Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Minimum alcohol pricing is nigh

1226227229231232321

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,211 ✭✭✭✭Suckit


    I don’t know about the rest of you, but I sure as **** didn’t see alcohol action Ireland on the ballot in the last election, i sure as **** didn’t vote or get to give my consensus as a citizen on a public health topic as sensitive as alcohol and addiction to it and you can sure as **** guarantee that no meaningful input, discourse or research went in to this and the knock ons involved.

    I have mentioned before, that I will be asking politicians why are AAI the only charity getting funded by the government, and why so much.

    They should have their funding cut off (regardless of MUP) and earn like other charities. They seem utterly clueless as to how to combat any issues other than to copy that guy over there. I do not want to be paying for that or any charity I haven't chosen to donate to myself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    It may be your example. But why are you using it as an example in your maths, when you are not drinking it. Do your maths again. Your preferred drink can be got in Tesco for under €1.50. This is what you said in the thread earlier:

    In my opiniin Brewdog isnt nice. I prefer a can of heineken or bottle of corona. Its down to personal tatse. I cant stand most of the craft beers.



  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Ah sorry. I was talking about the 440ml brewdog lager. I like the 330ml ipa which i will probably drink from now on. Apologies for not clarifying.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,351 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    I do drink alcohol, but your "neo prohibitionist nanny state" stuff is just slightly over the top.. It is standard medical advice that there is no safe level of alcohol when it comes to your health. That's the science.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,351 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    Do you put any value on your own time? If you include your own time even at minimum wage, the savings are fairly petty.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anyways

    A bottle of heineken in asda xan be got for as little as 58cent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,351 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    I agree because we have drinking problems in Ireland.

    Try asking your doctor if that is a perfectly healthy level of alcohol consumption. You might be in for a shock.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    For Dublin etc people, Asda Portadown is probably the handiest.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34,099 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Is the the science or is this the lancet study which was quite uncompromising and fails to demonstrate the positives of some level of alcohol intake.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I might be. But my doctor certainly doesnt think its overly harmful. I run 10km 3 times a week. Dont smoke. Good diet. BP good as is cholesterol etc.

    Its not about that anyway.

    I think we all know if we were to only drink in pubs and not buy in off lincences then mup wouldnt be a thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,803 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.

    The current government does not care about ruining the enjoyment of ordinary working people in my opnion as it thinks it can keep enough votes to stay in power by claiming the higher moral ground. The incompetent opposition parties have helped with daft policies to alienate others and with this legislation failed to even stand up for lower waged workers who at times they claim to represent.

    It has touched a nerve not like you and AAI would claim because there is such a big problem with alcohol but because it is simply wrong to make life harder for people on lower incomes with legislation that has in other places proved to be so useless. The figures from Scotland show record levels of drug related deaths and deaths from alcohol in years since MUP has been in force there yet you still seem to think that somehow price is such a magical tipping point in stopping people with addiction problems from abusing substances.

    The issue with advertising that I found objectionable is that it took away funding for sports from competitions like the Heineken cup in rugby. The issue with warning labels for me is that it prohibits smaller brands of alcohol from entering the Irish market as they simply can't afford the extra administration costs of specific labels for products with limited volumes of sales here.

    Alcohol consumption has already been going down here in recent years yet AAI and yourself still claim it to be a massive problem that the nanny state needs to clamp down on. Will be setting up the home brew system myself as I live a good distance from the North but am not ruling out a couple of trips to stock up on more reasonable priced products there. The last thing I'd like to say is that MUP is an extremely unfair and discriminatory bit of legislation and I hope someone in future sees sense and gets it removed from the rules of this country where the costs of living have already been allowed get too high in so many areas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Those figures from Scotland did not come from any research into MUP there. You can find that research on the internet.



  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,218 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    He was the same muppet that was on VM last night - spouting absolute dribble like after 2 weeks no one will be crossing the border anymore and it won't affect lower pay people

    The ex alcoholic was excellent with his points and the student, but the same muppet again spouting the same absolute shoite, had an air of a politician about him


    Has any politician been interviewed about this or is it all been directed to AAI



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,778 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    There's medical advice and there's the government dictating how much things cost in shops. We all know the damage alcohol CAN do, the majority of the population understand this. But as usual the government's approach is to punish everyone. I mean even the timing...with the pubs closing at bloody 8 o clock. Its like they're trying to suck every inch of joy out of life. For me it absolutely grinds my gears to no end doing 12 hour shifts as a Frontline worker and not being able to go for something as simple as a fûcking pint after work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    Not everyone is being punished. About 20% of adults do not drink.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,540 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    That was my point everything is more expensive but we get paid more which is why its not worth comparing price between the two



  • Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Thats not really relevant. They dont drink. So lower or higher prices have no impact on them at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    But I think they are getting included in the population count that people are expecting to go to the North for drink. Also children are being included.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,540 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    This policy was well known before the last election so people had the chance to vote on it but didnt care enough



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,778 ✭✭✭✭MEGA BRO WOLF 5000


    They're all the same. It really doesn't matter who's in power. Right now we've an unelected government ran by a bunch of lads called NPHET.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,218 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    Who in Ireland reads every parties manifesto (and believes half of it) and where in the manifesto does it say we're gonna screw you with the price



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,540 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    So you think we should have a referendum on every little thing then?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,218 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    What's a referendum got to do with it???

    Should have been more consultation than with a government sponsored "charity"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    What else can the parties do except publish it and ask the people for their votes? This was in the FG 2016 manifesto, and true to their word they introduced the legislation in 2018.

    4. Improving the Health and Wellbeing of the Nation Healthy Ireland: We will pursue the Healthy Ireland and HSE Health and Well-being programmes, supported by increased annual budgets. Alcohol Misuse: We will enact the Public Health (Alcohol) Bill, with a full review 3 years post implementation to consider additional measures to further tackle excess alcohol consumption and misuse.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,540 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Try reading the post I was replying to

    I don’t know about the rest of you, but I sure as **** didn’t see alcohol action Ireland on the ballot in the last election, i sure as **** didn’t vote or get to give my consensus as a citizen on a public health topic as sensitive as alcohol and addiction

    I swear I am anti MUP until I come on to this thread but then listening to all this BS about 2 million people going up north, the nanny state or the doctor that thinks 30+ pints over 3 days is grand is making it hard to side with the other anti MUP people. And shure now we have the unelected NEPHT clown posts and the "ordinary working people" peddlers too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,218 ✭✭✭✭fritzelly


    I disagree, the "drinking problems" are myths from the government.


    They also said they were doing it to help the bars - so what? Where does it say goodbye to your holiday specials, its gonna be more than double the price?

    Name a time when a party has not broken one of their pledges - manifesto's are nothing more than vote getters for the bits people agree with



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,215 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005




  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 24,207 ✭✭✭✭ Axton Tall Chisel


    Alcohol Use Disorder is a massive issue, a progressive fatal disease of the affected individual does not decide to undertake a difficult prolonged course of rehabilitation. It’s one of the most destructive illnesses that one can witness which destroys the individual’s life in every single aspect. Access to treatment by anybody wishing to undertake that should be provided without recourse to any more personal financial resources than that applicable to any other health issue.

    I do believe that some bit of tax from alcohol could be to ring-fenced to provide rehabilitation services for those who might opt for it, and for a campaign that encourages those addicted to consider the future possibility of making a decision to get sober with the help of resources. It could also fund education to inform children & young people just how addiction can creep in and how it happens that the nervous system fights against the effects of alcohol so that it is in hyper-drive when the nerve-dampening substance is withdrawn after a long time of habituation.

    But the present situation is one of forcing those in addiction to spend even more money of alcohol, leading to further worsening of finances, failure to provide for any dependents, and even less spent on nutrition that could lessen the effects on ongoing progressive brain damage from micro-bleeds due to the small blood vessels losing their structural proteins. I don’t think many people really understand the whole nature of a disease which directly affects about 5% of the (US) population, and indirectly affects a hell of a lot more, including their families.

    Ireland has quite a genepool of addiction, but reading about it the simple habit of even reluctantly taking more than one might intend on too frequent a basis can lead to physical dependence with the full gamut of withdrawal, including delirium tremens, liver destruction, Wernicke Korsakoff Syndrome (brain damage from micro-bleeds due to thiamine deficiency, and Alcoholic Ketoacidosis which causes complete suppression of appetite, destructive personality changes, and can lead to rapid fatal cardiac arrhythmia. This was well studied in Japan during the 70s & 80s where businessmen, who didn’t even enjoy alcohol, gave into social pressure at meetings to imbibe as this was the way business was done; many ended up being h physically addicted, and of course that eventually leads to a craving for a constant supply just to feel ok. It was determined these people had no such thing as a family background of addiction, and it was the mere social pressure that led to the addiction.

    So anybody can potentially become addicted, but those with particular genes do so more quickly.

    Mental Health is a disgracefully abandoned area in Ireland, limited access treatment facilities being left in the hands of the religious, or expensive private facilities.



Advertisement