Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Cities around the world that are reducing car access

1333436383973

Comments

  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    you have no idea how little I'm actually paying all-in for my EV monthly due to subsidization/tax treatment by Government and Company. It is a no-brainer for me to run an EV car.

    That proposed only gives Governments the right to remove VAT or reduce it below 15%. Convincing Government to do so is another matter.

    As has been seen time and time again if a lobby group goes to government and gives them an excuse to introduce or increase a tax/levy they'll listen but lobby groups who propose removal of taxes are given the cold shoulder.



  • Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators Posts: 10,395 Mod ✭✭✭✭CatInABox


    Leicester introducing a levy for employer provided parking spaces. Has the potential to be a game changer for cities.




  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    And do you see that as a good thing while knowing nothing about the commuting needs of each and every one of those who work in Leicester?

    But yeah...cars are always evil irrespective of usage pattern, footprint or method of propulsion.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This is an interesting one and one which is already proposed for Galway. Cork & Dublin are to get congestion charges. It should be noted that In Nottingham and what is proposed for Galway allow for exemptions for employers with less than X spaces so it wouldn't impact small businesses, only mid to large scale employers. I think its 20 spaces in Nottingham currently. Also in Nottingham, the employers have chosen to pass the cost on to employees.

    Eventually the 4 main cities will all have both as well as exclusion zones. Well if the latest proposals are anything to go by, but who knows how long until they introduce these things. Hopefully not too long



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    so you put the potential employees of multi-nationals at a disadvantage of hundreds of euros to potential staff in other areas of the world.

    Multi-nationals are only interested in the total net cost of putting staff behind a desk and working.

    I suppose it is a way to resolve congestion but at the expense of turning a city in to an economic wasteland.

    but, but, but WFH is a panacea for all the ills of the world.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Have you actually a shred of evidence that this approach would turn a city into an economic wasteland?

    If you look at cities that encouraged the car based culture, the cities tend to be poorer for it. Many cities in the US become derelict at hignt because of this culture. There is no city centre. In terms of shopping, they all travel to malls rather than shop in city or town centres.

    Cities that focus on people (rather than cars) become much more economically active.

    So, would you like to rephrase what you were attempting to say or was it simply "wah wah its not fair that I might not be able to drive where and when I wish"



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Apart from my Colleagues who I worked alongside in Ireland for years being made redundant because the costbase was too high...No proof whatsoever.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Were your colleagues made redundant because of costs attributed to their mode of travel or for other business reasons?

    I'm assuming it is the latter so how exactly will someone's choice of travel threaten the future of a company? I have a choice as to drive, walk cycle or bus to my workplace. There are very few people who need to drive to work. Of all those who drive to and from work each day, the vast majority choose to drive simply because until now, it has been an easy choice. The ease at which this choice is made will now skew towards sustainable methods of travel. Any businesses that cannot adjust to cater for this and end up suffering are presumably near unviable anyhow irrespective of the costs per parking space



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Do you not understand that it doesn't matter if it is a parking charge or higher healthcare costs or income tax costs or cost of office space, all that matters is the cost to get an employee of adequate quality at a desk working productively in Ireland as opposed to somewhere else in the world. Either the Multi-national or the employee eats the cost of getting to the office and the Multi-national has options available to them beyond the reach of a Councillor in an Urban District Council. If the Multi-national is factoring in 500 quid for a parking space then they need to be paying 500 quid less for the employee and the employee they find who is willing to work for 500 euro less is not necessarily of the same quality.

    These are cold hard facts which my Irish Colleagues were faced with and left my Colleagues here in this Office shocked at how ruthless our Employer was when they needed to trim costs in the Department.

    You're the one without a shred of evidence to prove that discouraging travel to work actually on balance improves quality of life. It's all very well until you need to eat or pay rent.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Your style of posting reminds me of conversations with the lads in the Occupy tents back when they were around. They really seemed to struggle to argue a single point and instead seemed intent on maintaining a stream of whataboutery as a strategy to win an argument but the fact that they never stuck to one single argument or point makes "winning" impossible.

    Note, I have no problem engaging with you on any point, and already have done so, but you make it very difficult to even understand what you have issues with a lot of the time.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    You are all playing your games of SIM City in an imperfectly modelled environment.

    I'm not the one living in La-La land.

    There is no whataboutery involved in pointing out that if you increase the cost of putting a worker at a desk then a highly mobile employer will employ staff elsewhere.

    These are uncomfortable truths for many around here.

    Ah but more buses...who pays for them and do they reach their target.

    Ah but Amsterdam bikes...come back to me when the climate and geography of Ireland improves otherwise propose personal private transportation more compatible with Ireland's climate and environment.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    You're the one without a shred of evidence to prove that discouraging travel to work actually on balance improves quality of life. It's all very well until you need to eat or pay rent.

    There are plenty of reasearch that shows that commuting by car is not good for the health of the occupants of the car or for the wider population. As for discouraging travel to work is not something that is being proposed. What is being proposed is to discourage one method of travel in favour of more sustainable approaches. This will improve everyones quality of life.

    As for the multi-national wanting to pass on the cost - as these cost choices will affect each employer in the city (or at least each large employer) it will affect the market altogether. Furthermore, I as an employee of a MNC will not be affected because I've alread made the choice not to drive. If the MNC decides to absorb the cost then I wonder if BIK will be applicable to the employee (in the same way that it would be if the company paid for the car). However, if the MNC decides to up sticks because of this new charge then anything could have made them make the decision to leave, not just a parking space charge. However, in time hopefully we see most large cities implement such a charge so that the MNC will see it as a standard cost regardless of location.

    Either way, it still comes back to the point that people are largely choosing to drive most of their journeys. They don't need to drive them!



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    There is no whataboutery involved in pointing out that if you increase the cost of putting a worker at a desk then a highly mobile employer will employ staff elsewhere.

    As I've mentioned, I will not be subject to a parking space charge because I have made the choice to change my means of transport. Everyone else has that choice. The employer also has the choice to close some or all parking spaces as they see fit.

    Ah but more buses...who pays for them and do they reach their target.

    The bus users and the taxpayer. Why?

    Ah but Amsterdam bikes...come back to me when the climate and geography of Ireland improves otherwise propose personal private transportation more compatible with Ireland's climate and environment.

    I've already addressed this bullshit argument today. Did you not read it or do you disagree with cold hard facts?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Ireland is a high cost economy, sure, no argument there, but then it has been that way for the last 15 years, which was only balanced by the 12.5% tax rate. It'll be interesting to see what happens once there is a min 15% rate agreed but it'll take 5-10 years post introduction before we'll have enough info to see the real impacts.

    Not sure what any of that has to do with the thread topic though. Do you wish to start a thread on the Tax forum to discuss further, just drop me a link or do a @ mention if you do



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I mention it in this thread because a poster was wetting themselves with glee over a proposed move to increase the cost of working in a regional UK city all to combat those evil cars.

    Game Changer, yeah! Game Over for some, more like.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    No you didn't address it. You provided a string of words and felt smug.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Nottingham seems to be doing fine, which is probably why other cities are looking to introduce similar measures



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I'm withdrawing until something of substance is added.

    Posters here have not modelled the environment faithfully yet from a subjective perspective based on bias propose alterations to the model which will magically make it "better".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Its not about increasing costs of working, its getting motorists to pay their fair share towards the costs of building and maintaining car centric infrastructure that only the privileged few who can afford to drive get to avail of. Dont like it then don't drive to work, simple. Why are you so reluctant to pay your fair share?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    who are these "privileged few". There are 2.2 million registered cars in Ireland.

    remove those who aren't yet allowed drive under the age of 17, those who have retired from driving and those who are fortunate enough to not need a car and then tell me who are these "privileged few".



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Actions like this work very well to relieve congestion and improve city living

    A prime example, pre-covid, the difference in traffic levels when schools are off should tell you all you need to know about how much better life can be if we can build infrastructure that enables kids to cycle to and from schools safely and not need a parent to ferry them in a car. Thats not to mention the amount of commuters themselves who would also move away from car use, thereby freeing up capacity for those who have no option but to drive.

    Seems like a no brainer to me



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,395 ✭✭✭McGrath5


    Less than half the population in comparison then thanks for confirming that. You didn't mention why you aren't prepared to pay your fair share towards the cost of car infrastructure?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    show me the metric on which Dublin's climate is better for bike riders than that of Paris:

    https://weatherspark.com/compare/y/33845~47913/Comparison-of-the-Average-Weather-in-Dublin-and-Paris



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    You know there are very few one seater four wheeled vehicles on the road. You don't necessarily need to be gripping a steering wheel to be deriving benefit from the personal private transportation device which is a car.

    Seeing as Cars are punitively taxed during acquisition and use in Ireland I think you are arguing from a very weak position.

    I contribute nothing to cost of car infrastructure in Ireland. I'd thought that would have been clear. My taxes here however do contribute to a wonderful infrastructure system which interweaves roads with rail, high speed rail, light rail, aviation links, etc... all to the benefit of the Citizens and where planning of transportation policy is not in the hands of Radicals.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    It sure would be nice not to have to put on Galoshes and Waterproofs along with the thinsulate gloves in order to enjoy the Infrastructure.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    It would be nice to be able to weat t-shirts and shorts all year round. What's that got to do with anything? FFS



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,477 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    I cycle every day in Dublin, very rarely get wet. It never rains. I don't know why people are engaging with you you may as well be a brick wall, but it will be getting harder and harder to drive in the city going forward whether you like it or not.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I provided the statistics above. How can you argue with them?

    You are so tied to your beliefs that your concept of self would collapse if you were to dispassionately question them so you'd prefer to hang me.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    You really should focus more on the post and not the posters



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Do you accept that unfavourable ambient temperatures and precipitation would have a negative effect on usage of cycle infrastructure where provisioned.



  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,100 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    A small difference in temperature doesn't matter as you quickly warm up. Extremes are what you want to avoid. Really hot or really cold weather where you get snow or ice doesn't really work for cycling. As for rain, it all depends on when it rains. I walk a lot and it really doesn't rain that much in Dublin. I get the bus to work but have to walk a bit at either end. It rarely rained on me. I can only remember one notable time a few years ago where I got drenched but that was about it. After that day I left a spare pair of clothes and runners in my desk at work so that if it ever happened again I could just change. I have literally never used them. People make a much bigger deal of the rain here than it actually is.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators Posts: 40,287 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    It is a strange question. I could also ask if nice weather would make more people come out and cycle. Is winter or summer the benchmark? Either way, many people cycle all year round. Many more (especially women) would do so if they felt it was safe to do so.

    However, as the phrase goes, there is no bad weather, just bad clothing!.

    Either way, if you are looking for me to say that less people would cycle in poor weather, then yes, this is true. However, in a city designed to cater for the masses then there will still be room on the public transit systems (bus, luas, trains, etc.). If you are waiting for me to say that everyone should need a car then (as a petrolhead) I will openly say that this is not the case nor should it be.

    Lastly, why do people against the reform of our cities continue seem to focus (negatively) on cycling as the solution to traffic problems. Where are your questions around the potential time savings by using busses that aren't held up at junctions by motorists? Where are your questions about time savings because of the huge numbers of people who choose to travel by public transport rather than by car? Where are your questions about the money to be saved by the average household because they aren't spending the same amount each year on their car? Not one person in favour of reform is pushing a bicycle as the solution nor are they telling people to get out of cars and onto a bike. It is honestly getting boring now.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,260 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Looks pretty comparable so let's just stop that nonsense.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    um, the very first graph in the link; dublin is milder than paris? higher lows and lower highs.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    and you ignore the graph showing how many months of the year it is deemed "comfortable". You're grasping.

    Nonsense. You ignore "less rain", "less wind" and the amount of times it is deemed "comfortable". You are a funny bunch round here.

    The weather in Ireland is inclement. There is no denying it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    huh. they regard 17C as 'cool' rather than 'comfortable'. wimps.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    The weather in Ireland is inclement.

    Disagree. It can be unpleasant some days, sure, but they are few and far between and considering most journeys by bike at 20-30 mins max, its really not that big of a deal.

    However, lets say for arguments sake I think you are right and say the weather is crap on X days of the year.

    What point are you trying to make with this as the basis of your argument? If the weather is bad on X days, what conclusions are you drawing and how do they relate to the topic of the thread?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    build a beach resort in Ireland then don't be surprised if it achieves low occupancy rate. build an all bells and whistles cycle infrastructure in Ireland don't be surprised if it does convert the populace to cycling.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 27,260 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I've driven during bad weather. It is a miserable experience and I'd much rather be on a bike with a jacket instead of taking twice as long as normal in the car.

    Anyway, the logic is absurd. Its akin to saying no one will shop in town when they can shop in covered shopping centres cause it rains sometimes.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    you've jumped the shark if you're trying to compare a beach resort with provision of cycling infrastructure.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    Magicbastarder, how much did your bike cost you again? I remember you bragging about it elsewhere. I think it would be fair to say you are raging and unapologetic proponent of Bicycles to the exclusion off all other transport. Your record speaks for itself on this sub-forum.

    I see people claiming that 2.2million registered cars are used by the privileged few but when used as the transport medium for entire families cars are actually the majority and here we have a band of unreasonable people who want to ban them from Urban areas(the places where people live and work) without a jot of thought for the consequences.

    No consideration as to whether quadricycles or Kei cars might be a happy medium. Prohibition from use in locations where people actually live in large volumes is the preferred solution. Discussion about reducing the rush hour volumes through changed work patterns drowned out. No, ban the nasty car, expel it from the City.

    I see people claiming that Irish weather isn't so inclement when we all know there it is not at all suited to bike riding over long distances.

    There is a huge difference between cycling a few hundred metres in densely populated cities to many kilometres in Dublin.

    The Group Think on this forum has led to a misdiagnosis of the problem and led to the proposal of inappropriate solutions some of which would destroy the livelihoods of Citizens(and I'm not talking about the motor sales industry).



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    wow, much conclusions, so little time.

    do you mean the bike i bought for €50 and spent another €100-€150 bringing back to health?



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i can assure you though that when i am driving later this afternoon, i will be crying with self hatred. couldn't let the side down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,436 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    It would pay for itself too, and pay for a whole lot more.


    You're not concerned about tyre particles and brake particles then?



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    No, I meant this one in the group w@nk thread where cyclists brag about how much their bike is worth:

    It does show how disingenuous you are that you don't mention it or did you get a 3k bike for 50 quid and then spent 150 euro repairing it.



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Since you're interested, my good bike cost me less than 2k, probably about as much as a 15 year old car would cost in today's market.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I had to drag that out of you. You are the quality of poster I'm debating against.



  • Posts: 2,827 [Deleted User]


    I already dismissed those reports regarging tyre and brake particles but the media is hungry for scary headlines and paper won't refuse ink.

    The EV doesn't wear out brakes. I put my car in to B mode when I start it to regen the battery on the hill in the morning and my range goes up by 4 or more KM.

    The reports regarding tyre particles are scientifically unsound. If tyres were losing the amount of rubber that was claimed then a car's speedometer would be reading 4 or 5kmph more after 10k km and would be down to the metal. My low rolling resistance tyres certainly don't lose thread as I have returned my company cars on their original tyres after 4 years and 100k km with plenty of thread left in the tyres. That's two cars on their original summer and winter tyres.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,167 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Congrats, you dragged it out of me. To what end?



Advertisement