Joe Biden Presidency thread *Please read OP - Threadbanned Users Added 4/5/21*

Did you even read the links that you shared?

Absolutely NOWHERE does it say that anyone accessed the White House Servers etc. during Trumps administration.

There is a reference to February 9th 2017 ( a whole 20 days into the Trump administration btw) as the date that a report was submitted with additional allegations - It does not say when that data was obtained or that it came from information from White House systems just that Feb 9th was the day the information was provided.

We know that the Rodney Jaffes company had access to the WH Equipment during the Obama administration.

Please point out where in the links you have provided that Durham says that WH Servers were accessed during the Trump administration?

You can't , because it doesn't - Any suggestion that it does is an extrapolation/interpretation of information that does not yet exist in the public domain.

The Durham indictment papers are sufficiently vague (perhaps deliberately so) such that by listing all the places that had been accessed by the Tech Company without actually specifying WHEN the access occurred, people can come to conclusions that are not supported by the actual stated facts.

Could they have spied on the Trump WH? - Sure it's possible, but nothing in anything Durham has made public thus far definitively clarifies that point in any way whatsoever.

Given that the updated/additional information was submitted on February 9th , it would want to have been some operation to find and analyse the data and then create a report that was then submitted to the FBI in the less than 20 days of the Trump administration at that point.

It should also be pointed out that Durham has not brought ANY charges in relation to anybody hacking/spying on anything. The 3 people charged thus far have only been charged with allegedly misrepresenting who they were working for or where the information came from.

If Durham had evidence that someone had illegally accessed the WH Servers for nefarious reasons one would assume those would be the charges he'd be bringing and not the far far weaker charges that he has brought forth.

Is there a point you are trying to make here?

It's an open/ongoing legal case , of course they aren't going to comment on it - That's what normal administrations do , they don't try to influence the outcome of judicial proceedings.

If she'd said "The President thinks it's a load of rubbish" what would the reaction have been?

Equally if she'd said (as Trump did the other day) "The President thinks that the Death Penalty might be applicable here" - What would the reaction have been?

The ONLY sensible response is the one she gave - "I can't comment , talk to the Dept. of Justice"