Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

F1 2022 thread - see post 1 for rules

13334363839137

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,031 ✭✭✭✭duploelabs




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,702 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199


    Has Mazepin left? He Haas!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    Glad to see the back of Sochi but, strictly politically, I would have preferred to see Germany back on the calendar rather than Turkey. Great track that it is but Turkey isn't exactly the most political stable place either, no where near as bad as Russia obviously but I'd have loved to have seen Nurburgring or Ostereichring back on the calendar.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Sky have a two-part doc out this weekend about how Hamilton was screwed by Masi in Abu Dhabi because Toto claims Masi was "turned" by red bull SD Jonathan Wheatley. Toto makes claims about the Jeddah "deal" when under a red flag.


    They (Sky) are unbelievable, every effort being made to discredit Max.


    Toto and Hamilton really are so easy to dislike. The sense of entitlement, but beyond that it's like they actually cannot remember their own words and actions when they don't get what they want.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, they're selling airtime. If it worked the other way around, sky Netherlands would be selling thr exsct same documentary in reverse.

    I also don't pretend to know what kind of skullduggery goes on. F1 is a mix of sport, entertainment ans business. F1 needed a new champion for the entertainment and business parts. I wouldn't be at all surprised if there was bias (whether explicit or implicit) towards helping someone else win the championship.

    Hamilton is not good with words, but Toto usually chooses his words very carefully. If he's making an accusation of serious conspiracy against his team, is it worth wondering if there's something to it before declaring it a Sky conspiracy to discredit Max?

    What is the Jeddah deal?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Max cut T1 but a red flag came out, so the "deal" was to give the place back on the grid as opposed to a 5 sec penalty Presumably.


    Sky are quoting Toto as saying Masi and Wheatley had a "bromance" and Masi was "turned" by Red Bull. It's very much aimed at discrediting Max.


    Its like Toto never sent emails to Masi or was never on the radio telling him not to bring out the SC when it suited Merc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,604 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Pulling out of russia and ignoring Saudi amd Bahrain etc is so typically f1, like why even pretend you give a **** about ethics and morals???



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,899 ✭✭✭✭mickdw


    Toto Hamilton and sky need to review lap one. They also need to review their own tactics in leaving Hamilton a sitting duck.

    Verstappen was ahead on points going into the last race so Mercedes were always at a disadvantage strategy wise given that both driver not finishing would benefit max.

    If they had pitted Hamilton, max would have been ahead on the restart but would have made it very very hard for Hamilton to pass as he could afford a crash.

    Mercedes tried to steal the race on lap one by not giving the place back. When it didn't work out, Toto spat the dummy. No class at all and a low act trying to discredit max and his championship that he won in every measurable way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,978 ✭✭✭✭Frank Bullitt


    Both teams tried to influence the race to their own advantage, Toto didn't want the SC when Giovanazi was going slow so he is equally as guilty in influencing the race at that time.

    If Sky are doing anything, it is just to muster up numbers for the coming year. They can try and undermine RB and Max all they want but to say there is a conspiracy? After 8 years of dominance and only now the FIA and RB are in cahoots? Come off it, lads.

    It is good press for the coming year. That is all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 516 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Absolutely this. For all the skullduggery that went on, Toto was up to his neck in it. His comments today about never wanting to speak to Masi again I thought were poor. I always thought Toto was a shrewd operator with how he ran that team, but it seems he's not good in the face of adversity, really gone down in my opinion last season.

    I actually feel F1 got so toxic over the last few seasons. Ive said it on here before, but so many fans now have that partisan football type attitude now where my guy = good and your guy = bad. I wonder if it's down to Drive to Survive and how they have invented drama and rivalries. It's bound to ramp up again next week with that release too.

    On that note, haven't seen this posted here but FLoz has a new season review out and honestly his videos are better put together than DTS where he tells the stories of each season with video clips. He did a great one on the silver war between Hamilton and Rosberg, amongst others. Just started this now for my Friday evening viewing!

    https://youtu.be/uH3KPDA1jQ4



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,083 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Toto was only "professional" and "decent" when things were going his way. The second anything didn't go exactly the way he wants he becomes a spoilt petulant child.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭Harika


    Still rumours but can't see Fittipaldi in as he hasn't convinced anywhere.

    Rumour is that Ferrari wants giovanazzi in, Alpine might want to give gp2 champ piastri experience.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭Harika




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,081 ✭✭✭kksaints


    Had to be done. As a driver he's no real loss to the sport and team in any case. The loss of the sponsorship could be a problem tho.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,083 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I'd be surprised if it isnt Gio, or does Fittipaldi have a ready made title sponsor attached to replace Uralkali.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,089 Mod ✭✭✭✭GoldFour4


    Who will be the likely replacement? Will they just go with Fittipaldi given how close to the start of the season?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ah, this stuff is overdone. The FIA made mistakes and Mercedes and Hamilton were shafted. The mistake decided the championship and they're very sour about it. I think that's fair enough. Toto didn't cover himself in glory and Hamilton thought discretion was the better part of valour and he was right.

    The scale and the consequences of the mistake aren't trivial. Its normal to expect them to be very cross. Once the new season starts I don't expect Toto to keep going on about it unless journalists keep bringing it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,161 ✭✭✭Hijpo


    I think it would be amazing to see the other teams do a whip around to keep HAAS afloat until they get a new main sponsor, if they need funding.

    Not sure how that would work legally but I think it would be great support from teams, let's be honest it's not like the other teams are keeping a genuine contender in contention



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Yeahbi was thinking the same myself. Having seen so much charity and cooperation over the Ukrainian situation, I would like to see it extend to cover the loss of Russian money for Haas. That's not really how F1 works.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,702 ✭✭✭✭Jordan 199




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,623 ✭✭✭✭flazio


    If Orlen and Kubica could be prised away from Sauber then Haas would have a sponsor and a driver who already has some 2022 car milage done.

    This too shall pass.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,558 ✭✭✭PsychoPete


    I kind of feel sorry for Mazepin losing his seat but it was inevitable. Reports are that Fittipaldi is to get the seat but I think Gio would be a better option especially how Haas basically wrote off last season because they were focused on the 2022 season



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    They were not shafted. Thats utter nonsense.


    Was Max/RB shafted when Toto was ordering Masi not to bring out a Safety Car ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,119 ✭✭✭This is it


    Same as before, allow all cars through or none at all. I'm delighted Max won, but Hamilton was definitely shafted in my opinion.

    On Toto, himself and Horner were as bad as each other on the radio.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,043 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Absolutely no point going over it. The history will remember it as the time Hamilton was 15seconds clear and coasting to the race ans championship win until an extraordinary set of decisions led to Max winning the race and the championship



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,345 ✭✭✭✭MadYaker


    Steiner seems very confident that Pietro can jump into the car without many problems, they're already backmarkers so what have they got to lose?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    Yeah but all the focus is on the RB/Masi conversations. Nobody is questioning Toto on his demanding no SC and why that's acceptable.


    The whole narrative from Sky is Lewis was robbed, and they are giving Merc all the angles to discredit Max



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,584 ✭✭✭Harika


    Don't think Pietro brings money. Would bet on a Andretti engagement sooner than later.




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,452 ✭✭✭Anjobe


    Because the problem was not with RBR (Jonathan Wheatley in this case) making a suggestion to race control for how to handle the lapped cars and the safety car restart in a way that massively benefitted Max over all the other drivers, the problem was with Masi following that suggestion without any consideration of whether it was the right or fair thing to do, and then putting Toto's objections down with a sarcastic comment repeating Wheatley's own words about a motor race was also very foolish. I can only presume Masi did not use the safety car earlier in the race because he didn't think it was necessary, I don't think he would let Toto sway him over a matter of safety.

    Its not just Sky and Toto who think that Masi shafted Hamilton and Mercedes, it seems to be quite a widely held view. This quote from Helmut Marko - "If Masi had everything they are going to enter now at his disposal, it would have been easier for him to decide, a video referee and an advisor by his side." - would suggest even he doesn't think Masi got it right.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,790 ✭✭✭✭Burkie1203


    When JW was onto Masi, Masi replied "just give us a moment until we clear the accident" or words to that effect. So he had, IMO already considered various options while the Latifi car was being cleared.


    If its possible Masi was swayed by that suggestion then you have to accept he was swayed by Toto regarding the SC?


    Both teams made suggestions which the RD implemented. However the focus is on the one which benefitted Max, not the one which benefitted Hamiltion even though it was what Merc/Toto demanded. This is a very deliberate attempt by Sky to discredit Max and his championship in every way possible.

    Sky's entire focus is the Merc viewpoint.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement