Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia - threadbanned users in OP

15735745765785793690

Comments

  • Posts: 391 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I would welcome the end of Russia as a great power. But I fear it will not go quietly into the good night. It may mean the dying of the light for all of us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,049 ✭✭✭Mecanudo


    What are you on about?

    In NATO just three countries are nuclear weapon states, these are: France, the UK and the US

    The Ukraine is not in NATO and previously gave up its nuclear weapons which it inherited from the former USSR for the guarantee that Russia would recognise its sovereignty. Russia has failed to do so.

    That Ukraine may seek to pursue NATO membership to prevent Russia from doing exactly what its doing now is really not that difficult to understand. And its certainly not the first exsoviet state to so. Poland, Lativa and Lithuania are all NATO members. Perhaps you think they shouldn't be simply because Putin doesn't like it?



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Yeah, I'd agree with this. This should be the consequence of any country that threatens to literally end the human race. They've done it several times already in one week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,868 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    Does that mean every conflict since time began is considered genocide?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,424 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Update : Putin told Macron he intends to take the whole of Ukraine - French President says he fears "the worst is to come".



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I don't think it will. It will just be bailed out at every level by Beijing and will lose a good deal of freedom of action. It'll become a big Belarus. I'm just guessing what might happen though I'm definitely not a geopolitical strategist.



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Amprodude


    It's not the first time the French are referred to cowards and surrenders



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    Really? that is a turning point then if true. These scummy blyats keep sending out mixed messages on purpose. The other day it was "Zelensky is the legitimate president" and "there will be no occupation".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,139 ✭✭✭Gregor Samsa


    Genocide is a very specific crime. It's not about numbers, it's about acts that specifically have "the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group" . And to be clear, I'm not down-playing how wrong Russia's actions are, denying that they're committing other war crimes, or saying that intervention isn't warranted.

    However, innocent Ukrainians being killed in war, no matter how unjust, that is occurring in Ukraine does not in itself necessarily reach the threshold of genocide. Indeed, genocide is discriminate killing, rather than indiscriminate.




  • Posts: 391 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Experts on existential risk hypothesize that humanity has a one-in-five chance of wiping itself out within the next few hundred years. I personally think the odds are grimmer than that. If the west negotiates in good faith a new geopolitical architecture with China and Russia, and then those countries break what was agreed, then we know for sure that there will be a nuclear war, and those who survive will live in a Mad Max type hellscape. But we have to try to settle it in good faith first. At the moment the west isn't giving an inch and this isn't sustainable.



  • Advertisement
  • Site Banned Posts: 4,034 ✭✭✭Amprodude


    Time for NATO and the West to step it up and stop Putin before it's too late. Now would be the ideal time to attack Russian forces when they are struggling in the Ukraine. Forgot Negotiations and diplomacy a waste of time against Putin. He needs to faced right on. Nothing to be feared but fear itself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,424 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, he's dropped all talk of "liberating the Donbass". He now openly admits he wants to take all of Ukraine (this is what the 'de-Nazifying and demilitarising Ukraine' euphemism has been about).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    Kind of. China will earn significant political capital if he brings Putin to heel, but in terms of China as an alternative pole of political power, it really is a lonely power as well.

    China can only really count Pakistan, Cambodia, North Korea and a couple of other pliant states as reliable political partners.

    This would send Moscow Mick and fellow travelers over the edge, but we should be very very careful about cheerleading the end of the US backstopped peace in critical parts of the world. East Asia and Europe would be back to normal service of taking lumps out of each other were it not for the American security umbrella.

    I read a nice little summation of NATO and it's ultimate purpose the other day: "It's about keeping the Americans in, the Russians out, and the Germans down."

    It's hard to argue with a compact like that, and it makes sense to this day. And the US aren't running around overthrowing EU governments, they've actually facilitated the growth and development of the most powerful force for European democracy and prosperity since dot.

    If someone has a better formula for protecting the European peace if we send the Americans back across the Atlantic, I'm all ears, but I don't think there is a credible one to be completely frank.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    I suspect it's happening already, but they need to go in 'unofficially'.



  • Posts: 391 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I think if Russia didn't implode after the breakup of the USSR, it's unlikely to any time soon. And a common cry in Russian circles these days is "Why do we need the world if Russia won't be in it?".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,660 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    @[Deleted User]

    At this point, western utopianism is going to get us all killed, because it has ignored the fact that there are other, lethal powers out there who won't allow liberal democracy to encroach into what they see as their back yards...

    I don't see the sanctions as sustainable or conducive to peace. Crushing sanctions is what caused the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. If you don't think that they will lead, at the very least, to a crippling cyber attack on western infrastructure leading to unparalleled chaos and escalation, just wait and see.

    These lethal "powers" are already in our "back yard". No scratch that they are in the house, living it large, sneering and laughing at us. So many minds hacked with their bullshít which is free to spread and eaten up by lots of people, so many elites bought and sold and utterly corrupted. So much dependence of the West on them, esp. Putin's smirking pals in Beijing. See this thread for examples. It's not all "bots", as they say.

    Putin has pulled his mask off now, and its clear to most what is underneath. The sanctions are necessary. Cut them off and close them out from the West, hopefully for a generation or more if current set up there survives and endures. I suppose I am a broken record at this stage but neither Russia nor China have some God given right to the extensive trade and economic and social interactions with us that they built up. Cutting them off isn't utopianism.



  • Posts: 7,946 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Have you not heard the expression give an inch and take a Moldova?

    How far are you willing to let Putin go before he is confronted - everything up until the NATO countries? If he attacks Latvia should NATO still do nothing? Or is it if it DIRECTLY affects Ireland you think it's getting a little serious?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,331 ✭✭✭Notmything


    I assume you include Ireland and Irish troops as part of this?

    Would you be willing to enlist if that's the case?



  • Posts: 5,121 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Putin is laying down the challenge then. What is the West going to do? Not much we can do really, other than cut off Russia financially, economically, logistically and socially. If those sentiments are true, Ukraine is gone



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,348 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    @Drumpot

    As Wibbs said, if you look at the thread, when people try to expand out from “Putin is bad, we have to save Ukraine” (which is fine to be the general narrative), people are accused of trying to deflect or somehow imply it’s ok what Putin is doing.

    You don't even have to expand on anything. All you have to say is tanks get stuck in the mud. 😆



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,381 ✭✭✭Yurt2


    I'll take Western utopianism over Putinist nihilism every day of the week, where demoralised and propgandised citizens greet wars of national extinction with a shrug.

    @[Deleted User]



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,422 ✭✭✭omega man


    I wonder are the Chinese themselves surprised at the coordinated western sanctions and their immediate impact. Surely they would take serious note, at least privately.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,485 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    A hell of a lot of rumours coming out of Russia that hes about to declare martial law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,424 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I'm not sure how much it will change the West's strategy. The only thing it tells them is that he has no interest in peace negotiations and has no intention whatsoever of withdrawing from Ukraine. It's the first time he has admitted though that the intention is to take all of Ukraine (and presumably install a puppet regime).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 805 ✭✭✭CB19Kevo


    Why should the West give an Inch.. What has Putin done that should make any of us give anything to him. Are we at the stage of rewarding terror. What does that teach any of us, what message does that teach our kids.

    Putin if he so wished could have taken a different route, a positive route for the Russian people but he has chosen to inflict terror & now he will pay & now he should suffer & now we all need to make a choice of living in a world where we accept and lie down in the face of evil or we stand united and face our aggressors.

    Nuclear threat or not, this question must be asked of us all.



  • Posts: 391 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Well, this is the quandary, isn't it? Your scenario would seem to be zero sum: Let Putin have Latvia or... Or what? Engage in a nuclear exchange that would end all human life on the planet? The choice is binary and those are the stakes. It's as stark and bleak as that. If you think there's a straightforward answer to that, you're a better man than me, Gunga Din!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,764 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Da Cor utterly wrong, as is usually the case, no surprise.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 894 ✭✭✭Bayonet


    Speaker of Russian parliament on Russian TV. This is now North Korea levels of propaganda





  • Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Russia scores 19, Ukraine 61 (Ireland 97). So therefore because Ukraine is not perfect, its as bad as Russia and we can both sides this?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,890 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Personally, I fear dying in the nuclear winds, or living long enough after to face famine, starvation, radiation sickness and cannibal tribes who just want me for my body.

    But that's me.



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement