions take effect. Any decent sanction that would hurt immediately we've avoided as we won't take any pain ourselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,355 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I don't think NATO would want to engage now even if nuclear weapons didn't exist, the outcome could still be millions dead with conventional warfare



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,067 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Russia flatten everything, force a third of the population out of the East of the Ukraine, the rest dead or subdued.


    It may break Russia to do it but they can win the longer it goes on.


    In another 10 months Europe will be dealing with an arc of hunger, revolution and economic instability from Nigeria to Afghanistan.


    The longer it drags out the worse for Ukraine,us and the world.


    Russia certainly are making it difficult for themselves and have been outfought by the Ukrainian forces. They'll resort now to long distance shelling, siege starvation and mass murder of civilians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    @RGARDINR Let's be honest I can't see Russia invading any other country after this Ukrainian invasion. ...


    Putin would be still be stupid enough to try ,he's not going to stop at ukraine or he's at least going to nuke part of Ukraine he's not living reality anymore



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    Bidens son didnt die in Iraq or in combat, he died from illness. It's easy to think otherwise given the way Biden goes on.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement