What does the future hold for Donald Trump? - threadbans in OP

Would that be the trump who had a private meeting with Putin with no US interpreter in the room, just Putin and his interpreter?

Maybe Sonic the Hedgehog porn again. You have to respect the classics.

I give you one better , I visited their tech page.

According to their "status" page at https://truthsocial.statuspage.io/

They are currently 12+ hours into an unresolved partial site outage on their 1st day , which is basically the entire time span since they officially went live.

They claim it's because of "unprecedented demand and traffic" but I'm leaning more towards "Cheap-ass implementation unable to handle even the most modest of traffic volumes " as the more likely reason

There'll be someone along now to argue that it is actually 11 hours, as if that makes a ****ing difference...

Still ironic that they feel they need a safe space after using that as a stick to beat the lefties with for so long. If they could restrain themselves from breaching the terms of service they wouldn't need their own special platform.

But GB News is still going and getting bigger all the time apparently.

If you hated it that much, you'd ignore it just like Trump twitter.

And easy

Who'd a thunk?..... Oh wait, EVERYONE!!!

Of course what will happen next (After they blame "Libtards", MSM, BLM, Hilary, SJWs, the LGBTQ+ community and others) is that the hosting service will have to drop them if it has taken down other (I'm sure equally enlightened) sites. This will of course mean that this company is immediately traitorous, un-American and downright commie.

I expect the interwebs will be full of screencaps of angry rants about jews or whatever once this gets going. Parler was a source of endless entertainment before it ground to a halt. We'll be seeing lots of Trump Twitter.

The problem is right wing neo-cons of various shades, manipulating media output to get people to buy their lies about the sources of peoples discomfort so that then they can get their desired outcome knowing that they will be insulated from the negatives that will hit most of the people who suffer as a consequence of this outcome.

And then have them, and their apologists to point at the people who said all this sh*t would happen and say you're the ones to blame for allowing this to come about.

I'm no longer annoyed at seeing this happen, I'm quite angry about it. I have friends and family members in the UK who are suffering in many ways as a consequence of the governance and media content of the last ten years and I see no reason why to let the people who are to blame for this off the hook.

In the US context, the problem wasn't that the Democrats picked Hillary, as people who make the same argument as yourself have made, it is that people facilitated Donald for their own means thinking that they could make a mess and the Democrats would prevent it getting too bad.

which makes them easy marks for the likes of Trump, Farage and the right wing media.

While there's a certain amount of truth to that, you'd hope that at some point they might realise that their protest votes actually made things worse for them.

I don't disagree with your first sentence.

I might have agreed with all of it a few years ago. But the people in the UK have looked at things steadily get worse over the last ten years, a decline which accelerated after Brexit and they voted for the same people who were in power for all that time.

People in the US watched the unmitigated sh*tshow that was Trumps Presidency and 74M said, 'Please Sir, can I have some more'.

Those aren't protest votes. They are either votes showing a comfort with the actions of both parties while they were in power, or an ignorance of what the reality truly was/is in which case I think the likes of GB News, Fox and the rest hold way more responsibility than those of us who have been pointing stuff out all along.