Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2022 PDC World Darts Championship

13233343537

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭ThebitterLemon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭shockframe


    Anderson was a huge disappointment in his BDO days but its overlooked that he was winning combined tournaments with the PDC back in 2007 beating the best of that field. He won the Premier League 2 1/2 years into his switch and just after making a world final. It's only that he was a bit superior to the field in the BDO in the late 00s (even with Adams, Whitlock, Webster etc) that made people question him. He was still a bit shaky but took to the PDC a lot quicker.

    Its different for Smith in that he's been hyped up for so long but too often he hasn't matched it. Wright was unbelievable in the last 3 sets but Smith just had too many loose darts when it mattered. Not his worst defeat but any bit of composure when Wright was clearly on the ropes and he had it.

    Even the attitude to Gando is different in itself. He was criticised for laughing and joking along when he lost but Smith just always looks miserable even when playing well.

    He could feature in other majors but that will be hard to recover from. There's so much competition out there that it's a lot harder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭bassy


    Bully bottled it lads he had loads of chances to kick on but never took advantage more so when he went 5-4 up,and there was umpteen times he had the chances to jump on Wright's low first 3 darts when Wright was throwing first in he's sets.better man won no doubt about it.


    Bully just doesn't have that kill it off xfactor or whatever you wanna call it,that's he's 2nd world final in 3 yrs has he learned not by tonight's showing.and he's opposition in the future not might go be here m the chances again.


    I think Wright would of beaten price in the final.

    And as regards covid mvg Wright would have smashed him.


    Mvg was never winning the world's COVID or no COVID.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,631 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    To be fair, I'm sure anyone world have kept pace with Wright over those last three sets.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    You said “really poor” at a point in time where the averages were 98/96.

    My question remains the same. Do you think sub 100 averages are terrible really poor and 100 plus is great?

    If not then what is the determinable factor?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,351 ✭✭✭Littlehorny


    Long time lurker here, but just wanted to ask how come Phil Taylor doesn't seem to be involved in any of the Sky darts events now?

    Either as a pundit or commentator surely the greatest player ever to pick up a dart should be on?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 565 ✭✭✭el_gaucho


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-42543/Darts-champion-fined-indecent-assaults.html This wouldn’t help. Anyway, being a great player doesn’t mean he would be a good commentator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    There’s a massive difference between 96/98 101/103 over 200+ Darts, so yes I would actually.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    At a guess

    1) He has no interest

    2) He actually isn’t great in-studio

    3) He’s tough to work with and Sky don’t see the benefit of having him

    Being the best ever doesn’t mean you’d be a good pundit I suppose.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Business & Finance Moderators Posts: 17,754 Mod ✭✭✭✭Henry Ford III


    Great seasonal entertainment as always. Whomever decided on the scheduling of this event to cover both Christmas and New Year was inspired.

    The Covid withdrawls lessened the event I thought, and I absolutely cringed at times seeing the crowd packed in at the Ally Pally.

    Wright deserved his win, even though neither finalist played to his potential in the decider. Smith is a great talent and is so relaxed when he's throwing well. His time will come I think. Price is a great player, but is easy to dislike.

    Callan Rydz is worth keeping an eye on but his combover is brutal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    A difference yes. But to call one great and the other very poor is fairly laughable IMO



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    In your opinion, yes.

    In MY opinion, those margins are large.

    In MY opinion, for a final especially it was a let down. You’d see from my posts however I praised Wright especially for his last few sets and his turnaround, but you won’t acknowledge that.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭Fattybojangles


    Peter Wright showed the difference between the great and the good last night playing those kind of darts under that kind of pressure to close out a world final is absolutely phenomenal.

    I think Michael smith's time will come he's only 31 plenty of time for it to come good after all Peter Wright was 47 before he won a tv title.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    Why should i acknowledge you stating the obvious?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kingp35


    Smith's time has been coming for quite a while now. It's said after every final he manages to lose that his time will come and he's bound to win a big one. Maybe he just isn't mentally strong enough to win a major final?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭Fattybojangles


    Well I don't think he bottled this final just beaten by the better player it happens not every loss is a bottle job. I think he will get the mental side right and has plenty of time to do so Wright was 47 before he won a tv title and was known as a bottler in finals before that Anderson was in his 40's before he won the world's.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,294 Mod ✭✭✭✭Kingp35


    I definitely agree that it wasn't an obvious bottle job but remember that Wright was only averaging 94 before he turned on the after burners. He was nowhere near his best and Smith couldn't take advantage of that fact. I posted in this thread a few times during the match that Wright was just about clinging on and he kept switching his darts as he wasn't playing his best.

    There wasn't an awful lot he could have done about the last 3 sets but it should have been over before that point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    smith is only 31, neither taylor,barney,ando or snakebite had a world title at that age, he's 20 years younger than ando and snakebite ,ive no doubt he will win at least 1 world title. imo he's ando mk2 , one big one and the pressure is off.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,513 ✭✭✭shockframe


    There's a world of difference between Smith and the other 4 though.

    Smith has to go through a field of 96 players and also has an extremely gruelling year round tour. That wasn't the case for the other 4 players when they were in their 30's.

    The lifespan of a player since 2010 is getting considerably shorter.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,224 ✭✭✭marklazarcovic


    true ,wouldnt take much for smith to be at their level though



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,513 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Taylor had a BDO world title before he hit 31. He won his second while he was 31.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,508 ✭✭✭✭ArmaniJeanss


    Smith is also dangerously out of shape for a 31-year-old, which won't be a help to him over the next decade. Yes, he could push on and win a few biggies, but he could equally peter out from here like Adrian Lewis but without "the 2-time back-to-back" in front of his name. MVG another 31yo who could do with a lifestyle tweak.

    Not everyone has to be as healthy as Gerwyn Price, but there's a happy medium ground of being just a wee bit portly (darts fit !) which the likes of Anderson & Wright occupy. Smith lost the the final at a stage when his comparative youth could have been a stamina advantage to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    Cause you were talking rubbish about it being a very poor game and deserved to called out on it (and i wasn't the only one).

    If it truly is your opinion that's fine but opinions don't get a free pass. It is a discussion board after all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,931 ✭✭✭Sultan of Bling


    I think he did do co-commentary for a very short period of time after his retirement.

    I would imagine with the whole me too movement that sky will now steer clear of him due to his previous convictions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,028 ✭✭✭boomdocker


    Cracking graphic from Christopher Kempf aka Ochepedia on Twitter

    One thing I do agree with Wayne mardle about is timing

    Between legs 35 and 40 it was soo tight, but then Snakebite just managed to find something somewhere

    By the time Bullyboy got going scoring wise (after leg 46) it was just too late, Snakebite had all the momentum and a lead

    I guess experience told in the end and yes, timing is everything



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,882 ✭✭✭sc86


    That was a decent final , to say otherwise is a strange view.

    There was some awfull finals over the years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    What the hell - when I commented I thought it was very poor. Notably then stated it had picked up when it did. What are you getting so upset over a damn forum?

    Edit: I couldn’t give a shite if I’m getting ‘called out’ on a personal opinion btw. Don’t take things here so personally



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    You were patently wrong at that point when you said you thought it was very poor. That is the point😆



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Jaysis you keep replying.

    Im entitled to my opinion my man. Some people might have called the Chelsea Liverpool match poor yesterday and others would’ve thought it was class. There’s no right and wrong personal opinion.

    Youve lost the plot altogether getting riled up so badly over something so small.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    But sure you keep replying too!!

    I'll do you a favour now though and stop. But you are incorrect. Opinions are wrong every second of every day.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    Of course I’d be replying - you were questioning what I said. Strange behaviour.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    What is strange about questioning terrible opinions on message boards?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,560 ✭✭✭celt262


    For what it's worth I though it was a good final

    Not poor or not brilliant but I'd near watch any darts I used to enjoy the BDO darts and enjoy it just as much. It isn't all about 100 + averages a good close game with some decent finishing can be just as exciting.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,013 ✭✭✭Officer999


    The camera work by Sky was very poor at this year’s Championship. I don’t ever remember it being as bad



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,938 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    There's a hell of a lot more to it than just the averages. It's pure nonsense to just decide one figure is poor and the other is excellent. You have to look at why the averages are what they are. You need to look at the stage and any issues, the crowd being nasty will affect players too. A 96 average on one day could be way more impressive than a 102 on another day

    As for Phil Taylor, he is still playing darts and making lots of money doing it. They have a Seniors World championship now and he's top man on that. Lots of legends playing it. Rumours of a mini seniors tour starting as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭bassy


    close the thread,might end the feud :D



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,839 ✭✭✭✭callaway92


    but I do look at it more than just the averages and I stated as such



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,596 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    They were very bad for showing the 20. Was very hard to tell if they were hitting the treble as they weren't zooming in. They couldn't keep up with Smith he was so fast at times.

    It kind of is taken for granted but its mad how quick Mardle is at being able to determine what score/double/treble etc is required. He was able to calculate and commentate on what was needed at the same speed at which the likes of Smith or Anderson throw



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭Choochtown


    Eric Bristow was employed by Sky for a while as a camera director. He would tell the camera operator exactly where to focus or whether to pull out and show the whole board etc.

    I remember seeing a clip of Bristow doing this. As well as knowing every possible finish he was also aware of what each particular player favoured.

    eg. For a 108 finish Barney who loves double 18 would probably start on treble 18. (Shanghai on the 18s =108).

    Somebody who prefers double 8 or 16 would probably start on treble 20.

    In the clip I saw, Bristow was constantly calculating and directing. eg. If 102 required and the 60 is missed Bristow would shout "bull" if single 20 was hit but "treble 17" if single 1 was hit or "treble 19" if single 5 was hit etc. etc.

    It's a skill that I don't think a general camera operator would generally have; particularly the knowledge of the preferred finishes of the top players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    Is there ever any discussion about changing the scoring system for the world championships to say first to 21 legs in the final and use the scoring system that most tournaments have? Is this likely to happen?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,596 ✭✭✭✭siblers


    That's very interesting, always wondered who told the camera men where to focus. Must be a tough enough job for whoever is operating the cameras. Was once or twice where Mardle seemed to get a bit annoyed with the cameras for not being focused at the right number/double etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,560 ✭✭✭celt262


    As a ex professional darts player that would be second nature to him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,280 ✭✭✭✭mdwexford


    Not that I’ve ever heard of.

    Why would anyone want that. It’s the different format that makes the Worlds so interesting.

    Who can handle the pressure in those key deciding 5th legs. Also allows for some big comebacks when you can work your way back into a game set by set.

    We get to see leg format in every other tournament bar the Grand Prix which has double start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,982 ✭✭✭Degag


    This.

    Think they are referred to as "spotters." John Part used to do it also.

    As someone else said, it's a skill most pro darts players should have. Even as an amateur myself, i'd have all the outshots memorised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,290 ✭✭✭tanko


    Yeah, i wouldn’t like to see it change, was just curious if there was any talk of that happening.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,037 ✭✭✭Cosmo Kramer


    I'd rather see things go the other way to be honest, with more tournaments using sets rather than just legs. The first to XX legs scoring system gets a bit tedious after a while and leaves less scope for drama and comebacks.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,438 ✭✭✭Choochtown


    That's it! "Spotters"

    I knew there was a word for that job.

    This year's spotter made a few mistakes alright. I play a bit of pub league darts at a fairly low standard but like yourself I'd know all the outshots. The only thing I'm not up to scratch with is the combinations coming down from the high 200s or 300s to leave a finish (eg. don't leave 163 or 159 etc) but I'm nowhere near a good enough player for that to matter. Having said that, if I'm sitting on 188 with 1 dart left in hand, I will of course aim for 18s ... you never know 😄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,580 ✭✭✭bassy


    anyone think that if smith had of played callan rydz in the quarters then smith would have been beaten.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement