Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

ESRI confirms Irish welfare dependent population is TWICE that of Germany or France

Options
11011121416

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    Yep. I find it outrageous that new builds are given to people on social housing list. Why do they deserve to live in a brand new house in the city centre?

    What should be done is the council is given the new house and then they sell it on the open market for 400k or whatever. They then use that money to buy a second hand house for 300k.

    I know someone in a social house and they were getting new doors installed recently. They were doing up really top class garden recently too. Social housing standards are way way higher than working people are entitled to it seems.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway




  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I'm sure you realise that, for example, in Dublin you can earn the national average wage and still be eligible for social housing. I'm glad in this country. We look after those who need our help and I have no problem with my taxes going towards helping those who need it. Personally I feel we need a massive government funded housing programme that replaces private property and every house should be built to the highest standard in order to reduce energy consumption and protect the environment.

    But by all means be like other posters here and continue to punch down on those less fortunate while ignoring all of the waste and corruption that goes on at the top of so-called civil society. I will only support a crackdown on social welfare when the government closes all of the loopholes that the rich used to avoid paying their fair share.



  • Registered Users Posts: 757 ✭✭✭generic_throwaway


    Closing every loophole, sadly, is impossible. Do you think it makes sense to say we shouldn't even try to close known loopholes until we have completely eliminated Social Welfare fraud?

    It seems to me it's immoral to try to eliminate either one and not the other.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    Actually I believe we need social welfare reform particularly to help those less fortunate, and especially those working in lower wage jobs etc. As you said Dublin is expensive, and workers should be prioritised for housing.

    With annual reviews to ensure the need is still there and the housing is appropriate. Ensure a 4 bed is fully occupied etc



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    One of the issues you could run into with having an annual review is discouraging people from earning more in work. For example, if you had an income limit after which you risked losing your home. All you would do is discourage workers from taking up more hours or higher paid work, the fairer system would be to simply charge a tenant the cost of the loan the government took out to build the house and once that is paid off. Simply charge enough to cover the cost of maintenance of the property and perhaps a small bit more which can be used to build even more social houses.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    And? Still don't see why they deserve brand new houses in prime locations.

    Let's say the cutoff for social housing was 30k. If someone earning 31k, can they afford to buy a brand new house in the city centre? No.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,239 ✭✭✭Pussyhands


    So someone can earn big money and keep their cheap house? Not fair at all.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    I think the review would be to ensure full capacity/utilisation as opposed to the above, however it had crossed my mind alright.

    We shouldn't be in a situation where social housing is more desirable than rented accommodation, but here we are



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Yes , doctors are so easily struck off in this country?

    Nothing cliquey about the medical fraternity



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    I have to hand it to you.

    That post is pitch perfect PC from start to finish.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    This makes little actual sense.

    You talk about how its great that people can earn the national average wage, along with getting social housing... and then leap to those who need "our" help. You're talking the old style of communist/socialist models for housing the population, ignoring just how prone they were to corruption, inefficiencies and abuse. Besides that any system where people on the national average wage supposedly need or should receive social housing makes a mockery of any kind of personal responsibility in financing, and essentially reinforces the nanny state model. I suspect you're also ignoring who would ultimately end up paying for all this, hoping that your preferred groups wouldn't be bothered.

    Social housing should be there for those who are definitely in need. Not people who can afford a house in the countryside, and commute to work. Your advocacy supports all those people in Dublin who can't bear to leave, because they want to live close to their parents, or whatever idiotic reason that prevents the natural pushing of people out of high cost areas, when they can't afford to live there. The natural evolution of cities is that people are pushed to the suburbs when they can no longer afford the costs of the city itself... and then they're pushed out of those suburbs, as the value increases. People have the choice to step up, get the required education/skilled/employment (which is available through government initiatives) or move further out to areas where they can afford to buy. Part of the reason we have a housing crisis is people like yourself who believe people shouldn't have the leave, with the government/taxpayer picking up the bill for this artificial resistance to movement.

    You're assuming some kind of high moral position by claiming you're representing the less fortunate but you're not really. If anything you're decreasing the resources available to provide for the less fortunate by giving to people who don't really need those supports. No doubt you're one of those posters who never question where the money comes from, believing that the State can endlessly provide for everyone, without any consequences to the majority. Your last comment about the rich failing to pay their fair share reinforces this impression. The vast majority of people in Ireland are middle class, and our "rich" segment are a relatively small percentage.. and they already pay a hefty amount in taxes. Just as the middle class do. This is just more of the traditional jealousy towards those who were born into better circumstances, and the desire to make them pay for it.

    The problem isn't that the rich aren't contributing enough. The problem is that posters, like yourself, have this inaccurate perception of Ireland, and believe it's capable of (and should) providing a standard of living that only the bigger or more wealthy (with generational long-term wealth) can provide.. and even those nations are struggling to do so. Ireland has done well economically, but times are changing... and honestly, expectations such as the above are likely to break the camels back, creating more and more costs to the economy without seeking to find any kind of balance.



  • Registered Users Posts: 962 ✭✭✭Fred Cryton


    Why does that not happen in other countries like Germany and France? Explain the gap in workforce participation rates please between us and other countries. Clearly the system is discouraging and dis-incentivising low paid work and if you disagree give us a detailed analysis why rather than telling us how you feel.



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,468 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Maybe you should have asked those questions BEFORE you made up stuff about it being easy to get on disability allowance? Maybe you should have spoken to some people with disabilities who've actually been through the process about how 'easy' they found it?

    Maybe it's not so easy to get doctors to struck off because the stories about them fraudulently signing off on disability applications didn't actually happen?



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx




  • Registered Users Posts: 28,468 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Have you spoken to many people who've gone through the process of getting and keeping DA? Give it a try.



  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    Have you?


    No doctor wants the equality authority or some other QUANGO accusing them of discrimination, much easier to say Tim Pat is disabled



  • Registered Users Posts: 28,468 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    Yep, loads of them. You should try researching what happens in the real world, rather than in your imagination. The Equality Authority hasn't existed for about a decade btw.



  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Given my background I see a lot. Both parents were youngest in big families so some of my first cousins are already grandparents.

    In the last 10 years, and this is no exaggeration, 75%+ of my cousins who aren't working have had their kids diagnosed ADHD. I can think of half a dozen others who got council houses within a year or turning 18. I know plenty are on the sick, one who was working under the table in a pub (50+ hours a week) then got on the sick.

    My sister used to believe the "no such thing as a free house" thing. But as I said, her and her mates are hitting their 30s, couple of mates she went to school with don't work, both have a kid or 2 and literally a brand new house for one of them. Well, almost new. It was rented to someone before for about 18 months. And because of that they got 3 new beds, new sitting room furniture and kitchen appliances. Obviously her and her fella had to "pay their way". Yeah 100 quid towards about €5k of stuff. The rest of her friends, mostly met in college, are trying their best to get on a deeds to a property before they then start trying to have a kid.

    I've seen it the whole time growing up. Kids with scum parents who never lifted a finger but the parents would go crying to the dispensary and send them off to the Gaeltacht for the summer. Unfortunately my parents had a bit more pride.

    I saw cousins who dropped out of school get all expenses paid trips to the States and Canada to work/train for a while. They got paid for it, all costs covered and their dole was sitting building up for them when they got home. But if I don't find a government doc showing it then it never happened right?


    As I was saying earlier about standards of living... there is no justification for spending like we do on "the poor". If you're not working then a 2nd hand sofa will do. I make about the average wage and have to pay my own rent so in my current place I got the cheapest bed and mattress I could and got a 2nd hand sofa for 50 quid. That's life. Since when should everyone be entitled to brand-new **** just because they want it?

    I see the moaning on Facebook. The "this is disgrace" when they're expected to pay for or do something themselves. I see (literally) grannies in their 20s and more in their 30s having offspring who despite growing up in welfare situations have a nice place to live, better clothes, toys and electronics than anyone I speak to on a regular basis.



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,191 ✭✭✭RandomViewer




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 13,505 ✭✭✭✭Mad_maxx


    often denying whats plainly staring you in the face is a pre requisite of being a good progressive , otherwise you might form " awful opinions "



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭malinheader


    Humphreys trying to change the way social welfare benefits are paid.

    Payment back to post offices to prevent fraud. Definitely agree with this. Of course not for a disability payment.

    Payment to be scaled on your previous employment. Not sure how this will work with people who have never worked.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,471 ✭✭✭Luxembourgo


    They get the minimum (or what it is currently)



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,972 ✭✭✭malinheader


    I can hear the cries of discrimination already if this was going to happen.



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,011 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    You would imagine that the country is not perpetually running a deficit the way some posters are suggesting further and further giveaways. We have the greatest standard of living in human history but we still feel aggrieved and entitled to more. A man on the dole in Ireland is richer than most people in Mumbai, why does he deserve that? Because of the location of his birth?



  • Registered Users Posts: 6,329 ✭✭✭Damien360


    Not a great comparison although I see your point. The man on the dole in ireland is much better off than someone on minimum wage. The level of entitlement is out of control. Nobody should be destitute but we are doing the very opposite and making people who choose not to work very comfortable. Pensioners roared for years that they were entitled to their lot due to the taxes they paid over many years and I agree with them. What’s the reasoning for the man on the dole for life having all the trappings of his working counterparts for none of the labour or cost to him.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    How many people who could be working but choose a life living on welfare are there and how are they achieving this 'good life'?



  • Registered Users Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭enricoh


    No self respecting welfare lifer is on jobseekers - too many pesky courses n meetings to have to go to. Disability is where it's at, you'll be left alone til the pension kicks in!

    https://davidmcwilliams.ie/the-mystery-of-disability/

    Over the past few years an extraordinary development has occurred in Ireland, which has gone broadly unnoticed. Tens of thousands of people have left the labour force due to disability. This has occurred despite the fact that the workforce, in general, has become younger and healthier on most measures and despite the fact that there have been significant positive steps towards reducing discrimination against disabled people in the workforce.



  • Registered Users Posts: 5,189 ✭✭✭Brucie Bonus


    No self respecting welfare lifer

    How many are there? How are they dodging work? Are doctors committing fraud? Otherwise we're talking anecdotes.

    Maybe consider reducing this type of thing rather than taking from the lowest rung?

    Sixty-five former civil servants get pensions of more than €100,000 a year





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 34,049 ✭✭✭✭The_Kew_Tour


    People on disability should be all reviewed every so often bar of course the real genuine cases.

    It might cost little at start but would save fortune in long run.

    Amount of young people on disability is a disgrace. Taking the piss.

    The whole SW system needs change.



Advertisement