Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

15775785805825833690

Comments

  • Posts: 2,016 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    You're really hurting my feelings. You are so cold and ruthless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭technocrat


    Its a simply a numbers game.

    Russia's military is no match for the combined west if the situation escalates, and Putin knows that.

    Also I've heard it discussed on the BBC there is a long chain of command from Putin to the guys that launch the nukes, they could refuse to act in anticipation of retaliation threat from the west.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 458 ✭✭slay55


    I can’t see any other outcome than at least one nation being nuked in 2022



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Yes, the same fellow ran a shadow army within Swiss intelligence set up to lead an anti-Soviet resistance in the event of invasion. Went under the radar until the early 90s.

    Anyone interested in Cold War stories should listen to the Cold War Conversations podcast. The above tale isn't covered, but it has a whole host of interviews with all sorts of people and their activities during the Cold War. Some crazy crazy stories out there.

    Both the USSR and the West were riddled with (sometimes not unfounded) paranoia. An extraordinary period of history - on the surface a period of growth and cultural flowering for Europe, but under the surface, so many people were working tooth and nail to prevent disaster striking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,017 ✭✭✭✭briany


    I think that the current Western values we currently hold are reliant upon a surplus of food, energy and water existing. On the hierarchy of needs, you have to have the basic needs covered before you can move onto the loftier self-actualisation goals. Once austerity bites, however, there's more of a drive to 'get with the program' and pull together (or be pushed together) in order to secure the basic resources we need for survival. That means less individualism and less liberty for ordinary people.

    My fear is that, based on the current trajectory of the world economy and population, we're setting ourselves up for a situation where authoritarian regimes like Russia and China have a natural advantage. As austerity bites from rising energy costs, and there are more humans competing for resources, China and Russia are better poised to both endure the suffering, and are more whipped into shape by their governments to hold together. Meanwhile, the West would be fighting with itself and in denial about the drop in standards of living, and in that world, China and Russia can move.

    So the choice for the West is to either adopt some of the aspects of authoritarian societies to perhaps set ourselves up to adapt to coming austerity, or else find methods of energy production that are cheap and clean so that we can continue with the surplus we currently enjoy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,012 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The airport buildings or one of the longest runways in the world?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    People should stop posting about nuclear attacks on Ireland and theorizing where and who would be worse affected.

    Its scaremongering



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    Russia dont need nuclear bombs in Ukraine - they are killing thousands with all the missile strikes and shelling each night and once the troops and tanks get into Kiev and other cities tens of thousands of Ukrainians will be killed each week if not day .

    Russia will use nuclear bombs if they go into Poland or Germany or Western Europe.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,978 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Right but you mentioned a nuclear attack, that's the condition of the Chinese-Ukrainian pact, if Russia were to launch a nuclear attack on Ukraine, China would have to retaliate against Russia.

    In terms of leverage, Russia won't be able to repair it's Boeing and Airbus planes soon, the world's major container shipping companies are refusing to do business with it, in fact most major global companies will stop doing business altogether with the entire country, it's largest bank stock has gone down 95%, the central bank has had hundreds of billions in assets abroad frozen, their currency has plunged 20% to 30%, Russian bonds and assets are toxic, I don't even want to think about their pension funds, it looks like the country is going to default on it's next bond payment, and this is just 7 days in.

    They are going to become very, very reliant on BRICS countries like China, the second largest economy in the world, just to survive. If the Chinese allow them. And don't scalp the hell out of them in every deal.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Were you one of those kids that when they closed their eyes they thought those chasing couldn't see them?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Don’t think it’s their military that’s the problem, it’s the threat of nukes. And while you may be correct about the chain of command, you can’t wage war in the hope that a Good Samaritan in the link will prevent the apocalypse. Aren’t there nukes in different parts of the army ? You might get lucky with naval officers and unlucky with certain army ones.

    Im guessing that the allies are speaking with those most familiar with Putin to gauge what probability of him using nukes in different scenarios. The mere fact that he is actually using them as a threat implies he’s ok having them as a bartering chip. I think that’s insane, not least because that nuclear war could spell the end of humanity, but it makes sense to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭Alonso77


    These theories about Irish targets all come from old Soviets war plans from 40/50 yrs ago - also there are a lot less nukes now that in the 70/80s with lesser yields - some believe the theories of nuclear winter are a myth and life would return to relative normality in a much lesser time that the doomsday modelling from cold war times



  • Posts: 2,016 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well it won't be the longest any more if there's a massive crater in the middle of it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,496 ✭✭✭Fighting Tao


    With the accuracy of Russian missiles on display in Ukraine, you’d probably be better standing in Westport town centre if you want to be directly hit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭technocrat


    Yes I watch the news and know whats happening in Ukraine right now.

    My post was theorising what happens if things escalate and the west get more involved.

    I would suggest we should call Putins bluff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,431 ✭✭✭combat14


    Screenshot_20220303-161011_Chrome.jpg

    First signs of corporate russia starting to wake up and speak out... they must know that the writing is on the wall for their balance sheet if west decides to go down the stop buying ALL russian oil route...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,708 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    It's never just one man's finger on the button and there are a large number of corridors to navigate before even a decision is reached regarding the use of a nuclear option. So all the talk of nukes is just hot air.

    The Russians know that there are several countries with nuclear options and they are all ranged at cities and other targets in Russia. If the Russian brass opt for a strike, they understand completely that that would, literally, mean the end of their own nation because it would be completely obliterated.

    They're not going to do that over some mickey mouse conflict in the Ukraine.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭Ninthlife


    No. I also dont think we would be a target.

    Others who read the thread and such posts may be of a more nervous nature though.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭Ninthlife





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,539 ✭✭✭Quitelife


    Lot of Ukrainians are dying in this Micky mouse conflict you speak of



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,327 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    (If that is so) no can't really agree with you. I'm no expert so possibly am straying outside the lines commenting on this aspect, but that kind of action IMO is going over some boundaries I mentioned in another post, the West directly attacking or threatening to attack Russia/its forces etc. militarily to protect Ukraine should not happen here.

    I disagreed with tomalak, but think he's right about that and I'm sure there is some "threshold" there with Russia where they may start to perceive that outside military assistance given to Ukraine is of such an extent/size that West is almost treating them as a defacto NATO member. The current assistance given of (I think - again no military expert) mostly lighter weapons that will help them defend themselves from the Russian invaders if they wish to do that, is I think very much the typical kind of thing that one side or another did in the Cold war with allies or proxies (e.g. assistance Russia or China I think gave to likes of North Vietnamese or Cubans etc.).

    The economic/social/political cut off of Russia that is now escalating is also very typical of what little I know of relations of that period, although its obviously very sudden and will thus create a shock and severely damage Russia, and to a lesser extent the West because of connections & dependencies that have built up during peace/post collapse of Soviet Union. Russia/Putin has basically begun a new Cold War with the West by launching this invasion.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    No it wouldn't - there dont have as many active weapons as you may think, nor do the americans for that matter



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭technocrat


    Exactly!

    While nuclear strikes on the west would also be devastating, in places that are targeted, Russia will come off much much worse and get totally wiped out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,306 ✭✭✭✭Drumpot


    Don’t Suppose you have any links to the chain of command on that, be very interesting to know how an order like that is processed. Wasn’t there nearly an accidental nuclear war in the 80s cause one Russian system incorrectly said that warheads had been sent towards Russia?

    I also thought there was a chain of command with the US president , anybody know the crack with the “nuclear football” that goes around with the president. So a president gives the order , do they just launch or is there some sort of system that filters it?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,012 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    It will be nationalised tomorrow and the CEO's and board will be in a Gulag next week.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Wishful thinking. Do you think the men who man the nuclear silos are chosen for their ability to disobey orders?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,317 ✭✭✭Alonso77


    I dont think nuking Shannon is gonna achieve that goal



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement