Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Covid 19 Part XXXV-956,720 ROI (5,952 deaths) 452,946 NI (3,002 deaths) (08/01) Read OP

1132413251327132913301580

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 101 ✭✭iwasliedto


    I don't think tests have been ramped up. It seems obvious that fewer people are presenting for whatever reason. I think Friday's numbers will see a big drop in positive results. Doctors clinics are also reporting a big drop in covid referrals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,378 ✭✭✭✭hotmail.com


    One thing I've learned is that Irish people love getting covid tested. And getting their children tested, despite how uncomfortable and scary it is for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Employers can ask. They're running a slight legal gauntlet, but only slight. There is no law which says that an employer can't ask. The solicitor in the above piece even says that:

    "If NPHET come out and say 'Yes you can ask these questions'... then in those situations that trumps the GDPR rules because it's a national emergency, or it's a health emergency".

    NPHET don't make laws, and they have no control over GDPR. The argument here is that asking the question does not become important unless NPHET explicitly says so, but that's a bit of a reach. NPHET's rules around close contacts require that unvaccinated close contacts must restrict their movements. Which logically means that employers have an obligation to ensure that anyone attending the workplace is not required to restrict their movement.

    Therefore GDPR is already being overruled and an employer is allowed to ask. They cannot necessarily demand proof, but if the employee declines to answer or says no, then the employer would be within their rights to act on that information in the context of the pandemic.

    They could of course completely side-step the question and ask employees to declare on a daily basis whether they are currently required to restrict their movements according to NPHET's rules. If the employer was to later discover that the employee lied, they would be entitled to take disciplinary action.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Spiderman0081


    Hi. That 360 are the registered deaths so far attributed to the vaccines. There are also thousands of reports under review, ie yet to be determined.

    There are of course many more thousands of less serious side effects under review also.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,353 ✭✭✭Le Bruise


    I've been pretty lucky, in that I haven't had to do a PCR test yet. A couple of Antigens and that's it. I know people who sign up for them regularly without symptoms or any close contact 'just to be sure'....madness!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,951 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The Irish are event junkies, always have been. And covid is the biggest game in town.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Yeah, it's only happening in Ireland. Nowhere else in the world are people signing up to be voluntarily tested. Sure they're not even doing covid tests anywhere except Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,259 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    Then why is no-one getting tested now a negative PCR isn't required? Surely we'd still be queueing up if we were just getting tested for the lols?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,166 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    To counter that argument if a workplace was to bring in such rules then any employee would be a fool to get any test done. People with symptoms would just stay home for a day or two until they cleared and save themselves a world of heartache.

    The isolation guidelines are run on a trust basis, which to date has worked extremely well. The government can't police it and employers/employees have worked together in nearly every workplace to adhere to them. The main reason being private medical information is a very grey area for employers to get into and they need to be super careful not to open themselves up to all sorts of issues.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,134 ✭✭✭eviltimeban


    Yes but I imagine many of them had their appointment set before the new no-PCR rule came in.

    Be interesting to see what happens in the coming days with test numbers. I for one will be relieved not to have to see daily case numbers in every headline. Are people really going to upload their antigen results, if they don't need to for work? No they are not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,259 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    With thousands of slots available, you could've filled 60000 slots without blinking 2 weeks ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,938 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    I think there are constitutional issues though when a body like NPHET are seen as being capable of creating derogations from established law simply by uttering something. Having the power to create or change law is one thing, and obviously not within the competence of NPHET, but that does not make it any less problematic when a body like NPHET is seen as wielding de facto control over how and when law applies. The mere fact that an eminent employment solicitor suggests that NPHET’s views can be of such weight as to (in effect) overrule a law like the GDPR is indicative of the power that this body now holds (even if by no method or desire of its own), particularly in a context where the Irish government has given them quite a lot of public leeway. And we are now well beyond the stage, two years on from 2020, where it can be considered a mere emergency blip.

    I don’t tend to level criticism at Holohan or NPHET, who I think for the most part have acted in good faith, but the power they wield by their mere words is problematic (think for example how Holohan telling people not to attend work Christmas parties almost immediately decimated business for hospitality) and a re-think is needed as to the public-facing nature of NPHET. Winding them down as a public-facing body — and by all means allowing their meeting minutes and recommendations to be made public in due course — is going to be an important step in what is fast becoming a critically urgent need to move on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,124 ✭✭✭Mike3549


    Im not arguing, that was more like a joke, we need a bloody symbol for sarcasm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,434 ✭✭✭Cork2021


    Working in a supermarket and the floflex antigen test sales have slowed considerably since last week. Couldn’t get them on the shelves quick enough last week and they were gone! Looks like a peak has been reached and to a certain extent people have stopped testing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,751 ✭✭✭✭ACitizenErased


    Just looking at the PCR website its the first time in weeks I’ve seen tests available in Cork. Nearly 500 openings still.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,077 ✭✭✭KrustyUCC


    Now to wait for the slow painful 'phased' easing of restrictions

    I'm not expecting restrictions to fully be rolled back on until end of February if we're lucky



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,190 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Even general discussion of it is dropping away. Anytime I'm talking to someone about it now, it's about those who had covid last week rather than than who has covid right now. Haven't heard of any new diagnoses of Covid in my extended circle in about ten days.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭Widescreen


    Just on the new regulations etc.

    Luckily I have not had the virus, and have never had need so far to take a PCR or Aunty Gin test.

    Going forward I will only pay for and take an antigen test if i feel different/ill in some way that may suggest I have the virus. Depending on the result I will do what is then necessary.

    If they want us to take frequent tests for other reasons they can make them available free of charge along with the "special" type masks.

    Personally I think they may be coming to conclusions here as regards the virus too quickly. I see news reports from other countries including the U.S. and it seems they are all dealing with a much more dangerous virus than we are!

    Anyone, I really hope this proves to be the launch pad back to normality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭Wombatman


    Stop with the misinformation. You clearly have an agenda and a happy to make half baked misleading claims to back up your ridiculous position.

    The report states:

    The table below shows the number of reports per age group where deaths are stated as the outcome of a suspected side effect. These reports are also included in the tables above.

    The Medical Products Agency can not say with certainty how many have actually died due to the vaccinations. We can only reproduce how many reports have been received where the patient is stated to have died. The reported deaths may be associated with the suspected vaccine in question, but they may also depend on the patient's other illnesses, other medications that the patient is using, or other factors.

    The report does not have vaccines "as the underlying cause of death" in the 360 cases. Do you agree?

    Have a look here to get a better understanding this type of statistic.

    https://blog.ons.gov.uk/2021/10/04/how-many-people-have-died-as-a-result-of-a-covid-19-vaccine/



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Assume you are right.

    360 deaths in 7,450,000 people vaccinated = 1/20,694

    Covid -15,462 deaths in 1,510,000 cases = 1/97.6

    A rate of 212 to 1.

    But of course you are not right. 360 deaths following vaccination does not equal 360 deaths attributed to vaccination. All deaths following receipt of a medical product are reportable, whether or not any link has being confirmed.

    THe UK ONS has an explanation on this, which explains it far better than I could

    The Yellow Card reporting scheme has reported that between 9 December 2020 and 8 September 2021 there were 1,645 deaths where the person died shortly after receiving one of the coronavirus vaccines. This is the number of deaths reported as possibly linked to a vaccine, however they will not have been fully investigated at the time of reporting and a report is not proof of causation. So, the numbers are likely to be a big overestimate. The MHRA follow up all such reports and use other sources of evidence such as the numbers of individuals who would be expected to experience different events irrespective of vaccination.

    In contrast, the different statistical agencies have reported that to August 2021 (June 2021 in Northern Ireland) there were 4 deaths in England, 0 deaths in Wales, 4 deaths in Scotland and 1 in Northern Ireland. Of these, 4 in Scotland and 1 in Northern Ireland had the vaccine as the underlying cause of death. This meant that there were 9 deaths in the UK that involved the vaccine (meaning the vaccine contributed to the death), of which 5 had the vaccine as the underlying cause (meaning the vaccine initiated the chain of events directly leading to the death). For these deaths, there was evidence to suggest that the vaccine played a part in the chain of events that led to the death

    Note. The original UK figure of 1,645 is similar in proportion to the 360 figure in Sweden when allowing for relative population size and the UK figure being up to September. No doubt the 9 confirmed in the UK has increased by a small number since.

    Usual suspects will be back around any second with their "with covid not from covid" canard. So lets examine that question. Since the start of the Pandemic there have been 5.51million confirmed covid deaths. How to go about examining that figure. Well if, as contended these are made up of a large proportion of incidental deaths that would have occurred anyway this would be reflected in the difference between excess mortality and recorded covid deaths. A detailed examination of Global Excess deaths by The Economist has identified that there have been between 12 million and 21 million excess deaths during the pandemic. For Sweden the number was 11,930, so potentially they over counted by maybe 3,000.No doubt all hit by buses.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,865 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    My impression is the nastier experience America and other countries are having with omicron is overwhelmingly due to them being much less vaccinated than us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,985 ✭✭✭Sweet.Science


    I get your point but 40k in a day is a huge amount. FWIW I think we will all need something new to argue about in a month or 2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,624 ✭✭✭FintanMcluskey


    I do think this discussion is so ironic

    If we applied the same metric to Covid deaths and illness there would be no pandemic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,627 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    Indeed. As far as I understand, in Denmark the army are rounding up 200,000 people every day and forcing them into the test centres. It must be quite the effort.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,297 ✭✭✭✭Atlantic Dawn
    GDY151


    How come theres almost no reports of superspreader events on airplanes now but there was lots at the start of the pandemic? Given the spread of Omnicron I'd have expected a number of flights a day in and out of UK and Ireland would have cases. Are they just not bothered tracing people at this stage?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,349 ✭✭✭Wombatman




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 442 ✭✭Spiderman0081


    It’s clear that you have an agenda otherwise you wouldn’t be getting all so hot and bothered. These deaths are “registered” as so, I never said that they were 100% the “underlying cause of death”. Just like covid deaths are “registered” as so. We all know that the number of covid deaths is greatly exaggerated. Do you agree?

    But it does not take away from the fact that they are “registered” as a covid death, despite a deluge of other possibilities in many cases.

    Seriously, calm down.



Advertisement