Do men need a license to be allowed socialise (MOD NOTE IN OP)

That's not what happened there though.

The female poster framed a disagreement dishonestly to make it look like the male poster dismissed her opinion because she was a woman. That was simply not true.

Plus if you tell me you don't want to be shouted at but I have my own reasons for shouting, I have listened to you. Ive chosen to ignore you and disagree that your reason is more valid than mine.

Your analogy makes it out that if people listened to you, you'd always get your own way. And it depends on what the personal boundaries are. It can very much be an agree/disagree topic.

Object away.

I definitely believe it was dishonest. And before you tell me I'm wrong, you don't get to tell me how I feel.

We can both do that.

And men aren't telling women how to feel ffs.

Pointing out that the safety issue has been ratcheted up by media and arsehole militant feminists and explaining (not mansplaining) that men are not the enemy is not telling women how to feel.

It's baffling that saying to a guy "you've no idea what it's like to be a woman. Shut up and listen" is accepted.

How you feel is not up for debate.

Grand. Feel away.

I feel you are being dishonest.

How I feel is not up for debate.

People do usually manipulate conversation by adding to it. It's not necessarily a bad thing. Unless its done dishonestly.

I believe you were being dishonest when you accused the other poster of saying you were speaking nonsense purely because you were a woman.

Trying to shut a poster up by framing them as sexist for not agreeing with you is either dishonest or incredibly stupid and I don't think you are stupid.

I genuinely didn't put 2&2 together there and was unclear as to what you meant.

I understand now but still am at odds with your opinion that it is indecent or senseless to compliment a woman you don't yet know.

I agree with your stance on whistling though. Mostly because I hate the noise.

Some people have such a hard-on for speech to be policed that they would agree that people should be charged with the egregious crime of complimenting a woman they don't know.

That's what's difficult to understand.

It used to be the likes of the ultra-conservative Mary Whitehouse types who would blame sexually explicit films and games for instigating violence and warping minds/ruining culture etc and try to ban films and imagery that was deemed unsuitable for society.

When did the roles reverse?