Are there any credible conspiracy theories?

There are hundreds, if not thousands, of true conspiracy theories, or theories that turned out to be true. The difference between these actual, provable ones and the rubbish posted here is that they were exposed after the fact, often by the very MSM websites that are much derided by the average CT loonies. I've never even heard of one that was first rumoured by CTers, then subsequently proven to be true. Here's four from the past few years alone.

Trump administration pushed to expose as many people as possible to Covid in order to achieve herd immunity faster than natural progression

Source

Dr's surgeries in the US used software that was unnecessarily prescribing opioids after the opioid drug company did a secret deal with the software manufacturer

Source

20+ Diplomats in Cuba developed brain injuries for no discernible reason

Source

"kids for cash" - At least two judges in the US were accepting bribes from private prisons for harsher sentencing of kids in Pennsylvania - including slagging the vice principal of their school on MySpace

source

Notice how that when you compare real conspiracies that happen and the ones being proposed here, there's this massive disparity in scale.

Conspiracy theorists never seem to suggest theories along the lines of the ones that $hifty points too.

It's never a small group of people in power abusing that power and bad systems to get money. It always has to be giant global conspiracies that involve multiple governments over the course of years using sci-fi technology or wacky schemes to take over the world yet also like leaving clues for internet detectives.

It's simply because real conspiracies aren't as interesting. They're more complex, sometimes difficult to understand and don't involve any exciting elements. They don't have snappy clues that can been presented in youtube videos under a minute. They don't generate gotcha questions you can use to sound clever. Often times they're just depressing and highlight broken systems, which isn't as fun as pretending to expose a giant evil plot by supervillains.

There's even reasonable versions of theories like 9/11. But because they don't involve secret demolitions and "analysing clues" from random quotes, no conspiracy theorists actually propose them.

No it can't be true because what you claimed was false and you aren't able to defend it.

Why do you think people would be convinced by your posts so far?

Yup. Again questions dodged, nothing of substance provided.

Another demonstration of why there are no reasonable conspiracy theories or theorists.

But dude it doesn't have anything to do with ego or what I can imagine.

I'm asking you to answer very simple questions about what you believe. You keep showing that you're unable to answer.

And yes, fires can take down buildings, this is what evidentally happened.

Do you have an alternative?

Also you claimed (falsely) that one of the people behind the conspiracy outed himself and admitted it on camera on the day on live TV.

This is an extremely silly thing to claim. You know it's a silly thing to claim because you keep trying to avoid it.

Why would people take you seriously when this is what you are claiming?

Might as well br arguing for the space laser theory. Far more plausible than secret explosive demolition.