The Killer Nanny: Did she do it?

I'd been meaning to watch it but will try to catch up on more 4 😏

I was left with the opposite opinion. Having been unsure years ago, looking at it now, I think she was responsible.

I remember this case well, huge media frenzy at the time.

How did she pick up a small infant, grab him around the body or under the arms and shake him as violently as was required to give him brain damage without leaving a single bruise on him anywhere? If she lost her temper with him she would have squeezed him very tightly first and then shook him, there'd have to be other signs of violence. The reason herself and her lawyer fell out was because of her greedy parents selling her story to the rags.

There's no evidence of her having dropped him, no external cuts or bruising.

AHH stop, the skull would show impact damage. Evidence is the key word here.

It wasn't alleged, there was evidence of an earlier brain incident I would like to have seen that explored further too. The doctor who later changed his stance seemed to imply it was a type of brain condition.

I used the word "alleged" because I'm not qualified to discern whether the scans showed what the defence claimed, not in a pejorative sense. Maybe there was a better word I could have used.

I remember watching it live at the time, she never convinced me, she admitted early on to being a bit rough with the child - I was shocked when she was released tbh.